[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 402 KB, 811x906, 1681866745085315.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22346683 No.22346683 [Reply] [Original]

Discuss this work

>> No.22346702

>>22346683
premptively refuted by German idealism

>> No.22346752

>>22346702
Would you care to explain this nonsensical statement

>> No.22346758

>>22346752
no

>> No.22346765

>>22346758
Quality posts thanks for contributing

>> No.22346772

>>22346702
I have no perception but I must deny the perception of others...

>> No.22346776

>>22346752
>Would you care to explain this nonsensical statement
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. That's supertautological

>> No.22346798

>>22346776
If you have a specific contention with a specific part of the CTMU you're more than welcome to go ahead and point it out and post about it instead of hiding behind idioms

>> No.22346835

>>22346798
I would have thought my infocognition would have been obvious since it refines itself from unbound telesis using the intrinsic language of the SCSPL. Supertautologically of course

>> No.22346862
File: 25 KB, 1335x815, gsgewg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22346862

>>22346835
Nice

>> No.22347181

>>22346752
sorry anon >>22346758 was me and just forgot what i was going to say. i had a bad day and if you'd let it slide this time it'd be much appreciated

>> No.22347194

>>22347181
kys

>> No.22347299
File: 859 KB, 3064x3614, 1682880051899199 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22347299

>>22346683
>use jargon to obfuscate
>never accept the onus is on followers to clarify arguments
>if anyone points this out or criticizes terminology say "YOU'RE JUST NOT SMART ENOUGH TO GET IT"
>if anyone criticizes the above behavior, project they're part of a system that has a vested interest to detract
>never accept the idea of "vested interest" is a projection from those who feel that Piss Fagman has validated their beliefs and anointed their intelligence
CTMU is a confidence trick, retards.

>> No.22347369

>>22347299
What's up Gary

>> No.22347373

>>22347299
based

>> No.22347717

>>22347299
KEK at picrel

>> No.22347756

>>22347717
Epic KEK moment for the win my good sir praise KEK

>> No.22347838

>>22347756
Seethe.

>> No.22348208

>>22346683
Somebody actually explain this shit to me

>> No.22348294

>>22348208
Sure which part

>> No.22348332

>>22346683
Langan’s ignorance of philosophical tradition is pretty obvious in his interviews. He only has a surface level knowledge of actual philosophy. That’s why he says retarded shit like “reality fits the algebraic definition if language” and uses circular definitions.

>> No.22348375

>>22348332
Not an argument

>> No.22348383

>>22348375
>not an argument
lmao, langan doesn’t even really use arguments either. He just says “this is the sclp” and vaguely relates it to his other so called “tautological” principles to make it seem like his stupid math symbols actually do anything to describe reality. He basically refutes his own system when he calls it a supertautology because that actually admits it’s meaningless like all tautologies are. It’s like he is consciously trolling retards like you by spelling out the fact that his system is a scam in big capital letters SUPERTAUTOLOGY and it’s funny because you still fall for it. If there’s any meaning in his principles, they aren’t tautological.

>> No.22348392

and btw, I can instantly refute Langan’s system just by being a nominalist, and he has no justification for why he isn’t a nominalist or how his system overcomes it because he probably doesn’t even know what nominalism is due to his profound ignorance of philosophy.

>> No.22348411

>>22348383
>He basically refutes his own system when he calls it a supertautology because that actually admits it’s meaningless like all tautologies are.
Correct, and logic and science are also completely meaningless endeavors as well, because every coherent logical and/or scientific statement necessarily assumes the validity of tautology. CTMU BTFO!!! Don't even try and recover from this one L*ngan...

>> No.22348427

>>22348411
First of all empirical observation doesn’t require tautology and neither do all formulations of logic. Aristotelian logic doesn’t even really use it. A tautology is basically a trick of the symbolic notation that only “needs” to be valid in modern logic to explain the symbol manipulation. And anyway none of this was the point, I didn’t say tautology wasn’t valid, I said tautologic statements don’t carry any real meaning. Langanms sustem can be valid and meaningless.

>> No.22348487

>>22348427
>First of all empirical observation doesn’t require tautology and neither do all formulations of logic.
Statement which assumes the truth of the tautology X=X as a requirement of intelligibility
>Aristotelian logic doesn’t even really use it.
Statement which assumes the truth of the tautology X=X as a requirement of intelligibility
>A tautology is basically a trick of the symbolic notation that only “needs” to be valid in modern logic to explain the symbol manipulation.
Statement which assumes the truth of the tautology X=X as a requirement of intelligibility
>And anyway none of this was the point, I didn’t say tautology wasn’t valid, I said tautologic statements don’t carry any real meaning.
Statement which assumes the truth of the tautology X=X as a requirement of intelligibility
>Langanms sustem can be valid and meaningless.
Statement which assumes the truth of the tautology X=X as a requirement of intelligibility

>> No.22348493

>>22348487
First of all that’s not necessarily the case because I could be using a logic that doesn’t allow tautological statements, second of all NONE OF MY STATEMENTS WERE TAUTOLOGICAL SO THEY WEREN’T MEANINGLESS. I NEVER SAID TAUTOLOGIES WEREN’T VALID, I SAID THEY WERE MEANINGLESS. WHETHER TAUTOLOGIES ARE VALID ISN’T EVEN RELEVANT TO THE POINT I MADE. MAYBE YOU SHOULD ACTUALLY READ WHAT YOU REPLY TO.

>> No.22348517

>>22348493
Tautologies are meaningful. For example, the tautology X=X means that any arbitrary X is identical with itself, (as opposed to not being identical with itself).

>> No.22348519

>>22348517
> any arbitrary X is identical with itself
And what does that mean?

>> No.22348526

>>22348519
It means that X is X and not not-X.

>> No.22348534

>>22348526
You just repeated what you said. That didn’t explain the meaning.

>> No.22348549

>>22348534
Explain what is unintelligible about the meaning of anything I've just stated.

>> No.22348580

>>22348549
I’m an Aristotelian and I understand that the copula states which predicates belong to a subject. I relate this to my epistemology and metaphysics which don’t include any self predication so you will have to explain your innovation to me. Just as you would explain any sentence to someone who doesn’t know the words already, obviously not by just repeating the words and expecting them to understand.

>> No.22348814

>>22346683
It doesn't work. His idea of seclusion instead of living is pure boredom.

>> No.22348819

>>22346683
>CTMU
Self-determinacy is superior to Intrinsic self-determinacy. Langan loses the plot.