/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.22296047]

How did one man refute every philosopher before him and still manage to be virtually unknown?

[Anonymous No.22296048]

>>22296047
>virtually unknown

[Anonymous No.22296054]

>>22296047
omerta from the academia complex

[Anonymous No.22296058]

>>22296047
(((They))) don’t want you to read him.

[Anonymous No.22296070]

Egoism is refuted by Open Individualism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_individualism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JomlwxRAtZo

[Anonymous No.22296116]

>>22296070
Shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.22296171]

>>22296047
>Heh, you think morals exist and that you should care about shit? That's so cringe :^)
No wonder only 4chuds consider this fucktard smart

[Anonymous No.22296182]

>>22296047
Dangerous author, unironically

[Anonymous No.22296200]

I refuted Stirner, posted my undeniable rebuttals of all of his central points, but nobody replied to me. These internet egoists like to unionjerk themselves but haven't even read his book and none are willing to engage under the pretense that egoism tells them to do as they please even if it means throwing reason out the window.

[Anonymous No.22296224]

>>22296200
What were you refuting? He based his affair on nothing.

[Anonymous No.22296242]

>>22296224
His text is internally inconsistent, and each interpretation (there are three I found in academic works) all lead to the same ridiculous conclusion that Stirner himself denies when talking about the Socratics early on in the book. He also didn't understand evolution or game theory.

[Anonymous No.22296247]

>>22296242
Sounds retarded. Have you read the book yourself?

[Anonymous No.22296466]

>>22296047
Why can’t you string two thoughts together?
How many years of schooling does this take?

[Anonymous No.22296634]

bump

[Anonymous No.22297351]

Lots of people know Wittgenstein