[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 2.14 MB, 1920x2353, Painting_of_David_Hume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22178949 No.22178949 [Reply] [Original]

He remains undefeated

>> No.22179009

>>22178949
…except by his diet, and that bog that he fell into one time.

>> No.22179010

so it seems, so it seems

>> No.22179028

>>22178949
Reality isn't so black and white, it's all about nuance. He was correct to the same degree that he was a handsome and healthy Aryan man. If he worked out more and had more children he would have been more correct.

>> No.22179801
File: 74 KB, 850x400, 41055.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22179801

he was so right that he turned the german's schitzo

>> No.22180019

>>22179801
its crazy the amount of schizo-cope that the fact that causality isnt real produces in some minds

>> No.22180055

>>22179801
>>22180019
wtf are you midwits talking about? Kant absolutely demolished Hume. The ones calling Kant schizo are the ones that get filtered by him.

>> No.22180060
File: 18 KB, 260x384, Causality_2009_Judea_Pearl_Book_Cover.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22180060

Judea Pearl debunked Hume's views on causality

>> No.22180088

>>22180055
kant separates knowledge from ontology, causality being necessary doesnt mean its real
>but we just have to... LE BELIEVE it is??
keep coping
neokantian philosophers were more based that kant anyways

>> No.22180090

>>22180060
>Judea

>> No.22180093
File: 33 KB, 657x527, 4896E00C-C4D9-41DA-BAF2-5CA68EC2E623.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22180093

>>22180088
>causality being necessary doesnt mean its real
Kant proves it real empirically, which is what Hume couldn't prove QED Hume btfo. now you may seethe.

>> No.22180102
File: 16 KB, 264x315, quentin-meillassoux-6bfec378-ac21-479a-b1e1-ab069217414-resize-750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22180102

>destroys Kant and Hume and turns them into dust

>> No.22180119

>>22180102
Too bad he's losing to Norwood

>> No.22180123

>>22180055
Dude Maimon literally uses Hume to pave the way to overcoming Kantian philosophy that ended up in Fichte, Schelling, Hegel.

>> No.22180197
File: 6 KB, 260x194, L L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22180197

>>22178949


He remained undeflated.

>> No.22180265

>>22178949
He HIMSELF gives his own solution to skepticism. God why doesn't /lit/ ever actually read Hume, not even the Enquiry but certainly not the Treatise.

>> No.22180267

>>22178949
his drip remains undefeated

>> No.22180346

>>22180267
this

>> No.22180398

>>22180265
But how do you know OP is not referring to his common sense, naive realism against the rational impractical skepticism?

>> No.22181584

>>22180398
Assuming OP is, the other anons don't appear to be.

>> No.22182732

>>22178949
Can someone please explain his hat a posteriori please, since it always comes across as a turban of some sort. Any a priori arguments will be discarded as pure folly