/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.22124234]

ITT random /lit/ posts you think about on a semi regular basis

[Anonymous No.22124302]

>>22124234
The Stirner one is unironically good

[Anonymous No.22124478]

>>22124302
the post that destroyed philosophy

[Anonymous No.22124490]

[Anonymous No.22124546]

>>22124490
This is a post that I'd probably need to think about on a semi regular basis because, honestly, I don't really get it. Why would he think this is funny? Why would she find it offensive? So many questions...

[Anonymous No.22124567]

>>22124302
meh, every expression of a thought that aims to be "universal" will fail in its execution simply because its composition can never fully be universal in itself

8mkk8

[Anonymous No.22124577]

>>22124546
>Why would he think this is funny?
lack of recognition of the perspective in an enviroment, not realizing that the thoughts are limited to the mind unless expressed thoroughly (and even then misunderstandings happen)
great imagination often forces a tunnel-perspective since every option isn't fully explored, I bet he didn't even think of "what could go wrong" but instead focused on the fantasy - "what could go right"
>Why would she find it offensive?
displaying sexual habits in non-alphaistic (lack of dominance and self-esteem) ways will always be awkward, especially when it happens at places where desires are repressed (at work, public places, etc)
>So many questions...
the last greentexted sentence explains it all.

[Anonymous No.22124580]

>>22124546
>Why would she find it offensive
Consider that the writer may be an unreliable narrator and tells it from his perspective.
>be female coworker
>be reading and eating alone
>male coworker interrupts your reading
>whatever
>male coworker is a little awkward, but seems okay, you'd still rather be reading
>next day
>notice male coworker has been glancing at you throughout the day
>creeped out
>go to lunch anyway, knowing he's been waiting for you
>pretend to not notice, you just want to read
>male coworker sits right next to you and starts reading
>doesn't say hello or can I sit next you
>become creeped out, signal your discomfort
>he starts mumbling about animal dick
>wtf, want to tell him to fuck off, but have to be polite to this creepy tard
>"please take your lunch break somewhere else"
>you just want to read

If you think the book is the problem, you're autistic

[Anonymous No.22124584]

>>22124302
lol

[Anonymous No.22124599]

>>22124546
It makes no sense because it's a fake story dreamed up by an autist

[Anonymous No.22124604]

>>22124567
>simply because its composition can never fully be universal in itself

[Anonymous No.22124609]

>>22124580
Maybe I am autistic. But I do think that you are inferring a bit too much here. I get your point though. Makes sense.

[Anonymous No.22124610]

[Anonymous No.22124629]

>>22124604
Read: Set Theory

[Anonymous No.22124632]

>>22124302
Half of these aren't paradoxes though

[Anonymous No.22124648]

>>22124629
Why? You can't express your ideas verbally?

[Anonymous No.22124651]

>>22124648
Is this a verbal dialogue?

[Anonymous No.22124777]

>>22124651
Since we were exchanging messages, I was under that impression.

[Anonymous No.22124869]

I'm homo

[Anonymous No.22124874]

>>22124234

[Anonymous No.22124885]

>>22124302
Philosophy has been quiet since this dropped

[Anonymous No.22124938]

[Anonymous No.22124957]

>>22124567
We express universals every time we talk about properties of things.

[Anonymous No.22125001]

>>22124234

[Anonymous No.22125258]

[Anonymous No.22125272]

https://voca.ro/1mieATxu8BHo

[Anonymous No.22125385]

>>22124234
Second poster is an idiot.
Frog poster probably took his words seriously though.
>Obi-wan Kenobi.jpg

[Anonymous No.22125394]

>>22125385
shut up butters

[Anonymous No.22125396]

>>22125272
i think about this post at least once a day. i would put it up on a wall in my room or something, but i feel that there are several good reasons to avoid that

[Anonymous No.22125401]

>>22124302
lel

[Anonymous No.22125404]

[Anonymous No.22125408]

>>22125404
What the FUCK is water???

[Anonymous No.22125410]

>>22125396
same

[Anonymous No.22125418]

>>22124302
>The Stirner one is unironically good
if you haven't read Stirner

[Anonymous No.22125570]

>>22124490
i like to think he read the whole thing

[Anonymous No.22125819]

>>22125272
Oh no that’s me

[Anonymous No.22125839]

>>22125272
fucking kek I posted that in a Dostoevski thread
Tortured Christianity is a kino life to live.

[Anonymous No.22126328]

[Anonymous No.22126342]

>>22126328
Mass education was truly a mistake

[Anonymous No.22126353]

>>22124874
This is the best in the thread. Fucking eternal truth.

[Anonymous No.22126384]

>>22126342
Mass education was the thin thread holding us above the abyss, and its failure is why we're sliding into the dark ages, you dumb nigger.

[Anonymous No.22126392]

>>22126384
Nonsense. Literacy restricted to first and primarily Bible reading had a salutary effect, the rest is communism.

[Anonymous No.22126453]

>>22126384
>>22126392
You both have some point, but it's actually the ubiquity of screens and the social network mindset (and the liberals brainwashing campaign) that it's ruining the new generation. The biggest part of humanity lacks self-control to resist that assault.

[Anonymous No.22126457]

>>22124874
Great except for the last line about Carlin. Perhaps the most overrated comedian of our time.

[Anonymous No.22126460]

>>22124302
This "desire" argument was confronted in BhaghavadGita tho - that's why you act with no attachment, and no expectation of result

[Anonymous No.22126492]

>>22124580
Woman post
The guy did nothing wrong up until the wolf dick book part. Literally nothing fucking wrong you dumb fucking woman, whores like you are why my friends have nightmares you stupid fucking piece of shit WHORE

[Anonymous No.22126521]

>>22124490
>anon doesn't know that saying alpha beta omega or sigma to a YA reading woman means "gay rapey furry porn with male pregnancy"
Even the women who read it are disgusted by themselves half the time, it's like if your bro asked you what your fave romance was and you said the Ripley books or something by Bataille

[Anonymous No.22126693]

[Anonymous No.22126709]

>>22126492
I'm a man incel

[Anonymous No.22126715]

[Anonymous No.22126752]

>>22126453
Screens and the internet is just the epitome of mass literacy. Idiots educated enough to read words but not smart enough to understand them nor wise enough to apply them (i.e., midwits) are the doom of society.

[Anonymous No.22126754]

>>22125839
Based anon. Perfect way to encapsule how those kind of people live.

[Anonymous No.22126808]

>>22126715
i dont get the criticism near that women write slice of life stuff. i mean dont tons of men write shit like that too?

[Anonymous No.22126843]

>>22125272
the kinda fella whose certainty of being thrown in the lake of fire you can't argue against.

and pretty good bait.

[Anonymous No.22126982]

>>22124234
The "I've never been in this neighbourhood before" short story of course.

[Anonymous No.22127056]

>>22126693
>>22126715
>>22125272
>>22124874
>>22124610
Blessed thread

[Anonymous No.22127073]

>>22124302
>presupposes an ought to recognize what is
No it doesn't.
>Muh Companions in Guilt
is retarded.

[Anonymous No.22127082]

>>22125394
Are you Jewish orthodox or something?

[Anonymous No.22127084]

>>22124234

[Anonymous No.22127094]

>>22127084
damn...

[Anonymous No.22127134]

>>22127084
>i said no not really.
Chills. Reminds me of Slaughterhouse Five although I'm sure other anons can think of better comparisons

[Anonymous No.22127142]

>>22127084
Wow, a real life book character.

[Anonymous No.22127145]

>>22127084
>still lost the war

[Anonymous No.22127149]

>>22127084
>War is easy
>Proceeds to talk about literally dozens of people who fought in a war and were killed, by his hands alone
GenXers really don't believe brown people are human beings do they?

[Anonymous No.22127153]

>>22127084
I don’t know what to think after reading that desu

[Anonymous No.22127209]

>>22124234

[Anonymous No.22127225]

>>22127153
Just about every special forces guy is like him. They want to kill people legally and they want the social status that comes from being a special forces veteran. They don't have any higher values.

[Anonymous No.22127235]

>>22127209
i feel this

[Anonymous No.22127238]

>>22127149
Those were civilians that he killed anon.

[Anonymous No.22127240]

>>22127145
>assuming that the goal was to win land
all major wars since 1945 have simply been large expeditions to raid and pillage other people's land
contractors made a fuckton of money from afghan, so mission accomplished

[Anonymous No.22127320]

>>22127209
>have a cool dad
>get daddy issues anyway
Bruh
>>22127240
Let us suppose that is so - still, if every fucking military adventure you organise ends up failing, eventually isolationism may become insurmountable.

[Anonymous No.22127328]

>>22127225
I've met a couple young special forces guys and they all give me the perception of natural achievers; solely driven towards the mountaintop. For whatever reason they picked "being the best" and pursue it like machines. Which in theory is honorable but is also undeniably vain and without clear completion. I wonder if this is what's on the other side it.

[Anonymous No.22127336]

>>22127320
Idk, sounds more like his dad was more concerned with being a coolguy than fathering some self-confidence into his son. Based if true.

[Anonymous No.22127338]

>>22124234
Atheistniggers literally incite violence on this board and they don't even get banned, mods just delete the thread to try to hide it. Meanwhile, mods will go through a rule-breaking thread to ban you for offending them, then leave the thread up.

Atheistniggers and loxist atheistic communist jews will spam the board with the same handful of extremely lazy, low effort, bait/troll threads and they won't ever be deleted. But if you criticize atheism or judaism or the jews, your thread is wiped and you're banned for "trolling".

[Anonymous No.22127348]

>>22127338
>t. schizo /pol/ incel tradcath larper

[Anonymous No.22127356]

>>22127240
That was US tax money, so really war is an excuse for private interests to pillage the USA that they are fighting on behalf of, while indiscriminately slaughtering civilians abroad as a way to test out new weapons and security systems (biometrics in this case) for private industry.

Crazy times we live in

[Anonymous No.22127377]

>>22127348
>adjective adjective adjective adjective adjective person I don’t like

[Anonymous No.22127425]

>>22127377
>loxist atheistic communist jews
>>adjective adjective adjective adjective adjective person I don’t like

[Anonymous No.22127533]

>>22125001
this one might be the one that I think about the most often. every now and then I wonder what that guy's up to
>picrel my contribution

[Anonymous No.22127539]

another one I think about frequently.

[Anonymous No.22127540]

I remember seeing an update about this one -- does anyone have it? I can't remember if it was a good update or a bad update.

[Anonymous No.22127544]

last one for a little bit but I fucking hate this website I hate that this is the first thing I think of every single time I sit down with Shakespeare I hate this I hate all of you but I love some of you a little bit

[Anonymous No.22127558]

>>22127539
I know that anon. He's now gay-for-pay in order to support his fentanyl addiction.

[Anonymous No.22127900]

>>22126808
yes, but men do also other stuff, the variety is the point. That is where the women dissapoint. They lack intellectual variety. Their nature is to follow thoughts, not to create them, but instead be the vessel for life.

[Anonymous No.22127920]

>>22127084
Lmfao if it’s so easy why did the Taliban win

[Anonymous No.22127943]

>>22127225
I think it goes deeper than that. I think the guy in >>22127084 realises the absurdity of it all. I mean there are just too many tells of regret. If he just wanted to kill people legally he'd be glad afghanis want to fight them, not curse them for their "stupidity" which makes them stand up for something.
Honestly, that entire post reads like a lament, filtered through the contemporary mutt "culture" which states he did nothing wrong and has to applaud even himself.

[Anonymous No.22127969]

>>22124874
This is a whole lot of words to just say women go after appearances and status, albeit that's pretty true.

[Anonymous No.22127984]

[Anonymous No.22127988]

[Anonymous No.22128024]

>>22124874
>>22126353
>>22127056
>>22127969
Holy fucking incel cope. You fucking faggots are so pathetic you can't even comprehend how easily manipulated people are because of their desperate need for social approval to the point that asking near strangers to do YOU favors actually makes them like you more. All you need to get a fellow human to befriend or fuck you is to provide them with some modicum of validation and withhold further validation until they acquiesce to your wishes. Your probably similarly pathetic fathers understood this and manipulated your mothers into letting them spill their seed into them, it's just that you are even weaker and less respectable than they were.
>You need to have status to get laid
There are dishwashers at Olive Garden who have produced spawn from more women than you have, you are all just the biggest fucking losers on the planet.

[Anonymous No.22128109]

>>22124302
post the Stirner one

[Anonymous No.22128131]

>>22124490
Why aren't women ashamed to read twilight or 50 shades of gray in public ?

[Anonymous No.22128151]

>>22128131
Because nobody actually holds women accountable for anything, regardless if they brand themselves a womanhater or a feminist.

[Anonymous No.22128154]

>>22128109
Biden's America could prevent this.

[Anonymous No.22128224]

>>22127348
He's not lying. I once posted in an off-topic thread calling the OP a faggot retard for posting off-topic shit. I then got banned for a month for posting in an off-topic thread. That really pissed me off.

[Anonymous No.22128229]

>>22124567
>because its composition can never fully be universal in itself
*blocks your non-Euclidean path*

[Anonymous No.22128265]

[Anonymous No.22128277]

>>22127984
CHUNG

[Anonymous No.22128335]

>>22124234
Does anyone have that post with butters mentioning Updike followed by anon's response? I remember she soon stopped posting after that.

[Anonymous No.22128349]

still makes me chuckle

[Anonymous No.22128377]

>>22127984
>2017 /lit/ pissed themselves laughing over this

[Anonymous No.22128393]

>>22128377
still funny
here's a (you) to make (you) feel better

[Anonymous No.22128401]

>>22127540
>missing out the Pharoah (1999) bit
In all seriousness this one has been DEBOONKED

[Anonymous No.22128410]

That one about the history of humanity just being about finding new ways to boil water.

[Anonymous No.22128414]

The one where someone wrote the introduction paragraph to a science fiction novel, making fun of all the tropes. Wish I would've saved it.

[Anonymous No.22128445]

[Anonymous No.22128453]

this review of cannery row often comes to mind

[Anonymous No.22128468]

[Anonymous No.22128486]

I always this post. It's what /lit/ should be like.

[Anonymous No.22128535]

>best of <board> thread
>it's all 2020+ or 2016+

[Anonymous No.22128604]

>>22127943
>Honestly, that entire post reads like a lament, filtered through the contemporary mutt "culture" which states he did nothing wrong and has to applaud even himself.
Yeah

[Anonymous No.22128631]

>>22128535
Anon it's 2023. That's 3 years after 2020, which is how long it was between 2003 and 2006. There's been 7 years since 2016, which is how long was between 2003 and 2010. 90% of the 4chan userbase arrived here after 2016, and they didn't come via /b/ like the old waves of newfags.

If you want to make things better you'll have to dust off your old old old folders and post some screencaps from the 00s yourself.

[Anonymous No.22128716]

>>22126457
Agreed. I like him as an actor but "pointing out societal flaws" is not comedy.

[Anonymous No.22128722]

>>22124610
So having a huge cock is virtuous only so long as the rest of your body is huge?

[Anonymous No.22128781]

>>22128445
>it's the 21st century
>we've got polite nazis now
I guess I've watched too many post-war movies. Hard to even picture it.
>>22128722
Yeah I think the takeaway is basically your cock should be moderate and proportional to your body, so if you want your huge cock to be good, the rest of your body must also be huge.

[Anonymous No.22128909]

>>22127084
>Missing the sandbox
>viewing the whole war as a fun trip with your buds
>viewing war as easier and safer than an industrial job
>wondering why the Iraqis or Taliban bothered shooting at us
These opinions are pretty common among sandbox combat vets. I'd guess half of all former grunts privately hold the same views. They just don't voice them out loud because they realize that saying "The most fun I've ever had was driving around Ramadi with my bros, shooting anything that moved" makes you look like a sociopath.

>>22127225
I doubt this guy is SoF. Everything about his post screams 11B.

[Anonymous No.22128931]

>>22128486
I really think the pirate anons are the only ones who read on this board.

[Anonymous No.22129012]

It's one that can go in humor threads or deep think threads. I often wonder if this post was a real story.

[Anonymous No.22129032]

>>22125408
Remember, this is water.

[Anonymous No.22129052]

Every now and then I remember this post and burst out laughing in public.

[Anonymous No.22129197]

>>22129052
kek can’t believe I forgot about this one

[Anonymous No.22129257]

>>22127544
Shakespeare isn't even that good
>Bullshit
>Misunderstanding
>Funeral with military honors

[Anonymous No.22129303]

>>22127920
anon said it was easy to kill them
unfortunately, the Americans (and all the rest of the world) weren't there to commit genocide, but to try to convert them to western democracy (a very hard if not impossible task)

[Anonymous No.22129348]

[Anonymous No.22129350]

>>22129348

[Anonymous No.22129357]

>>22127984
>I was there

[Anonymous No.22129361]

[Anonymous No.22129363]

[Anonymous No.22129426]

>>22129363
Dangerously based, and I say that without a trace of irony.

[Anonymous No.22129528]

>>22124567
>Every expression that aims to be universal fails
>Is universal

[Anonymous No.22129777]

>>22126453
>Muh technology
Retard. This notion was prevalent before the screens and I was its biggest proponent. It is about mass education, but only that it had created a counter culture that simply wasn't possible before.

A culture that is opposed from as simple as established order, punks or anarchist type style, or more nuanced, as the formal language, albeit, arguably, much more descriptive and "sophisticated", lacks the authenticity of experience. The more restraint you put in the translation of experience from form to form, the more data it loses, which in language case, is in itself desperately being solved by overcomplication of vocabulary.

Therefore, the natural counter balance, or counterculture is trying to combat this problem by pushing limits of what is necessary and efficient, by going back into a more expressive yet simpler communication. No one is safe from it, so it's a choose of being a pretentious faggot and enjoy the smell or your own success by resisting the temptation, or for that fact letting it all out, without any care for established framework and be not that different from the animal you were couple of millenniums.

Oh, and a small note, how this is also affected by social factors, where the true intent can be lost and a new and shallow one can be established as an incomplete simulation thousand times over itself.

[Anonymous No.22129794]

>>22126808
when men write slice of life it's based

[Anonymous No.22129804]

>>22128909
>makes you look like a sociopath.
>look like

[Anonymous No.22129805]

this thread remains my favorite thing I've ever found here.
also, apparently you pronounce her last name "tone"
>>/lit/thread/S2142656

[Anonymous No.22129817]

>>22128109
it's like kaufman came here to leak his plans for a scrapped chapter of antkind.

[Anonymous No.22129837]

>>22124567
exactly, niggas need to read the antinomies

[Anonymous No.22129846]

>>22124874
I unironically have this copied down somewhere

[Anonymous No.22129867]

>>22127084
>Milifag is an emotionless sociopathic nut that gets off on killing people
Why do people jerk off the military so much again?

[Anonymous No.22129869]

>>22124302
These are only paradoxes if your thinking is modeled on machine logic. It's an autistic 'gotcha' that really isn't.
As Pascal said: "the presence or absence of contradiction is no basis on which to judge truth."

[Anonymous No.22129877]

>>22127084
Whoa, it's almost like we've been fighting untrained troglodites who don't measure much higher then a mildly functional caveman instead of actual soldiers.

I wonder how a fag like this might function in say, Ukraine.

[Anonymous No.22129909]

>>22127539
good

[Anonymous No.22129925]

>>22128453
accurate.
it's not Steinbeck's best but it's definitely the funnest to read

[Anonymous No.22129939]

I tried responding to this guy to make him feel better but I don't know if I helped. I hope he's alright.

[Anonymous No.22129960]

>>22126492

We'll never know for sure. All we have are surviving accounts from that moment in the pre-plague time period.

[Anonymous No.22129965]

>>22128468
This made me cackle like an idiot. Most McCarthy parodies fall flat but this is perfect.

[Anonymous No.22129975]

>>22124874

Sometimes I feel like a sommelier of misogyny when I come to /litl/ Sure, if I want misogyny I live in Tennessee of all places so I could easily get some from one of my amateur friends or at the local gas station but it wouldn't be as finely aged or richly, painstakingly grown as I can find wandering around here. I slowly cultivate an understanding of all the subtle notes and other underlying details. You people make Nietzsche look like a scarf-wearing, free-trade coffee swilling LiveJournal user.

[Anonymous No.22129984]

>>22129975
>You people make Nietzsche look like a scarf-wearing, free-trade coffee swilling LiveJournal user.

Nietzsche made himself look like that

[Anonymous No.22129985]

[Anonymous No.22129995]

[Anonymous No.22130007]

>>22128024

Anyone who claims some universal lifehack to get laid isn't telling the truth. Of course I've never had sex and have never desired sexual stimulation of any kind (whether I'm naturally broken inside or I acquired it somehow) so don't look to me for courtship advice either. I'm not sure how what you're describing would work in practice even if you're trying it on the most raving of sluts. You just compliment someone, leave them alone, and then they'll try to ride you like the last cock in Hell?

>There are dishwashers at Olive Garden who have produced spawn from more women than you have, you are all just the biggest fucking losers on the planet.

From what I've read, line cooks are infamously promiscuous and desirable, so you're not far from the truth.

[Anonymous No.22130017]

>>22129985
This guy sounds like a protagonist of a Beckett short story

[Anonymous No.22130018]

>>22128109

What does this have to do with Stirner? I haven't got around to reading him.

[Anonymous No.22130035]

>>22128781

The original NSDAP was very pro-civilization. Even the things they did in the Eastern Front to partisans were lauded as civilized men doing uncivilized things in the interest of furthering Western civilization.

[Anonymous No.22130056]

>>22127084

I remember growing up I watched the TOS episode, "A Taste of Armageddon" when it first aired. The basic plot of the episode is that Eminiar VII is fighting a brutal war against Vendikar. Yet, there are no signs of warfare on either of the planets, baffling the Enterprise crew. This is because both sides have been fighting a purely simulated war. All attacks are simulated and all, "Casualties" must be euthanized. This way, both sides can still fight a war without either of their cultures being destroyed. Long story short, Kirk decides to break the Prime Directive (or technically he didn't, since they were warp-capable, but still he once again interfered) and force both sides to use real warfare, or to form a truce.

>Death, destruction, disease, horror. That's what war is all about, Anan. That's what makes it a thing to be avoided. You've made it neat and painless. So neat and painless, you've had no reason to stop it.

[Anonymous No.22130058]

>>22127084
>Everybody's going to the party, have a real good time
>Dancing in the desert, blowing up the sunshine

[Anonymous No.22130078]

>>22129052

This anon always reminds me so much of my ex girlfriend before she deepthroated a shotgun in my father's living room and painted the floor, coffee table, and bits of the wall in bone and viscera. The difference being I was with her from the age 14 to 22, she was a little under 8 years older. Yes, she groomed me when she was supposed to just be babysitting me but I don't regret it even slightly and I long since stopped all resentment of the way she treated me in less than 4 months. If any of you want a shortcut to becoming literate, develop Stockholm syndrome with a deranged yet intelligent and attractive older woman like this. She'll put you to work. It's like a reversal of everything András László said about alchemy being something women could be initiated in, but only with the constant guidance of an initiated man.

[Anonymous No.22130082]

>>22130078
Is this post real because you lived my dream and I'm also sorry for your loss

[Anonymous No.22130091]

>>22130058
>Beds are burning
Australians don't start wars.

[Anonymous No.22130100]

>>22130082

Thanks, man. I do genuinely miss her but she went out on her terms and I could make the argument that she was about as stable, happy, and lucid a person can be and still come to the conclusion they should go the Hemingway route. How many of us will go out on our own terms, instead of by other's and/or by sheer happenstance?

[Anonymous No.22130110]

>>22129052

My theory is that the Irish boomer lady in question and picrel know each other, if not are each other.

[Anonymous No.22130143]

>>22128131
Woman sexuality good. Discussing sex in public is haha funny. She reads porn because she’s empowered! Shut up incel.
Male sexuality bad. Men talking about sex is assault. Reading porn in public means you’re a psycho and you’re making the world unsafe for women. Shut up incel!

[Anonymous No.22130155]

>>22129303
it's actually both

[Anonymous No.22130197]

>>22128393
oh fuck this takes me back
in 5th grade my english teacher had a paperback gay smut book like that in the class bookshelf. because I was one of the lazy kids who didn't care much for school I never brought books to read like we were supposed to so had to read from the "shelf of shame". all the books on there were just normal antiquated airport novels for kids, shit like CYOA fantasy or whatever. But for some reason on that shelf there was a yellowing paperback that had one of those gay ass fuck titles like in that image. at first I overlooked it but since I ended up exhausting all the old 80s fantasy schlock I unknowingly reading that book instead, unaware that the title was some gay innuendo, I don't remember what it was. I don't even know why she had the book on the shelf. I guess no one other than me bothered to read the book since every other student actually got a real book from the library or from home to read during silent reading time. Anyways I read the book over the course of three class periods, the first sex scene about a third of the way through the book was the first time getting a boner... I don't even know if the teacher read the book or why else would it be up there. I blame that book for making me gay and my eventual hospitalization from anal complications.
I hated that teacher, she always graded my papers like shit and clearly had a bias towards the female students (like most teachers do). I had a disability that made it hard for me to write well as a kid so I find it unfair that I could try my hardest and still get the same grade as when I didn't try at all. I think I didn't have an english teacher I liked until freshman year of high school.

[Anonymous No.22130323]

>>22126808
Men can be woman-brained. Women cannot be male-brained (barring absolute anomalies I guess). There's a reason Aristotle considered women "mutilated men."

[Anonymous No.22130338]

>>22130323
>Men can be woman-brained.
this is a tranny sentence. ywnbaw.

[Anonymous No.22130360]

>>22130197

Thank you for sharing, anon. I'm sorry all that happened to you.

[Anonymous No.22130365]

>>22127209
>dad went to best preparatory school and then best business school where I live
>never got IQ tested but probably 135+
>i recently asked if he ever read philosophy and he casually namedrop two Nietzsche titles he read and say it was also tedious to do some translation of Plato from Latin in his ancient language classes
I feel that

[Anonymous No.22130398]

>>22124302
>>22124478

If you can answer / reach an end to a philosophical debate, hen it isn’t really philosophy is it?

Reminder that theoretical physics is philosophy of a kind.

[Anonymous No.22130421]

>>22130398
>If you can answer / reach an end to a philosophical debate, hen it isn’t really philosophy is it?
you certainly reached an end with that statement

[Anonymous No.22130428]

>>22130398
Correct. Philosophy isn’t meant to answer anything. Because it’s gay I think.

[Anonymous No.22130470]

Very under-rated shitpost

[Anonymous No.22130517]

>>22124234
The most elaborate “anime sux” post I’ve ever seen

[Anonymous No.22130535]

>>22130007
>line cooks are infamously promiscuous and desirable
i don't understand why yet this is true

[Anonymous No.22130575]

>>22129939
If this is real I wonder where anon is or if he's still around..

[Anonymous No.22130576]

>>22127539
>Kansas
>Flint Hills
this guy lives/works within a 15 mile radius of me. it's a good place to enjoy isolation and nature.

[Anonymous No.22130597]

>>22130338
Men cannot be women anon. To be a woman means having ovaries. When I say they can be woman-brained, I mean they can lack the positive qualities that make a man a man; ones that must be cultivated throughout life. You would likely be lying if you didn't admit that this is an absolute pandemic in contemporary times. That's why the presence of a father figure in a boy's life is crucial.

[Anonymous No.22130600]

>>22130421
But he never said his statement is philosophy.

[Anonymous No.22130608]

>>22130517
That's like saying "rock music sux" to someone who posted a really shitty Coldplay song. Anime absolutely can be beautiful and in a time where ugliness is promoted at every possible outlet, it stands out as the exception.

[Anonymous No.22130619]

>>22125272
>anime girls
>disgusting

[Anonymous No.22130625]

>>22126392
literacy wasn't restricted at all, most didn't need or even care to read. literacy as the duty of the citizen is the foundation of the protestant-managerial state

[Anonymous No.22130691]

>>22127356
Yet soldiers can't loot and pillage

[Anonymous No.22130705]

>>22130575
It smells real.
I'm a self-loathing, depressed, miserable alcoholic despite having what many would consider a perfect white picket fence life and once every month or so I wake up to find I wrote something very like that around midnight in a black drunk. Just with better spelling because I'm not brain damaged yet.

[Anonymous No.22130843]

>>22130597
>to be a woman means having ovaries
>mfw my sister has AIS and was born without ovaries, vagina, cervix, or fallopian tubes
guess she's my brother now

[Anonymous No.22130848]

>>22129361
>"War is suffering. The human mind is strong enough to withstand it and come out of it changed (for the better)."

[Anonymous No.22130850]

>>22129985
for years I thought that an "inner monologue" was a metaphor people used to convey thought, which obviously happened in rushes of feeling, inclination, and concept. then I found out that people actually do chatter to themselves inside their heads. wild.

then I found out that "the mind's eye" wasn't a metaphor either.

it's quiet up here. I don't have an internal monologue and I don't experience mental imagery. sometimes I wonder what it would be like if I did.

[Anonymous No.22130851]

>>22129869
if you think the first two aren't paradoxes you're genuinely ngmi btw

[Anonymous No.22130852]

>>22129805
I really miss those days. I am in there somewhere but I can not quite remember which is my post, just remember responding.

[Anonymous No.22130864]

>>22130535
>>22130007
it's because line cooks embody many traits that women are socialized to find attractive, along with the proximity effect. first, if you spend more time around someone, you're more likely to find them attractive over time. proximity. they work eight hours a day and often more with them. second, line cooks are creative without being fruity -- there's always the suggestion of "chef" floating around, which is artistic enough to be interesting, but not so much as to be pretentious/inaccessible. it's also masculine. line cooks have an air of danger and edge to them; they sweat, they work with sharp knives, they cut raw meat, they play with fire. they always seem to be focused and on edge. they often drink to excess or use drugs, which you would think makes them less attractive, but actually does the opposite for a certain kind of woman. plus, line cooks are good at something. most men are good at nothing. they have no skills, no talents, and no hobbies outside of staring at screens and consooming. a line cook can roll up his sleeves, whip his sharp knife around, disassemble a carcass, snatch it from open flame, and make it into a fine-tasting dish, all while three beers and a pill deep. that's why

[Anonymous No.22130866]

>>22130365
The grass is always greener anon.
>be my dad
>be good at middle school sports
>after that, proceed to do absolutely nothing, ever
I genuinely don't know how to describe him. He just doesn't do anything.
>>22130850
I am constantly verbally narrating everything. I can't turn it off. The only thing I am not narrating is stuff like moving my hands, fingers, legs etc. Everything else is narrated. When I was reading this thread, I read every post "out loud" in my mind. Formulating my opinions about the stuff I read also happens in monologue format.
I don't think it's a good or bad things to have or not have it. Both have their uses.

[Anonymous No.22130889]

>>22130850
I was in my 30s before I found out that not everyone has an inner monologue or the ability to visualize in their head, still have issues imagining what that would be like, especially for a reader. I assume it is something like drunkenness where you (I) can not see past the moment.

[Anonymous No.22130909]

>>22130866
fascinating. I guess it's a situation where neither is better nor worse, just different.
>>22130889
when I read, I see the words on the page and I understand them. there's no image that forms, there's no voice that narrates. it'd be nice to be able to "read" different characters' voices in different ways, or to be able to "see" a character's room, face, a scene, but it doesn't really happen for me. if I try really hard I can kinda form an idea of what a scene would look like, but from what I understand from talking to people who can form mental images, my version's a poor, pale imitation. I can't really *see* it in my mind the way most people can. I did once read an interview with a blind person where he said that when he's asked to imagine a table, he can imagine one that's wooden, hard, about this long and that wide, and about this high off the ground, but there's no color; there's just nothing there. that's pretty much what it's like regarding mental imagery for me.

regarding thought; it's still difficult for me to put this into words because until recently I thought my experience comported with everyone else's. I don't really "think" in the way that most people understand thinking. there's no narration that occurs. I can talk myself through something but I have to consciously do it. ideas, impressions, memories, come on as gusts of feeling or concept. for example, if I'm vacuuming my living room and I remember I have to do the dishes, I'm not thinking "alright let me vacuum over here, get this thing off the floor, let me move the cord, hate it when it snags on the table, get by the sink OH SHIT I have to do the dishes." I'll see the sink and just realize I haven't done the dishes. when I consciously choose to think about something, I'll weigh options, compare, contrast, examine, all the things that you'll do, but it happens without narration or image. just the concept.
>something like drunkenness where you can't see past the moment
kinda, but I can still plan for the future and remember the past. not sure if any of this makes sense.

[Anonymous No.22130922]

>>22130843
>ACTUALLY chud some women are born without certain women parts, guess they're not real women huh?
cool, so trannies should be statistically irrelevant genetic deformities, glad we called that up

[Anonymous No.22130924]

>>22130909
By drunkenness I really just meant being in the moment. I don't narrate my life much like that other anon, generally it is more a silent conversation with myself in which what I am currently doing may tie in but generally not. Everyword I type here is my internal monologue beyond the odd edits to clear up the assumptions which I make for brevity, I know what the assumption is but no one else would. For me, to lack this would be like living in those times where I shut it off and that is beyond comprehension for me, more difficult to imagine than losing my legs.

What is reading stream of consciousness like for you?

[Anonymous No.22130940]

>>22130922
she's my sister anon. I don't appreciate you calling her a statistically irrelevant genetic deformity. she means a lot to me

[Anonymous No.22130956]

>>22130924
hmm. weird. stream of consciousness literature's interesting, but that's about it. I think it's confusing like everyone else does. usually worth the effort. I don't think it mimics thought very well. it feels like someone trying their absolute best to get thought across, but ultimately failing, which is okay. all literature ultimately fails.

[Anonymous No.22130957]

>>22127084
My favourite because I was there for it and it reads nice

[Anonymous No.22130958]

>>22127209
>Read and spell at a '6th or 7th grade level' in 2nd grade
>Oh yeah anon? Well I skipped that grade altogether
>Get into some retarded program for 'gifted children' probably bullshit but I was excited
>Anon, when I was your age, I got put into a GENIUS school
>Get a girlfriend
>When I was your age anon, I had raw dogged 6 women and was dating a senior
>Get bullied, kicked off my bike riding past some older kid going home from school etc
>Anon when I was young, my older brother, mother, AND classmates beat the shit out of me
>Stim ONE time in a lower grade, shaking my head and pulling my hair up because I'm interested in the subject and because it feels good
>Dried up old angry white bitch teacher tries to put me in actual special ed
>Why the fuck were you acting like a retard, anon? I know you're not a retard. What the hell is wrong with you?
>Beats the shit out of me with a belt

Whatever you're doing right now, fuck you. You faggot

[Anonymous No.22130959]

[Anonymous No.22130961]

>>22130956
That is essentially what I expected since stream of consciousness is the literary representation of internal monologue. This might be the reason some find it effortless and others fi d it difficult, it is abstract to those without an inner monologue.

Is there any works which you feel do a good job of demonstrating the thought process as you know it?

[Anonymous No.22130999]

>>22129348
>>22129350
These are amazing, thanks.

[Anonymous No.22131075]

[Anonymous No.22131281]

[Anonymous No.22131312]

>>22130940
based

[Anonymous No.22131489]

>>22131281
amazing

[Anonymous No.22131491]

>>22128109
This is amazing

[Anonymous No.22131505]

>>22131281
great stuff

[Anonymous No.22131519]

>>22124546
>>22124580
women live in the present social situation. Why would she find any connection at all as the time she read that thing is so much away from her that it might as well have never existed in the first place.

[Anonymous No.22131579]

>>22129939
>In a world of constellations all I see are stars
Fuck

[Anonymous No.22131603]

>>22124234
I remember a post someone made on psychology to help me but I ended up snapping at him. Not sure why

[Anonymous No.22131606]

>>22130843
My sister is infertile but we don’t get along at all

[Anonymous No.22131611]

>>22127348
Nah I’ve seen this shit happen in real time. Shits actually worse on /his/, so be thankful for that.

[Anonymous No.22131612]

>>22124546
he had some small talk about the book (she probably wants to just read in peace during it but is being polite to him) which to him was some kind of relationship advancement but to her it's meaningless and she will forget the conversation immediately. he brings the book and expects her to remember the conversation about how twilight is erotic. it's more of a callback than a joke but it's bad regardless and even if she realises what he is doing she will probably find it weird

[Anonymous No.22131618]

>>22131611
To add, almost every religion thread on /his/ is anti religion. And the jannies let them soil the board and then a meta thread is posting complaining about Christians. I never see hardly any Christians post there. Very strange.

[Anonymous No.22131744]

>>22131618
DO you visit this palce at all? I barely visit the main /lit/ page but I often see theistic stuff. Like, I would assume there's at least one big christian thread per day, not to mention the islamic ones.

[Anonymous No.22131786]

>>22128393
>Bangin' brothers
Holy shit, "Brothers Karamazov" actually got a sequel?

[Anonymous No.22131809]

>>22124874
Old fucking news, but the pic used is hilarious and true, does anyone have it?

[Anonymous No.22131850]

>>22131281
I am now thinking about this one...

[Anonymous No.22131854]

>>22131603
might've been me

[Anonymous No.22131862]

>>22131281

[Anonymous No.22131865]

>>22131854
Nah, it wasn't you.

[Anonymous No.22131866]

>>22131281
>people either talk about what happened, what happens or what will happen
no shit. this sociopath is doing exactly (1)

[Anonymous No.22131871]

>>22131809
>>/lit/thread/21392481#p21409216
>>/lit/thread/21243889#p21259603

[Anonymous No.22131886]

>>22131519
I don't understand why you freaks think banal remarks like this are worth posting.

[Anonymous No.22131908]

>>22126492
Get a grip

[Anonymous No.22132038]

>>22131886
Same reason you thought to post yours.
Something stirs up shitty emotions in you/them, so you/they act.

[Anonymous No.22132064]

>>22130535
line cooks are in Control of the situation and there is emotion and energy in the situation. when they fuck up it becomes a tense situation and tension is sexual in energy. plus they have spent a lot of time in degenerate situations and so have some personality and the ability to chat.

[Anonymous No.22132075]

>>22124234
That's like saying there's no middle class because there wasn't one a few hundred years ago.

[Anonymous No.22132080]

>>22124302
Dialogues are just "I'll portray myself as Chad and yourself as So yjack"

[Anonymous No.22132113]

>>22129984
>>22129975
>mfw this
>> look like a scarf-wearing, free-trade coffee swilling LiveJournal user
>is literally Kant
I know none of you cunts read shit but this is funnier than the bit with the beer

[Anonymous No.22132203]

>>22130852
yeah, when I re-read it just now, I recognized two of my posts, but they weren't part of the story, they were just "nice post, man" posts. I didn't have any ideas that day.
thanks for the (you), old timer. we're here forever, but glad we saw the genesis

[Anonymous No.22132252]

>>22130091
how can they sleep though?

[Anonymous No.22132311]

>>22130850
i think it's a meme. sometimes i do have one sometimes I don't. depending on what I'm doing

[Anonymous No.22132342]

>>22124874
schope-pilled

>>22125404
kinography

[Anonymous No.22132354]

>>22124874
>The whole world is like this. Determining real value is costly to the assessor. This is fundamentally the reason to read the classics; someone else has put in the effort to assess that they are a Thing. Maybe the best book ever sold 1,200 copies and went out of print forever but I'm not going to read through all the undifferentiated pulp to find it. If I did I probably wouldn't recognize it for what it is because getting the most out of something takes commitment which is costly. There is value in being self assured about your own taste but there is also value in recognizing your own limitations.

[Anonymous No.22132395]

>>22129877
>n fighting untrained troglodites who don't measure much higher then a mildly functional caveman
I'm sure he'd function quite well against ukranians or russians lmao. one doesn't have shoes and the other drives tanks across mines one after another after another after another

[Anonymous No.22132397]

[Anonymous No.22132398]

>>22127539
neat, that guy was repling to my post about the Brontes and yorkshire

[Anonymous No.22132403]

>>22130850
You can entertain yourself, like JD on scrubs, but I don't think it's a big disadvantage to not have it, most people have two types of thinking, the "loud" visual and verbalized kind, and the silent kind, obviously you don't need to say something out to draw conclusions. I've looked it up and people with aphantasia seem to also score higher on IQ tests.
I would imagine the advantages of mental visualization and verbalization may somehow be related to the planning stages of certain things (not to imply that people with aphantasia lack the ability to plan), like planning to redecorate a room, or to navigate a city, or to repeat a sentence in your own head to hear how it sounds before you speak it or write it down, maybe visual artists benefit from it.

[Anonymous No.22132406]

>>22127084
the last seven sentences of this literally BTFO anything written in the last 50 years

[Anonymous No.22132690]

>>22126457
yep, was such a strong post until that line

[Anonymous No.22132712]

>>22126492
holy based. yea, kys you fucking stupid shallow whore

[Anonymous No.22132713]

>>22132690
It's just an old copypasta

[Anonymous No.22132718]

[Anonymous No.22132731]

[Anonymous No.22132732]

>>22132718
Tranny post, but imagine the smell if a real woman actually did that. It would be like one of those beaches, you know the ones where for some reason all the rotting marine organic material washes up.

[Anonymous No.22132746]

>>22131281
Read more Hemingway. Then read Faulkner. Then read Heaney. And then you can really begin.

[Anonymous No.22132766]

This is a very short, simple post but the wording of it stuck with me for years for some reason. It flashes in my mind's eye whenever I see a reference to a great work in a mediocre one.

[Anonymous No.22132808]

>>22130850
I suspect that the inner monologue may be a symptom of parasitic sub-process in the mind.
It seems that existence as a pure system, without meta-processes, only input->process->output without the constant mental thrashing is like being in flow-state 24/7, peaceful
I also suspect drugs can get the mind in this state by impairing the parasitic process

If anybody is familiar with this idea, please recommend me readings

[Anonymous No.22132821]

>>22130961
good question. no, not really — my thought happens silently and blindly. the closest might be movies with excellent match cuts; not to imply that associative links in my noggin are visual in nature, but good match cuts convey a sort of associative, instant current. I’m thinking specifically of this one. (if you’ve never seen it don’t worry the part at the very end’s not a real eye.) again, the past that aligns with how I experience thought isn’t the images themselves, but how one immediately calls the other to mind. I think that most people also experience the “immediacy” or “spontaneity” that I’m talking about, but it’s accompanied with narration or image streams. I’m trying to get across a sense of the connection + some ineffable emotional import. It’s pretty hard for me to separate emotion from abstract thought.

[Anonymous No.22132843]

>>22129052
>search thread in archive
>he didn't post the reincarnation proof as a reply, and no one even asked for it
fuck you guys

[Anonymous No.22132845]

>>22129985
i laughed

[Anonymous No.22132850]

one might piece together all the stories ITT into one long scroll
the Decameron goes on

[Anonymous No.22132853]

>>22132397
good one lmao

[Anonymous No.22132862]

>>22128024
Imagine seething this hard at random 4chan posts lol

/lit/ has been having a lot of belligerent faggots getting extra mad at the dumbest shit lately

[Anonymous No.22132867]

>>22124604
> he hasn't read gödel
filtered

[Anonymous No.22132874]

>>22124234

[Anonymous No.22132901]

>>22124874
George Carlin sucks dick

[Anonymous No.22132962]

>>22127084
>some girl asked me if I missed the army today in class. I said no not really
No way this isn't a planned shitpost, this read like something Hemingway would take weeks to write

[Anonymous No.22133018]

>>22131281
I'd agree with the comment on signal-to-noise ratio and on mind modeling of reality via metaphor, analogy, mapping, structure.

I don't agree on his filters and their application in evaluating personhood.
Only because the quality of communication is independent of the minds that are communicating.
Though it is probably safe to say that they trend together.

Impressive if he can actually do that evaluation in real-time though.

And some advice on women:
Do not seeks a mental peer in your female mate.
Women generally communicate with a very low signal-to-noise ratio, especially with each other.
You want a woman who makes your life easy.
Let her pick you, don't try to force anything.

[Anonymous No.22133035]

>>22133018
>Do not seeks a mental peer in your female mate.
b-but why
she exists, I'll find her
she's out there somewhere

[Anonymous No.22133037]

>>22131281
Anon has incidentally defined what it means to be oversocialized - it is to be a person who is trapped in or incarnated by this type of unceasing empty chatter

[Anonymous No.22133057]

>>22133035
dont let your girlfriend stop you from finding real love

[Anonymous No.22133114]

>>22127533
He gets posted here a lot but still, wild timing

[Anonymous No.22133119]

>>22133035
Consider finding a mommy instead.
She can take care of the tedium of life, which fulfills her, while you pursue the things that fulfill you.
A woman is a beautiful intrigue, probably because they don't think like men, so you would be silly to have contempt for their short comings.
The ones that do think like men will not be nice to live with.

A woman who is polar to you makes an ideal mate, it gives balance to your relationship.
Understand what a woman wants out of the relationship, and make sure she gets it -- usually safety, security, and leadership.

Find male friends to converse with instead, or just keep it in your head, or write a book, or shitpost.

[Anonymous No.22133124]

>>22127533
>>22133114
Well, let's give it a few days and see if anon was right

[Anonymous No.22133135]

>>22127984
I don't get it

[Anonymous No.22133699]

[Anonymous No.22133709]

>>22124874
>women are le bad and stupid and that's why they don't like me
uhuh
another classic

[Anonymous No.22133748]

>>22130470
i keep fucking trying to explain to people i argue with that analogy is not an argument

[Anonymous No.22133765]

>>22129869
>modeled on machine logic.
that's the only real logic.
all else is cope.

[Anonymous No.22133771]

>>22130600
he mused, out loud no less.
that is all it takes.

[Anonymous No.22133772]

>>22133035
Because women are not men. Women don't have the same mind as men. Women can't be "stupid" or "intelligent" in the way that men are stupid or intelligent. They use a different measuring system. You wouldnt try to measure density of a liquid with a ruler and then get upset because the density is not enough centimeters for your liking?
stop treating women as men
i keep telling you fucking incels this every single thread
women are women, they are their own category, in everything, in every aspect

[Anonymous No.22133782]

>>22133772
>women are
obsolete

[Anonymous No.22133846]

>>22126492
the person expecting a woman to take a cheeky wolf dick joke with gumption like it was your buddy is in the wrong

[Anonymous No.22133886]

>>22133709
Who cares who women like or don't like? Women are bad and stupid, like you said.

[Anonymous No.22133909]

>>22129804
You can't really be a sociopath having fun killing foreigners with your bros. I mean sure, in a "modern" sense you can, but then you have to classify basically entire ancient societies as sociopaths and then the word loses all meaning. And why are we different? Because we were exposed to another opinion? I'm sure the bronze age raiders also got to face the opinion of the enemy farmers that killing me is wrong because ow.

[Anonymous No.22133927]

>>22130078
Don't you think it's interesting that when you two were through, you were as old as she was at the beginning? There's no way that numbers are impersonal. Doing mathematics in school I've had extremely strong feelings of narrative and character emanating from the different numbers to be processed, like here's the protagonist, here's the villain, here's the old mentor and here's the impassioned observer. It didn't make any sense from a logical point of view, I just knew things.

[Anonymous No.22133934]

>>22130365
Anon, I have a 130+ IQ, can namedrop nietzsche and if i ever took latin I'm sure it would have been a pain in my ass to translate plato, but I'm just a fat fuck lying on my couch browsing 200 tabs of 4chan simultaneously in between the cooldown of jacking off. Your dad might just be surface.

[Anonymous No.22133940]

>>22130957
>>22132406
>>22132962
stop giving me hope assholes

[Anonymous No.22133944]

>>22133934
man slacking off fucking rules. you will NEVER catch me in the 22% tax bracket.

[Anonymous No.22133963]

>>22132080
That's discussion on 4cuck in a nutshell. People s*yjak eachother without even realizing it. S*yjaking people is 4cuck discussion in its most pure and raw form. Just because the s*yjak image isn't posted doesn't mean it's not there. It's too powerful. It literally got an entire board wiped. Also you look like this and say this lol faggot

[Anonymous No.22133962]

>>22133944
Not sure I'm slacking off, listening to work-related instructions I immediately drift away into trying to figure out what the greeks would have thought of cinema or what's wrong with my biochemistry. I'm just a useless piece of shit with a engorged brain.

[Anonymous No.22134066]

>>22130843
She's not your brother, but she's not a women by any practical definition

If I need a car to get to work and you lend me your car, but it turns out your car doesn't have an engine, wheels, or drivetrain, then did you actually lend me a car? no, of course not. In fact I'd be really upset at you for cranking me

and that's just borrowing a ride to work! Imagine how insane it'd be to call that a car if I was trying to buy one. I dream all my life of driving down the highway into the sunset, engine purring, windows down, smell of salt and storm in the air, and you're trying to tell me this hunk of junk is basically the same thing?

it doesn't mean this collection of parts is a bike or a wagon. it's also, to be fair, not *nothing*; there are probably a tiny number of people who see a "car" like this and think "yeah, ok, I can use that", but it's a 0.0001% sort of thing. irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.22134079]

>>22133927

The academic term is, "synchronicity."

[Anonymous No.22134092]

>>22133927

So what you're saying is that he has no choice but to find someone to babysit?

[Anonymous No.22134170]

>>22134066
>practical definition
God you are an insufferable faggot. These are people, not taxonomic subjects. If you saw her on the street, you would see her as a woman like any other. You would want to fuck her like any other, and you wouldn't know she """wasn't a woman""" until she told you.

[Anonymous No.22134206]

>>22124302
I immediately lose respect for anyone that uses rhetorical nonsense like
>he who knows nothing is closest to the truth

[Anonymous No.22134229]

>>22134154 is going to stick with me for awhile, it made me happy.

[Anonymous No.22134244]

>>22129867
because the government told them to. they think local sports team or their school or whatever them to, but it was the government

[Anonymous No.22134698]

>>22134170
correct, I wouldn't know she wasn't really a women until the parts involving her womanhood become important. that's the whole point! she's a women in the same way that a picture of an apple is food

[Anonymous No.22134740]

>>22134170
if she lived in the past she would be considered a second-class citizen and practically subhuman, let alone unfit as a woman, just like any other barren person
and the societies that would have treated her like that were more moral and healthy than the ones we have today

[Anonymous No.22134742]

>>22134066
defining gender by genetics rather than the developmental physiological programs just shows you have a layman view of biology.
>but he's missing the proper parts!
if you're born without hands it doesn't make you inhuman.

[Anonymous No.22134874]

>>22133934
Same, although i'm at a deadend job so I'm getting paid some small amount to shitpost too.

[Anonymous No.22134884]

>>22133934
same but i dont have a cooldown and can jackoff all day

[Anonymous No.22134908]

>>22127084
Despicable evil bastard

[Anonymous No.22134912]

>>22132395
>the other drives tanks across mines one after another after another after another
Oh like how Americans drove humvees over IEDs so much in Iraq it made up half of all American casualties? You stupid nigger HAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.22134931]

>>22134908
nothing despicable in there. nothing inherently evil about killing. just a guy writing a little about how it is.

[aaa No.22134963]

>>22124234
It depends. Usually, it's ok.

[Anonymous No.22135013]

>>22132874
top is better, bottom sounds like gpt

[Anonymous No.22135016]

>>22126521
Honestly sometimes I need to remind myself if I am reading a male post or a female post when I see alpha beta etc.

[Anonymous No.22135044]

>>22130608
>"Anime absolutely can be beautiful"
>posts soivangelion

[Anonymous No.22135103]

>>22129877
Actually a lot of Americans came to Ukraine when the war started. Then they realised that this is an actual regular war with artillery shelling your ass 24/7 and snipers picking from every corner of a ruined building. A lot of them died without doing anything in that bombing that blew away the entire foreign camp close to Poland's border. Rest got so scared that they left in droves, americans, canadians, aussies etc. Those people can't fight actual war if they have no absolute technological superiority over their enemy like shooting sand people in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Right now we have three real battalions that do proper work and push the frontline forward.
That is White Russians
Georgians
Poles

If you want to join the war those are three battalions that do actual fighting and have the most experience.

t. a Pole currently working as SoF in Ukraine.

[Anonymous No.22135108]

>>22130078
sorry for the loss anyway. precious people are more prone to try to catch a bullet with their teeth for some reason.

[Anonymous No.22135110]

>>22130843
>no vagina
Definitely not a woman. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.22135124]

What a bad thread
>all shitty forced meme pastas from the last few years

[Anonymous No.22135126]

>>22135103
The cult of SOF is one thing I really hate about modern first world militaries. These dudes are really skilled and experienced, sure, but they train to insert into compounds in the Middle East and shoot dudes wielding AKs while supported by an outer cordon platoon or company, QRF, artillery, mortars, and a ten-plane-high stack of air support chilling overhead. Everyone acts like they're supersoldiers who could slaughter Chicoms and russkies with their bare hands and jerks them off 24/7 but in a legit war (not the dumb COIN junk we've been doing for 20 years) it's the guys in mechanized and motorized formations who are gonna have to do shit like charging entrenched machine gun emplacements while getting a rolling artillery barrage dumped on them and with zero air cover.
t. American infantry NCO

[Anonymous No.22135127]

>>22135103
>white russians
oxymoron

[Anonymous No.22135133]

>>22135127
You stupid Americans. He was referring to Belarus.

[Anonymous No.22135135]

>>22135124
you're very clever don't worry

[Anonymous No.22135154]

>>22135127
>>22135133
I was referring to Russian nationalists like from before bolshevik revolution. That's how we called them back then and that's how we refer to them today as well.

[Anonymous No.22135160]

>>22132398
I'm sat in Howarth right now. Yorkshire is top tier comfy. The nice bits at least.

[Anonymous No.22135161]

>>22135154
>russian nationalists fight for Ukraine
lolwhat

[Anonymous No.22135162]

>>22135161
There are Ukrainians fighting on russian side as well. I don't know why are you surprised. Just shows how little people in the West understand about this war.

[Anonymous No.22135163]

>>22135103
>If you want to join the war those are three battalions that do actual fighting and have the most experience
What if I want to shoot at NATO dogs

[Anonymous No.22135164]

>>22135162
No one is surprised, you're just a dumb larper.

[Anonymous No.22135167]

>>22135103
Opowiadaj dalej anonku, ciekawie będzie poczytać niusy z pierwszej ręki zamiast nieustannej propagandowej sraki.

[Anonymous No.22135201]

>>22134742
To call a eunuch a man is widely considered incorrect; it's the same in principle. Womanhood and manhood are functions of reproductive organs, and before that stage is reached, people are either boys or girls. Regardless, anomalous contradictions do not upset definitions.

[Anonymous No.22135202]

>>22135164
You are a complete cretin who doesn't understand what actually is going on in this war lmao
Stay mad child

[Anonymous No.22135220]

>>22135201
If you can say "a mans penis" then it implies that the man exists outside of the penis, and you would still be a man if you removed it.

[Anonymous No.22135257]

>>22127988
Delightfully absurd

[Anonymous No.22135335]

>>22135220
That's right, because he still has testicles.

[Anonymous No.22135389]

>>22129985
Joycean

[Anonymous No.22135486]

>>22135044
shouldve posted utena honestly

[Anonymous No.22135523]

>>22127338
>a rule-breaking thread
Kill the janny in your mind before complaining about the mods

[Anonymous No.22135527]

>>22128401
I bought a copy of Pharaoh (1999) on CD at a thrift store because of that post. Should I play it?

[Anonymous No.22135687]

>>22130470
lmao

[Anonymous No.22135912]

>>22135220
>if I use fringe cases that are incredibly rare and abnormal, I can twist the meanings of words to suit my own needs

[Anonymous No.22135918]

I read this post on some guy replying to a guy about attachment issues, don't have a screenshot

> Just do what I do, see women as a communal entity instead of a set of individuals, and then fuck whores. When I see a beautiful woman right in front of me, I think "wow, what a hot baabhabhiat, I can't wait to fuck that stripper later this week, as I budgeted." It's the same as seeing someone eating pizza, it just makes me want to go have some pizza. Not HIS pizza, or THAT pizza. SOME pizza.
> There are always SOME women around to fuck. Individual women are not worth the hassle. Fuck SOME woman, and regard the rest as billboard and bus-side advertisements.

[Anonymous No.22135986]

>>22130365
>>22127209
My dad is not intellectual at all, he likes watching some history programs but that's all. He never finished his engineering degree, instead emigrated to us to make mad dough for menial labour

[Anonymous No.22136052]

>>22128109
Kek, satire of woke dystopia where child grooming is normalized

[Anonymous No.22136129]

>>22127988
kek