/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.22065514]

Imagine how many classics she would have inspired in the past. Are we cursed or blessed to be able to see beauty like this on a consistent basis?

[Anonymous No.22065528]

If evil were not beautiful and virtue not disgusting no sinner would ever be tempted

[Anonymous No.22065542]

>>22065514
once you’ve fucked a few women and lived with one for some time, all the feminine mystique and attraction dissipate like a fart in the wind
it’s hard to appreciate their aesthetic value in isolation when you know how debased the woman creature is in real life

[Anonymous No.22065546]

>>22065514
Who is this guy

[Anonymous No.22065550]

>>22065542
>how debased the woman creature is in real life
Women are debased because men debase them.

[Anonymous No.22065556]

>>22065514
simp
>>22065550
men and women are both debased
also nice bait dawg

[Anonymous No.22065558]

>>22065542
all things fade in the modern world, beauty and sex all the same

[Anonymous No.22065559]

>>22065542
>once you’ve fucked a few women and lived with one for some time, all the feminine mystique and attraction dissipate like a fart in the wind
>it’s hard to appreciate their aesthetic value in isolation when you know how debased the woman creature is in real life

[Anonymous No.22065561]

>>22065550
well yeah, unless you’re into grooming 14 year olds you’re already getting used goods almost certainly, but there’s something about the fembrain that’s innately shallow, animalistic and deceitful

[Anonymous No.22065565]

>>22065550
>Women are debased because men debase them.

[Anonymous No.22065570]

>>22065542
>Le hecking edgy casual 4chan misogyny
Just face it, people are kinda gay and lame. Most women are gay and lame and most guys (YOU) are gay and lame. Being human is about being gay and lame most of the time

[Anonymous No.22065572]

>>22065565
u fell for the bait
>>22065561
(gay man)

[Anonymous No.22065585]

>>22065550
On the contrary, women debase men and corrupt them and their minds.

[Anonymous No.22065611]

>>22065514
>to be able to see beauty like this on a consistent basis?
where? IG?

[Anonymous No.22065660]

She is just young, not exceptionally beautiful. Just a plain pretty young girl.

[sage No.22065903]

>>22065514
>I gorged on seafood and other aphrodisiac foods, so I almost came off before I screwed up. Perhaps it is true that what is earned dishonestly is quickly squandered.

>I look in the mirror. I stand there admiring my rizzo cock for a couple of minutes. A man ought to have his picture taken when he's standing like this, with the battle clapper. And show the photo to the boss when he goes to ask for a pay raise. And then, also, to show it to the grandchildren, as an old man.

>The ass walking ahead of me swings like a pendulum, marking the seconds of my desperation. Here's another pussy I'll never screw! Millions of other assholes will be drooling desolate like me right now...and that pendulum keeps swinging...and death is getting closer at every moment.

[Anonymous No.22065967]

>>22065514
Is this AI image of Cleopatra?

[Anonymous No.22066040]

>great mischief with mediocre artistic doings derives because many mistake a strong external stimulus for their true artistic vocation.
t. eta hoffmann in "der artushof"

>the weakest candelight flares up sometimes and in the life of every man there's a moment where one feels ignited or enabled for a great deed. but what really counts are the long intervals in between and the small daily occasions are the real touchstone where most of our philosopher's gold sinks to the level of ordinary metal.
t. carl maria von weber in his unfinished novel

[Anonymous No.22066047]

>>22065542
>once you’ve fucked a few women and lived with one for some time
You haven't though, so why should I read the rest of your post?

[Anonymous No.22066059]

>>22065967
Not AI. The pupils are perfectly circular and of the same size. Also, there's no crazy hair that becomes more voluminous at the ends.

[Anonymous No.22066147]

>>22065561
>unless you’re into grooming 14 year olds
any tips?

[Anonymous No.22066162]

>>22065611
Gio.scotti on tiktok

[Anonymous No.22066182]

>>22065514
And yet incredibly sub-par feet. This woman isn’t a triumph, she’s a tragedy. Unfinished. Look at the state of the nailbeds, how outmatched they are by the meat of the toes. I suppose the toenails are both ingrown? Complete crushing encirclement. It’s like cannae down there.

I cannot sustain attraction to a woman with ugly feet. It puts me off the whole package. It’s like a woman with horribly malformed breasts, or pustules on her labia.

I’ve paid large sums of money in the past to sleep with beautiful instagram ‘influencers’. I would not pay to sleep with this one, as the feet would put me off, unless the whole thing were doggystyle - I haven’t seen her soles and cannot judge, naturally a veruca or blisters or dry skin would put paid to that plan - but even then, this girl’s main beauty is in her face, so it defeats the object.

And before you call me mentally ill, I stand on the side of Flaubert, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Shakespeare and Pushkin, among others, in my appreciation for a nice pair of pieds.

[Anonymous No.22066190]

>>22065514
A lot of modern beauty is artificial and therefore sterile. Not to mention, it getz balanced out by all the people who bog themselves into something that barely resembles a human anymore.
Also, an objective beauty doesn't need to display herself sexually to be considered attractive, unheard of by the "onlyfans link in bio" women.

[Anonymous No.22066243]

>>22065542
I disagree. I actually find women delightful to talk to. Men, especially younger men my age, are such a disappointment. I know your idea of men is Socrates and Gigachad, but the majority of guys are vapid dudebros. You can't really talk about anything but sports and money with them. Women are much more pleasant to talk to, they will take a number of subjects seriously, they are more eager to talk about how they feel about things. Generally speaking, they're nicer and usually more well-read than guys. If a guy is well-read he's usually some kind of horrible soiboi. I'd rather talk to a woman.
The only problem is just this >>22065561 I'm not wasting my emotions on people with a body count. But I still prefer to talk to women.

[Anonymous No.22066244]

>>22065514
If you were a weevil you would be driven by the same pheromone impulses to your baseline unconscious to declare, in passion, the same sentiment about a female weevil.

It is just a girl.

>cursed
if unattainable

>cursed
if attainable, as we would become bored after a few days.

>blessed
only if she lacks the power of language and you never realize what a nit she might be, and if she never realizes that you have no need of her.

[Anonymous No.22066252]

>>22066243
>they will take a number of subjects seriously
weird, i agree with your observations on men but i've never found women to be willing to talk about any subject except in terms of the people involved with it. i'm a chudcel desu so i only talk to coworkers.

[Anonymous No.22066258]

>>22065556
This wasn't bait. I'm completely serious.

[Anonymous No.22066274]

>>22066182
Based. Patrician taste. There is nothing that matches the sensual pleasure of running your ravenous tongue up and down a woman's sole.

[Anonymous No.22066275]

>>22065514
why do men keep saying women have beauty when the woman's soul is repulsive?
Why can't men stop being materialist?

[Anonymous No.22066278]

Yes women love to be fucked by Max Hardcore, James Deen, Pierre Woodman. Women say it explicitly and they keep doing it.
Women don't love the guy infatuated with beautiful women. What In their teen age men know unconsciously, then very much consciously in their adult age, is that women
-never value the eternal beta orbiter
-women will have debased sex with the first stranger who ''makes them vibrate''

Women don't give a shit about long-term relationships. Women just want to larp over a few days as the non-slut girl and then they want the sex, and they want it bad.

The second strategy women build to avoid viewing themselves as slut is their fantasy of ''summer love'', which is just the situation with the ''stranger which makes them vibrates all over'' extended to a few weeks of casual fun sex with no string attached and zero bad consequence for the girl (especially no pregnancy, which is reached thanks to normalization of abortion).


What a girl utterly despises are 2 things:
-being called a slut, but only outside of the romp
-having physical contact with repulsive orbiters (but still wants all their attention and all their money) which is why tinder and other onlyfan are a godsend and makes women thrive in democracies

Women don't want to to be respected and make love in the dark with their devoted provider. What women want is to be fucked raw by an Adonis they barely know who makes them squirt everywhere and fuck them until they can barely walk the day after.

Women want the convulsive orgasm where they lose consciousness to the point that they roll their eyes and lose their social self, getting in touch for the first time their true self, ie the sheer whoredom. You think they will get that by looking into the eyes of their generic subservient beta appliance fucking them in the missionary position?
Think again.

Everything you see in porn and tinder is the truth about women. And that's why you hate it.

[Anonymous No.22066290]

>>22066274
>>22066182
>sub-par feet. This woman isn’t a triumph, she’s a tragedy. Unfinished.
homosexuals shouldn't pretend to speak about women.

She is a farm animal who can provide a few children. What greater ideation is there than this?

[Anonymous No.22066295]

>>22066290
>t. prole

[Anonymous No.22066296]

>>22066278
Get massive chud vibes from this post. You probably haven't crawled out of your dingy basement in weeks, foul cockroach.

[Anonymous No.22066300]

>>22066252
I've found that women are more receptive to new things, although they're harderning a bit and maybe this will go away as American culture becomes fully established here. Men these days are encased in a shell of irony which in older men used to be no-nonsense pragmatism. And that's good, mind you, because you don't wanna talk about abstract shit and feelings all day, it's good that men are still action-oriented, but the irony is extremely gay and insufferable. Women are a bit like kids, if you catch their attention with something interesting they'll engage with it. They're refreshing. Surely a male friend with a male sensibility and a culture is more relatable than a woman, but those don't exist. If a man has a culture of any kind of he's going to be some kind of soiboi and generally speaking, the extent to which he'll be able to talk about his influences is "I know thing, I consumed thing". They don't seem to have any deeper thoughts. Women generally think more, and more deeply, about what they consume, even if what they consume is shit. They're going to ruminate and actually imagine. They have a more imaginative mind than men for sure.
I dunno I still like 'em, but they're still not completely pozzed by American feminism, so there's that. My absolute best friends were always male. If you have a good male friend it's still the best thing in the world. There's nothing like the kind of mutual enrichment you get from spending time with someone who's on the same level as you, mentally. But now if you are too close to a man you're le gay which I suppose has contributed to making men even more insufferable.

[Anonymous No.22066305]

>>22066295
i prefer the term yeoman or provincial soldier

[Anonymous No.22066309]

>>22066296
He's 100% right though. It's simply not worth i to get emotionally involved with women any longer. You're going to learn the hard way if you ever start dating.

[Anonymous No.22066315]

>>22065542
True true true.

>>22065550
>Women are debased because men debase them.
"The american nigger smashes up black businesses because of white people in another part of the world,"
youthful idealism

[Anonymous No.22066316]

>>22066305
Not too shabby

[Anonymous No.22066320]

>>22066309
People are getting sick of your incel shit
>>22066310

[Anonymous No.22066321]

>>22065546
Looks like Jim Morrison at one of Jacob Epsteins parties back in the day.

[Anonymous No.22066324]

>>22066320
Have you tried hanging yourself, faggot?

[Anonymous No.22066325]

>>22066278
This. I once rucked a woman for what felt like a marathon. She was all over me after that. Kept messaging me constantly. Turned into a 2 pump chump for a bit and she lost all interest.

[Anonymous No.22066326]

>>22066324
>Have you tried hanging yourself, faggot?

[Anonymous No.22066329]

using avatars is against the rules, moron

[Anonymous No.22066331]

>>22066320
nta but how do you think 'not' being interested in womens games is 'incel'? The OP who lusts and wonders whether it's a curse to 'see' beauty is clearly displaying the incel position.

I mean, I wouldn't take this approach,
>>22066309
>It's simply not worth i to get emotionally involved with women any longer. You're going to learn the hard way if you ever start dating.
cos it's based on a western spoiled idiot woman; it's true, of course, but there are non-western non-urban women everywhere who aren't such pigs.

[Anonymous No.22066335]

>>22066329
It's called mocking you, faggot, not using avatars.

[Anonymous No.22066346]

>>22066331
>there are non-western non-urban women everywhere who aren't such pigs.
People here idealize "non-urban" women so much because you've never had to do with "non-urban" women. You think they're like the lovely Quaker women in old movies. If you've grown up an urbanite you wouldn't want to spend an hour alone with them. Although maybe things are different in America, and women in fuckoff Alaska or in Texan ranches are actually lovely. No idea. But the problem for a lot of people is that being an urbanite is an unfluence on you, and whether you like it or not it's part of who you become, but if you have any standards when it comes to morality or sexual promiscuity you're completely fucked. The ideal would be a well-educated, modern woman who is not a slut but the two things practically counter each other.

[Anonymous No.22066354]

>>22065514
Who is this?

[Anonymous No.22066371]

>>22066346
>People here idealize "non-urban" women so much because you've never had to do with "non-urban" women.
That's demonstrably false in my case. I am talking about country girls, as you say, but also women from foreign parts of the world who just haven't been subjected to the same poor culture and influence of the modern west : hateful, vapid, stuck-up, stupid (when do you get to know them), and obviously (all bad experiences from older men who've been through having a children taken from them, false accusations of sexual abuse, etc.).

We can understand entirely why a western woman is how she is and we cannot do much about it, but there's no reason to be embittered over it - and every reason to advocate warning younger men about the dangers involved. I can understand where the kneejerk reaction comes from; to spit at men who say this and to pretend they're very bad, I would have said the same thing when I was a kid - hoping that defending women like a white knight would differentiate me from the bad and stupid men as a kind of mating-strategy.

You'll find women even deny this so strongly that they don't place any value even on the exceptional man who is not an idiot ... whilst we know what white knighting is all about anyway; a simp or betacuck or whatever they say nowadays.

> If you've grown up an urbanite you wouldn't want to spend an hour alone with them.
No way. The only bad part is when they start to envy the city women and think those fucking trollops are better than they are.

>The ideal would be a well-educated, modern woman who is not a slut but the two things practically counter each other.
Remember: the ideal Woman who is well-read and also into war and combat doesn't exist and she came from Jupiters imagination (his idealism), whereas the pretty Woman who seems innocent and pleasing to the eye is Pandora whose weapon is Hope (you hope that the trollop is a minerva, and she cannot ever be).

The real woman is more a voluptua or venus or iuventas more accurately; carried along on the temporal breeze, subject to all influence and malice, envious of her older brothers, liable to fuck her father, she may mature into a venus or a vesta one day.

[Anonymous No.22066374]

>>22066300
>Surely a male friend with a male sensibility and a culture is more relatable than a woman, but those don't exist.
Sucks to be you

[Anonymous No.22066407]

>>22066371
>also women from foreign parts of the world who just haven't been subjected to the same poor culture and influence of the modern west
I'm not interested in moving to Afghanistan, ty

[Anonymous No.22066412]

Beauty is in the transcendent infinite, and op is a dog in heat
Wtf is wrong with all you losers

[Anonymous No.22066502]

>>22065550
Reminder woman suffrage gained traction with the support of men.

CAPTCHA: PSSYH8

[Anonymous No.22066511]

>>22066407
>isn't aware of mass immigration

[Anonymous No.22066567]

>>22066511
lmao niggers