[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 493 KB, 2048x1448, 259a45facfc69b05cbd338c1f7e5aadd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21956348 No.21956348 [Reply] [Original]

Hegel, Deleuze, Guattari, Butler, and any other "academic" who writes in an obfuscated way is a grifter who wants to make their ideas seem deeper than they are. There is nothing worth gaining from reading any of them.

>> No.21956353
File: 118 KB, 900x900, unnamed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21956353

You don't get Hegel. You become Hegelian as second nature.

>> No.21956370

>>21956348
Hegel wasnt trying to obfuscate, he was just extremely confused. Even Deleuze is not really trying to obfuscate. People like Derrida or Judith Butler actually are.

>> No.21957253

>>21956353
>You don't get Hegel. You become Hegelian as second nature.
Hegel is neither got not acquired nor enclosed as enclosure is an act of appropriation. Hegel is unappropriate as appropriation is a becoming. Hegel cannot be cummed inside. Hegel is not your sister. Hegel is not your Waifu. Hegel is the negative presence of Hegel as an action of being. This is not a becoming but an ontological self-inspection of negativity. Hegel is the fistfucking of Hegel's absence as a cunt. Here then is the inappropriable nature of Hegel: he has no cunt but you must fist.

Gape.

>> No.21957264

>>21957253
Dude, you had one job, to end a dirty sex joke with "agape" instead of "eros" and you failed.

>> No.21957266

>>21956348
Now apply that to the western canon and entire world canon
Congratulations and welcome to enlightenment

>> No.21957280
File: 28 KB, 650x635, q123sxc4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21957280

>>21956348
>>21956370
>If you use words in a manner with which I am not immediately familiar then your work is obfuscation
It's not for everyone

>> No.21957282

>>21956348
not /lit/
>>>/his/
>>>/pol/

>> No.21957288

>>21957280
>if you deliberately try to hide what you are trying to say, if you are trying to say anything at all, and your life's work is of purely aesthetic interest to people as cultural capital but contains nothing of intellectual significance, then a bunch of retards will try and defend you by hurling insults because they obviously aren't smart enough to do anything else
sucker born every minute

>> No.21957294

>>21956370
Deleuze is trying to obfuscate or he would have written and spoken normally, or else he's retarded. these people obviously don't live the shit they preach, unless again they're severely mentally handicapped and cant help it. it's a day job, then they go act like normal people. it's a con not for money but for attention and praise

>> No.21957326

What are the ideas that they wish to make seem deeper than they really are?

>> No.21958784

>>21957326
Gnosticism, anti-foundationalism, historicism is what I usually find.

>> No.21959036

>>21956348
go back to /a/ tranny

>> No.21959043

>>21956348
>>21958809

>> No.21959186

>>21956370
Hegel wasn't confused. It's called dialectical writing you imbecile

>> No.21959203

>>21959186
>It's called dialectical writing
AKA confusion

>> No.21959469

>>21959043
Fucking kill yourself. That general should never pick up. The philosophy threads are the best ones on /lit/.