/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.21949983]

What are some literature that can explain transgenderism intellectually?

[Anonymous No.21949988]

The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State

[Anonymous No.21949991]

>>21949983
The Man Who Would Be Queen
The Transsexual Empire

[Anonymous No.21949995]

>>21949983
DSM-IV
/thread

[Anonymous No.21950000]

>>21949995
This.

[Anonymous No.21950004]

It's all pseudo-religious waffle about transcendental buttsex.

[Anonymous No.21950013]

>>21949983
Whipped Girl
Men Trapped in Men's Bodies

[Anonymous No.21950020]

>>21949983
Joyce H. - Trans. When Ideology meets Reality (2021)
Shrier A. - Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters (2020)
Howard S. - The Transgender-Industrial Complex (2020)
(partially) Williams J. - Women vs Feminism. Why We All Need Liberating from the Gender Wars (2017)

[Anonymous No.21950032]

>>21949983
As a tranny myself I can safely say that every book that tries to explain gender dysphoria or transgender history is shit. They're all written by sex-starved middle-aged mannish trans women who are upset cis lesbians won't fuck them.

[Anonymous No.21950038]

>>21950032
YWNBAW

[Anonymous No.21950060]

>>21950020
>Irreversible Damage

About 50% of that book is dedicated to Shrier going on about just how Jewish she is so I don't know why you fuckers keep recommending it

[Anonymous No.21950073]

>>21950032
YWNBAW

[Anonymous No.21950074]

How are women reacting to this?

[Anonymous No.21950081]

spiteful mutants

[Anonymous No.21950082]

>>21950074
baphomet?

[Anonymous No.21950095]

>>21949983
Sarrasine

[Anonymous No.21950135]

Elliot Page's upcoming memoir, Pageboy.

[Anonymous No.21950197]

>>21950135
Clownworld.

[Anonymous No.21950270]

It's a gnostic tranny cult bubbling to the surface again, it destroys civilisations.
Philo wrote about the same phenomena 2000 years ago

[Anonymous No.21950286]

>>21949988
>>21950000

[Anonymous No.21950341]

>>21949983
Silent Spring (the first modern environmentalist book, published in the 60s) documents a lake that had been grossly contaminated by hormonal birth control (I believe the site producing it was next to the lake). They found the fish to have higher rates of:
> Intersex features
> Homosexual relationships
> Asexuality
> Under development reproductive organs
> deformed reproductive organs
> Infertility

Very few fish were spared from some kind of abnormality

[Anonymous No.21950345]

[Anonymous No.21950389]

>>21950074
With blind acceptance

[Anonymous No.21950531]

>>21949983

>In a slick video released on Facebook with over one million views so far, a hyper-feminized/sexualized 8 year old boy (who some have compared to a drag version of JonBenét Ramsey) is featured partying in a hypersexual adult LGBT environment and telling kids watching that if their parents or friends do not support their desire to be drag (or trans), they need to get new parents and friends. As “Lactatia” speaks to his peers, while an all too happy host leers, bold text leaps out at the viewer saying “YOU NEED NEW PARENTS! YOU NEED NEW FRIENDS!” You too can be a drag queen or transgender superstar and perhaps head out on the town to party with the wild LGBT boys and “Lactatia.” If your parents won’t get on board, they can simply be replaced with a new “glitter family.”
https://www.studocu.com/row/document/university-of-nicosia/finance-managerial-accounting/synanon-transgender-this-is-an-essay-about-gender-issues-around-the-world-and-how-we-are-influenced/16420782

>Masked Antifa protesters show up brandishing weapons at Texas 'drag brunch' with kids

https://www.foxnews.com/us/masked-antifa-protesters-show-brandishing-weapons-texas-drag-bunch-kids

https://twitter.com/TaylerUSA/status/1564073099015897089

https://thegrayzone.com/2021/12/24/leaked-files-syria-psyops-astroturfing-breadtube-covid

https://www.city-journal.org/the-real-story-behind-drag-queen-story-hour?wallit_nosession=1

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/26/the-german-experiment-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/billionaire-family-pushing-synthetic-sex-identities-ssi-pritzkers

https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html

https://thefederalist.com/2021/11/15/transgender-professor-at-old-dominion-university-rebrands-pedophiles-as-minor-attracted-persons/
https://nypost.com/2023/01/20/couple-pimped-their-adopted-sons-out-to-pedophile-ring-report/
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/may/07/scottish-paedophile-ring-guilty-child-abuse

yes we should definitely trust these people, nothing suspicious going on in here, these are just individuals who want to express themselves and be left alone, not brainwashed tools of a totalitarian corporate social engineering agenda /s.

[Anonymous No.21950536]

>>21950531
remember this is cultural marxism if you support ''gay rights'' or ''trans rights'' if you are on the left, this is what you are supporting. anything here would have been unimaginable only ten years ago think about were we will be in ten years if we do not take out these ''people'' immediately. , smash cultural marxism through radical and uncompromising action

[Anonymous No.21950548]

>>21949983
queer theory like butler is absolute gibberish, because the point is not to make sense but to provide an ideological rationalization for the biocollectivist programme of the DNC/FEDGOV/biomed industrial complex and perverted paedo kike billionaires like the pritzkers

[Anonymous No.21950568]

Reality punishes lies. Here is an anecdote: take a man at an elite British university who is slightly autistic, a philosophy student with an awkward personality—he eventually decides he is trans and has the op. Autists often feel disconnected from their body, in all likelihood his obsessive nature decided to resolve his strange relation to his physicality with an op—if I never feel at home in my body then a gender change must be the answer, so he reasoned. He then became a prostitute in Brighton, a city well-known as an LGBT Mecca; he presented as female. One day, after he had finished with a client, he cheerfully informed the man that he was trans—a naïve statement that might be expected from a sheltered autist. The client experienced a meltdown and choked him to death and burned down the house. Reality punishes lies.

What happened was that the boy caused his client’s perceived reality to collapse. This is a dangerous thing to do to a person because, as the boy found out the hard way, when a person experiences reality collapse they often flip to extreme positions: self-harm or murder—a good reason not to spike a person’s drink with psychedelics, by the way; or, indeed, to pretend you are the opposite sex when you are not and then initiate the most intimate act possible between two humans. 1/?

[Anonymous No.21950572]

>>21949988
genderideology cannot subsist. without massive government intervention, you just want to replace the family with the compulsory education system, hospitals, journalists psychiatrists and the woke pimps and pornographers of the sex industry. as if that wouldnt be much worse

[Anonymous No.21950573]

>>21949983
Look up books about mental illness and consequences of being a degenerate faggot.

[Anonymous No.21950577]

>>21950568
the LGBT(tm) identity is based on science and evidence, not even heterosexuality is backed by as much Hard data. so instead of relying on sexual repression and christian religious superstition you should catch up to the 21st century and embrace an identity based on LOVE (aka objective scientific and psychiatric authority)


Many 4chan users are neurodivergent but have internalized the ableist prejudices of the wider society rendering them vulnerable to radicalization by incels, transphobes, russian bots and white supremacists. it would be far more radical to adopt an intersectional equity based perspective that places evidence based treatment and the lived experience of mental health consumers first and foremost in its intersections with gender race sex worker status, internalized stigma against the use of hard drugs. Besides it plays into the arguments of reactionaries to imply queer peoples identities are based on trauma and not on objective scientific and psychiatric authority

[Anonymous No.21950585]

>>21949983
there is notthing to explain they are biocollectivist NPC attack dogs brainstormed up by a democratic party think tank as a an attack wedge to increase state power

[738 Apostle No.21950590]

>>21950568
There are some people—myself included—who collapse their perceived reality all the time, mostly to move with reality; and for me this is a spiritual exercise where the final goal is to identify with unmediated consciousness and not the transitory identities that form and reform within me—the various personas crafted by the ego. However, to collapse perceived reality involuntarily and without experience beforehand is an event that disturbs; some people encounter what is essentially an ego death through drugs, near-death experiences, uncovered adultery, the revelation that they are adopted, sudden loss of work, and so on. Occasionally, I suggest, in jest, that the world would benefit if the water supply was spiked with LSD; actually, this would almost certainly be catastrophic—and it would also violate other people’s psychic integrity. It is true that the world would be improved if all people—trans or otherwise—became more loosely attached to the personas their egos craft; and yet people must come to that discipline if called to it, you cannot impose it on them.

You see you could sleep with an enlightened master and then reveal you are actually the opposite sex; he would smile and laugh, not being attached to any particular presentation—it is all a play, only emptiness is reality. Yet this is what our boy expected, a saintly man who visits whores; he was naïve: he thought the world is filled with saints, people who are infinite in their tolerance and forgiveness. Of course, he was spoilt: mum and dad provided, approved, and welcomed his broad-minded outlook and his cute little performances. “We’ll support you, whatever you decide.” Yet reality is not an audience that adores you—and it is not infinitely forgiving, except to those who serve it; no forgiveness and infinite comprehension without respect, and this boy did not respect reality—now playtime is over. 2/?

[738 Apostle No.21950594]

>>21950590
I must admit, incidentally, that I have almost no interest in the trans issue whatsoever. I once chatted with someone who made occasional references to “troons”, and, since he was associated with the right, I for a time thought it was slang for “octoroon”—an 18th-century term for people with 1/8 African blood; actually, as I eventually found out, it is a derogatory term for a trans person. I was pretty ignorant about this issue; and though I mention it from time to time it leaves me largely indifferent.

Everyone knows that it is an issue that impacts a tiny, tiny group; and yet it has become a central cleavage in the division between in-out groups that characterises the left-right divide in the West. Personally, I doubt that half the statements—for or against—transgender issues are deeply felt by either side, except that the whole business, along with climate change, pretty much demonstrates which team you are on at the moment; so if you want to play, you better express a strong view in this regard. This is not to say the issue is insignificant, for if the trans activists get what they want then the changes to society will be very far-reaching and profound; and the left will merely roll on to the next issue, almost certainly sex with children; remember, once it is established that someone can begin a transition to another gender very early there is no reason why they should not have sex as well—and the leftist activist treadmill, the leftist religion, eagerly seeks new issues; and I am sure it will be this one.

So as an issue in itself I am indifferent as regards the trans; if someone wants to cut off their balls, wear a dress, and asks me to call them “Susan” I have no objection. I doubt it is a good idea, but if you really want that…Yet, of course, this is not really the issue at stake; it is about compulsion, not harmless eccentrics who have always existed and always will (as do their more malevolent companions)—and it is also about reality distortion. For what the left demands with this issue, as with so many others, is that you accept their reality and accept it under compulsion from the state; when Jordan Peterson protested against compelled pronoun use he was on the right track as regards this issue. For as we shall see, this is just another gambit for control—and status accentuation. 3/?

[738 Apostle No.21950598]

>>21950594

We must pause here to consider language use, very crucial to this issue. So far I have said “trans”, yet the issue is currently presented as being about “gender” and not “the transsexuals”—indeed, whether we are in a discussion about gender or sex is quite important to the way this issue is framed. I will often speak about “sex” in this essay, although I accept that there is such a concept as gender too. I was once interviewed on a podcast by someone with strong views against trans activism, and he was adamant that “gender” should not be used at all—and suggested it had been invented by the CIA for nefarious purposes. In the sense I understand “gender” this is what I mean: the cultural ways in which sex is expressed differ; so that, for example, a kilt is functionally a dress and yet is male attire because it is so in Scotland—and it is so because it is nested within a wider sign system that is, in turn, linked to biological and spiritual sex.

So far as I can tell, trans activists just take the cultural analysis of gender, of how a kilt comes to be a man’s item of clothing, and then act as if this sign system does not plug in anywhere else—not to biology, or to spirituality. Obviously, gender is malleable; it would be possible—though difficult—to change a kilt into a purely female clothing article, though it would require very coercive and highly propagandistic measures; yet to change what a kilt signifies does not change biological sex or spiritual divisions between the sexes. I suppose that basically gender is never completely isomorphic with biological or spiritual sex expressions, and it is the fact that sign systems do not always map precisely onto other layers of reality that trans activists exploit—and yet if given freedom, gender and sex align almost seamlessly.

I think at heart, as I will discuss later, the left admits that nobody changes sex; at some point in my life the language moved from “transsexual” to “transgender”; and the tacit admission in that move is that the cultural signifiers can float and be adopted at will with no reference to biology or spirituality, although sex never changes. Note also, “transgender” is a word that makes it difficult to speak about an individual; it is literally a they word—you cannot say, “He’s a transgender,” in the way you can say about someone, “He’s a transsexual.” This gives us a clue as to why the language was changed, it is about an attempt to destroy the individual; it is an attempt to make Heidegger’s inauthentic “they” more than a philosophical abstraction, to make it a concrete actuality 4/?

[738 Apostle No.21950601]

>>21950598
It is socialised language and it actually makes it difficult to articulate the process underway, since, for example, I could not say the boy I described at the beginning was “a transgender”, whereas I could have said he was “a transsexual”. As with many leftist ideas, it is a profane inversion—we are meant to lose our individuality through contact with the Godhead, not efface the individual through language. As with all leftist language use, the intention is to obscure and make the issue difficult to talk about; and its terminal goal is to create an in-group identity that anyone, whatever they feel about sexuality, can adopt—hence the enormous recorded increase in teenagers who identify as LGBT.

Stated correctly, to change gender means: “I can adopt various signifiers and physiognomic features so as to more or less mimic the sign system that indicates the other gender.” Embedded within this idea is the admission that nobody changes sex; and when the right protests that nobody can change sex they, in a sense, talk past the left—the left does not even claim that. The right’s assertion, put fully, could be said to be: “Sex and gender are isomorphic, except in some very marginal cases where dysfunction has occurred—or when there is a novel development that has yet been processed by culture in accordance with the biological and spiritual dimorphism.”

To return to the play of masks: trans people change masks, but just because they change masks does not mean that they are not attached to their masks; theirs is not a spiritual position, generally they are absolute materialists—so they exchange one rigid identity for another, they are still asleep. In some ways they are more asleep than most people, for they often impose their new masks through pure intellectual will—especially if autistic—and that is not an organic development, it does not move with the real; it moves with the egotistic desire to impose an intellectual narrative on reality: it is, of course, literally pride; the view that what you have crafted in your mind can be imposed on reality by verbal fiat—though reality only gives you rewards if you open yourself to it, acknowledge your nothingness before it. 5/?

[Anonymous No.21950603]

>>21950531
>foxnews
>twitter
>etc.
Kindly f*** off with your off topic ragebait.

[Anonymous No.21950606]

>>21950568
YWNBAW is murder?

[738 Apostle No.21950607]

>>21950601
So not to inform someone that you are trans when you are is abusive. I hate to use this much, well, abused word; but there is no better word—it is to abuse a person’s trust as regards the most intimate possible human relationship. To do so is to open the possibility that you could inflict an involuntary ego death on someone; the results, not uncommonly, run to murder and suicide—or profound dislocation and distress. What has been done is to consciously manipulate a person’s perceived reality and their grasp on it; and this is abusive, it is to reach into and distort another person’s fundamental sense of self and so it is the deepest violation possible—aside from rape. It is effectively to rape another person’s soul. A boundary has been violated and a person’s most intimate property has been tampered with, as if you broke into their house and rearranged all their furniture—and then, if they then complained, said it did not happen or that they had a latent desire to have their furniture messed around with anyway (“You’re just latently gay; deal with it, sweety. You’re only angry because you’re gay, really.”)

The left frequently complains that it is being gaslit; of course, it is the primary gaslighter; the left seeks to control through narratives that induce shame and build in-out group dynamics based on resentment. Trans activists often jump back to a rather antique Freudian line that people who do not wish to sleep with the trans or express disdain in this regard are merely repressed or latent homosexuals. Strange, really, since as we shall see the trans issue is very much connected with our cybernetic world and not Freud’s world where everything is pistons and pressurised steam that seeks a means to escape the unconscious and its steel pressure chamber. It is besides the point; even if someone is latently homosexual, the way to help them is not to seduce them under the guise that you are a woman; if someone is in serious psychological conflict about their sexuality it is unlikely to be helpful to distort their perception of reality, to distort it further—it might even lead to murder or suicide. Of course, it is all baloney; an attempt to undermine opposition to the trans through shame and gaslighting, nothing to do with genuine attempts to help people who are conflicted in their sexuality or to come to an accurate assessment as regards reality. 6/?

[738 Apostle No.21950611]

>>21950607
Besides, in truth, I doubt that homosexuals are made; I think they are born, and their numbers are probably no more than 1.5% of any population at the very most—though a common fantasy, understandably, for homosexuals is that “everyone is like us really” and if we can get them drunk or fool them their real desires will come out. They retain a large influence for three reasons: they tend to have above-average intelligence; they tend to work in highly loyal clandestine networks; and thirdly, unfree societies, in which we live, use perverse people as enforcers to control the population—people with no families have no loyalty, except to their patrons. Hence, as Gibbon observed, the eunuch emerges when a society has become a decadent tyranny; the eunuch thrives in Byzantine imperial politics, and as a man with no stake in society he is loyal only to power—not family or other organic links. Hence for the trans issue to explode in America, the greatest empire the world has ever seen, makes sense; the empire is decadent and Byzantine, the eunuchs—the trans—have arrived on schedule.

A common line taken by the trans is that if a sexual partner cannot tell the difference then it does not matter either way; and so the trans issue is partly an issue for our time because it is about simulation and virtuality; and we live in an environment that is highly virtualised and simulated, and everyone feels we are on the cusp: some even more sophisticated virtuality awaits, just slightly over the horizon. 7/?

[738 Apostle No.21950613]

>>21950611
Behind the transsexual issue lurks the question, “Can a machine (a technological artefact, rather like a trans body) be human?” “Can it imitate humanity perfectly, and is to imitate a thing to be it?” The trans issue runs in parallel with climate change: we are meant to eat artificial meat to avert climate change; and we are meant to copulate with artificial trans bodies, perhaps to reduce the population that consumes so many resources—sterility is virtuous. Again, the question arises as to whether the simulation matches reality and whether you can tell the difference—if it makes any difference at all.

“All the correct tastebuds are stimulated, what do you mean it’s not meat?” “The neurones for sexual stimulation in a heterosexual man have fired in the correct order, what do you mean this person you slept with is not a woman?”. Those are empirical claims, incidentally; and even if it is not consciously expressed the correct circuits, so to speak, are not engaged when people eat fake meat or meet men who masquerade as girls. No, this is uncanny valley territory and the uncanny is essential to horror; hence the trans issue evokes horror, something has been covered up: when it is exposed the screams begin…the house is burned down. 8/?

[Anonymous No.21950619]

>>21950603
i mean when LGBTSJWTFDNC political soldiers can only post the same copypasta about republicans or catholic priests raping children, because they are not actually against pedophilia, they are against outgroup and they are for the party that advances their biocollectivist agenda. I mean at least conservatives and christians tried to keep the child abuse discreet and at a respectable level, they saw it as something shameful and wrong that wasnt supposed to happen. but the left and LGBT want to brainwash us all into thinking its actually progressive and normal.

[738 Apostle No.21950623]

>>21950613
The simple answer to this is to imagine a restaurant that finds a way to make sausages from sewage. The sewage is treated, shaped, and flavoured so as to be indistinguishable from a real sausage. Has the restaurant done anything wrong? In law, certainly so—and if you were fooled and found out you would want redress. Why? Because it is wrong to coerce people, and that includes coercion with lies; whether or not the sewage-meat is excellent or deeply unhealthy is neither here nor there—the crime lies in coercive deception. This answer is sufficient in itself without any recourse to questions about what constitutes a real man or woman; no need to evoke biology, metaphysics, or God.

Yet, on the other hand, we still ask: “How is the sausage made?” To say that it does not matter how the sausage is made indicates a guilty conscience; if there is truly no difference then the factory floor would be opened up and we would all see the sausage—or, correctly, see how the sausage is turned into a vagina. Yet the coercive deception—the lie—exists because this exposure is feared. As with “Beyond Meat” products, as with fiat currency, and as with the trans, the right wants the authentic and the real: the left says we should be satisfied with appearances, for quality implies discrimination—and that is bad. 9/?

[738 Apostle No.21950624]

>>21950623
As soon as you say: “Well, being trans is fine but do not deceive anyone else as you go about it,” you find, funnily enough, that you are in the anti-trans camp; and why that should be so we shall see later, for all is not as it seems as regards this demand to “be women”. For now, it is enough to say that coercive deception is wrong—whatever the product, so to speak, you sell; and, indeed, did an excellent product ever need deception, or even advertisement? Certainly not, quality speaks for itself.

Yet all this has been a distraction, a wander up the garden path; for, in fact, the contemporary question over transgender issues does not concern verisimilitude at all; it is nothing to do with how plausible an imitation woman can be made, for, according to contemporary beliefs, it is enough to declare that your pronouns are now she/her and not he/him for the change to be in effect—and even the pronouns they/them indicate that this is not really about dimorphism in sex. So far as I know, it is not even necessary to change your appearance or dress in any special way. If I woke up tomorrow and said, “I’m a woman now,” and placed a few pronouns in my Twitter biography then that would be enough; no need to change anything else—no need even to raid my aunt’s closet for a bra into which I could stuff a few socks, no need to buy a wig on Amazon, no need to slip into some second-hand heels, no need to tuck my substantial member into a steel-wired box-shaped undergarment. No need even to take these minimal steps, all that is required is that I feel a certain way and make a public declaration; if I do so, I am as good as the next woman—at least so far as this belief system goes. 10/?

[738 Apostle No.21950627]

>>21950624
It is possible to imagine a government that established fully objective criteria for people who claimed to have transitioned: surgery to a particular standard, government-approved vaginas only (a terrifying thought, surely “HMG-standard” vagina would be grey and with a sandpaper consistency); breasts in five or six approved sizes, with nipples in one or two shades; mandatory speech therapy and behavioural courses to pass so that daily behaviour met a minimum feminine standard—the qualifications to be a woman could be quite rigorous. Yet nothing like this is proposed: there will be no “woman licence”, annually renewed or otherwise—and that is because the belief system has no interest in femininity or masculinity; it merely says that words and feelings can change reality, and, further, everyone else is obliged to respect your words and feelings under pain of government sanction, media disapproval, and social opprobrium.

So it turns out that this has nothing to do with sex or gender after all. Everyone engaged in earnest beard-tugging as to whether 7 out of 10 heterosexual men would judge a trans vagina to be indistinguishable from the indigenous article bark up the wrong tree. Whether or not a trans can “pass”, whether there is metaphysical sexual dimorphism, and whether or not certain genetic clusters happen to conform to long-standing sex differences encoded in cultural institutions are all neither here nor there.

Correctly stated, the current transgender movement’s demand is not, “Recognise people who were born biologically and spiritually male as female.” Put accurately the demand is actually: “Whatever we say or feel about reality must be granted as true.” To refute this position does not require an appeal to genetics, the Bible, advanced philosophy, or postmodernism—or anything. I get up in the morning and say, “I am a beachball.” During the day, I bounce about a lot and generally behave like a beachball. By the day’s end I observe that I have not turned into a beachball—it is demonstrated that I cannot state that I am a thing and then become it by verbal fiat; at best I can mimic some superficial elements about it. 11/?

[738 Apostle No.21950629]

>>21950627
As already mentioned, everyone involved in this game—and it is very much a game—knows that really. Where does this all come from, then? It comes about because Nietzsche was correct: life is a vicious power struggle, specifically a struggle for status—a struggle lived out through values; and this struggle is partly conducted through language. In other words, if I can make other people call me a thing—especially if that proposition is ridiculous in common sense terms, then I am a pretty damn high-status individual. The phenomenon was named by the acidulous blogger Spandrell, “Point deer, make horse,” in homage to a Chinese fable about a corrupt emperor. We live in a society that considers femininity, victimhood, and minority status as the highest values; ergo, men who wish to be very high status, who follow the status economy closely, will want to be: firstly, feminine; secondly, victims; and thirdly, a minority. To become trans is the trifecta, transgender people are: feminine, victims, and a minority. The person who can impose his verbal fiat over society—make his underlings call him a girl when he blatantly is not—represents the top dog, no doubt.

Everyone knows that elites counter-signal their contemporaries by playing poor, always have done; only the poor want to be ostentatiously rich, the rich want to play pauper; not least to reduce envy from the poor—and transgenderism is a great way to play pauper; and this is why we hear so much about how transgender people are victimised via crime statistics; the greater the victim, the more holy and high value. In this transvaluation of values the lower classes can then be demonised, turned into the out-group “the cis”—the unwashed out-group who have not been inducted into the special jargon, the sign regime, that is used to explain transgenderism; a complex jargon mostly taught and developed at the most elite universities, by the way.

The unwashed and unlettered majority retain isomorphic sex and gender; hence they must become “the cis”: the word is simply the opposite to “trans”, as in “Cisalpine Gaul” (Gaul on this side of the Alps, as opposed to “Transalpine Gaul” on the far side). Yet forget this Latin etymology for a moment, the reason “cis” is used as an out-group designator is to goad and manipulate; it suggests negative femininity, as in “sissy”, and it also has a sororal relationship to “comrade”—it suggests that we shall become like “sisters” together. 12/?

[738 Apostle No.21950632]

>>21950629
This is why the conservatives who contest transgenderism slightly miss the point when they talk about biology, tradition, or the Bible. The people they are in discussion with—or in a fight with—know all that well enough. Indeed, to deny reality is the point: only really high-status people can afford to deny reality and be blatantly contradictory and hypocritical; if you can be hypocritical and get away with it—force other people to acquiesce to your ridiculous assertions—you must be very valuable indeed. So the hypocrisy and contradictory assertions are the point; to punish the unwashed for their inability to keep up with the lexical dynamics within transgenderism demonstrates status—this is much more than whether or not a person passes as female, as variations such as “Xer” show. As Julius Caesar, another Latin, observed, “We came, we saw, we kicked their ass.”

This is the classic left-right division at play: the right represents the masculine position, and the left the feminine position. The feminine position says: “Words can change reality, and words should not hurt how I feel about myself. This is about how I feel as regards my contemporaries, you must respect it (it is about my status; my narcissism and insecurity when reality confronts me).” The right says: “There is an objective reality out there; here is the evidence—facts don’t care about your feelings.” Essentially, you can do absolutely nothing with your life, but if you claim to be transgender in some way—there are many variations, you do not even have to be snipped—then you can become an in-group person and claim status as a victim; very high status, in fact. There are even laws about what people can say about you, just as with the king in olden days.

However, the right’s error is that it attempts to negotiate or debate with the left—it debates and negotiates with emotions. Rationally, this is pointless: you cannot debate or reason away an emotion, or a purported emotion. Possibly, one-on-one, you could get behind the logic that underlies the emotion (or the lie); but practically, in public debate, it cannot be done. This indicates that pundits like Ben Shapiro are not really doing what they claim they are doing; you cannot oppose an emotion with facts and logic—yet this is precisely what they claim to do; either they are grifters, or simply masochists who want to lose and then have a moan about it. Probably they derive some narcissistic satisfaction from the act that they are “rational” and “logical”; yet this has nothing to do with actual facts or logic—or winning. The situation comes about, in part, because the right is already very feminised: it thinks you should negotiate with women, but if you do that then you will always lose; you cannot stably negotiate with emotions—emotions are non-negotiable. 13/?

[738 Apostle No.21950636]

>>21950632
For example, if someone comes to you in tears—periodically they let out a scream—it is pretty futile to use facts and logic on them, at least not immediately; perhaps you could help them with some Stoic thought and philosophy when they have calmed down sufficiently—in the immediate situation, they need to be contained; stroked, hugged, or calmed down. Yet this is not really the situation we face with the left-right divide; the left pretends emotions; it is more akin to a toddler who sits down in a supermarket aisle and maintains their feet are “hurty” and refuses to move unless they are carried—probably there is some truth to it, the child is tired; substantially, they make out they are in more pain than they actually are to get an easy ride.

It is emotion, in this sense, that the left deploys; again, there is no point in negotiation—not with a real emotion, and certainly not with a pretended emotion. I knew a man who was in so much emotional distress after his mother died that he was literally slapped on the cheek by his wife, since that was what it required to snap him back to reality—no room to negotiate there. Even less room if the other person has faked an emotion to get what they want: you cannot negotiate with a lie. To meet emotion and lies with reason, logic, and negotiation is to waste your time. This was why Trump was so effective; no narcissistic huff-and-puff about reason and logic, he just said that woke people are losers—he met emotion with emotion, or with emotional truth.

Indeed, the entire LGBT movement has never, ever been about homosexuality or people who genuinely feel that are the wrong sex. From the start, it was founded by former Marxists—such as Harry Hay—on the hunt for a new cause; just as the Marxist-Leninists used “national liberation” as a wedge to attack the West, so it was decided in the 1960s to use “gay liberation” as a new non-class wedge against the West. The Marxist-Leninists always intended to do away with the nationalists once their goal had been reached, just as the LGBT movement has no inherent interest in homosexuality—actually it has substantially left homosexuals and all other groups under its umbrella worse off; not every gay person is homosexual, and not every homosexual is gay. 14/?

[738 Apostle No.21950641]

>>21950636
The reason the transgender movement is so broad in its linguistic conception—from xer to they—is that it is meant to provide a parallel in-group marker to set against organic society; just as men in a car factory were meant to identify as proletarians in the old days. It has nothing integrally to do with sexuality; as previously noted, anyone can join—become “queer” or “trans”—whenever they want. The kernel—people who are genuinely homosexual or confused about their sex identity—finds itself expanded out, so that now large numbers of teenagers identify with these labels; perhaps they consider a little surgery here and there, a modest snip. Again, this is not a development that can be countered by facts about biological sex; it simply is not about that issue, even in its own terms.

This is all a logical outgrowth from feminism, incidentally. The so-called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) are doomed—as with all conservatives—to lose. The reason is fairly simple: feminism asserts that men and women are equal; if there are inequalities between men and women then this can only be due to residual bigotry, biased institutions, and so on. From this it follows that the division between male and female is arbitrary; if we are fundamentally equal, how can there be any difference? No, any differences arise from arbitrary and unjust impositions—attempts to exploit people who have been designated “women”, just as America’s criminal justice system exists to exploit people who are called “black”. So the idea that gender is, as they say, a social construct that can be mutated at will remains entirely consistent with what feminism must mean; note well, the idea that gender can be changed at will with a new biography—new pronouns—constitutes arbitrary action. “Why is this so?” “Because I say it is.” Thus spoke every tyrant in the history of the world.

I do like the name “TERF”; it is quite evocative, since it suggests that these women inherently wish to defend their “turf”, they want to stand their ground—and their ground is biological sex. Although they will deny it to the Heavens, they constitute the right; and this is because as soon as you start to engage with reality even your language becomes rightist in nature. “We will defend our turf as women.” It is only the same as the patriot who wishes to defend his physical turf from foreign incursions, the businessman who wishes to defend his property from confiscation, or the religious person who wishes to defend the integrity of their rites. It also rightly establishes that it is the transgender movement that constitutes the aggressor; the person who decides to stand their ground does so because he has been transgressed against—nobody decides to stand their ground out of the blue; no, we stand our ground in response to a specific threat. 15/?

[Anonymous No.21950642]

>>21949983
Scenes from drag events hosted across the United States in bars, clubs, and outdoor festivals have been even more shocking and disturbing: in Miami, a man with enormous fake breasts and dollar bills stuffed into his G-string grabs the hand of a preschool-aged girl and struts her in front of the crowd; in Washington, D.C., a drag queen wearing leather and chains teaches a young child how to dance for cash tips; in Dallas, hulking male figures with makeup smeared across their faces strip down to undergarments, simulate a female orgasm, and perform lap dances on members of a roaring audience of adults and children. Newspaper headlines have also announced abuses: “Tucson High School Counselor Behind Teen Drag Show Arrested for Relationship with Minor”; “Houston Public Library Admits Registered Child Sex Offender Read to Kids in Drag Queen Storytime”; “Drag Queen Charged with 25 Counts of Felony Child Sexual Abuse Material Possession”; “Second ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ Reader in Houston Exposed as Convicted Child Sex Offender”; “Drag Queen Story Hour Activist Arrested for Child Porn, Still Living with His Adopted Kids.”

Advocates of Drag Queen Story Hour might reply that these are outlier cases and that many of the child-oriented events feature drag queens reading books and talking about gender, not engaging in sexualized performances. But the spirit of drag is predicated on the transgressive sexual element and the ideology of queer theory, which cannot be erased by switching the context and softening the language. The philosophical and political project of queer theory has always been to dethrone traditional heterosexual culture and elevate what Rubin called the “sexual caste” at the bottom of the hierarchy: the transsexual, the transvestite, the fetishist, the sadomasochist, the prostitute, the porn star, and the pedophile. Drag Queen Story Hour can attempt to sanitize the routines and run criminal background checks on its performers, but the subculture of queer theory will always attract men who want to follow the ideology to its conclusions.

[Anonymous No.21950644]

>>21950032
Kys tranny

[738 Apostle No.21950647]

>>21950641
Doubtless PhDs and popular books are in preparation even now on the topic; just as Susan Sontag produced AIDS as a Metaphor, an extraordinary book in which she condemned doctors and scientists who spoke about AIDS as if they were engaged in a battle—as if bodies had borders that were violated or subverted by outside invaders, as if you should be concerned that hostile entities have entered your body and undermined it from within. This disturbed Sontag; although it is simply a truth that evolution produces entities—undetectable to your immune system—that undermine your immune system and allow other hostile entities to destroy your body; evolution has produced such organisms—some barely even alive, being more like dead matter, such as the AIDS virus—in many forms.

Yet to use such language could, possibly, spark another holocaust, averred Sontag. And so I fully expect that there will be an earnest thesis on the TERFs: “TERFs and turf: blood and soil rhetoric in 21st-century post-fascist movements”—you can fill in the blanks. Yet doctors talk about AIDS—and other infections—as if these are invasive entities, armies, and covert infiltrators because when someone is infected with such a virus it really is a battle; the language is isomorphic with reality.

Sontag produced fantastic critiques as regards language; and she rightly, for example, noted how AIDS arrived with the computer virus—and how the language around both meshed; both were created by a networked world, networks of modem-tapped telephone lines and networks of air routes that facilitate global viral transmission work on similar principles—and can probably be modelled in a similar way. Yet she never proposed an alternative way to described reality; and that is because there is no alternative, to quote Sontag’s contemporary—Margaret Thatcher. The language is sound, you really do battle AIDS—you do not have a tender conversation with it. So what Sontag—people like her—propose to do is simply cover up reality, forbid people to describe their experiences; indeed, you could say that Sontag belongs with those people who oppose revelation. 16/?

[738 Apostle No.21950653]

>>21950647
Yet the TERFs will lose; they have decided to defend a property, femininity—yet feminism socialises women; even de Beauvoir, the rather forgotten but paradigmatic 20th-century feminist, held that “femaleness” was not biologically determined; if a woman has a hysterectomy, she says in The Second Sex, then she is still a woman—not due to hormones or genetics, but because she lives in the sign system that signals her as feminine; in other words, feminists have never thought biological sex is connected to femininity—if they did, they could not be feminists. The precondition for this outlook—a departure from reality, as with all leftist ideas—has been inherent within feminism from the start. The TERFs fight within the egalitarian structure laid down by feminism; yet they cannot be consistent and logical—if they were, they would admit there is no sex equality. Yet they cannot do this; and so their opponents will own them, for they take the logic of feminism to its correct conclusion: there is no difference between man and woman—save arbitrary and unjust impositions—therefore, if I say I am a woman I am one. If you have a problem with that it merely demonstrates your self-hatred and unconscious misogyny.

The TERFs will also lose because their opponents are very often highly successful and aggressive men; real alpha-male types. For various reasons connected to psychopathology, a certain male type—instantiated in Caitlyn Jenner and Zoey Tur, the former a top athlete and the latter a hyper-aggressive newshound—often wants to take the transgender route; in part, this relates to a desire to be high status; these men have often achieved everything possible in their careers, the final status gambit is to become a woman—a great physical and mental challenge that also grants them, as white males, the hitherto unrealised status boon that comes with femininity and victimhood. Men were always behind feminism, and these new man-woman feminists will easily brush aside the butch lesbians, tomboys, and TERFs. These are men who get things done and get what they want—in business, sport, and politics—and so they will have it their way, as men always do. 17/?

[Anonymous No.21950655]

>>21950603
its ragebait! you are a domestic terrorist if you are on the least bit upset about this totalitarian religious movement being literally shoved down childrens throats. how dare you haver thoughts not approved by my political party NGO propaganda apparatus,.how dare you not surrender freedom and the innocence of your children out of pity for me!

[738 Apostle No.21950658]

>>21950653
Incidentally, these men are the same type as the serial killer Russell Williams, a British-Canadian air force colonel who had a storied career until he was picked up as a serial killer; he murdered women and liked to wear and photograph himself in their underwear after the act. Perhaps, in time, this would have developed into a desire to be transgender. It is men like Williams—special forces heroes and the like—who often take the transgender route. They are highly intelligent, ruthless, and remorseless in their actions; and perhaps have a touch of autism too, Williams’s father was a nuclear engineer. In short, the type of man who likes softcore girly pics that depict “a girl with a gun”, a look beloved by a certain libertarian type in the States: the men who want to become, literally, girls with guns. This type will get what they want, I am quite sure—they always have done in the past; and I would not be surprised if I hear that Williams has requested to transition to womanhood in prison—a very logical, perhaps desirable, way to ease his sentence.

Hence, the few times I have chatted up trans people on Tinder, I noticed that they take a sadistic pleasure in the fact they think a man is fooled and on the line; it is easy to tell from their language—in reality, they know they are not real women; it is all a charade, and they enjoy the charade and the chance to play with another person’s reality. And why not? For many are the Russell Williams variety; men are sadistic—especially men who, say, have had a stellar career in the special forces or the military. Obviously, you can pump them with the relevant female hormones but the old masculine desire to torture or be sadistic remains intact. Further, many will have transitioned purely as the ultimate status enhancement; they are only there for the status, the old ultra-competitive masculine heart beats on. Sure, some are the rather wet and basically confused boys—as with my first example—but the advanced guard are not. These “women” are hard as nails, I tell ye—and, frankly, rather malevolent. 18/?

[Anonymous No.21950660]

>>21949983
Transgenderism is a synthetic collectivist identity being promoted by the DNC the biomedical industry and billionaires like soros and the pritzkers. it is an inherently pedophilic identity because children are not born ''trans'' or ''gay'' they are no longer campaigning for individual rights but for the right to determine what is psychologically normal, to censor their oponents and impose their ideology through the compulsory education system.. an ideology essentially based on bare life and war on terror ideology, and ultimately serving elite interest groups. any criticism of the identity based political machine is tantamount to a genocidal assault on the identity itself. if you are lgbt your very existence as a synthetic collectivist identity associated with pritzker/soros social enginnering programs is a threat to the idea of individualism. there is no such thing as trans genocide because the goal of transgenderism has always been an elite led campaign of demoralization and cultural genoicide waged by an elite against the majority population,.

[738 Apostle No.21950661]

>>21950658
So, in conclusion, this whole issue has very little to do with sexuality and sex changes; a tiny kernel—a tiny eccentric or psychopathological minority—has been settled upon as a useful tool to work over the system: the incentives have been created by the inner logic found within gay liberation, feminism, and the equalities legislation that has been passed in the West over the years. It is the “they” ideology; the idea that everything is collective, and that there is no private property—and consequently no individual, since “they” own it; socialism by verbal fiat, linguistic abolition of the individual. The fact that the overall value system has long venerated the female, the victim, and the (deformed) minority meant that this issue would be picked up pushed through by, well, ambitious men. When this issue has triumphed, a new one will be on the agenda and the process will begin again—probably some conservative transgender people will break off and announce that what was once a pure and good movement has gone too far and become irrational.

Possibly Western societies will have ceased to function by then, for I am not sure that you can unglue from reality to the extent that law protects the statement, “What I feel to be true is true.” I am not sure that a society can survive when child sex becomes normalised; not because there will be some general uprising against such a move—nobody cares about other people’s children—but simply because to depart from reality to that extent is unsustainable.

In its esoteric aspect, the transgender movement is about a desire to become a hermaphrodite—a particular way to know God, a path followed by Jesus and Moses and the Buddha. Yet, as materialists, the transgender make this idea—the union of the masculine and the feminine—into a parody; it is a spiritual operation, not a literal one. Magic is real, but it does not work by verbal fiat; you have to work at it: you cannot just say, “Now I can fly,” and jump out a window—you need a broomstick at the very least. Yet this is precisely what transgenderism attempts, doubtless literal operations and derangement with pronouns accomplish some magic effects—especially among the burgeoning trans movement found among computer programmers, a priesthood of sorts. Yet, substantially, this is a movement that covers up reality; it covers up consciousness, the divine—and so no matter how many genitals are hacked off in Bangkok, you will find few true hermaphrodites among the transgendered. 19/19

[Anonymous No.21950662]

>>21950270
So uhhh, eyaculating in femboy prostate is bad?

[Anonymous No.21950664]

>>21949983
Waste of time. Whole thing wouldn't exist the way it does current year without the massive propaganda campaigns and astroturfing of all media, particularly the internet. It's just most people don't even question their constant connection to this matrix of hubbub, noise, confusion, and the overflow of information that comes with it.

I'd say gender dysphoria definitely exists, but it's rightly classified as a mental illness and should be dealt with through self-acceptance, not affirmation.

[Anonymous No.21950672]

>>21949983
le fake FBI 'insurrection' means you should send your children to be raped! le ebbin queer leftists are just the people who mindlessly defend DEI HR corporate bureaucracies, compulsory education and the biomedical psychiatric pharma complex the 'progressive security state' and the sex industry like the dumbest of dumb right wingers defend the church police and military.

[Anonymous No.21950676]

A 10 minute video. It's not complicated
https://youtu.be/fpGqFUStcxc

[Anonymous No.21950679]

>>21950676
JUST TAKE THE VACCINE, ANON
>When Palestinian residents of the besieged West Bank town of Ramallah turned on their TVs over the weekend, what they encountered was neither news nor any of the usual Palestinian Authority programming; they encountered pornographic movie clips.

>Three of the four TV stations in Ramallah, headquarters of Yasser Arafat, had been occupied by Israeli troops. The town’s remaining TV station was meanwhile running a crawl at the bottom of the screen explaining that the porn clips were the work of the occupying forces. “We urge parents to take precautions,” it read.

>Israel is not below exposing families and children to pornography against their will. I mean, what did we expect? They’re not below murdering children outright, so exposing them to graphic sexual images is a step up as far as Zionist morality is concerned.

>Replacing Palestinian news and other programming with such material also increases the stress and frustration of the populace. Remember, Ramallah’s residents were unable to leave their homes, even to buy groceries. Their need for information was intense. Israeli forces had the option of taking the TV stations off the air entirely. Instead, they left them operating, but broadcasting “replacement” imagery. The pornography may well have been even more demoralizing than no programming at all.


>George Soros and his charitable organization, Open Society Foundations (OSF), in advocating for the full decriminalization of the sex trade industry. Research finds that OSF spends only a small amount of money on grass roots “sex worker” groups around the world advocating for full decriminalization, but the foundation awards larger amounts of funds to large human rights groups whose reports and policies have a wider reach.
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=dignity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H7rqkXXb98 [Embed]

>Leaked files expose Syria psyops veteran astroturfing BreadTube star to counter Covid restriction critics
>Valent Projects staffer Hamish Falconer has disclosed that the “exciting” Challenging Pseudoscience campaign has also received “generous support” from the Open Society Foundations of CIA-adjacent billionaire George Soros.
tranny breadtube star philosophytube collaborated with adam ruins everything. xe also did videos about normalizing ''sex work''. the reason leftist propaganda makes you feel like you are at the receiving end of a root canal, its george soros and prince charles trying to buckbreak and quintuple vaxx you into a fierce fetanyl affirming sex worker.

https://thegrayzone.com/2021/12/24/leaked-files-syria-psyops-astroturfing-breadtube-covid

[Anonymous No.21950683]

>>21950572
Exactly, that's why I quoted this infamous book. Trans ideology is just the new frontier of the socialist ideological destruction of the family and the gender models it was based upon.

[Anonymous No.21950686]

>>21950661
didn't read. can you sum it up in 2-3 sentences?

[Anonymous No.21950690]

>>21950679
5mg risperidone taken rectally with a healthy dose of bbc

[Anonymous No.21950695]

>>21950686
>>21950661
TL:DR the whole history of occultism can be understood as a series of rationalizations for homosexual behaviour

[Anonymous No.21950699]

>>21950695
alright, and what's your reasoning and sources behind that?

[Anonymous No.21950701]

>>21949983
I know you made this thread for ragebait but unironically read whipping girl.

[Anonymous No.21950703]

>>21950701
marginalized folx have every reason to trust progressive bourgeoisie and managerial strata over fascist white settlers who want them dead.we have every right to deplaatform fascists and reactionaries and class reductionists and capitalist realists and science deniers and ensure safety for marginalized and vulnerable members of our communities. out for what they are: white supremacist domestic terrorists! If you are not with us then you are with the terrorists! We have every right to demand the destigmatization and normalization of sex work, mental health, fat positivity, pornography, drug use, decolonization prison abolition police abolition family abolition the sexual enmancipation of children and an end to white supremacy and the gender binary and the abolition of a white supremacist culture based on the tyranny of the written word.

Instead of pandering to the most backward sectors of the working class we should lead the way along with the most advanced ones, black and indigenous people, and queer/ trans sex workers. Sex workers not the straight male labour aristokkkracy who are at the vanguard of the proletarian movement, women and queer people taking the means of production into their own hands by refusing to perform unpaid sexual and emotional labor for white men.

The real class struggle is not in factories but in womens bodies. Sexwork is a threat to patriarchy the capitalist system itself it is radically queer because it goes against the idea that sex is for the reproduction of the nuclear family and the patriarchal ideology of romantic love. Its a means for workers to take the means of production into their own hands here and now to abolish the distinction between the private sphere and the public, between work and pleasure and self expression. To break down the walls of lily white christian suburbia into a brave new world of pleasure rebellion and freedom. Yes it is true what they say about us queer postmodern neomarxists We are gonna groom all your daughters to be whores and your sons to be nympho trans sex workers

[738 Apostle No.21950706]

>>21950686
I can try. Basically 738 x 738’s argument is that Trans are mentally ill power tripping maniacs who attempted to manipulate reality by verbal fiat. They are enabled by gynocratic and bio-Leninist tendencies inherent in a decaying western civilisation. But this a simplification.

[Anonymous No.21950708]

>>21949983
I mean,bros,have you tried bringing up any books for that matter around your local lgbtsjwtfnpc marxist cattle? In no time you will see their beady stupid cowlike eyes light up in panic. Soon enough they will start with the usual subhuman bleating, screeching and snivelling hysterically as if begging to be put out of their misery"wasnt he sexist? Arent you being dangerously eurocentric? Hasnt it been deboonked as fake news russian bot pseudoscience?Why read books by dead white men when you could have been watching CNN reading the NYT streaming the latest diverse and inclusive workplace comedies at netflix hulu and disneyplus? your daily mandatory dose of ''ethically sourced'' child pornography? Didnt you know reading antything beyond YA literature is ableist towards people who are too retarded to read? How does this further the short term electoral goals of the democratic party? Are you saying child sex workers arent real sex workers?Have you been taking your daily recomended dose of high fructuouse corn syrup your SSRIs and HRT? it is very important that you take the medication dr goldstein prescribed otherwise we will report you to corporate for mandatory sensitivity training as per the domestic terrorism act of 2021"

[Anonymous No.21950710]

>>21950699
>Doesn't read the full post
>Complains about no reasoning and sources
Do /lit/fags really?

[Anonymous No.21950728]

>>21949983
Ellul is a dangerous thinker because he's a crypto reactionary and a christian fundamentalist science denier hiding behind superficially left wing sounding arguments. he'd have you believe marginalized folks fighting for the right to exist are morally equal with fascist white supremacists because its all propaganda.

ou think you are edgy but you are just parroting the hegemonic christofascist reaganite neoliberal ideology. selfish bourgeoisie individualism and white male settler frontier fantasies. you dont understand class struggle or are outright on the side of the enemy. you ignore the long running attempt to defund public education and squash teacher's unions. public education is necessary for the same reason vaccination is neccesatry, homeschooling will always benefit rich parents and perpetuate inequalities, it alows for the perpetuation of ideologies such as white supremacy, christian fundamentalism, extremism that feed into the system of domestic terrorism.

You are repeating right wing fascist transphobic propaganda that puts vulnerable people a marginalized minority at risk of genoicide. You are supporting family values and heteronormative christian family against those you perceive as deviants. You show no understanding of how privilege works. Basically falling for the same old neoliberal trick that scapegoats marginalized folks such as queer or PoC or sexworkersand public sector unions,anti intellectualism against journalist scientists and academics in order to defund public services

[Anonymous No.21950732]

>>21950032
repent

[Anonymous No.21950736]

>>21950728
stale pasta

[Anonymous No.21950775]

>>21950603
Woah YAS kween slay! such science! such victimhood! such love! such identity! Such NPC! Such DEI EGS! Such LGBT! Such Bioleninist pedoganda! Such Cultural Marxism! Such vulnerable! Such marginalized! Such Diverse and Progressive! Such objective scientific and psychiatric authority! Such Sex Work ! Such BLM! Such unlimited expansion of the administrative state! Such such democracy! such empathy and basic human decency!

[Anonymous No.21950791]

imean if you are watching shitlib propaganda all day, maybe youd believe the tranny narrative, but i think its impossible to actually read and internalize things like this>>21950531
without coming to the conclusion these ''people'' are souless and evil bugmen, lower than rats and cockroaches and literally deserving of death

[Anonymous No.21950832]

>>21950577
>not even heterosexuality is backed by as much Hard data

[Anonymous No.21950880]

>>21949983
the preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy

and this >>21949988

[Anonymous No.21950884]

>>21950880
>In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely relations of production appropriate to a given stage in the development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or – this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms – with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead sooner or later to the transformation of the whole immense superstructure.

[Anonymous No.21951399]

>>21949983
There aren't any

[Anonymous No.21951777]

>>21949983
>gender ideology relies on the idea that identity is socially constructed meaning it's impacted heavily by those who promote terms
>they want us to use the language developed by a pedophillic charlatan quack that still forms the basis of their ideology while seperating how he himself would have influenced their movement
Simple as.

[Anonymous No.21951970]

either The Trangender Industrial Complex or Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality.

[Anonymous No.21951995]

The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit

[Anonymous No.21952009]

>>21949983
Can transgender people have sex after their operations? I tried to find video evidence of this(yes I know this is degenerate) and it doesn't seem to really exist. There is porn of basically everything but not of this

[Anonymous No.21952063]

>>21950341
You should look up the stars of how most Americans have varicocele.

[Anonymous No.21952071]

>ctrl+f weininger
>0 results

[Anonymous No.21952097]

>>21950594
>since he was associated with the right, I for a time thought it was slang for “octoroon”—an 18th-century term for people with 1/8 African blood
not sure why I found this incredibly funny

[Anonymous No.21952098]

>>21949983
The Tanakh. Ted Kaczynski suffered from transgenderism and he was a victim of the MK-Ultra experiments. The man in charge of these programs was Jewish. These are not coincidental facts. It's just a sophisticated genocide pogrom. Jews are told repeatedly that they must gore the nations to the ends of the Earth and destroy everyone by their god Yahweh.

[Anonymous No.21952111]

>>21950135
Is that still being published even after she shot all those kids in that school? Seems really evil.

[Anonymous No.21952115]

>>21952009
? just google post-op tgirl or tboy and see it, it literally exists, why would you lie about something you can literally just google
>>21950603
this is the weekly off-topic ragebait tranny thread

[Anonymous No.21952116]

>>21949983
Unironically, The Varieties of Religious Experience.

[Anonymous No.21952126]

>>21952115
>just google post-op tgirl or tboy and see it, it literally exists
I'm asking whether they can have sex, like can the neo vagina accommodate a dick, can the neo penis enter a vagina. I found 1 video of this but the dick is only going in like 1 inch it looks like and the recipient seems like they are in pain. The extreme paucity of videos seems to me like evidence it doesnt really work

[Anonymous No.21952142]

>>21952126
there's not a lot of porn of post-op trans ppl out there bc at that point its just a girl with a vagina/guy with a penis so half the appeal is lost for the trans porn fans.
and yes it can accommodate a dick, don't you ever hear the "dilate" insult thrown around here? its literally a huge dildo they use a bit after the surgery, ofc they can fit a penis if they can fit a dilator
and the neo-dick can go into a vagina, any stick would be able to

[Anonymous No.21952149]

>>21952142
Anon do you seriously expect me to believe people wouldnt make porn of this? Nobody? It's not plausible

I had literally never thought about this before yesterday and it suddenly occurred to me

[Anonymous No.21952164]

>>21952149
i just looked it up on PH and there they are.
>I had literally never thought about this before yesterday and it suddenly occurred to me
i mean i guess i just don't see the appeal between this and just regular porn.

[Anonymous No.21952173]

>>21952164
If you properly investigate I think you'll find the videos dont really contain the relevant act. But perhaps we have dwelled on this subject enough

[Anonymous No.21952299]

>>21950603
>>21952115
thats because the people who oppose your movement always post hard evidence while you can only cryu victimhood and bleat the propaganda programmed into your feeble mind by DNC and pritzker.you are an NPC, you are less than human, you are the emboddiment of a conspiracy to lower the very biological level of human life in order to expand state control and corporate profits

[Anonymous No.21952388]

hegel

[Anonymous No.21952405]

>>21949983
To clarify- are you asking for books on transgenderism written by transgender people explaining transgenderism from their own perspective or are you asking for books by right wingers about why transgenderism is evil?

[Anonymous No.21952430]

>>21952405
is there such thing as a third option? like just trying to describe how life in the 21st century is saturated by propaganda and pornography and psychological warfare and the medicalization of all aspects of life? right and left ideologies just seem to fail to describe the full horor of the thing or articulate any alternative to it.