[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 88 KB, 1440x1073, 1682020059942.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21936130 No.21936130 [Reply] [Original]

Recommend me more books like this.

>> No.21936150

feet

>> No.21936155

Nothing else like it, sadly.

>> No.21936162

My diary desu

>> No.21936181
File: 118 KB, 1000x1600, F27719B5-16FE-4DD9-A420-A2BD151B1763.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21936181

>>21936130

>> No.21936185

>>21936162
yes officer, this post right here

>> No.21936186

is there a short version of this? containing only the best parts

>> No.21936188
File: 100 KB, 1081x811, 1679685522490756.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21936188

>>21936185

>> No.21936194

>>21936150
based footbro

>> No.21936198

>>21936188
you have to go back

>> No.21936262

Tiger, tiger

>> No.21936307

>>21936181
epub? can't find on zlibrary

>> No.21936477

Dostoyevsky - The Meek One (Krotkaya)

>> No.21936503

Where's the pasta?

>> No.21937144

Bump

>> No.21937840

>>21936186
Pedofag zoomer reveals himself

>> No.21937845

>>21936130
the quran

>> No.21937960

>>21937845
The bible actually has lots of accounts of men fucking little girls and fathers fucking their own daughters

>> No.21937968

Off topic, but i couldn't be arsed to make a new thread about this: what are (you)r thoughts on the movie adaptation by Kubrick? The only contact that i had with Lolita was that movie and if it is anything to go by, i'd rather stay away from the book

>> No.21938029

>>21937968
The movie sucks and is very loosely based on the book
The book is probably too spicy for you

>> No.21938050

>>21936130
Justine (Sade), Bastard Out of Carolina (Dorothy Allison), Confessions of an English Maid (anonymous).

>> No.21938064

>>21938050
Synopsis?

>> No.21938086

>>21938029
>The book is probably too spicy for you
The reason that i disliked it hasn't anything to do with its content, in fact, the spicier it gets the better

>> No.21938420

>>21936130
Ada or ardor if you like the weird underage girl sex stuff written by Nabokov.

>> No.21938424

>>21938420
Lolita is not even about the sex
The sex is specifically the parts that the author skips over

>> No.21938528
File: 38 KB, 300x463, art-353-Tampa-300x0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21938528

>>21936130
Nothing fancy or spectacular, but it's okay and an enjoyable read.

>> No.21938638

>>21938528
imagine reading this in the subway

>> No.21938854
File: 64 KB, 634x650, 1681940222073586.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21938854

>>21938528
Is her family name "nutting" for real?

>> No.21938870
File: 482 KB, 605x586, 17708-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21938870

>>21938528
She looks like this btw. Imagine knowing that your milf English professor has written a book about fucking little boys.

>> No.21939008

Is there a Lolita equivalent for bestiality or do I have to write it myself?

>> No.21939027

>>21939008
Fuck off

>> No.21939129

>>21936262
WARNING!

this book is even more sad than lolita
read with caution

>> No.21939196

>>21939129
Oh
I haven't read it yet but was going to read it after Lolita

>> No.21939213

>>21939196
id say its better than lolita at some things
having the girl be the protagonist offers a unique perspective on her situation and her relationship with the older man
but of course the writing itself doesnt even come close nabokov

its also a lot more erotic than lolita

>> No.21939217

anything by eliot, pound or faulkner

>> No.21939583

>>21939027
Filtered

>> No.21939604

>>21939583
You were filtered out of the gene pool

>> No.21940254

>>21937960
no it doesn't

>> No.21940335

>>21940254
Lot*

>> No.21940351

>>21939008
Write it yourself, sis

>> No.21940361

>>21940254
You clearly don't know shit about the bible
Go read original kjv

>> No.21940372

>>21937840
>you're a pedo
>you're a little kid
what did he mean by this

>> No.21941032

>>21939008
STOLEN , STOLEN POST , MODS , JANNIES

>> No.21941389

Penguin knew what they wuz doin' with that cover.
They knew.

>> No.21941803

>>21936130
when I was going through puberty I jerked off to this cover

>> No.21941823

>>21936130
Off topic, but where can I get the Humbert Humbert cover? You know... that disturbing one...

>> No.21941828

>>21941823
I think that wasn't actually put into production.
It was just making a point.

But yeah, it is the cover that makes the most sense and fits what the author was going for.

>> No.21942103

>>21941823
>>21941828
>muh Humbert must be in the cover, not Lolita!! Nabokov even said this!!

'Lolita' is a novel about an obsession for a little girl. The girl has to be in the cover.

>> No.21942108

>>21942103
Brain dead take

>> No.21942244

>>21938870
>its okay when women do it
i'd hang her out of pure spite for the double standard you niggers hold

>> No.21942370

>>21936130
Don Quixote

>> No.21942379

>>21936130
The Enchanter, Nabokov

>> No.21942387
File: 1.59 MB, 1000x790, 1680824544826843.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21942387

>>21936130

>> No.21942662

>>21942387
Haruki Murakami has a fetish for the old woman

>> No.21942681

>>21942387
I asked for the exact opposite

>> No.21943943

>>21942103
Yes, but I love disturbing and uncanny, and that cover is a masterpiece. If I want to have a collection, I'd get that one....

>> No.21943955

>>21942108
>I want a 40 year old man in the cover of his book!!

Gay take