META

[Anonymous No.21932293]

is racism allowed here? i am thinking of publishing a TOME that will ENLIGHTEN the world (this board) on racial autism.
technically there is a site-wide rule against racism (except on /b/). but you guys post hitler and bunch of other racialist authors all the time, anyway.
so i'm wondering if it's ok if i post a link to a pdf that contains /pol/-tier content.

[Anonymous No.21932296]

No.

[Anonymous No.21932300]

the mods on /lit/ are completely ambivalent, if there are any mods here at all.

[Anonymous No.21932305]

Someone already wrote that book in the year 1853. It contains 500+ pages, it goes in detail with every civilization in the world, it spans 4000 years of history and I doubt you will anyhow top it in anything.

[Anonymous No.21932306]

What's the worst that can happen? Some janny bans you? Hey janny, eat SHIT!

[Anonymous No.21932307]

>>21932296
>>21932300
why is it ok to link to / refer to famous racialist authors? is the rule that they have to be a public figure? we can post mein kampf but not a non-famous poltard text?

[Anonymous No.21932330]

>>21932307
The rule doesn't mean anything. What is racism? All the rule entails is that you will be subject to a janny's interpretation of what racism is. Is posting IQ comparisons racist? Debatable, many jannies will give you a slide if it's relevant to the dicussion. Is saying "I HATE ALL NIGGERS" racist? Not so debatable; you can typically expect a ban for that.

[Anonymous No.21932343]

What is the book about?

[Anonymous No.21932347]

>>21932293
I figure if it is of literary merit it will be accepted here. even non fiction. I’ve talked Madison grant and Gobineau on here before.
Personally I’d love to read any attempt at a contribution to the scholarly tradition of racial science

[Anonymous No.21932365]

>>21932307
>why is it ok to link to / refer to famous racialist authors?
Who the fuck are you and why are you here? You give me bad vibes.

[Anonymous No.21932368]

>>21932343
a transcendental new species of human that renders current homo sapiens inferior. i'm basically racist against everyone, lol.

[Anonymous No.21932391]

>>21932365
relax, schizo. i am in favor of being able to talk about them. i am only asking whether there is a double-standard that disadvantages *non-famous* authors like me or any other random anon.

[Anonymous No.21932392]

>>21932368
> that the Brahmans of primitive India, the heroes of the Iliad and the Shahnameh, the warriors of Scandinavia – the glorious shades of noble races that have disappeared – give us a higher and more brilliant idea of humanity, and were more active, intelligent, and trusty instruments of civilization and grandeur than the peoples, hybrid a hundred times over, of the present day. And the blood even of these was no longer pure.

[Anonymous No.21932451]

>>21932293
>technically there is a site-wide rule against racism
lurk on /pol/

[Anonymous No.21932452]

>>21932391
>relax, schizo
The schizo thing is worn out dogshit. The Jews popularized it as an insult. It was likely easy on the tongue for them because of the elevated amount of schizos in their population group.
>take your pills
>meds now
It's all so tiresome.
>i am only asking whether there is a double-standard
How new are you that you do not understand what the board culture is and where the guardrails are? You think that I cannot smell you, but I can. You are supposed to figure this shit out on your own.

[Anonymous No.21932455]

>>21932451
*acutally don't, it's a shithole. But you get the point

[Anonymous No.21932478]

>>21932452
>You think that I cannot smell you, but I can.
i'm western european and a former natsoc.
>How new are you that you do not understand what the board culture is and where the guardrails are?
and i've been lurking for years, but i've never published a full book here; i guess that's the difference.

[Anonymous No.21932486]

>>21932392
>>21932478
Reply to this

[Anonymous No.21932499]

>>21932486
i don't know what to say other than that romanticizing south asians and middle easterners is cringe.

[Anonymous No.21932501]

>>21932499
Then what is your book about? Romanticizing muh North Western Yuropoorpeans is even more cringe

[Anonymous No.21932507]

>>21932451
>>21932455
oh, yeah, i was wondering why /pol/ gets a pass. is it just an informal rule that it is exempt like /b/?

[Anonymous No.21932524]

>>21932478
he meant that you're an insufferable newfag, no one cares about your /pol/-cred

[Anonymous No.21932534]

>>21932501
>Yuropoorpeans
are you trying to be wrong?

[Anonymous No.21932543]

>>21932534
> muh gdp
Truly more glorious and more interesting than the epics of Mahabharata and totally not something gorillion people have already written about
Why don't you use your energy to write something people will read?

[Anonymous No.21932546]

>>21932524
i'm a zoomer. it's literally impossible for me to not be a newfag. there's nothing i can do about it.

[Anonymous No.21932571]

>>21932543
you're clearly either a cringey hare krishna white guy, or a coping brown guy who desperately seeks validation from white guys.

[Anonymous No.21932582]

>>21932571
I don't see how race is anyhow relevant in this topic, but the most red-pilled book about racism, I've read all of it (something /pol/ fags never bothered to do and still think they have a right to bring their ignorance to table) and the dude says that the Vedians are very based. I mean let's be honest, as Europeans, that although we are whiter than the Vedians, they have conserved both the religion of their Aryan forefathers and their political system. Germanic Europeans have lost both, feudalism having ended in 1789-1918. So yeah, under this double report, Indians are more Aryan than Europeans and I don't see anything in Europeans anymore other than their eternal cuckery for homoglobo corporations and states.

[Anonymous No.21932597]

>>21932546
>there's nothing i can do about it
you can lurk moar before posting

[Anonymous No.21932605]

>>21932582
>North Western Yuropoorpeans
>as Europeans, that although we are whiter than
oh, god, i'm talking to someone from outside the hajnal line, aren't i? please tell me you aren't georgian, at least.

[Anonymous No.21932619]

>>21932597
no worries. i am about to disappear for at least a year until i complete the book, anyway.
farewell, litfags.

[Anonymous No.21932629]

>>21932605
I'm as European as it gets. But in no way am I satisfied about, not even the people that are coming into this country but the Europeans themselves, are giving their worst these days. That's why I also prefer to indulge in ancient text books from other parts of the world. They come from an age of glory that will (probably) never return. Even the feudal lords of the Middle Ages were better off than we are. I also think that the eurohomos are part of the problem and not it's solution.

[Anonymous No.21932784]

>>21932619
Farewell, zoomer.