/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.2192380]

[Anonymous No.2192383]

sasha grey is so smrt

[Anonymous No.2192388]

and sexy

[Anonymous No.2192390]

ma baby mama

[Anonymous No.2192393]

[Anonymous No.2192399]

I think it's great that a porn star can be a respected public figure.

[Anonymous No.2192401]

not /lit/

[Anonymous No.2192414]

[Anonymous No.2192420]

>So girls, remember: you can take up to 3 cocks in your vagina.

[Anonymous No.2192419]

i guess sometimes the ends do justify the means

atleast she's using her popularity as an ultra-whore to actually reach out to kids and do something that actually contributes to society, other than being a cock-stuffed cum dumpster

[Anonymous No.2192425]

>>2192401

Is this your first fucking day or something? Sasha's /lit/'s mascot, waifu and mentor all in one. Plus she's a published author, and you're not - you're just a cunt. So fuck off.

[Anonymous No.2192428]

>>2192419

acting in adult films does not make a person a whore

sage for not /lit/

[Anonymous No.2192430]

Hmm, Sasha Grey or George Bush...Welp I'd rather have a porn star than a politician read to my children. At least they make an honest living.

[Deist !!fMq8ZXuIWTO No.2192432]

Shes compensating for her sense of inadequacy by pretending she has more dimensions that porno whore

[Anonymous No.2192433]

>>2192425
I have reported every thread about her over the past couple years. She will never be /lit/, whether you like it or not

[Anonymous No.2192435]

Apparently the parents flipped their shit about it. Fucking hypocrites probably all conceived their anklebiters after a night of Julio Gallo and Pr0n.

>Oh no it's that woman who used to do porn, stop her from getting a new career.
>Yeah, go back and make more porn. derp.

Fucking moral majority can kiss my arse. And so can Sasha, but in a nice way. If she was a teacher at my kids school, I'd take a lot more interest in parent-teacher shit, I can tell you.

[Anonymous No.2192436]

>>2192428

She's a writer, you fucking idiot.

See picture at >>2192425

[Anonymous No.2192437]

Deep&Edgy, even after having his tripcode compromised and a bunch of Anons run wild with it, is still the best tripfag on /lit/.

[Anonymous No.2192438]

>>2192436

so make a thread about her book

[Deep&Edgy !pSkjEcB9sQ No.2192442]

>>2192437
thanks

sage for not /lit/

[Anonymous No.2192443]

>>2192436
It's a picture book.

[Deist !!fMq8ZXuIWTO No.2192444]

>>2192443

If its pictures of her naked I'm incredibly interested.

[Deep&Edgy !pSkjEcB9sQ No.2192447]

>>2192442

[Anonymous No.2192463]

>>2192444
I don't think you'll actually have to buy a book to see pictures of her naked.

[Anonymous No.2192467]

>>2192463

It's actually quite hard to find any other kind.

>>2192443

Is it not possible for a picture book to be litertature then? Serious question. Something like Where the Wild Things Are would be suitable for discussion on a literature board I think.

[Anonymous No.2192482]

>>2192437
Let's be realistic about this.

Being the best tripfag on /lit/ is a little like being the best potato-chunk in a drunken Irishman's vomit.

[Anonymous No.2192500]

>>2192482

And he's not even the best tripfag. That loser who occasionally used to drop in from /mu/ rocked his shit a few times, made him look even more stupid than usual.

But on the whole, I agree with you - this board is actually getting pretty unbearable, and being the best thing in it is probably an anti-prize.

[Anonymous No.2192505]

>>2192482
>>2192500
He's not even the best poster on /lit/ named Deep+Edgy.

By the way, he just never leaves. That's all. He's at his computer, posting, while pretending to be out with the lads.

Pic related.

[Anonymous No.2192508]

>>2192505
Hey now, we should be flattered. If the literary utilitarian calculus in that ASOIAF image is anything to go by, our posts are clearly the pinnacle of great literature, as D&E wouldn't waste his time with us otherwise.

[D'Averc !UfFKGtFx2M!!/0aWHODYBc0 No.2192546]

>>2192508
>If the literary utilitarian calculus in that ASOIAF image is anything to go by

It's not. There's nothing specifically relevant to utility in that image. Utilitarianism does not have a monopoly on "don't waste your precious time on shit if you want to get good at something".

[Anonymous No.2192634]

I find it interesting any book from a person who has to keep his professional life so far from her social life. Has merit to be two people (or at least try) so different.

[Anonymous No.2192640]

>>2192546

>"don't waste your precious time on shit"

>spending hours and hours, every day, on 4chan

[Anonymous No.2192782]

>>2192546
>There's nothing specifically relevant to utility in that image.
>don't waste your precious time on shit if you want to get good at something

[Anonymous No.2192959]

>Sasha tweeted about the experience — calling the students the “sweetest” ever. However, not everyone saw it that way … some angry parents complained to the PTA — who then contacted the school’s principal … but there’s one problem. A rep for the school district is flatly denying Sasha was ever inside one of its classrooms — telling TMZ, “We have several celebrities who read to our students each year. The actress you have indicated [Sasha] was not present.

Comedy gold.

[Anonymous No.2192967]

The things I'd do to have an ex-pornstar for a teacher

[Anonymous No.2192971]

>>2192959
>>2192959
>>2192959
>>2192959
wait wut

[Anonymous No.2192976]

>>2192971
the school disowned her after they realized she was a chronic toilet licker.

[Anonymous No.2192977]

>>2192967
It's not like you could get laid with the quoted ex pornstar now teacher anyways. Silly fantasy. They have sex for money. They would not have casual sex with some random asshole. Pornstars just want to make loved and feel truly appreciated. Not to continue being used as cattle.

[Anonymous No.2192982]

>>2192976

what exactly abuot licking a toilet makes someone unfit to be a teacher

[Anonymous No.2192999]

>"I want to tell young women that sex is ok. It's ok to be a slut. You don't have to be ashamed."

HEY. I HAVE AN IDEA.

LETS LET HER READ TO OUR CHILDREN!

[Anonymous No.2193001]

>>2192999

go back to saudi arabia or really anywhere but /lit/

[Anonymous No.2193005]

>>2193001
slut detected

[Anonymous No.2193006]

>>2192999
There is nothing wrong with being a slut. It's a social structure and a way for people to judge each other a la american thrashy talk show style. There is nothing wrong wit having sex with multiple characters unless is without protection or some other shit that's too detailed to go into it.

But yeah, fuck off to Fox news.

[Anonymous No.2193007]

>>2192428
>acting in adult films does not make a person a whore
You have got to be shitting me.

[Anonymous No.2193012]

>>2193007

nope learn what words mean

[Anonymous No.2193013]

>>2193006
>There is nothing wrong with being a slut. It's a social structure and a way for people to judge each other a la american thrashy talk show style. There is nothing wrong wit having sex with multiple characters unless is without protection or some other shit that's too detailed to go into it.

lolwomen....

[Anonymous No.2193020]

>>2192380
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


>>2193006

Are you serious?

[Anonymous No.2193021]

>>2193006
oh wow, I was just kidding when I called you a slut.

Now you went and blew your cover.

[Anonymous No.2193032]

>>2193013
>>2193020
>>2193021

Not that guy but what is morally wrong with being a slut?

I love arguing retards about this issue.

[Anonymous No.2193033]

>>2193006
>There is nothing wrong with being a slut.

Right.

Then comes the whiny whore you posts on tumblr how her boyfriend dumped her because she had multiple gangbangs with strangers.

When did they add computers in the kitchen?

[Anonymous No.2193036]

>>2193033
>>2193021

go join a monastery

death to all misogynists

[Anonymous No.2193038]

>>2193033

What's wrong about it?

I'm amazed at the number of autistic neckbeards on /lit/. For a moment there I thought I was on /v/.

[Anonymous No.2193044]

>>2193006
lol, whine more.
Being a promiscuous whore is OBJECTIVELY a negative and bad thing.
No man wants a woman who sleeps around. And them having fucked lots of guys is a BIG NEGATIVE.

Our civilization is dying due to these relativist liberal concepts... hurr don't judge me!! Disgusting.

[Anonymous No.2193045]

People only find her interesting because she used to be a porn star & she's a hot piece of ass. Her writing would be ignored otherwise.

[None !WvWWh.l.CE No.2193047]

i never knew there was so many islamic fundamentalists on /lit/

[Anonymous No.2193050]

>>2193044

Good luck finding a pure-white virgin so you can have painful, awkward missionary sex in the dark while crying.

[Anonymous No.2193052]

>>2193045
>she's a hot piece of ass
hahahaha
you like women who fucked niggers and licked toilet bowls?

>>2193038
You need to open your eyes and stop being a brainwashed idiot.
But maybe you cannot because you are a woman, this is why there has always been a "patriarchy"

[Anonymous No.2193053]

>>2193044

Why is it wrong, retard?

I'm sure if you try real hard you can come up with some illogical bullshit to type!

[Anonymous No.2193055]

>>2193044
what would you call a promiscuous man?

[Anonymous No.2193056]

>>2193053
Well, if you cared about things more then MOMENTARY PLEASURE, maybe you would understand.

>>2193050
Enjoy your aids, traitor.

[K. T. No.2193057]

>>2193036
K. T. is that you?

[Anonymous No.2193059]

>>2193052

I'm not a woman, I just like arguing with angry, dumb neckbeards.

Especially about this issue.

[Anonymous No.2193060]

>>2193052

seriously what is wrong with licking a toilet (and don't say germs because they can be easily sanitized)

[Anonymous No.2193061]

>>2193050
I'd rather have awful virgin sex with a pure maiden instead of genital warts.

[Anonymous No.2193062]

>>2193055
a rake.
It is just as negative for a man to be promiscuous, but there are naturally different consequences.
A man wants to be sure that his children are his own + it's just plain unmanly to be a goddamn cuckold.

[Anonymous No.2193063]

>>2193060

Would you lick a toilet?

[Anonymous No.2193064]

>>2193056

>Enjoy your aids, traitor.

Ouch. I know you're still mad at your mom for forcing you to watch as she was anally-penetrated by the milk man, but that's a piss-poor excuse to take it out on all women. However, it's a great excuse to become a serial killer, so good luck with that.

[Anonymous No.2193066]

>>2193057

sorry wrong number

[Anonymous No.2193067]

>>2193060
>what is wrong with licking a toilet
Liberals....

[Anonymous No.2193068]

>>2193056

>Well, if you cared about things more then MOMENTARY PLEASURE, maybe you would understand.

That implies out of the momentary pleasure there comes negative consequences which is why it should be avoided. Which is incorrect in this case (assuming it's safe sex).

[Anonymous No.2193072]

>>2193060

Pssst, there's more germs in your kitchen than in your bathroom.

[Anonymous No.2193073]

Whats wrong with being a slut?
Only a slut with remorse would asked a question like that.

Enjoy cheapening yourself, and having no confidence in yourself. Why else do you think this whore would help preschoolers? Out of the kindness of her heart? HAHA

The real question is:
Why would a guy want to be with a girl whose been with so many guys?

Your choice, but don't be surprise when you are rejected because you are used goods.

[Anonymous No.2193074]

>>2193060
if you don't think there's anything wrong with licking a toilet seat, go grab your digital camera and snap some photos of you licking one. Then post it here. Hell, you can even sanitize the seat before you lick it. I just want a picture of you doing it, then I'll concede my point.

[Anonymous No.2193077]

>>2193073

Whatever will women do without you?

[Anonymous No.2193079]

>>2193057
My point here is to stop talking about this shit. It's creating the lowest denominator. Be a good person, general the get a lot more sex. Be open, no one needs to get hurt. If you want to fuck around be honest about it, it's ok. Why would you get upset with a guy for saying anything. Just do it.

[Anonymous No.2193080]

>>2193064
someone is mad.
Noone wants to "take it out on women" you fucking retard. We want to be able to love women and to have that love returned and have meaningful productive relationships.

If she is damaged goods from living in a fucking dreamworld her whole life because liberals tell BLATANT LIES TO CHILDREN and encourage them to act unsafe... then shit is just not going to work out.


>>2193068
yes because mental consequences dont count huh?

[Anonymous No.2193081]

>>2193073

[Anonymous No.2193082]

>>2193077
They will likely cry a lot and be really depressed because women are not made to be independent.

[Anonymous No.2193083]

>>2193073

>Only a slut with remorse would asked a question like that.

I am not a slut, in fact, I've only had sex twice

>Enjoy cheapening yourself, and having no confidence in yourself. Why else do you think this whore would help preschoolers? Out of the kindness of her heart? HAHA

How is it "cheapening" to have sex? Why would having sex lower one's confidence?

>Why would a guy want to be with a girl whose been with so many guys?

Why would a guy NOT want to be with a girl who has been with many guys, assuming she is a responsible enough person to have been practicing safe sex?

[Anonymous No.2193090]

I honestly can't tell if you people are trolling or seriously saying you find nothing wrong with fucking for money or licking toilet seats.

[Anonymous No.2193093]

>>2193079
Their just upset that their not getting any. If the guy want's you exclusively be honest and tell him no. And don't think you can be nice by going back to him and then continue fucking around. That's brutal

[Anonymous No.2193096]

>>2193090

how do either of those things impact you personally, clint

[Anonymous No.2193098]

>>2193080

But the thing is, you're arguing with a bunch of liberal men & women, when really you should be trolling for some republican ass. That way, she'll stay in the kitchen & do whatever you want & stop having hobbies to make you martinis & keep to term all of the children she'll have when you fuck, because condoms are the devil's playthings.

[Anonymous No.2193100]

>>2193080

>yes because mental consequences dont count huh?

The only "mental consequences" that could come from being a slut is the fact that assholes like you ostracize them for being a slut, it has nothing to do with the actual act of being a slut.

We're talking about the reason you ostracize them for being a slut and why is it justified, why do they deserve to be ostracized?

[bassetquirrel No.2193102]

>>2193090
Nothing wrong with it man,,, fuck , fuck,,,fuck. Do what you want. Why should anybody tell you different. be open , no body cares anymore. if your hiding something it's your own fucked up sense of right and wrong. Or you want it both ways. You know what, no one can have it both ways for long. That shit don't last

[Anonymous No.2193103]

>>2193090

Lay down some arguments or fuck off retard.

[Anonymous No.2193105]

>>2193083
>I am not a slut, in fact, I've only had sex twice

Congratulations!

>How is it "cheapening" to have sex? Why would having sex lower one's confidence?

Because you are an attention whore, an object and you will be treated as such whether you want too or not. Men are going to use you and your going to end up hurt- its inevitable. If you have no problem being treated as an object then yes, your right it won't lower your confidence.

>Why would a guy NOT want to be with a girl who has been with many guys, assuming she is a responsible enough person to have been practicing safe sex?

Don't answer my question with other questions.

[bassetquirrel No.2193106]

I think Sasha Gray's an awesome chic and really hot. And I wouldn't fuck her or want to be her friend. I'm not that open myself.. I hope she wouldn't hate me for it.

[Anonymous No.2193107]

>>2193102
>moral less nihilist atheist logic
You do realize that your sort are fucking scum?

[Anonymous No.2193110]

>>2193096

Nope, this is pretty interesting actually, I'm interested in how different people think.

>>2193103

Licking toilets are gross, can't you see something that obvious? People take shits in those things for god sake. I shouldn't have to argue the fucking for money part. If you wanna sleep around, fine, but don't do it for fucking money.

[Anonymous No.2193115]

>>2193110

sure it's gross! but is there really a moral imperative to stop people from doing a gross thing? for instance i think pickles are gross as hell amd if my burger comes with them i'm definitely going to peel thiem off. but do i go around taking pickles off otehr people's sandwiches? would i be right to do so?

[Anonymous No.2193117]

>>2193105

>Because you are an attention whore, an object and you will be treated as such whether you want too or not.

Uhh, what? It takes two people to have sex, they're ideally both as into it, why is one person an "attention whore" or an "object" more than the other?

>Men are going to use you and your going to end up hurt- its inevitable. If you have no problem being treated as an object then yes, your right it won't lower your confidence.

I'd appreciate if you stopped talking to me like I'm female but I again don't see where you're going with this. How is a woman having a lot of sex with different guys going to hurt her? I mean due to the faults in our society (propagated by assholes like you) she will be called a slut but how is the act itself demeaning? The man is just as much of an object as the woman in casual sex.

>Don't answer my question with other questions

Well the reason a man would want a woman who has had multiple partners would be because she is 1) More experienced 2) Probably more easier to get into bed with.

[Anonymous No.2193118]

>>2193105

What makes your almighty penis so irresistible that women cast themselves at your feet, sobbing that they cannot even dream to touch your holy balls because they've already touched another? Once you actually get around to having sex, you'll realize that yeah, it's great. But it's not a huge deal.

This isn't an interrogation, this is a debate. You can't tell somebody not to ask questions.

[Anonymous No.2193121]

>>2193115

Bro, I think it's universally accepted that toilets, especially public toilets of the American variety are fucking filthy. Your distaste for pickles is a personal, subjective taste. I for one happen to love pickles. Especially those little finger sized ones. Yum.

[Anonymous No.2193122]

>>2193073

that's a interesting point, I know some girls that wouldn't date a guy who's been with many women.

Personally I wouldn't date someone who's been with a ton of people, if we had sex ( disgusting I know ) she would be comparing me with past lovers or fucks. I rather be with someone who's somewhat normal and not a slut bucket.

[Anonymous No.2193125]

>>2193110

>but don't do it for fucking money.

This is some backwards ass logic. Why NOT do it for money? Why would you do thing x when you can do thing x and get a lot of cash for it?

[Anonymous No.2193128]

>>2193122

So exactly how many people do you have to fuck to be a slut? Do blowjobs & handjobs count?

[Anonymous No.2193129]

>>2193125

Because you're willing to put a price tag on your body? Don't you find that degrading in the least? Where's your pride man?

[Anonymous No.2193131]

>>2193122

It's an observation, more like, and it has nothing to do with the question "what's wrong with being a slut?"

[Anonymous No.2193133]

>>2193121

so we agree pickles are a subjective taste -- is it really that much of a stretch to say that toilets are a subjective taste? like even if just a handful of people like licking toilets (and you knnow they must be out there) doesn't that mean that to some tiny extent it's subjective?

(and as i pointed out earlier you can sanitize a toilet no problem so germ/filth concerns should be essentially a non-issue)

[Anonymous No.2193139]

>>2193129

If I could play the violin I would put a price tag on my hands.

If I could fuck good and not be anxious about getting hard in front of a film crew why would it be wrong to sell my skills?

[bassetquirrel No.2193142]

>>2193131
Define slut?

Would you define yourself by some else's opinion of you?

[Anonymous No.2193146]

>>2193133

I think it's not only a matter of sanitation, but also a psychological thing. Just think for a second, you're putting the muscle you use to eat your food on some place someone else's piss, shit, and ass cheeks have been. Think about that for a second.

>>2193139

And I wouldn't. Agree to disagree.

[Anonymous No.2193148]

>>2193146

>people who like to get peed on
>people who like to get shit on

There is a target market for toilet-licking.

[Anonymous No.2193150]

>>2193142

>Define slut?

Someone who has sex with an high amount of different people.

>Would you define yourself by some else's opinion of you?

Of course not.

[Anonymous No.2193152]

personally I think it's like people who eat much but with some extra social stigma. there are people who love food, there are people who can be healthy and still eat plenty just as there are people who can have a lot of safe sex without hurting themselves or others. but then there are people who eat to comfort themselves or to push more important matters away. and there are people who have sex because they have low self-esteem, they might hurt people and they might be bad with protection
don't care about porn-stars though, they're paid to do it and they've signed legal papers and stuff. I'm sure most of them are grown adults

[Anonymous No.2193153]

>>2193146

>And I wouldn't

But we're talking about moral issues here and whether it's wrong or not.

[Anonymous No.2193154]

>>2193146

i very much agree, and that's why i would most likely never lick a toilet

as a thought experiment, though, what if it's a toilet in home depot or wherever, straight out of the factory, perfectly clean, and you stand to win a huge monetary prize for giving it one lick. could you bring yourself to?

[Anonymous No.2193158]

>>2193148

Whatever bro, if you like the taste of shit in your mouth go ahead and lick toilet bowls. Do whatever gets you off, just keep that shit to yourself.

>>2193153

I realized that we would probably be going around in circles. I honestly don't know what to think anymore.

>>2193154

Are you kidding dude, fuck yeah I would.

[Anonymous No.2193160]

>>2193133
So everything is subjective?
I certainly hope you have never denigrating anyone for being "racist" then.
And of course, hitler was just another person then, with his own subjective beliefs and ideals and likes, right?

[Anonymous No.2193161]

>>2193160

you just totally kicked that strawman's ass, congrats

[Anonymous No.2193170]

>>2193045
>People only find her interesting because she used to be a porn star & she's a hot piece of ass. Her writing would be ignored otherwise.

>See Sasha Grey pic
>104 posts, 23 images
>lol u guys

[Anonymous No.2193178]

>>2193117


Its always amusing though, when sluts realize no guy wants them for a serious relationship and their chances of getting an STD is pretty much 100%. If you payed attention to what I wrote previously you would know what I'm trying to convey to you.

The fact that you're not a women pretty much kills this conversation, you see no-one is gonna respect a slut, its plain and simple, It doesn't matter if you argue with me or not because that's just want happens. Look at Kim Kardashian shes a slut, and famous for being one; do I repsect her? why would I? she has no respect for herself and her riches are just a facade for the inevitable future she has. Guys mainly only talk about dat ass and that's it, not as a person or anything else GEEE I wonder why.

Slut - Hit it and Quit it
then the sluts start to feel like shit and try to justify their choices(like this thread), its all part of the motion called denial.

>More experienced
> Probably more easier to get into bed with.

You made the mistake of judging all men and claiming we all think the same
PROTIP : We don't

[Anonymous No.2193181]

Its always amusing though, when sluts realize no guy wants them for a serious relationship and their chances of getting an STD is pretty much 100%. If you payed attention to what I wrote previously you would know what I'm trying to convey to you.

The fact that you're not a women pretty much kills this conversation, you see no-one is gonna respect a slut, its plain and simple, It doesn't matter if you argree with me or not because that's just want happens. Look at Kim Kardashian shes a slut, and famous for being one; do I respect her? why would I? she has no respect for herself and her riches are just a facade for the inevitable future she has. Guys mainly only talk about DAT ass and that's it, not as a person or anything else GEEE I wonder why.

Slut - Hit it and Quit it
then the sluts start to feel like shit and try to justify their choices(like this thread), its all part of the motion called denial.

>More experienced
> Probably more easier to get into bed with.

You made the mistake of judging all men and claiming we all think the same
PROTIP : We don't

And with your logic, I suppose nothing was wrong with Stalin either.

[Anonymous No.2193185]

>>2193181
It is not amusing at all.
The women have been lied to their whole lives and then they suffer for it.
We should hang liberals from the nearest tree for being subversive liars, frauds, traitors, and criminals.

[Anonymous No.2193186]

Maybe.

Just maybe.

A woman's primary goal in life is something other than getting married & baring your neckbearded children.

[Anonymous No.2193189]

>>2193186
If any of course ancestors had thought such a thing, then you would not be here.
You have a duty to them, to yourself, and to those still to come to carry on your bloodline.

[Anonymous No.2193190]

>>2193185

It is amusing, because we wouldn't have shitty threads like this.

[Anonymous No.2193191]

>>2193181

>Slut - Hit it and Quit it then the sluts start to feel like shit and try to justify their choices(like this thread), its all part of the motion called denial.

Annnnnnnd that's a wrap people; see you all next week.

[Anonymous No.2193195]

>>2193181

>Its always amusing though, when sluts realize no guy wants them for a serious relationship

That's the fault of the guys for being as retarded as you.

>and their chances of getting an STD is pretty much 100%

But that's just so false and what annoys me is that you knew that was bullshit when you typed it but that didn't stop you.

>The fact that you're not a women pretty much kills this conversation, you see no-one is gonna respect a slut, its plain and simple, It doesn't matter if you argree with me or not because that's just want happens.

We're arguing about WHY is it justified to not respect someone for being a slut you fucking imbecile, you don't need to tell me there's disrespect for slut. That's the whole reason we're talking about this.

>she has no respect for herself

How do you know that? And even if she didn't, that still wouldn't address the fucking issue of this debate.

>You made the mistake of judging all men and claiming we all think the same
>PROTIP : We don't

I'm not judging men, women are just as oppressive towards sluts too.

>And with your logic, I suppose nothing was wrong with Stalin either.

Kill yourself you fucking retard. I am amazed you managed to type that pile of bullshit without once addressing the question: Why is it wrong to be a slut?

Also, I'm not female but if you insist on talking to me as if I am I guess I can't stop your imbecile ass.

[Anonymous No.2193196]

>>2193178
The amount of sheer ignorance both amuses and disgusts me.

[Anonymous No.2193200]

So, what books was she reading this class? I can see a Dr Seuss one, not sure about the others.

[Anonymous No.2193202]

>>2193195
>Mfw reading this post with no arguments
not that guy, but seriously he did make some valid points and I think your being a tad unrealistic.

[Anonymous No.2193204]

>>2193178
I feel as ashamed reading that post like if I wrote that. Dude, I have never said this to anyone. Kill yourself. You are drunk with social constructs and your eyes filled with media and judgement.

I seriously wish for you the best intellectually.

[Anonymous No.2193206]

Seeing as it's obviously been deleted, I'm now curious as to what >>2193178 said.

[Anonymous No.2193210]

>>2193202

Can you point to the arguments that address "why is it wrong to be a slut?" ? I honestly can't find them. It's all about how sluts are disrespected in our society.

[Anonymous No.2193215]

>>2193195
>BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWW

I thought you were a girl because of how pussy whipped you were, I don't see the point in having this conversation.
And you still haven't answered my question.

[Anonymous No.2193216]

>>2193210
So right away you have one argument.
People don't like sluts, therefore since we live in a society, you should try to fit in.

Do you want to get into moral arguments? That's impossible because liberal atheists don't believe in morals.

[Anonymous No.2193217]

>>2193215

>I don't see the point in having this conversation.

Because I'm male?

>And you still haven't answered my question.

What question?

[Anonymous No.2193218]

why is this thread not deleted

[Anonymous No.2193220]

>>2193217
>Because I'm male?

Obviously.

>>What question?
Why would a guy want to be with a girl whose been with so many guys?

[Anonymous No.2193221]

I just came into this thread.

Since when the fuck does anyone on 4chan follow social norms.

[Anonymous No.2193223]

>>2193218
Because hey, it's a party!

[Anonymous No.2193225]

>>2193216

>People don't like sluts, therefore since we live in a society, you should try to fit in.

Did you think that through, buddy? "People enjoy having slaves, therefore since we live in a society you should try to fit in"

>Do you want to get into moral arguments?

That's what this has been from the very start.

>That's impossible because liberal atheists don't believe in morals.

What a load of shit.

[Anonymous No.2193226]

This society is experiencing a moral decay, best suggestion is to forget about sex and irrelevant shit and move on to more important topics.

[Anonymous No.2193229]

>>2193220

>Obviously.

Why would that affect the debate in any way? Are you mentally deficient?

>Why would a guy want to be with a girl whose been with so many guys?

I did answer that

>More experienced
> Probably more easier to get into bed with.

Although this has nothing to do with the issue we're debating though.

[Anonymous No.2193230]

>>2193226
>moral decay
>bad

protip, culture is not your friend.

[Anonymous No.2193234]

Get this through your stupid head you retarded cunt.

People have different morals, that's a fact, If a women wants to be a slut no-one is stopping her, but when you try to justify your decisions because you start to feel regret- THAT is crossing the line.

I don't want to be with someone that's been with 100 guys, its disgusting and horrifying and some people eat bugs from the ground which is also disgusting; my point you may ask?

Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.2193237]

>>2193234

>If a women wants to be a slut no-one is stopping her, but when you try to justify your decisions because you start to feel regret- THAT is crossing the line.

I'm not a woman or a slut, I'm just justifying their actions because I feel like it, I'm not really sure what you're trying to pull here brah.

>I don't want to be with someone that's been with 100 guys

That really has nothing to do with this debate.

[Anonymous No.2193243]

>>2193230
protip: Yes it is. It's the fucking basis of civilization.
All nations require unity or they die. This constitutional patriotism and post nationalism garbage is completely fake.

>>2193237
It is morally wrong, sex out of wedlock is morally wrong.
You make the claim morals don't matter, but very few people actually agree with you.

[Anonymous No.2193247]

>>2193230
>moral decay
>not bad

Kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.2193256]

The moment you take 20 dicks for money, lick cum off a toilet seat for money, or fuck guys on camera for money. You become a commodity. That is simply how it works in our society and no one can really blame Sasha Grey for doing what she is doing because it's her choice. It's just something that should be accepted.

[Anonymous No.2193257]

>>2193243

>sex out of wedlock is morally wrong.

There we have it, thank you, finally you give your "argument".

It's a sad, shitty argument but at least we have it now.

>You make the claim morals don't matter

I'm not making such a claim at all. That is such a stupid thing to say you're almost starting to sound trollish. You think because I don't agree with your morals I don't have morals?

[Anonymous No.2193259]

>>2193243
I'm not even taking this "debate" seriously, because no matter how you look at it, a slut is an object - period.

A guy trying to defend a slut is like watching Christians explain The matrix.

[Anonymous No.2193261]

>>2193257
Are you saying sex out of marriage is ok? then whats the point of marriage?

[Anonymous No.2193262]

>>2193259

>a slut is an object - period.

Being sexually objectified increases one's chances of being laid, how is that bad?

[The Grand Analizer No.2193265]

>>2193261
Property rights.

[Anonymous No.2193272]

>>2193261

Wait, what? I thought his argument was the sluts have casual sex without marriage, therefore they are morally in the wrong.

Although if it's okay with the married couple of course anything goes, but this is really beside the point.

[Anonymous No.2193277]

>>2193262
Read about what you just wrote and see how retarded you sound.

Last time I check women don't like being the subject of objectification.

>>2193265
Haha,
So true.

[Anonymous No.2193280]

>>2193262

If you can fuck more people. It's fine. It all depends on the individual though, and what kind of value getting laid holds for them.

[Anonymous No.2193281]

>>2193259
Which is humorous to me because in my theology "class" more than a week was spent trying to do just that, but with a Judeo-Christian spin.

[Anonymous No.2193283]

>>2193277

>Last time I check women don't like being the subject of objectification.

1) Not all women think alike
2) Again, we're talking about SHOULD they feel bad about it, not how people's general perceptions of these things are.

I wouldn't mind being sexually objectified but that is, again, beside the point.

[Anonymous No.2193284]

> A women who deserves your utmost respect.

[The Grand Analizer No.2193288]

>>2193277
Haha!
You think I'm kidding.

[Anonymous No.2193289]

>A guy trying to defend a slut is like watching Christians explain The matrix.

How can you say this kind of shit with a straight face when the strongest argument for your side ITT is "sex out of wedlock is morally wrong".

I mean you guys are doing worse than fucking /v/, it's depressing.

[Anonymous No.2193292]

>>2193281

Let me guess, did they say the Architect = Satan?

[Anonymous No.2193293]

>>2193281
>judeo-christian
I don't think you know anything.

[Anonymous No.2193296]

>>2193288

>dat feel when I know you're right

[Anonymous No.2193301]

>>2193283

>1) Not all women think alike

Ah, but very few women would agree with you, try calling a random women a slut and see what happens.

[Anonymous No.2193303]

>>2193283
I wouldn't mind being sexually objectified

But you aren't a girl so your statement is invalid.

[Anonymous No.2193305]

>>2193301

Doesn't matter. That's not what we're talking about. Try to keep up.

[Anonymous No.2193306]

>>2193303

>But you aren't a girl so your statement is invalid.

What difference does it make?

[Anonymous No.2193311]

>>2193293
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judeo-Christian
There you go, hipster.
The teacher was attempting to argue that the movie was a parable illustrating the necessity of the moral code defined within the Old Testament - hence pre-Catholicism, hence Judeo-Christian.
Having further analyzed the thread, it's fairly obvious that your chief objection to the majority of the posts have been that they support what you view as a lax moral code.
The obvious response being that there is no morality and life is best lived for the greatest possible pleasure. All other philosophies are irrational.

[Anonymous No.2193314]

>>2193292
First film only, but I would assume yes.

[Anonymous No.2193315]

>>2193305

it does matter you hipster cunt, you said not all women think alike and I'm showing you how your wrong.

[Anonymous No.2193317]

goddamn she is so cute.

[Anonymous No.2193323]

>>2193315

You admitted in your own post that not all women think alike. You imbecile.

[Anonymous No.2193325]

>Oh yes, this is something any girl would be proud of making

[Anonymous No.2193334]

>president who sends people off to bomb and invade other countries and kill innocent civilians
>come read to the kids!!

>nice girl who happens to work as a porn star
>GET HER AWAY FROM OUR CHILDREN


Yep, we sure have our moral priorities straight

[Anonymous No.2193340]

>>2193323
Let me clarify, MOST women do not like being objectified, if the ones who "claim" they don't mind being objectified should not try to justify their actions no matter how disgusting it is.

There's no reason why someone would want to get objectified, because were humans not sex things.

[Anonymous No.2193345]

>>2193340
*sex objects

[Anonymous No.2193350]

>>2193340

>no matter how disgusting it is.

Why is it "disgusting" ?

>There's no reason why someone would want to get objectified

Reason to objectify or to be objectified is to have casual sex. Casual sex being sex where there are no emotions, no strong emotions anyway tied to the sex. How is that wrong?

>because were humans not sex things.

I lol'd. Next you're going to tell me we aren't animals.

[Anonymous No.2193364]

>>2193350

>Why is it "disgusting" ?

whatever floats your boat.

>Casual sex
it is impossible for two people to have sex without at least one of them developing some sort of emotion, that alone will have damaging consequences.

>I lol'd. Next you're going to tell me we aren't animals.

I don't want to be viewed as a object and I'm sure there are many who would agree with me, the elephant in the room is you my friend or in say sluts as well.

[Anonymous No.2193370]

>>2193364

>it is impossible for two people to have sex without at least one of them developing some sort of emotion

Maybe it's impossible for you. Also, do you think porn actors/actresses develop feelings for each other everytime they have sex? Even when they're extremely objectified like Sasha Grey?

>I don't want to be viewed as a object and I'm sure there are many who would agree with me

Ok.

>the elephant in the room is you my friend or in say sluts as well.

What is this? Another way of saying that society, generally speaking, frowns upon sluts? Yeah, we went over this about a billion times already.

[Anonymous No.2193393]

This:
>>2193334

[Anonymous No.2193395]

>>2193370
>Maybe it's impossible for you. Also, do you think porn actors/actresses develop feelings for each other everytime they have sex? Even when they're extremely objectified like Sasha Grey?

Are you saying they don't? Plenty of Porn stars get married.


>What is this? Another way of saying that society, generally speaking, frowns upon sluts? Yeah, we went over this about a billion times already.

And yet you still don't understand;
Women can't dress like sluts even in Corporate offices .. ever seen a CEO of Company come in a meeting like that ?
or front office Bank officers half naked? why ?

Every company wants to maintain code of dress- a level of decency - Something sluts lack and why they are generally looked down upon.

What happens when a neckbeard start flaunting his dick in public? Wont people be offended at all? Won't you find it disgusting?

Only the insecure fools need to show their body (and have sex with numerous strangers) to attract others attention and eventually gain trouble and disrespect.

Thats just the way it is, and if you don't like it there are two options:

1.Deal with it
2. Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.2193405]

>>2193395

I think one guy said it perfectly :

Sluts = Hit it and Quit it

If sluts don't like it, then stop being a slut
Its easy as pie

sage for not vidya

[Anonymous No.2193409]

>>2193395

You ever notice how its always guys defending sluts and not actual sluts themselves?

Shit is hilarious man.

[Anonymous No.2193416]

>>2193395

>Are you saying they don't?

I'm saying it's perfectly possible to just desire someone's body without developing feelings for them. I mean jesus christ how would a gloryhole work if you needed emotions to enjoy a fuck?

>And yet you still don't understand;
>Women can't dress like sluts even in Corporate offices .. ever seen a CEO of Company come in a meeting like that ?
>or front office Bank officers half naked? why ?

Because it's socially frowned upon. An attitude that I'm contesting and an attitude that you're supposed to be defending.

>Every company wants to maintain code of dress- a level of decency - Something sluts lack and why they are generally looked down upon.

Because it's socially frowned upon. An attitude that I'm contesting and an attitude that you're supposed to be defending.

>What happens when a neckbeard start flaunting his dick in public? Wont people be offended at all? Won't you find it disgusting?

Well it wouldn't be very hygienic, yes I would probably find it disgusting. No one has the right to not be offended though. The whole idea of "being offended" is kind of silly to me actually.

>Only the insecure fools need to show their body (and have sex with numerous strangers) to attract others attention and eventually gain trouble and disrespect.

Yes, that's what we're talking about.

>Thats just the way it is, and if you don't like it there are two options:
>1.Deal with it
>2. Kill yourself

After all this bullshit you still miss the basic premise of this whole fucking debate. YES THAT'S THE WAY IT IS RIGHT NOW AND I'M SAYING IT SHOULDN'T BE THAT WAY. I AM AMAZED YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND THE SIMPLICITY OF WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY HERE. YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT HOW THINGS ARE AND I KEEP ASKING WHY SHOULD THEY BE LIKE THAT, HOW IS THIS JUSTIFIED AND YOU JUST KEEP REPEATING HOW THINGS ARE LIKE YOU HAVE ALZHEIMER'S OR SOMETHING.

[Anonymous No.2193421]

>>2193409
I got into a huge argument due to using the word 'relevant' in relation to philosophy

I hope they jump on you as they did me, in the interest of fairness

Relevance is what you make it.

[Anonymous No.2193423]

>>2193409

Why is that funny?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about this because I'm deeply involved in the issue personally, it's more about the satisfaction of winning a debate, which is easy to do when you're talking to mentally deficient little manchildren like >>2193395

[Anonymous No.2193425]

>>2193416
>gloryhole

What the actual fuck? where did that come from?

>Because it's socially frowned upon. An attitude that I'm contesting and an attitude that you're supposed to be defending.

Translation: I don't give a fuck about decency and being modest

>The whole idea of "being offended" is kind of silly to me actually.

Dude what.

>YES THAT'S THE WAY IT IS RIGHT NOW AND I'M SAYING IT SHOULDN'T BE THAT WAY.

Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.2193433]

>>2193425

>What the actual fuck? where did that come from?

Do you not know what a gloryhole is?

>Translation: I don't give a fuck about decency and being modest

WHAT? No seriously WHAT? Are you just now realizing we're having a debate about what is morally right? What do you mean "decency" ? What do you mean by "being modest" in this context? Being modest about what? Having sex? Why would you have to be modest about that?

>Dude what.

Yes I don't get what "being offended" is all about.

>YES THAT'S THE WAY IT IS RIGHT NOW AND I'M SAYING IT SHOULDN'T BE THAT WAY.

Holy fucking shit. If you've been trolling me you are a fucking master buddy.

[Anonymous No.2193450]

>>2193423

Again.
If a women wants to be a slut, no-one is stopping her; have your slut walks or whatever.

If you want to be doing that alot well no one is about to stop you. If you were in this just to "win" a meaningless debate over a gutter site, I think you need to prioritize your life, To have have such low self worth is sad and dis-heartening.

I would not, and am not going to involve myself with someone who has been with 100 people. I like my women to have some class and some dignity for herself, if she is going on a self journey to discover her sexuality that requires her to sleep with multiple strangers, count me out.

No matter how much you whine and complain, a person who objectify himself becomes exactly that - an object.
We are who we make ourselves to be:

person who murders is a murderer
a person who is creative is an artist
a man who races cars is a racer
a women who objectify herself is an object

Of course you may disagree, but the fact remains person must establish control. As long as she realize what shes getting into (the consequences being the possibility of STDs, broken/ruined social statuses, loss of friends, and pregnancy) and are not acting on impulse, then whatever.

Prostitutes gotta get paid too.


I gotta admit, I'm trying to play skyrim here and I'm having a hard time switching my neck constantly between screens

[Anonymous No.2193456]

http://www.ics.uci.edu/~dan/midi/rock/ComeSailAway.mid

[Anonymous No.2193470]

>>2193450

>If you were in this just to "win" a meaningless debate over a gutter site

It's not meaningless to me.

>I think you need to prioritize your life, To have have such low self worth is sad and dis-heartening.

But I don't have low self-worth. This psych evaluation is not only unnecessary but as wrong as one can be.

>I would not, and am not going to involve myself with someone who has been with 100 people.

Ok. Coolio.

>No matter how much you whine and complain, a person who objectify himself becomes exactly that - an object.

But the objectification is only present in the act of casual sex, it doesn't carry over to anything else you do. Just because you fuck a lot doesn't mean someone can just stop you on the street and rape you I mean what the fuck are you talking about man.

>a women who objectify herself is an object

The fact that you talk of women as if this doesn't apply to men just as well is very telling.

>person must establish control

Control is needed when negative consequences occur if control is not present. The only control that needs to be in this case is to prevent STDs.

>broken/ruined social statuses, loss of friends

As a sidenote I'd like to add that if the world wasn't filled with assholes like you these consequences wouldn't exist.

[Anonymous No.2193484]

>It's not meaningless to me.

That's what happens when you spend all day on 4chan, go outside and see the real world.

>But the objectification is only present in the act of casual sex, it doesn't carry over to anything else you do.

:broken/ruined social statuses, loss of friends

>The fact that you talk of women as if this doesn't apply to men just as well is very telling.

I swear I said there was a double standard or someone here mentioned it.

>Control is needed when negative consequences occur if control is not present. The only control that needs to be in this case is to prevent STDs.

Yes..That's what I just said.

>As a sidenote I'd like to add that if the world wasn't filled with assholes like you these consequences wouldn't exist.

Are you saying that a nice girl/guy who donates to charity adopts,donates organs has a friend who turns into a slut bucket and doesn't want to associate themselves with that is a "asshole"?

also "the low self worth" comment was actually a typo and part of the sentence that came before.
Are we done here?

[Anonymous No.2193493]

>>2193484

>:broken/ruined social statuses, loss of friends

Yes, these are consequences that could result from being slutty in our current society. It shouldn't be that way though.

>Are you saying that a nice girl/guy who donates to charity adopts,donates organs has a friend who turns into a slut bucket and doesn't want to associate themselves with that is a "asshole"?

He is being an asshole in that specific situation.

>Are we done here?

If this

>As long as she realize what shes getting into (the consequences being the possibility of STDs, broken/ruined social statuses, loss of friends, and pregnancy) and are not acting on impulse, then whatever.

means that you don't think it is particularly wrong morally but you just personally find it to be disgusting behaviour, then yes.

[Anonymous No.2193494]

>>2193484
"Never argue with a fool, on lookers may not be able to tell the difference."

I get what your saying and I agree but this hipster faggot already stated hes in it to win an argument, I don't see what your trying to do here.

[Anonymous No.2193497]

>>2193493
>It shouldn't be that way though.

But it is, so deal with it.

>He is being an asshole in that specific situation.

Cry more. Next time word your argument properly.

>means that you don't think it is particularly wrong morally but you just personally find it to be disgusting behaviour, then yes.

Wrong.
I already stated several times I find it morally wrong and disgusting, what have you been reading? or is that cock so far up your ass that its cutting off blood flow?

[Anonymous No.2193500]

>>2193494

Yeah, I'm bored and done.
I guess its "Chewbacca Defense" at its finest.

[Anonymous No.2193502]

[Anonymous No.2193506]

>>2193502

>chocolate pudding

[Anonymous No.2193508]

>>2193497

>But it is, so deal with it.

This argument was about why is it morally wrong to be slutty, I don't understand why you incessantly bring up the fact that sluttyness is socially frowned upon. It is fucking irrelevant. I'm asking YOU, not society.

>I already stated several times I find it morally wrong and disgusting, what have you been reading? or is that cock so far up your ass that its cutting off blood flow?

Yet you haven't said a single reason why it's morally wrong. You just keep babbling on about how it's socially not accepted and blah blah blah I mean jesus fuck.

It it the "lack of control" that makes it morally wrong? What is it? Say it already, don't write another paragraph about how sluts are not respected.

>>2193494

Just because I'm in it to win an argument doesn't mean I don't fully believe all of what I am saying.

[Anonymous No.2193511]

>>2193508

>is it*

[Anonymous No.2193513]

>>2193038
here's one man
>>2193052


anyone notice how all the kids are mexican in th epix

[Anonymous No.2193523]

>>2193513
South central LA is overwhelmingly Hispanic now.

[Anonymous No.2193526]

>>2193513
>>2193523
that's progress.
There will be only be peace and harmony when the hated white race is exterminated.

[Anonymous No.2193529]

>>2193508
I already answered your questions and frankly I'm getting bored with this conversation.

I'm appalled at my self for wasting time arguing over the internet.

Enjoying talking to yourself bro.

[Anonymous No.2193532]

[Anonymous No.2193533]

>>2193508
You don't believe in morals, you don't believe in absolutes, you believe that you should be "free" to do whatever the fuck you want with no consequences, and that anything you want should be provided by the state/society.

You are the typical liberal.

[Anonymous No.2193536]

Sasha Gray looks so cute in ordinary clothes.

[Anonymous No.2193537]

>>2193508

Fuck off cunt.

[Anonymous No.2193540]

>>2193529

No you have not.

>>2193533

>You don't believe in morals

Yes I do.

>you don't believe in absolutes

I'm not sure what that means.

>you believe that you should be "free" to do whatever the fuck you want with no consequences, and that anything you want should be provided by the state/society.

Are you trying to be a stereotypical conservatard here or what?

>>2193537

Little Jimmy ran out of things to say? Dawwww :3. So cute.

[Anonymous No.2193544]

Am I the only one amused that in OP's pic only dudes are swarming on her?

Also, she looks like a typical student-teacher there. Man...

[Anonymous No.2193546]

>>2193540

QUICK EVERYONE AGREE WITH HIM

[Anonymous No.2193550]

>>2193546

Are you chastising me for trying to convince people in a debate? Did mommy drop you on your head when you were little?

[Anonymous No.2193554]

[Anonymous No.2193557]

>>2193554

>HURRR DURRR GODDANG LIBURULS!!!!111

Convincing argument, sport.

[Anonymous No.2193568]

>>2193557
Liberals prove again and again that they will never listen to argument. So you have to sometimes just laugh at them and wonder if they ever get a clue.

[Anonymous No.2193573]

>>2193568

Excuse me, what argument? Point me to it.

[Anonymous No.2193576]

>>2193568
>Conservatives prove again and again that they will never listen to argument. So you have to sometimes just laugh at them and wonder if they ever get a clue.
Fixed that for ya, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.2193578]

>>2193573
Things become normal and traditions for a reason ya know?

That alone is more then enough of an argument.

>>2193576
Completely wrong. conservatives are the ones who listen to reason and logic and change their minds on topics.

All conservatism is, is looking at the past, seeing what worked then and wanting our countries to continue working, growing and prospering.

[Anonymous No.2193582]

>>2193578
>change their minds on topics
>The definition of conservatism is to keep things the way they are with a minimum of change.
>Troll detected

[Anonymous No.2193583]

>>2193578

>Things become normal and traditions for a reason ya know?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy

>That alone is more then enough of an argument.

You're kidding me, right? Slavery was normal for thousands of years. Shouldn't people have tried to change things because it was tradition to have slaves? Jesus fucking christ.

I seriously hope you're doing a tongue-in-cheek parody of the average conservatard because otherwise this is fucking depressing.

[Anonymous No.2193584]

>>2193582
They are Correct hence why they don't need to change their minds.
Their proof is a thousand years of history and tradition through which our societies have stood strong.

Already 50 years of liberalism and we are almost dead. Not a good track record, in fact it makes me wonder how anyone could support it! But i suppose traitors will be traitors.

[Anonymous No.2193590]

>>2193583
So you are saying that not being able to fuck strangers whenever you want, for money, is the same as keeping negro slaves?

[Anonymous No.2193591]

>>2193550

I read this entire argument and this is guy is such a fucking libtard its amazing, I'm surprise the other guy put up with more then he should have.

Then again, this board is know for liberal hipsters so I'm not all that surprised.

[Anonymous No.2193596]

>Already 50 years of liberalism and we are almost dead.

God damn, I just realized that.

>>2193583
>Comparing Sluts to slavery


ISHYGDDT

[Anonymous No.2193597]

nice ass

[Anonymous No.2193598]

you would think on a literature board people would have better insults than "retard"

[Anonymous No.2193602]

>>2193597

[Anonymous No.2193603]

>>2193590

No I'm not saying that at all. Can you read?

>>2193591

You should've interjected and put me in my place with your awesome arguments bro.

I mean starting to talk about "libtards" and "liberals" doesn't really paint a nice picture of you. Here I am, picking a very specific area of discussion and not mentioning anything about conservatism or the people associated with the belief I am debating against but then you come in with this bullshit. It's completely unnecessary. Just address the issue itself or fuck off.

[Anonymous No.2193606]

>>2193584
>>2193591
Samefag detected.
He's either a troll or very stupid. Either way you should know better than to poke your fingers into his cage.

[Anonymous No.2193607]

>>2193596

I WAS ATTACKING THE IDEA THAT THINGS SHOULDN'T BE CHANGED BECAUSE THEY ARE THE WAY THEY ARE.

NOW THAT I TYPED THAT OUT I REALIZE JUST HOW FUCKING RETARDED THAT STANCE IS AND THE IDEA OF HAVING TO ACTUALLY WASTE MY TIME ARGUING AGAINST SOMETHING LIKE THAT IS RIDICULOUS. I MEAN JUST READ THAT FUCKING SENTENCE.

[Anonymous No.2193609]

This thread is awful.

[Anonymous No.2193611]

>217 posts and 41 image replies omitted.
wtf, /lit/. You'd think this was an Ayn Rand thread.

[Anonymous No.2193612]

After 200+ replies the strongest argument you can muster is still "sex out of wedlock is wrong".

Well done, retards.

[Anonymous No.2193614]

>>2193603
look here:
>>2193537

This is why no-one is taking you seriously

[Anonymous No.2193616]

>>2193614
look here:
>>2193550

This is why no one is taking you seriously.

[Anonymous No.2193617]

>>2193603
Hedonism and promiscuous behavior is a symptom of degeneracy and so it is objectively bad.

[Anonymous No.2193618]

>>2193614

Do you actually think that's an argument?

[thyme No.2193621]

basil

[Anonymous No.2193622]

>>2193618

That's not an "argument" I am merely stating the obvious.

[bassetsquirrel No.2193624]

>>2193612
what kind word is wedlock?

If i ever got married i would hope my wife would fuck who ever she wished.

And if she fucked someone other than me I would hope she would rot in hell and die alone as the bitch no one can ever trust.

[Anonymous No.2193625]

>>2193617

What is degenerate about this promiscuous behavior? Why is something hedonistic where the negative consequences can be nullified degenerate? Why is it bad?

[sage No.2193628]

I hear tasty herbs are being served ITT

[Anonymous No.2193629]

>>2193617

>inb4 WAAA BUT IT SHOULD'NT BE THAT WAAY SAY WHO FUCK SOCIETY

[Anonymous No.2193633]

>>2193364

people find promiscuity easier thats why it's looked down upon. It doesn't take any work or commitment, so how much happiness can it really bring you? Not that it can't bring you any happiness, but most people find a loving, stable, monogamous relationship more fulfilling. Doesn't everyone say that everything worth having requires hard work?

I agree with you brother.

[Anonymous No.2193636]

>>2193625

Because it leads to harm since hedonism usually does not involve self control. If you argue that it does then real life will re bulk that quickly. There can be dangerous consequences that affect the person who is in a constant hedonist state and the people around them.

[Anonymous No.2193641]

>>2193636
Excellent point, I think someone mention this to him already but hes just trolling at this point.


Of course the way you worded it, was much better.

[Anonymous No.2193642]

>>2193636

How does safe sex with strangers lead to harm?

[Anonymous No.2193648]

>>2193642
>how are babbys formed??
>why is the ocean blue??
>why do women have breast??
>how do birds fly??
>Whats a fraction?


PROTIP: Go figure it out like the rest of us

[Anonymous No.2193653]

>>2193642

You said hedonism. Hedonism is the pursuit of maximum pleasure. Safe sex does not give as much pleasure as unprotected sex. You said nothing about safe sex in your post.

[Anonymous No.2193654]

>>2193648

I assume you aren't the guy I responded to.

[Anonymous No.2193657]

>>2193642

He asked this question already and it was answered.
Don't respond, let this shitty thread die already

[Anonymous No.2193662]

>>2193653

The negative consequences of this "hedonistic" act (which isn't purely hedonistic (depending on your definition of the word), which is something YOU equated to being slutty incorrectly in this post >>2193617 ) can be nullified.

Trying to pull the ol' switcheroo, eh?

[Anonymous No.2193754]

>>2192393
Where canst thou find this video.

[Anonymous No.2193770]

>>2193653
Depends. Epicureanism is a form of hedonism.

He would argue that one should not have unprotected sex too often, only because it could lead to dissatisfaction later. Such as unwanted pregnancies, STD's, etc.

Hedonism is defined by a pursuit of pleasure. How one defines pleasure is different.

[Anonymous No.2193771]

she does everything for attention
when she started out as a porn star, she went straight to the tyra banks show to get the most publicity as possible
she tried making it as a musician, to mixed reviews
If she's being all like "just cause I was a porn star, and I want to do "x" get over it" she is doing it specifically to garner attention.

[Anonymous No.2193772]

>>2193770
or, which I forgot to mention, the overindulgence of pleasure... which can result in pain. Taken in a literal sense, if you eat or have sex too much, you are stuffed to discomfort or have chaffing sores.

However, if one eats good food too much, that "good food" is no longer luxurious. It becomes "normal" to that person, and loses it's luster. The pursuit of pleasure has to be moderated, or else it leads to pain. This is according to an Epicurean philosophy.

[Anonymous No.2193773]

>>2193771
>she does everything for money

ftfy

[Anonymous No.2193794]

Looks like a lot of brown kids. Most likely neither them or their teachers have internet acces to know that they invited one of the most disgusting human beings on the face of the Earth to read Dr Seuss.