[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 74 KB, 736x1104, pomo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21888160 No.21888160 [Reply] [Original]

what's it going to be called?
what will it look like?

>> No.21888172

>>21888160
Hypermodernism
look up our peak bum John David Ebert

>> No.21888186

a prolonged malaise until we reach total skeptic degeneration that will lead to a secular dark age

>> No.21888188

>>21888186
this, and then the second coming manifest as nuclear war. where else could it go?

>> No.21888208

Turns out adding the prefixes Post- and Neo- to everything is a poor naming method.

>> No.21889004

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91gT68xeDMM

>> No.21889361

the flood

>> No.21889366

enjoy this zoomer critique of postmodernism
https://youtu.be/Fav-SS0L78Q

>> No.21889383

>>21888160
that image is not even close to what modern and so-called post-modern characteristics are.
>1. M: The object of knowledge is grounded for us in our gnoseological and epistemological structures // PM: Technology goes beyond humanism and so humanistic grounding should be re-judged.
>2. M: Object is determined through categories // PM: The gnoseological and epistemological structures need to be accounted genetically
>3. M: Different branches of Rationalism // PM: Different branches of Genealogy

>> No.21889388

metamodernism

>> No.21889520

Postmodernism is a lot of things and that image only partially captures the idea

>> No.21889606

>>21889520
>Postmodernism is a lot of things and that image only partially captures the idea
so the entire concept isn't captured in a summary? damn

>> No.21889613

>uhh history is over nothing left but to just wait for societal collapse and the nukes to fly
have some imagination you retards

>> No.21889628 [DELETED] 

>>21888160
negative modernism
>Knowledge is certain, objective, bad
>Aversion from the image, and from the symbol behind the image
>Discard reasoning, knowing, communication
You can call me retarded, I am literally retarded so it's fine really

>> No.21889925

>Postpostmodernism
>Metamodernism
>Hypermodernism
Things are too meta to be named

>> No.21890040

>>21888160
New Sincerity /s

>> No.21890068

>>21888160
Postmodernism was coined to reffer a historical moment that couldn't be deffined through a modernist worldview. It then ---because americans have always be name-tag-fetichist-consoomers--- became 2 things: 1) Lyotard and others keep using the term postmodernism as a kind of thought as US universities wanted to do in order to exploit content (even if it was a shitty conception like 'anthropocene' and the like); 2) Non US-subjectivated people kept using it as a term that reffers to searching the state of thought after modernist narratives collapsed.

>> No.21890645
File: 990 KB, 712x1082, dickgirlsuperior.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21890645

Transpostmodernism we are unironically living in it see pic related

>> No.21890654

>>21888160
Metamodernism

>> No.21890696

>>21888188
second coming, two more weeks, guys. don't forget your tithes

>> No.21891185
File: 83 KB, 1024x572, A5F30D08-0411-4672-B7ED-825A509389B2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21891185

>>21889366
That’s actually really good,
A based zoomer? Now I feel old

>> No.21891198

>>21888160
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_realism_(philosophy)

>> No.21891369

>>21888160
pre-futurism

>> No.21891413

>>21890645
Hyperfemininity
More real than real

>> No.21891525

>>21888160
>modern: knowledge is… medieval. Set in stone by the priests themselves
This is modern?

Modern: focused on object. Never ideas
Beg pardon?

This picture is so stupid

>> No.21892241

i think any -ism will become irrelevant and a new term will be use for whatever new trend comes out

>> No.21892251

>>21888160
>hermeneutic
Can anons explain this to me?
Is like bubbles, knowledge makes sense/is true "in group(s)", inside your group's bubble?

>> No.21892262

>>21889383
this sounds more like your interpretation that you're trying to make appear generally accepted

>> No.21892270

>>21892251
hermeneutics are basically interpretation or the abstraction of observation of events
the blue curtains are not blue curtains, for instance; they are a metaphor for sadness

>> No.21892292

>>21892270
Thanks, I misread it as
>Hermetics
Kek

>> No.21892313

>>21892251
hermeneutics is interpretation or interpretation within a certain context. so for instance, the first time you read socrates is different from the time you read him after you've been exposed to the broader field of philosophy. it's the same work but your understanding is different than the first time.

what the op's image is trying to express is probably the interpretation of something in a context that is appropriate for the time it was created in. for instance, you wouldn't divorce the study of history from the context and cultural atmosphere belonging to its time. if you read a very loving and sugary letter from one woman to another, you might think that they are gay lovers, but, if you take into account the time's cultural norms, you might find that it's not indicative of a homosexual relation but one of deep affection that is not sexual.

>> No.21892728

>>21888160
We're not even in 'postmodern' yet, if there is such a thing. Check out Nathan Brown's "Postmodernism? not yet" from I think PMLA or Radical Philosophy a few years ago

>> No.21892856

>>21888160
I'm starting to suspects that hermeneutics doesn't mean anything. Everyone has a different definition and the only common characteristic is that people interpret a thing in different ways. That's not something new.

>> No.21892892

>>21892262
no, he is right