[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 374 KB, 1200x1523, Femboys vs Tomboys.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21739443 No.21739443 [Reply] [Original]

A sincere clash of minds between the defenders of "feminine men" and those of "masculine women." Which would you choose to empty your seed into, spend your waking hours alongside, and love for the rest of your life in neverending matrimony? These are the questions among the lonely, porn addled anons of 4chan's literature board.

OP's observed pros and cons of both options:

>Femboy
+low skill ceiling
+"metaphysical cuckoldry" of the subject's father
+ego boost
-aids
-feminine hobbies
-troon pipeline

>Tomboy
+similar hobbies
+healthier lifestyle
+child-bearing capabilities
-masculine features
-high maintenance
-high testosterone

Discuss.

>> No.21739462

>/lit/ - Literature

>> No.21739467
File: 1.56 MB, 498x339, gachimuchi.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21739467

>>21739443
Men. MANLYMEN. Men in tights.

Duh.

>> No.21739473

>>21739443
As a straight man:
- A masculine woman is still a women. Sex with women is heterosexual.
- A feminine man is still a man. Sex with men is homosexual.
- Therefore, I, a heterosexual man, choose sex with women.

>> No.21739479

>>21739443
>plato is wrong
>aristotle is right
The more things change the more they stay the same

>> No.21739486

>>21739467
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yQobd_Lkgs

>> No.21739502
File: 59 KB, 680x596, American Woman vs Thai Man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21739502

>>21739473
By those traditional conventions, anon, you would surely choose the American woman over the Thai man in regards to pic rel, correct? I for one find my heterosexually challenged by this dilemma and wonder how negligible a man's reproductive organs can be on an otherwise womanly figure.

>> No.21739503

A trap that acts like a tomboy.

>> No.21739511

>>21739503
That's a man

>> No.21739514

>>21739502
Men are attracted to BEAUTY, which is defined in attractive women
Ugly women are abominations and no dignity is had in fucking them

>> No.21739515

>>21739443
I've only ever seen one femboy that I would ever consider fucking, and that was on tiktok. He was working behind a counter I think and the person filming asked him if he was really a boy. He was ridiculously beautiful and I would have made passionate love to him all night.

>> No.21739520

>>21739443
The femboy will lose his beauty far more quickly than the tomboy hers, I choose the latter

>> No.21739525

>>21739443
Tomboys don't exist
>>21739515
Source

>> No.21739529

>>21739502
Femboys have dicks. Completely ruins everything. And anal “sex” is gross.

>> No.21739533

>>21739443
No disrespect to fags but I've never understood what's so hot about anuses, an anus is dry, stinks, there's poop inside, it's not tight like a pussy, fucking awful

>> No.21739537

>>21739525
No I haven't been able to find it again since then, and I was hoping someone ITT might know

>> No.21739541
File: 594 KB, 1346x1005, 1624291544716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21739541

>>21739443
Anyone who thinks that make-up, shopping or tv shows are the worst things about women has never been in a relationship. What actually happens is that you're putting up with thoroughly selfish and cynical adolescent whose 3 primary modes of behavior are:
1. demanding attention
2. shit-testing/nagging/gaslighting
3. demented, malicious gossip
And needless to say, given enough time, you're almost certain to get cuckolded.

>> No.21739545

>>21739533
Sticking your bare dick into a literal shithole is mental illness. Don’t let the freaks deceive you.

>> No.21739546

>>21739443
A woman's beauty is simply the bait to hook you into starting a family, the true purpose of life. A man can never give you children, so it's all just illusory pleasure for the sake of pleasure.

>> No.21739547

>>21739511
You wouldn't understand.

>> No.21739626

>>21739541
Get back to me when you stop fucking girls and start fucking women. The adult version is so much worse.

>> No.21739643
File: 192 KB, 500x1315, Philosophers on Traps.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21739643

>>21739529
If a man's body is feminine to such a degree that it becomes indiscernible from that of a woman's, the presence of the penis would be the deal-breaker for you? Because from what I can gather from your limited response, the penis alone ruins all other pleasures that can be derived from a femboy? I suppose a disdain for sodomy and a high value of "pure" vaginal sex is commendable, but an outright rejection of this emulated female form, a usurping of beauty standings in defiance of "normal women," a being that exists for the sole purpose of submission and loyalty to the "alpha male," just because of a small, chastised, dormant body part that may slightly incontinence your advances or bring a tinge of shame upon your sexuality, I don't understand.

>> No.21739652

>>21739626
I just graduated to women recently as all the girls on dating apps are late 20s or over 30 for me now and they are the must sub-human monsters I've ever seen, how can you have such low value and still only think to talk about how you went skiing once, everybody has been skiing once you fucking moron.

>> No.21739662

>>21739533
>it's not tight like a pussy,

Well it's obvious you have no idea what you're talking about

>> No.21739666

>>21739515
Yeah femboys are an exclusively online fetish because they can hide behind filters and poor lighting. Real life ones are probably as rare as gold in the dirt. I don’t see many tomboys these days either though, and the ones I’ve seen in the past haven’t been that enticing to me.

>> No.21739669

>>21739643
If we are talking about sex, genitalia is a huge issue, not a small one.

>> No.21739676

>>21739541
The better looking they are the more true this is. It can be a little fun if you’re in that mode to deal with it though. But nowadays I just don’t care.

>> No.21739691

>>21739533
>dry
That’s what lube is for.
>stinks, poop
Not if it’s cleaned. An uncleaned vagina stinks and is full of period blood too.
>not tight
Anuses are WAY tighter than pussies. That’s the whole attraction to them.

>> No.21739696

Logically speaking, Femboys are much more efficient, A Femboy both have a hole and a pipe to stick in a hole, Tomboy only have one.

>> No.21739733
File: 62 KB, 736x467, Are Traps Gay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21739733

>>21739669
I understand your perspective from a strictly reproductive standpoint, but when gauging the amount of pleasure that one can gain from a sexual relationship with a femboy (as I believe this thread has focused much of it's discourse on), the options, as well as the positions, available to the dominant "top," differ very little from what can be experienced with a woman. Missionary, for example, a common position used for vaginal sex, is equally applicable using a trap's anus. In theory, very little contact with the submissive's penis is needed, perhaps none at all.

>> No.21739748

>>21739691
Vaginas are naturally self-cleaning. A normal thin girl should have a pussy that doesn't smell, and that's if we're talking about eating it. If you just want to fuck, you won't ever notice a smell unless she has a severe pH imbalance. Vaginas are literally plug and play. They just work. Don't lie about anuses fag, you know the constant cleaning and prep time is unpleasant for everybody. It's a lot of work.

The only thing anuses have going for them is tightness. In exchange for that, every time you fuck someone's ass you're gradually wearing out their anal muscles and giving them hemorrhoids and other issues in the long run. Remember the mnemonic, AFHDA: all fags have destroyed anuses.

>> No.21739771

>>21739748
I don't see the downside for me. The faggot gets to spend a day cleaning his ass, gets it loosened up, catches a disease, and I get my nut off. Win-loose, and I'm the winner.

>> No.21739781

>>21739771
based AIDS spreader

>> No.21739784

>>21739443
>masculine features and high testosterone are a con of tomboys but not of femboys
Retard. Also a femboy is not “troon pipeline” it literally is a tranny.

>> No.21739791

>>21739443
I've always been with Aristotle on this one