/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.21701194]

Who are the top right wing writers of today other than Hollobeck, Peterson

[Anonymous No.21702127]

>>21701194
>Hollobeck, Peterson
>right wing
Kek

[Anonymous No.21702133]

Most famous one probably BAP. There aren't many.

[Anonymous No.21702161]

>>21701194
Hoppe
Yarvin

[Anonymous No.21702169]

>>21702127
Cuckservatism is the biggest bluepill

[Anonymous No.21702176]

Savitri Dev, Oswald Spengler, Miguel Serrano, Mosley, Degrelle, Rosenberg

[Anonymous No.21704115]

>>21702127
Not real right wing. Real right wing has never been tried.

[Anonymous No.21704125]

Samuel T. Francis
Alain de Benoist
Paul Gottfried
Alexander Jacob
Jonathan Bowden
Kerry Bolton

[Anonymous No.21704132]

>>21701194
Who is Hollobeck?

[Anonymous No.21704133]

>>21701194
BAP

[Anonymous No.21704138]

Theodoro Dalrymple

[Anonymous No.21704147]

Thomas Sowell

[Anonymous No.21704152]

>>21704133
Controlled opposition natcon

[Anonymous No.21704159]

Isn't right wing small government? If so then why is Hitler considered right wing if its a big fascist state?

[Anonymous No.21704213]

>>21704152
Kys

[Anonymous No.21704223]

>>21704125
>>21704147
These

[Anonymous No.21704265]

>>21701194
George Lincoln Rockwell but he is dead.

[Anonymous No.21704366]

>>21702133
>>21704133
garbage that's as bad or worse than peterson

[Anonymous No.21704377]

Curtis Yarvin, his blog is known as Unqualified Reservations.

>>21704147
Since when are liberals considered 'right-wing'?

[Anonymous No.21704574]

>>21704377
>profane jewish hack

[Anonymous No.21704590]

>>21701194
Žižek

[Anonymous No.21704646]

Can't think of many left, all the greats are dead. Marilynne Robinson, Wolfe, Updike and Bellow are the obvious answers.

Plenty of mediocre authors though: Simmons, Card, Niven, Sterling, Vinge, Cook, etc.

[Anonymous No.21704672]

>>21704377
unrestrained and restrained views on human nature are largely what separates left wing and right wing

[Anonymous No.21704679]

>>21704574
Yarvin is the most coherent of the grifters. Make of that what you will.

[Anonymous No.21704704]

>>21701194
Dugin

[Anonymous No.21704707]

>>21701194
How's it like being underage, OP?

[Anonymous No.21704708]

>>21701194
me

[Anonymous No.21704718]

>>21701194

[Anonymous No.21704719]

>>21701194
Raw Egg Nationalist

[Anonymous No.21704725]

>>21704159
Because they form their beliefs just to oppose leftist liberals, not to have coherent thoughts. They work inside a dichotomy.

[Anonymous No.21704742]

>>21704159
Small gov are lolbertarians.

[Anonymous No.21704804]

>>21704159
nazism is revolutionary in essence, lefts throwed it to the right because nazis opposed marxist socialism

[Anonymous No.21704824]

right wing must be anti-revolutionary, anti-utopia, belief in fallibility of men, political skepticism, permanent or almost no change human nature, affinity to tradition and tradional values

[Anonymous No.21705004]

>>21704115
Yes it has, Hitler and Mussolini are examples of real right wing governments. I can't imagine the microscopic pea brain of any retard who thinks flaccid limp-wristed neoliberal accomodationists like Peterson or hedonistic nihilists like Houellebecq are rightwing.

[Anonymous No.21705011]

Can’t think of a single person that
1 isnt dead
2 is good

[Anonymous No.21705016]

>>21701194
His speeches may have entered meme right wing culture but thankfully only the intelligent and/or truly deserving read his writings.

[Anonymous No.21705051]

[Anonymous No.21705071]

Paul Kingsnorth, Martin Shaw

[Anonymous No.21706124]

another thread where leftists pretending to be right-wingers post demoralization propaganda claiming that literally all noteworthy right-wing writers are controlled opposition and that any right-wing group action is run by feds
#wow #whoa

[Anonymous No.21706151]

>>21701194
thierry baudet

[Anonymous No.21706471]

>>21701194
Rockwellfag poster.

[Anonymous No.21706493]

There’s a bazillion christian conservative and libertarian writers out there but no one knows if they should count as RW cause RW means biological racism and JQ online. That said Sam Francis is probably the best recent RW thinker but he’s dead

[Anonymous No.21706506]

>>21704159
>Strong, verticle hierarchies
>Exclusionary rather than inclusive
>Rootedness and preservation of family structure
>Technologically realist, technology will not fix the problems of society
>Anti-Utopian world-view.

[Anonymous No.21706509]

>>21706493
so happy that francis is getting more appreciated lately

[Anonymous No.21706582]

>>21701194
If you mean currently writing, Sylvain Tesson is more based than Houellebecq even just among Frenchmen.

[Anonymous No.21706605]

Panagiotis Kondylis
Ludwig Von Haller
Gustavo Bueno

[Anonymous No.21706614]

>>21701194
Jared Taylor

[Anonymous No.21706663]

>>21702127
It's laughable. I hate nu/lit/

[Anonymous No.21706715]

>>21706663
To be fair the OP is obviously a falseflagging tranny or fed trying to disrupt organic right wing movements online. Like the "trad generals" the idiots are trying, where they post jbp, andrew tate and george orwell implying they're traditional.

[Anonymous No.21706735]

>>21706506
These are Right-Wing meta-values. Healthcare and abortion, gun rights and business rights are neither left nor right. Both modern left and right are both left-wing, there is a cig papers breadth between them. Actual right-wing systems are so far removed from anything resembling any kind of democratic system.

[Anonymous No.21706741]

>>21704719
>>21704133
You tards really take niche internet micro celebrities seriously. Ngmi

[Anonymous No.21706755]

>>21706506
>>Technologically realist, technology will not fix the problems of society

he conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.”


― Theodore J. Kaczynski, Industrial Society and Its Future

[Anonymous No.21706804]

>>21706755
Traditional values are not a thing. Ted is Left-Wing too.

[Anonymous No.21706834]

>>21706804
Wrong, everyone who is in favour of industrial society is a progressive and everyone who is not is a reactionary.

[Anonymous No.21706848]

>>21706834
What an absolutely retarded thing to say.

[Anonymous No.21706853]

>>21706834
>lawyerly redefining terms against all usage to fit preestablished claims
Ok, rabbi.

[Anonymous No.21706854]

>>21701194
Nobody has mentioned Nick Land who has aligned himself with Yarvin

[Anonymous No.21706876]

>>21706848
>>21706853
If you seriously think on technological society for some time and conclude it represents anything other than faustian progressivism you are deluded. Like Ted said, the greatest foolishness is to think you're in any way reactionary or conservative while approving of technology.

[Anonymous No.21706880]

>>21706854
He's mad at Yarvin now because Yarvin said he's team human and AGI revolution and singularity are both unrealistic and undesirable. Nick Land wants runaway machine intelligence to destroy all life on earth and colonise the universe so they're completely at odds.

[Anonymous No.21706891]

>>21706880
Yarvin is such a cuck.

[Anonymous No.21706913]

>>21701194
Auron McIntyre

[Anonymous No.21706978]

>>21706876
Read other books. You are no different to the Leftists Ted K describes.

[Anonymous No.21706990]

>>21702133

[Anonymous No.21707001]

>>21706913
lol, might as well list Nigel Carlsbad (pbuh) then

[Anonymous No.21707036]

>>21707001
Should I know who that is?

[Anonymous No.21707134]

>>21702176
>top right wing writers of today
>names dead ones

[Anonymous No.21707276]

>>21706876
Technology is a tool. Nothing more or less. The worship of tools such as technology is the same mistake as worshipping other tools in their various forms (like political ideologies or economic systems). These tools should be used when they are convenient and discarded when they are harmful, but instead they embraced as religions to be adhered to at all costs, even past their usefulness which often times leads to problems

[Anonymous No.21707282]

>>21702127
OP is a retard.

[Anonymous No.21707459]

>>21707036
yes, you should, political illiterate

https://carlsbad1819.wordpress.com

[Anonymous No.21707597]

>>21701194
Alexander Hamilton.

Fuck lolberts

[Anonymous No.21707791]

>>21707276
This choice is an illusion, either you recklessly adopt new technologies or your enemy does before you and gets a competitive edge and obliterates you. Nobody really had a choice to take or leave firearms, for example.

[Strange Love No.21708612]

>>21707276

>Technology is a tool.
>These tools should be used when they are convenient and discarded when they are harmful

Bingo.

>>21707791

The choice is in proper application of potentiality. Improper application against oneself is ultimately self destructive. Improper application against the enemy only is justifiable. Order is not established by rejecting to pick up the sword.

[Anonymous No.21708618]

>>21707134
Savitri Devi overcame material death in our plane of existence when she reincarnated into the next Vishnu avatar, pleb.

[Anonymous No.21708639]

>putting King Midwit Peterson on the same level as Michel Houellebecq
>calling Peterson "right-wing"
>unable to conceptualize the distinction between being Right wing and reactionary
This board is done, literally just /pol/ 2.0 with the same level of absolute 90 IQ retards posting here

[Anonymous No.21708648]

Peter Sloterdijk

That's it

[Anonymous No.21709573]

>>21708612
>The choice is in proper application of potentiality. Improper application against oneself is ultimately self destructive. Improper application against the enemy only is justifiable. Order is not established by rejecting to pick up the sword.
given the nature of the game anything that will have benefits short term must be implemented even if it has disastrous long term consequences if the alternative is being outcompeted now. That's how we ended up with the world we have.

[Anonymous No.21709577]

lmao

[Anonymous No.21709686]

>>21708618
ok where is this avatar now

[Anonymous No.21709703]

>>21709686
shitting in the street somewhere smoking a bidi

[Anonymous No.21711291]

>>21708639
>muh pol
Low IQ nignog detected.

[Anonymous No.21711562]

>>21707036
Damn, a quote by another eceleb. Amazing author.

[Anonymous No.21711569]

/lit/ sucks at the weekend

[Anonymous No.21711573]

>>21707459
Why should I care about some livejournal garbage?

[Anonymous No.21711609]

Iirc Hoppe is still alive

[Anonymous No.21711622]

>>21711609
He's too based for this world.

[Anonymous No.21711693]

>>21701194
Nu-right/alt-Right/MAGA//pol/?

None really. There is BAP I guess, but it's a more anti-intellectual movement than most anti-intellectual movements. It's mostly focused on the news cycle events of the day. The big figures in the movement are primarily into video and audio, and outrage porn of the week is very dominant. It's very much a reflection of the algorithm/hits driven world of "content creation."

>Traditional conservatives
Francis Fukuyama is probably the most influential political scientist of the past few decades with some extremely impressive work. His two volume opus on state development is fantastic. The End of History and The Last Man is shit on by people who never took the time to understand the theses. The Last Man theses had proven especially prescient with the whole wave of tactilarp and desire for war and conflict to "give life meaning."

There is Charles Murray. While his policy prescriptions are generally milquetoast 90s GOP policy, his diagnoses of the West's major issues is spot on. His attempt to link growing inequality to genetics is speculative at best, excuse making for recalcitrant elites that fundamentally misunderstands heritability at its worse, but other stuff he's done is worth engaging with.

Huntington hasn't been gone that long, and some of his less well known students like Feaver write good op eds.

There is Sowell. I am not a huge fan but he definitely counts and was good in debates.

The problem is, for the nu-Right, these guys are the "bad guys." The evil elites, and essentially leftists, and that very vocal minority steers conservative culture, so are these guys still conservative?

There are lots of big conservative writers on defense policy, but they seem even more exiled out of the new movement. Hell, the movement is now downright hostile to the military and security agencies. Petreus, Espers, Mattis, now public enemies.

There are also lots of influential right wing religious thinkers but that's sort of further outside politics.

[Anonymous No.21713027]

>>21706990
Keep seething, keith

[Anonymous No.21713054]

>>21706735
what my nigga steve got to do wit it

miss that guy frfr

[Anonymous No.21713544]

>>21713054
My childhood hero :_(

[Anonymous No.21714461]

>>21701194
Jonathan Bowden
Kai Murros

but we live in an upside down joke world, more likely to get something closer to genuine authoritarian govt from the likes of Greta Pooberg and the Blairite globocrats.

[Anonymous No.21714572]

>>21704159
You Americans are so clueless. Concepts like big and small government are fucking meaningless.

[Anonymous No.21715569]

>>21714572
Not to American political philosophy.

[Anonymous No.21715634]

>>21708639
Last year it was all snarky leftypol pseuds so I'm okay with this

[Anonymous No.21715650]

>>21715634
???? It’s been increasing steady towards /pol/ the last seven years or so. This place was never /leftypol/. No amount of lying will change that