Goodread's gender stats

[Anonymous No.21658949]

Men and women have different taste in literature

[Anonymous No.21658986]

>>21658949
People who use Goodreads are a breed of their own, and I mean this in the most negative possible way.

[Fren to James No.21658997]

>>21658949
genre and sex are the same thing, lefty!!

[Anonymous No.21659021]

>>21658949
Guys we need to read more poetry! poetry is based as fuck. Dont let them take this from us.

[Anonymous No.21659024]

>>21658949
>more men read chick-lit than historical romance

[Anonymous No.21659051]

>>21658949
What i find interesting about this is that it shows women are more willing to read a broad range than men.
Men group together on a smaller set of genres, but it seems like the women don't mind reading more typically male genres.

[Anonymous No.21659077]

>more femoids do read philosophy, than man classics
How could THIS happen, lads?

[Anonymous No.21659093]

More women use GR than men. This chart is useless.

[Anonymous No.21659097]

Goodreads is basic bitch tumblrite and söyboy central, its stats aren't too relevant for measuring anything.

[Anonymous No.21659107]

>>21659097
I’ve met some fellow chuds on there. The fact it’s full of soys means I don’t get bothered too much

[Anonymous No.21659148]

>>21658949
Men don't read nowadays, they spend their time watching thots on Tiktok and Onlyfans.

[Anonymous No.21659558]

>>21659051
you mean more women are more willing to scan their useless cow eyes blankly over a page causing nothing to happen in their empty skulls, then they proceed to leave the cliff notes summary as a'review'

[Anonymous No.21659584]

>>21659097
Just follow some rabbit holes of good accounts. You can find some pretty good books via that.

[Anonymous No.21659675]

>>21659558
No I didn't mean that.

[Anonymous No.21659916]

>>21658949
I'm a female in Goodreads

[Anonymous No.21660015]

>>21658986
What other sources exist to browse books and read book reviews?

[Anonymous No.21660089]

>>21659916
He means actual woman.

[Anonymous No.21660137]

>>21658949
If we adjust for sampling-inequality, how would the graph look? Just the bottom 3 rectangles for women equals the top 6 rectangles for men

[Anonymous No.21660208]

>>21658949

This chart is really just another way of modeling the intelligence bell curves for men and women as two separate groups, which is not to say that women are dumb, but simply that they are on average more mediocre.

[Anonymous No.21660435]

malesisters....

[Anonymous No.21660824]

>>21659916
Prove it. Post your favorite 3 (three) bookmarks

[Anonymous No.21660887]

>>21659051
that's a good point!
Women's tail end is at 50% than their main genre while men's is 10% or even less.
Another thing is how different in taste are the two. The disparity is to the point men's favourite genre is women's least favourite and vice versa

[Anonymous No.21660898]

>>21660887
(Me)
Actually, the difference is opinion is so distinct it's suspicious. The favorisim tiers are literally ordered the exact opposite. If the paper is not faking that's impressive

[Anonymous No.21660955]

[Anonymous No.21660972]

>>21658949
>Historical romance
WTF I never knew women were this based??!!?

[Anonymous No.21660986]

>>21660208
Idk, the only fields that men dominate are comic books and flavour of the month Michael Moore tier political trash.

/lit/brothers this is looking pretty grim

[Anonymous No.21660998]

>>21658949
Those philosophy and science fiction stats garner hope for my heart.
Though I worry what they might consider a philosophical work just as I worry what kind of science fiction the more gentle sex might prefer.

[Anonymous No.21661003]

>>21659558
>cow eyes
Cow eyes are so cute though. It also warms my heart thinking of a pretty girl with big eyes.

[Anonymous No.21661012]

>>21659024
I'm also dumbfounded. Perhaps historical romance means something else on goodreads.

[Anonymous No.21661026]

>>21661003
Cow eyes is a worthless insult, because it's targeted mostly at good looking and moral women. Maybe the type of men who like crazy bitches invented it, if two persons with the same sickness meet they don't get intimidated by each other's gaze.

[Anonymous No.21661189]

The fact that there's so many women compared to men goes to show that they view reading as social clout.

[Anonymous No.21661534]

>>21660887
>>21660898
it's percentage ratio of reviews, not disparity of opinions (60% reviews of philosophy books are written by men and the remaining 40% by women, this is what the graph says, it's the same data on both bars but reversed, nothing impressive or suspicious about that)

[Anonymous No.21661542]

who gives a shit
women dont even write real reviews
it's either a wikipedia outline of the story or seething that the author committed badthink.
they're fucking pozzed robots for the elite technocracy

[Anonymous No.21661547]

>>21661012
it's the ones with shirtless guys on covers, not Wuthering Heights

[Anonymous No.21661552]

>>21661026
simp

[Anonymous No.21661764]

Females read more and have a broader taste

[Anonymous No.21661866]

>>21659077
The men that read classics read classics and don't use glorified social media to talk about it. Except 4channel.

[Anonymous No.21661972]

I primarily use Goodreads to keep track of what I read and to chuckle at seething reviews