/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.21657213]

What's the deal with marxists trying to put child porn in school libraries?

[Anonymous No.21657220]

>>21657213
They want to fuck your kids

[Anonymous No.21657229]

Nobody cares about your stupid pearl clutching. None of the books in your bait post are actual textbooks nor is anyone (except for the most extreme sex-crazed lunatics) actually wants them in schools, and they are always and consistently shut down and will continue to be so by parent-teacher boards. Your thinly veiled bait post and political beliefs do not make you interesting and worth talking to nor are you contributing in any way of furthering this board's purpose and discussion other then pushing people further away from your beliefs by being a faggot about it.

[Anonymous No.21657230]

>>21657229
Why do you bother typing all of this out when you could just be honest and say you want kids to read these books? Do you think you're fooling anyone?

[Anonymous No.21657237]

I know extremism only produce extreme opposition and endless war, but you can't really blame someone for not seeing the value of moderation and becoming a Nazi when it gets to this level.
I saw a video of a "family friendly" drag-queen show. They had a drag taking tips from 7-year-olds and an "It's not going to lick itself" neon sign in the back.

[Anonymous No.21657238]

>>21657213
Protip: public schooling was always about indoctrination and brainwashing

[Anonymous No.21657242]

>>21657213
Public schools are a stupid idea, and these book conflicts shows why education should've never been moved to the public realm
The purpose is to allow governments to control how people are brought up, Rechudlican or Pedocrat, not to teach children or prepare them for life
It's better to let the parents decide who teaches their kids, give them the money instead of the school districts
The rich get to send their children to private boarding schools while the inner city genius rots in negro and rat infested 50-year old schools

[Anonymous No.21657250]

>>21657237
They are trying to bait somebody into shooting a child molester. The term is a 'drag-floyd' event. Then they can legislate in further red-flag surveillance laws and censorship as well as citizen disarmament ones. They are using a tactic of "I'm not touching you, I'm not touching you, I'm not touching you haha" of sticking a finger near but not in your eye so that when you respond the state can react toward you as the one who escalated. It's all so tiresome. Just stop watching the state media and homeschool your kids. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.21657251]

Whatever you wanna call it, it is clear how plainly ideological it is. It is not merely a diverse now-this-is-how-sex-really-is-for-everyone, but the intentional promotion of practices toward a certain end. If before, the sexual manual might have taught children it is merely a matter of reproduction and upholding the family (the kind analyzed by Duvert in Good Sex Illustrated, which can certainly also be ideological), now it is this—and it's an even subtler and grotesquer manner of control.

[Anonymous No.21657258]

Any books on the great satan and generally anti american literature?

[Anonymous No.21657261]

>>21657258
The Fabian Manifesto is a good start to all of this.

[Anonymous No.21657263]

Everything that has occurred since homosexuality has been normalized is a great example of why homosexuality should never be normalized and should be oppressed instead.

[Anonymous No.21657265]

>>21657263
I feel sorry for the homos that just want to be left alone to slowly commit suicide in the same way I feel bad for the real jews who aren't khazarian demons.

[Anonymous No.21657271]

>>21657250
It's not like I don't know the solution (or palliative, better said), but it really got to the "it's all so tiresome" point. The humiliation phase has started.

[Anonymous No.21657273]

Is this a bot thread?

[Anonymous No.21657280]

>>21657263
I don't think homosexuals should be executed but they absolutely should live in fear of being revealed.

[Anonymous No.21657288]

What's the obsession some people have with sex and children? Specifically demanding all types of sex be taught to children, at all. It's a weird thing to focus on as an adult.

[Anonymous No.21657291]

>>21657229
>None of the books in your bait post are actual textbooks
Prove it

[Anonymous No.21657302]

>>21657288
They're child predators and want to be able to molest children easier.

[Anonymous No.21657304]

>>21657288
It's funny how "story time" was always advertised as just "story time" and solely for the sake of telling stories. The only exceptions were if a particularly famous person was going to tell, or if the person telling has a job that kids find cool (like firefighters).
Now there are drag queen story hour events all around. I wonder why.

[Anonymous No.21657318]

>>21657291
The onus of proof is on OP, midwit

[Anonymous No.21657323]

>>21657213
>It is of crucial importance for the success of the revolution of the proletariat that children be schooled and learned in the ways of gay sex in the butt
-- Karl Marx, Das Kapital, Vol. IV pp. 314-315

[Anonymous No.21657331]

>>21657229
>and they are always and consistently shut down and will continue to be so by parent-teacher boards

Three random examples of school boards keeping one of these books available despite parent objections

https://www.wlky.com/article/gender-queer-book-louisville-jcps-libraries/41393659

https://chicago.suntimes.com/education/2022/6/10/23163160/gender-queer-book-ban-downers-grove-school-board-proud-boys-trans-identity-library-students

https://www.beaconjournal.com/story/news/2022/03/05/hudson-committee-says-gender-queer-can-stay-school-library-shelf/9322969002/

[Anonymous No.21657347]

>>21657229
based based based

[Anonymous No.21657352]

Wasn't there a book that says that keeping children away from anything sexual turns them into fascists?

[Anonymous No.21657400]

>>21657229
>nobody cares
I mean, marxists clearly care enough about wanting to put child porn in school libraries by doing it by any means necessary.
Are you claiming that everyone else is just pretending to not want child porn in public school libraries?

[Anonymous No.21657408]

>can you believe what your political opponents are doing?! it’s OUTRAGEOUS!
fuck off back to your containment board faggot

[Anonymous No.21657413]

>>21657408
>t. child predator

[Anonymous No.21657416]

>>21657352
>Wasn't there a book that says that keeping children away from anything sexual turns them into fascists?
Technically, they're right.
You have to be completely fucked in the head from an early age to not think adopting fascism is the bare minimum response to the insane level of leftist degeneracy.
Last time things got this bad people elected Hitler to put a stop to it, and were absolutely, 100% justified in doing so.

[Anonymous No.21657421]

>>21657413
wow i got btfo

[Anonymous No.21657434]

>>21657220
They want to destroy the nuclear family. That structure is, according to many Marxist thinkers, is inherently Fascist.

[Anonymous No.21657473]

>>21657213
are those Marxists in the room with us right now?
>>21657434
nuclear family isn't destroyed by putting gay shit in books but only by the proletarian dictatorship destroying capitalist economy. if you think for Marxists the determinant of the form the family takes is ideology rather than economic relations, then you should just refrain from talking about Marxism and stick to something at your intellectual level

[Anonymous No.21657493]

>>21657473
>are those Marxists in the room with us right now?
Yes.
>nuclear family isn't destroyed by putting gay shit in books
Yes, it is.
The entirety of "queer theory" is just rebranded Marxism for the sole purpose of destroying the family unit via incentivizing abnormal sexual relatuons.

[Anonymous No.21657494]

>>21657242
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-02/what-happens-now-that-gov-newsom-vetoed-high-school-ethnic-studies-requirement

[Anonymous No.21657502]

>>21657434
The nuclear family is gay
Bring back the clans

[Anonymous No.21657525]

>>21657502
The clan structure is composed of families.
>t. border reiver.

>>21657473
Yes it is. Marxism is against the standard nuclear family.

[Anonymous No.21657549]

>>21657229
/lit/ needs more of this sentiment. We should filter all low quality threads

[Anonymous No.21657557]

>>21657213
MARXISTS ARE BAD
THEY RUINED MY LIFE
THEY'RE THE REASON I LIVE IN MY MOTHER'S BASEMENT AND CAN'T GET A WIFE

[Anonymous No.21657560]

>>21657242
I went to inner city public school and it ruined my life. I'm not the only one I know like this. A friend of mine who is clearly 145+ IQ had to graduate at 20 years old in an alternative school because the public school system is set up solely for the most retarded children and if you don't fall in line with that program then you're the problem. They show no interest in promising students and its all about money anyway. Parasitic cunts just want a free ride.

[Anonymous No.21657563]

>>21657557
>MARXISTS ARE BAD
Yes.

[Anonymous No.21657568]

I don't care about the ethics of the situation. I don't really think that matters but why should it be schools' responsibility to teach kids sexual things? It simply doesn't make sense to me.

[Anonymous No.21657573]

>>21657229
Thank you

[Anonymous No.21657584]

>>21657568
1. Putting child porn in libraries isn't "sex ed".
2. Transgender communists who think men can get pregnant shouldn't be teaching sex ed, nor should they be allowed within 1000ft of a school.

[Anonymous No.21657603]

>>21657271
I forget the term but it's something like 4th tier of warfare where you just battle using propaganda alone.

[Anonymous No.21657616]

>>21657557
>the fabians convinced you marxism is the problem

[Anonymous No.21657628]

>>21657557
I AM VERY SILLY

[Anonymous No.21657640]

>>21657525
>Yes it is. Marxism is against the standard nuclear family
First they destroyed the family family on which grandparents helped you educate and care for your children by selling you a particle board house that you can pay property tax on. Then they destroyed this family by convincing the mother to go work so she could pay income tax so now the mother doesn't even educate and care for the children with minimal help from the grandparents. Now the state is relied upon to raise your children for you. Now your children are taught by the state and fed goyslop by the state to continue this cycle. But this wasn't enough because women occasionally help raise their children so they had to promote abortion and birth control so the income taxation never stopped producing revenue and you could just import more laborers to pay more taxes.

[Anonymous No.21657649]

>>21657493
>rebranded Marxism
>actually the opposite of Marxism because it claims the reverse relation between base and superstructure
>>21657525
>Yes it is. Marxism is against the standard nuclear family.
literal 30 iq level logic. "grass and frogs are both green, so they're the same thing"

[Anonymous No.21657656]

>>21657649
Marxism failed 130 years ago and the fabians won. Just shut the fuck up already.

[Anonymous No.21657667]

>>21657656
tell that to all the people who keep making posts reeeing about Marxism, not to me

[Anonymous No.21657719]

>>21657640
Because the other system destroys the family less directly does not distort the fact that many major marxist theorists think the nuclear family needs abolished because it is an unjust/imbalance of power.
Capitalism, while terrible for the nuclear family seeks profit.

Hence why National-Socialism is superior to both and the only means by which the family, nuclear and extended, are protected.

[Anonymous No.21657735]

>>21657213
You would all be perfectly fine with hetero sex ed books

[Anonymous No.21657746]

>>21657649
>Yes it is. Marxism is against the standard nuclear family.
Yes.
it literally always has been.
The nuclear family has always been the strongest check against a totalitarian state, which is why leftists have always attacked the nuclear family so relentlessly.

[Anonymous No.21657756]

>>21657735
Notice how exactly zero heterosexuals are trying to put child porn in public school libraries.

[Anonymous No.21657758]

>>21657746
>The nuclear family has always been the strongest check against a totalitarian state,
What? Historically the nuclear family can only be protected by a strong non-marxist state. An open, permissive state allows for the dissolution and destruction of the family.

[Anonymous No.21657782]

>>21657229
well said

[Anonymous No.21657785]

>>21657758
No, the family unit is a support system, a loyalty that doesn't belong to the state, a means of independence and generational wealth accumulation, and the most natural order in the world.
It takes generations of relentless leftist propaganda before getting to the point where being a baby killing, bug chasing scat fetishist is seen as more desirable than having a family.

[Anonymous No.21657789]

>>21657782
this isn't twitter, responding to yourself a hundred times with "ugh, you're so right!" just makes you look even more retarded than your original post

[Anonymous No.21657832]

>>21657323
A recurring coincidence
And also commies trying to invert everything Christian

[Anonymous No.21657844]

>>21657785
>No, the family unit is a support system, a loyalty that doesn't belong to the state, a means of independence and generational wealth accumulation, and the most natural order in the world.
You misunderstand my position. The family is not loyal to the state, the state must have loyatly only to the family. Wealth accumulation, imo, does not enter in to it and part of what causes the atomization of the family structure. They need to 'hustle', work hard, put in 40+ hours
When all they need is ootedness in a home they own in a homogenous area paired with skills and means for the local community to support them. End all dependende on foreign crops and products, chocolate, coffee, etc. Begin homestead houses and freeholders. Restore the honorable peasant class and noble rulers, stamp out the aritifical middle-class.

Picrel

[Anonymous No.21657957]

>>21657719
Nah. Agrarian libertarianism is the superior choice. You are just a communist.

[Anonymous No.21657979]

>21657213
Public education has always been retarded, this is nothing new, it's just in tune with [current thing]. Fuck off and take your retarded off topic bait thread with you.

[Anonymous No.21657986]

>>21657979
>Public education has always been retarded, this is nothing new, it's just in tune with [current thing]. Fuck off and take your retarded off topic bait thread with you.

[Anonymous No.21658060]

>>21657957
>libertarianism
Enjoy your bill gates oligarchy and subscription to continue living. Any libertarian thought only helps big business further take over markets, industries. After they have all the money they need, or better yet, circulate their own labor-tokens for use at their own store, what happens then?

[Anonymous No.21658067]

>>21658060
>Enjoy your bill gates oligarchy and subscription to continue living. Any libertarian thought only helps big business further take over markets, industries. After they have all the money they need, or better yet, circulate their own labor-tokens for use at their own store, what happens then?
Things look exactly the same as now because what you are describing is what happens with a state-corporation? bill gates makes windows have backdoors for the cia, the markets are state controlled in most industries, and they have state-corporation tokens that they print at will. I don't see how removing the state from doing this at gunpoint is worse than having the state do it all at gunpoint. They printed $14T over a cold in the last 2 years and you are arguing sound money with a libertarian? Are you mentally retarded?

[Anonymous No.21658073]

>>21657331
That guy and the people who replied to him with support completely ignored this post.

[Anonymous No.21658079]

>>21658073
He was just samefagging. Pretty common on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.21658147]

>>21658079
I figured he was. Embarrassing nonetheless.

[Anonymous No.21658160]

>>21658067
Because the state is an obstacle for big business to surmount, with the removal of that bug business fulfills the role/definition/space of the state. This is the same thinking that marxists have when they say the state will wither away. It does not, nor can it. It is a natural structure, the only means of making it beneficial is removing all traces of marxism and democracy from the leadership.

[Anonymous No.21658257]

>>21658160
>big businesses take the role of the state
>i choose which one is the best and get something out of it by paying my subscription
>monopoly is unsustainable
>the state exists by being a monopoly
>i have absolutely no choice and am enslaved to pay my subscription (taxes)
>monopoly is sustained through violence

[Anonymous No.21658314]

>>21658257
You can have a state that does not tax or take revenue from families.

[Anonymous No.21658322]

weird how the countries that actually call themselves marxist communists don't do this. Ah well, probably doesn't mean anything

[Anonymous No.21658349]

It’s not really Marxists doing this anymore, it’s just standard shitlibs. Marxists only got into the whole “the family and sexual conservatism are le tools of the bourgeoisie for keeping the revolution down” when people were losing faith in orthodox Marxism. They were basically grasping for more and more elaborate copes as to why capitalism wasn’t imploding. The funniest example I can think of this is from the 30s when Wilhelm Reich wrote that your children will turn into Nazis if you don’t let them play with their own poop and let them play incestuous exploration games as toddlers. Back to the point, shitlibs want to demythologize sex i.e. take away the stigma, and they especially want to do it for weird and aberrational forms of sex because practitioners of those are usually marginalized in some way

[Anonymous No.21658371]

>weird how the countries that actually call themselves marxist communists don't do this. Ah well, probably doesn't mean anything

[Anonymous No.21658373]

>>21658349
Oops, should be *don’t let them play the incestuous exploration games. He was all about that life. Btw there’s a rich history of this crap on the socialist western/new left that really went stratospheric in the 60s-80s. Though Marxoids itt are trying to squirm away from it

[Anonymous No.21658472]

>>21657229
Why would anyone listen to what you are saying after having seen how Progressives act in the real world? They ridicule the predictions of where their policies will lead, then the use institutional power to put those policies in place, then they ridicule anyone who questions the self-evident truth of the new system.

You don't have a compelling reason as to why children should not have access to that kind of material. It's an unprincipled exception. All you have is a set of pre-programmed emotional responses that are liable to change at any moment because they purely tactical and do not correspond to a consistent set of values.

"Only the most extreme people want that" means jack fucking shit when the wingnuts are the ones providing ideas. The moment the "moderate" beliefs cease to be a source of power, you will import an extreme idea to fill the void. The steam running out of gay marriage is the reason the current wave of gender/sexual anarchism exists in the first place, which literally everyone understands except Leftists who so deep in their ideology that they cannot see the larger structure.

You participate in a political pattern which obligates you to form a coalition of low-status people and propagandize on their behalf, pushing as far as you can towards the bottom of society without causing a backlash. Your sanctimony is meaningless because you literally don't have control over your own positions. If pedos emerge as a political power block that can swing elections, you will be obligated to incorporate them.

[Anonymous No.21658490]

>>21658472
You're talking to a literal demon who has no other existence than to destroy anything good and decent in the world. You can talk to him about principles, but he has no principle other than molestation and destruction. There is no reasoning with it.

[Anonymous No.21658493]

>>21658472
the simpler answer is that he's just a liar

[Anonymous No.21658502]

>>21658371
almost like Marxists try to subvert non-marxist countries but try to support marxist countries.

[Anonymous No.21658511]

>>21657746
>The nuclear family has always been the strongest check against a totalitarian state
Nope. Extended communities with an organic, internal elite is. The dipshit father of a White, suburban family is a prime host to infect with propaganda, while his great-great-great-grandfather who farmed in a remote village was virtually immune to it. The Communists always struggled with peasants more than urban proles, which is why they tried so hard to turn serfs into urban proles, or at least mill them around in massive collectives. Read Ellul.

[Anonymous No.21658529]

>>21657832
ME NO LIKE JOO
ME NO LIKE JOO
THEY ARE VERY INFERIOR TOO