[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 25 KB, 584x532, 6781B312-37EA-437D-8283-0D89A09CEBF9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21554595 No.21554595 [Reply] [Original]

Has acceleration been criticized or peer reviewed seriously? Any modern blogs or books on this other than the primary source? I sorta see the logic in supporting monarchies since they seem to survive the rebellions and objectors can be shipped away to another country if necessary. So many tangents on this topic.
>the enemy isnt here they’re in another country and we have to kill them or else
This is a great way to pretend the enemy isn’t home to avoid unnecessary hysteria. Cultural governance is an evolving science with the need for intelligence security yet that’s a very costly system. The forever war must end and its perpetuators lynched to protect our species’ liberty. Exhaust the angst of the schizos and welcome them back to humanity. Eugenics is not the answer. Every man woman and child deserves the right to build upon this land a home or move to find opportunity. We can have nice things but we must act for immobility is for the dead. Ty for reading my Ted talk. -1 thread

>> No.21554929

>>21554595
You ask a good question. I wonder if accelerationism is an idea invented and promulgated by the globalists.

>> No.21554945

>>21554595
>criticized
Uncle Ted

>> No.21555016

>>21554595
daily reminder that accelerationism is not something that one does, but rather observes.

>> No.21555590

Edward Dutton interviewed him

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kI0KjipQ2jdZ/
https://odysee.com/@JollyHeretic:d/Curtis-Yarvin-('Mencius-Moldbug')-Tells-All-About-the-Cathedral:a

>> No.21555595
File: 49 KB, 240x240, slatestarcodex.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21555595

https://slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-faq/

>> No.21555620

>>21555595
I got in an argument with Scott recently and have concluded he isn’t capable of understanding complex scientific problems or statistical analysis as he doesn’t seem familiar with the fundamentals or what they imply. He just kept sending links to articles written by normal journalists over various scientific subjects. I told him he should change his dumb motto from “less wrong” to “why think when you can link”

I thought it was a good one.

>> No.21555627

>>21554595
Huh

>> No.21555658
File: 69 KB, 452x363, 9c3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21555658

>>21555620

>> No.21557230

>>21555620
He tries his best. Sometimes asks the PhDs on Tumblr for help

>> No.21557265

>>21555016
Seconded

>>21554929
Brainlet

>> No.21558129

fuck off with your zioshill garbage

>> No.21558162

>>21554595
peer review is advanced form of confirmation bias

>> No.21558186

>>21554595
Acceleration only helps you if you have some sort of network in place. You need to actually be in a position to do something if things collapse or even if the system gets wobbly

>> No.21558203

What's the point of peer reviewing Moldbug? Like certain other beliefs popular on this board, it's a closed loop. Either you agree with him or you are part the Cathedral. Why waste your time with bad faith arguments?

>> No.21558270

>>21558203
This. Peer review is just a Cathedral purity test.

>> No.21558589

Moldbug is a retard with Ignatius Reilly opinions

>> No.21559017

>>21558203
>>21558270
Why is it called the Cathedral and not the Synagogue?