Schopenhauer Thread

[Anonymous No.21548832]

He is genuinely one of the greatest philosopher's of all time, I don't understand how universities constantly write about sophists such as Hegel, who write obscurely so that they may create a mystical allure of profundity to stupid and naïve students. He concisely reiterates Kant's philosophy even better then Kant himself, showing that space and time originate in our cognitive faculties, he then removes Kant's categories and shows that perception is an intellectual function, and in extraordinary depth shows how the brain receives an inverted impression, and how we see though two eyes one object - he also corroborates his theory with scientific studies at the time. The spatio-temporal multiplicity of the world is but an illusion, the principle of individuation is solely for representation; what the other German pseudo-philosophers of the time called the "Absolute" is undifferentiated and thus not subject to the principle of sufficient reason. What the Hindus call "Jiva", which means striving is the essence of all organic life. He always went to lengths to show that his metaphysics was in line with the natural science of the time, and after he passed away, his philosophy was mentioned by Charles Darwin himself. Not only that, his principle of individuation was appreciated by the likes of Einstein, Schrodinger, Wolfgang Pauli and Ernst Mach. I'm not sure what to read now after reading him, possibly Nietzsche.

[Anonymous No.21549217]

>>21548832
>I don't understand how universities constantly write about sophists such as Hegel
Hegel wrote for the universities, Schopie wrote for us.

[Anonymous No.21549224]

>>21548832
>I'm not sure what to read now after reading him,
Don't, search ends with Schopenhauer

[Anonymous No.21549256]

>>21548832
>>21548832
Order to read him in? Next on my reading list

[Anonymous No.21549267]

>>21549256
Kant -> WWR -> Parerga and Paralipomena
Also read at least a Stanford article on Descartes, Hume, Leibniz, and Wolff so that you can begin with Kant.

[Anonymous No.21549274]

>>21549267
For fucks sake.

[Anonymous No.21549277]

>>21549274
That was the minimalist route.

[Anonymous No.21549291]

>>21549224
Honestly, the only people to carry on his work is Schrodinger and Kastrup, I read some of Schrodinger's philosophical lectures and his book on philosophy, Kastrup is alright.
>>21549274
I simply read Kant's section on the Transcendental Aesthetic, Fourfold Root of Sufficient Reason and then the WWR. You could start with Parerga and Paralipomena if you just want to hear his views on various topics before reading his actual philosophical views.

[Anonymous No.21549296]

>>21549291
>Kastrup
Fuck no. He is an optimist, a religioncuck, a politicalcuck, a jungiancuck and teleologycuck.