[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 270 KB, 1051x818, 1658756153991507.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21524297 No.21524297 [Reply] [Original]

candid refutation of nietzsche

>> No.21524338

>>21524297
Indeed.

>> No.21524352

>>21524297
this is just schizo babbling, he didn't even address Nietzsche's point that the crucifixion of the innocent represents an objection to life. and did he seriously just say that the gospels aren't possessed by any mimetic contagion? lol.

>> No.21524670

As usual Christians seethe at Nietzsche when his points apply to far more than them. Honestly this sounds more like a critique of Schopenhauer than Christianity, your dealing with a take that seems to me more trying to digest and reverse pessimism than debunk Christianity. Any denial of life is is a sin for Nietzsche, even ascetics, orientals, transcendentalism. Also the Dionysian “mob” refers more to a Greek chorus than a decadent Roman larp. The dithyramb is based af. Wagner was the source of a revival of the kinda shit that aspired to Aeschylus. Christians are vain and think everything is out to get them. The whole slew of democratic values was more concerning than Christianity, which he saw as already on the way out. I hate it when Christians seethe at Nietzsche, if they had any fucking marbles, they’d see him as an ally or reformer of stuffy Victorian bullshit, if their faith is so easily challenged than they just prove god is dead. It’s not that hard to have a nuanced and respectable opinion of Nietzsche while also being a Christian yada yada butthurt, grow up.