[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 288 KB, 496x426, C290C1E7-1235-4FA9-9260-D2DC64663CD6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21462144 No.21462144 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any good novels centered around divorce? Seems like infidelity is a major theme in literature but the decline of a marriage into divorce gets little attention with how common it is today.

>> No.21462162

>>21462144
He must objectify the woman as a cereal thus devaluing the woman in this analogy. Sexist moment.

>> No.21462167

>>21462162
objectification is literally part of male sexuality. if women are so concerned about it, they should just become lesbians.

>> No.21462187

>>21462167
lesbians objectify women more than men. homosexuals are obsessed with their sexuality and sexuality in general. it's all they talk about.

>> No.21462201

>>21462187
There is no such thing as a lesbian but yes, you are correct, fags are narcissistic degenerates.

>> No.21462211

>>21462162
no, the cereal is objectifying him here.

what's wrong with objectification anyway? people are more objects than they are anything else.

>> No.21462216

>>21462144
Other Men's Daughters

>> No.21462250

>>21462162
Men are the cereal in the analogy and he’s the woman, since it is the cereal upset about him sleeping around

>> No.21462282

>>21462250
the better analogy is he's the 48th person to eat from the same bowl using the same spoon, and he can't wash that spoon just like she can't unfuck those 48 guys.

>> No.21462287

>>21462282
bingo.

remember kids, better a virgin than a roastiefucker.

>> No.21462300
File: 91 KB, 600x798, 1462455851678.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21462300

>"Some infinities are bigger than other infinities," I said. "What do you mean?" she asked me. "You see my bowl of cheerios?" "Yes," she replied. "Imagine if the bowl was infinite. You would need infinite cheerios to fit in the bowl too, right?" "Of course," she said. "Well, the bowl is still bigger than the cheerios inside it, logically speaking. Therefore, there are two infinities: the infinite bowl and the infinite cheerios, but the infinity of the bowl is bigger. Now suppose you filled an infinite bowl with every dick you've ever taken, and it overflowed the bowl so that the infinity of dicks you've taken is bigger than the infinity of cheerios AND the infinite bowl. If you had taken that much dick, I would still love you." "Do you really mean it?" she said. "You bet. If I'm drizzle, and you take a hurricane of dick, I'll still give anything to lie down beside you." Hazel was cry.

>> No.21462309
File: 126 KB, 1109x1252, D88E9470-EABD-4B10-A77D-38515B879ECA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21462309

>>21462287
Unless you’re a Muslim, you are not going to marry a virgin.

>> No.21462316

>>21462309
c'est la vie

>> No.21462320

>>21462309
kek they're so evil, you have to respect it

>> No.21462346

>>21462144
You are free to be a slut but not be free from consequences of being a slut

>> No.21462434

>>21462144

Who is this loser?

>> No.21462443

>>21462309
I hope every one of the authors of these articles is inside the NYT office when it inevitably fire bombed

>> No.21462553

>>21462162
Fpbp

>> No.21462607

>>21462309

I did. She was seriously mentally ill and we ended up divorcing anyway. To this day she's still salty that I'm the one who took her virginity.

>> No.21462626

>>21462434
>tfw this loser is one of the most famous living people from my city
fug

>> No.21462711

>>21462144
Feel like a lot of the literary focus on divorce is highlighted by the decline, not actually even including the divorce. Young stem pseud but Stoner is the first book that has jumped to mind every time I've thought about divorce since I read it

>> No.21462743

the atheist marriage is bastardization of the theist marriage
atheist marriage= the public servants say you are bound to another person defining a household and they give you tax cuts out of it

atheist marriage only makes sens is you take the democratic republic seriously, ie the bourgeois revolutionists public servants.

And the fact that they allow divorce without cause shows how much of a joke their marriage is.
The atheist marriage is just the hedonistic version of the theist one, people get married because they feel like it, then they get divorced because at least one of the person feels like it. There that's the atheist marriage for you.

The atheist marriage is nihilistic, like anything created by the atheists.

>> No.21462745

>>21462144
Loving Wives category on Literotica.
Its a free sex story site so you have to filter the BBC Bull / Swappers & Swingers / Cuck cream pie / hit by the martian slut ray BS, but there are some excellent stories about break downs, divorce and recovery.
Dream Cloud, Rehnquist, Daniel Quentin Steele, Jezzaz & the Unoriginalist may or may not appeal.

>> No.21462764

Wait doesn't this guy identify as a Christian? Lol lmao
Like it's fine if you believe that, and yes men and women should be held to the same standard with sexual practices, but you can't reconcile that with Christian belief which says - only one sexual partner in YOUR ENTIRE LIFE, anyone extra is adultery except and only when the first partner is dead
I'm not a Christian myself and this is obviously bullshit

>> No.21462804

>>21462764
Its perfectly logical.
Abstinence / single life partner was the only way of preventing the spread of sexual disease. The Israelites only kept virgin goy girls, killing all others they conquered.
No remarriage meant childrens inheritance of land would not be compromised / ended like the Princes in the Tower by the stepfather (see also Hamlet's stepdad) / evil stepmother (Cinderella).
No polygamy / concubinage ensured genetic diversity.
No marriage within 6 degrees of seperation destroyed clan ties, and allowed the rise of the manorial system, unitary church and then nation states.

>> No.21462834

>>21462804
Not him, but I think he's talking about John Green being a "Christian" and unironically shilling un-Christian ethics, although you are right.


Frankly, we're oversexed as a society due to the prevalence of porn and the sexual revolution and the way society is structured isn't conducive to actual family creation. That's why all this weird degenerate sex shit is popping up and we act like it's normal. We're so fsr gone from our humanity we're even lower than most animals. At least they aren't rational enough to know when they're doing degenerate shit.

>> No.21462916

>>21462144
I mean, have you tried google?

>> No.21462937

>>21462916
I mean, I am looking for good books, not whatever books

>> No.21463063

>>21462834
If you look at his schnoz he's probably a (((Christian))).
You are also correct about family creation. Its been deliberately destroyed as a concept since the 1960s. Slaves kept in an animal state are less likely to rebel. They have to successfully rebel against their indoctrinated base urges first.

>> No.21463232

>>21462144
Read the bell curve anon. The high divorce rates are on average higher yes, but that mainly applies to the lower end of the cognitive spectrum, factoring for SES your and your partners IQ are what predict divorce the most

>> No.21463245

>>21463232
That’s not a novel

>> No.21463873

>>21462144
>I like cereal that has had 46 dicks in it

>> No.21463935

imagine being the kind of guy that would buy a laptop second that's "only been jizzed on twice"

>> No.21464272

>>21462162
>>21462167
we both "objetify" each other. If you can say men objectify women and view them as objects with reproductive capabilites, you might just as well point out that women objectify men by viewing them as objects with providing capabilities.
We grade our objects of desire by the metric of fertility, they grade their objects of desire by the me metric of providability(which is a bit difficult to define so it's expressed through a mix of things which I think can be summed up as material+social capital the man posseses).

>> No.21464279

>>21462607
I think I did this when I broke up with her after 5 years. I think you can't blame yourself for other people not willing to fix their shit and selfishly ask for others to go with it.

>> No.21464343

>>21462144
A more apt comparison would be "do I want to eat this cereal that 48 other people have chewed before me?"

>> No.21464931

>>21462282
>using the same spoon
What, do they all share a penis?

>> No.21465373

>>21462162
>Sexist moment
Correct.
..and what is your point exactly?