[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 105 KB, 1603x1683, literallymeifiwasbald.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21419052 No.21419052 [Reply] [Original]

>We define an anon who is a fag trivially
>We define an anon who is based trivially
>We define an anon who is "fased" if they are a fag before Christmas Day 2022, or are based after christmas day after 2022
>We observe a large group of anons, and determine them all to be fags
>We can conclude that if we were to observe another anon, they would also be a fag [Conclusion 1]
>We observe that because all of the observed anons were fags, and because it is before Christmas Day 2022, all of these anons were also fased
>We can conclude that if we were to observe another anon, they would also be fased [Conclusion 2]
>We observe one final anon on Dec 26th, 2022, and observed him to be a fag
>Thus, C1 is correct
>However, this anon has not been observed to be based after Christmas Day, 2022
>Thus, this anon is not fased
>Thus, C2 is false
>C1 and C2 are structurally identical
>What changed between fagness and fasedness?

>> No.21419112

>>21419052
I taught a class on grue and bleen twice and I still don't get it.
Please don't tell anyone.

>> No.21419187

I'm getting a hangover from reading this pencil neck garbágé.

>> No.21419284

>>21419052
just ban that anon, problem solved

>> No.21419803

>>21419284
For this specific anon, perhaps
But what about future anons? Can we induct upon fagness at all?