[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 23 KB, 443x692, tgd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21418091 No.21418091 [Reply] [Original]

>The Devil's Delusion
>Is God a Delusion?
>The Straw God Delusion
>The Science Delusion
>God is No Delusion
>The Atheist Delusion
Just some shitty self-published "refutations" I found on the first page of Amazon while searching for The God Delusion.
Why does this book cause so much seethe?

>> No.21418120
File: 58 KB, 714x356, Screenshot_20221222-150911_Brave.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21418120

>>21418091
Its a popular book so its good for grifting off of.
Its also written by fuckwit Dawkins so its easy to argue against

>> No.21418130

>>21418091
It's just sad man. Let me describe what life is like for someone without Jesus:
>Optimize pleasure to pain based on effort at all costs
>Say small lies to make everything easier and constantly seek an aura of sociability
>Calculate exactly how nice or mean to be to someone based on their stature, how much you like them, and how nice they are
>Judge everyone morally as if that's meaningful
>IQ is God and intelligence is the most important virtue
>hold on tight to the fantasy of a "good life" that only exists for .01% of people and even they are frantic with anxiety
Atheism makes people miserable and it doesn't upset me so much as saddens me like seeing an abused child is sad.

>> No.21418134

>>21418120
fuck pinker

>> No.21418203

>>21418130
>occasionally do something really fucked up and evil, and it's okay, because God's not watching
And yes, they do all do it.

>> No.21418221

>>21418091
Cause he created the name for outrage so people make outragous parodies. Also Dawkins is not the best person for Atheism. Hume, Paine, Stirner and Feuerbach all do that job way better even if some weren’t full fledge atheists. That’s just a few. Hell. Rand and Marx and Mussiolini do a better job.

>> No.21418236

>>21418130
>look mom, I've defeated strawman atheism, again!

>> No.21418264

>when you judge all of Christian thought, based on a few low effort writers who are basically grifting for money, selling products to idiots
Not even religious, it's just such a strawman.

>> No.21418365

>>21418091
god is geometry. dawkins knows he is lying because aryans come from space and he should kill himself immediately before he pollutes this fallen world with more n*ggerbabble

>> No.21418407
File: 580 KB, 220x275, 1630491639713.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21418407

>>21418221

>> No.21418422

>>21418130
Christianity always made life seem pointless to me. It’s a waiting room, nothing more. Once you’re saved you’re just left waiting to die. Nothing you do matters. You’ve raised the average lifespan by 20 years? Halved the infant mortality rate, decreased poverty across the globe? Great you just made someone’s time in an infinitesimally small fraction of their existence better.

>> No.21418434

>>21418091
>>21418120
Its actually a great book for someone new to atheism. Especially one who has never considered the idea that God(s) may not actually exist. Which is very true for many who grow up in backgrounds where God's existence is taken as a default.

My only gripe is it focuses too much on Christianity.

>> No.21418453

>>21418434
I guess it's useful to get insight into how people who think God doesn't exist think but if you just became an atheist maybe pick up the bible, if you are already an atheist why just read books that reaffirm your incorrect assumptions?

>> No.21418488

>>21418434
if you take a list of pagan gods and throw darts at them you will probably hit one who is still alive

>> No.21418519

>>21418453
There a huge market for "books that reaffirm your incorrect assumptions" just look at any religious bookshop. Aka preaching to the choir.

>> No.21418549

>>21418407
the value system of someone who would find that meme funny is itself based on atheistic "anything-goes" endorsement of free love and competition in the sexual marketplace as a measure of one's worth

>> No.21418566

>>21418549
the old gods don't stop existing just because they make queen elizabeth piss herself

meanwhile Jewish monotheism is still technically correct because all things are components of the same system

atheism is just papists rewriting the heroes out of history

>> No.21418613

>>21418519
What books specifically?

>> No.21418659

>>21418203
Ah baby is good boy who can't do no evil.
>>21418422
>Christianity always made life seem pointless to me. It’s a waiting room, nothing more. Once you’re saved you’re just left waiting to die. Nothing you do matters. You’ve raised the average lifespan by 20 years? Halved the infant mortality rate, decreased poverty across the globe?
The grandeur if the Gospel is that this world is both totally meaningless and totally meaningful. It is that what you do to yhe poor matters but not what you do to yourself. This is totally wrong because it makes Christianity seem entirely focused on the afterlife itself versus more importantly your attitude towards it. Also, none of those matter ultimately. The old die and so do babies, but to not try despite its impossible is the sin. "The poor you have always with you but not me you do not." - Christ.

>> No.21418663

>>21418519
>There a huge market for "books that reaffirm your incorrect assumptions" just look at any religious bookshop. Aka preaching to the choir.
> i do bad because other bad man do bad
The mind of an atheist.

>> No.21418665
File: 25 KB, 328x500, 41OpFORY9YL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21418665

>>21418091
missed this one

>> No.21418688

>>21418091
Another one is 'Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life'. Yeah it's a bit silly, but I can understand, though I don't care about what either has to say.

It's a popular book that is presumably wrong. These books likely more convincing than Dawkins, as Dawkins is rather ignorant and even in his own domain peddles his pet stupidity legitimised as popular knowledge making his betters as you put it 'seethe'. Do you wonder why he wrote a book in this style, for a certain audience?

Also
Your truth? Based takedown of lies! Another truth? Seethe and cope!

>> No.21418703

>>21418091
Atheism should be no more than an unfortunate phase for teenagers before growing up. Seems that the whole rockstar atheist trend died with Christopher Hitchens and has been replaced with New Age.

>> No.21418734
File: 432 KB, 1280x1224, Christianity US projection.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21418734

>>21418703
As has been the case for decades religion is on the decline in basically every developped country.
Easy to see why too, as somebody who wasn't raised religious, no matter how many arguments for the unmoved mover or how unlikely the disciples were to make shit up, it won't change the fact that the core premise of christianity and every other major world religion just looks and sound so absurd that I can never bring myself to really taking them seriously.

>> No.21418784

>>21418703
>IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN JESUS YOU'RE A CHILD!!!
Christian "philosophers" have been touting this since at least Bacon and it's never been a good argument.

>> No.21418803

>>21418130
I really took "be not conformed to the mode of this age" and "flee youthful lusts" seriously when I was 18. Now that Im 24 I kind of regret it.

>> No.21418822

>>21418784
Who said I was a Christian? I don’t really like the idea of an intermediary to God either. And no God isn’t literally a man in the sky, that’s a typical argument retarded atheists use. God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and is likely all of us debating itself on whether it exists or not.

>> No.21418884

>>21418822
oh okay you are a nonsense new age type of guy

>> No.21418889

>>21418734
religion is about math you fucking literal ape

>> No.21418909

>>21418434
>new to atheism
The fuck does new to atheism mean? You need cope literature for NOT believing something?

>> No.21418910

>>21418889
1+1+1=/=1

>> No.21418912

>>21418884
No I can’t stand New Age

>> No.21418921

>>21418912
I’m schizophrenic kek

>> No.21418932

>>21418822
>debating itself on whether it exists or not.
why?
Im sympathetic to the idea that we're monads of god but why not just instantiate individuality for fun?

>> No.21418939

>>21418932
>Why?
God knows

>> No.21419011

>>21418910
what the fuck are you even saying you mi6 faggot

>> No.21419037

>>21418120
Did he seriously say this?

>> No.21419043

>>21418221
That isn't just a few, thats nearly all atheist thinkers ever of note. It's a barren field of morons.

>> No.21419103

>>21418453
You must be retarded or something. I explicitly mentioned that the books serves those who never considered the alternative and you completely ignored it for your own diatribe.

>>21418488
Assuming that Gods die

>> No.21419163

>>21418091
The Science Delusion also published as 'Science Set Free' is genuinely worth reading. I believe the former title was at the publisher's request.

>> No.21419210

>>21418734
>religion is on the decline in basically every developped country
No it isn't. People might not be taking communion, but the amount of religious beliefs held by people has remained constant, as it always will.

>> No.21419246

>>21418130
absolutely 100% true. this man is incredibly wise, we should pack in the thread right now boys

>> No.21419319

>>21419210
objectively incorrect, but keep coping

>> No.21419326

>>21418822
>God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and is likely all of us debating itself on whether it exists or not.
Such a god is a meaningless concept then. Might as well just define reality as god and move on like nothing at all has changed. It leads to no change in perception of reality, no reason to behave differently.

>> No.21419332

>>21419319
Objectively correct, keep dilating

>> No.21419333

>>21419210
Except rates of people professing an actual lack of belief as opposed to a belief without formalized doctrine or regular church attendance are also increasing.

>> No.21419351

>>21419333
>muh professings
I don't care what they profess, I care what they do. And the sum total of woo believed in by the population of the west has not decreased since the 10th century

>> No.21419359

>>21419351
>I care what they do
well they don't go to church or pray, that's for sure

>> No.21419380

>>21419332
While survey show that the decline of belief of core religious principles is slower than the rate at which people stop attenting churches in the likes, the decline is still there.

>> No.21419444

>>21419351
>I care what they do
>They don't go to church
>They don't pray
So what makes them religious? You're just coping

>> No.21419463
File: 182 KB, 1080x866, df0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21419463

>>21418091
literally

>> No.21419520

>>21419326
False because the the concept of meaninglessness wouldn’t exist either. God, reality, whatever you want to call it, simply is. And why would anything have to change? Your perception changes all the time throughout life and it’s infinite manifestations.

>> No.21419598

>>21419520
So lets follow your assumption, god exists. Why should I care? If Christian god specifically exists I have a reason to care, I worship him and get heaven, reject him and get hell. Greek polytheistic gods existing gives me a reason to care, I pray to them and they give me good shit or protect me. God as a nebulous force of existence means nothing.

Besides your whole argument is to find a thing and define it as god because the thing is so nebulous that it cannot be contradicted.

>> No.21419636

>>21419598
the new testament is an encoded atlantean magical text you dumbass

>> No.21419694

>>21418734
You tell yourself that but the science based world view you subscribe too is just as absurd but lacks any intellectual foundation at all.

>> No.21419706

>>21419694
If a science based worldview is cringe, it is because it is implicitly theological.

>> No.21419727
File: 553 KB, 720x1600, Screenshot_20221222-160725_Gallery.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21419727

>>21418091
>Why does this book cause so much seethe?
Why does this book cause so much seethe?

>> No.21419729

>>21419694
I fully admit that I simply don't know how the universe works. But the creator of the universe incarnating as a human and paying back all the sins of humanity with a blood sacrifice is just silly.

>> No.21419753

>>21419729
not silly
Jesus's sacrifice is what reconciles God's infinite Justice with God's infinite Mercy.
Without God's Son paying our debts for us, the two (justice and mercy) would be in conflict.

>> No.21419781

>>21419753
>not silly
because you have been raised with it in a culture that has it as background noise.
Think about it, why would the arbitrary amount of suffering one guy felt from being crusified make up for literally all the evil in the world.
>Without God's Son paying our debts for us, the two (justice and mercy) would be in conflict.
>god infinite mercy cannot forgive unless he kills himself for a bit
makes him seem awfully limited for an allmighty being

>> No.21419822
File: 514 KB, 712x871, Screenshot_20221123-173735_Firefox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21419822

>>21419781
>because you have been raised with it in a culture that has it as background noise.
you have already dismissed me as your philosophical peer
I tried.
bye

>> No.21419868

>>21419729
what else is he going to incarnate as you dumb motherfucker, an asteroid?

>> No.21419872

>>21419868
why does he need to incarnate in the first place?

>> No.21419900

>>21419753
Why would the creator of the universe pick some random desert tribe's rules to play by?

>> No.21419949

>>21419598
Why is your selfish ego seeking a reason desu? Being in the grace of God is all you need. Those who distance themselves from it cause suffering. I don’t know about heaven and hell either. How can you be sure you aren’t in hell now?

>> No.21419951

>>21419900

you mean random rules like "don't steal" and "don't fuck your neighbor's wife"? real mystery

>> No.21419967

>>21419951
You think only Jews are clever enough to think of "don't steal"? Even the Code of Harambe had that.

>> No.21420027

>>21419729
The idea that the “creator” of the universe cares about us at all is completely laughable. Not to mention the creator not having any human qualities or senses and is probably more like a phenomenon that has no agency or awareness. When you really think about it religious modes of thinking are extremely barbaric.

>> No.21420249

>>21418091
God has a better chance of being real than Christianity's authenticity. If God is real, we understand nothing of it's true nature. God never came to earth, neither did his son, or the holy spirit. All that is total garbage. Cope.

>> No.21420328

>>21419967
the jews didn't invent the ten commandments moron they discovered them

>> No.21420391

>>21420328
I discovered an 11th commandment that you should give me all your money.

>> No.21420406

>>21418120
the
>I wear a "I fucking love science" tshirt
tweet

>> No.21420421

>>21420391
you can tell your jokes to ammit the demon when he devours your soul for violating the Laws of Ma'at

>> No.21420431
File: 87 KB, 768x1024, ass.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21420431

>>21418120
ass

>> No.21420537

>>21419037
https://mobile.twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/365527708458946561

>> No.21420554

>>21419949
>Why is your selfish ego seeking a reason desu?
Why care about the truth if it makes no difference whether or not you know it?

>Those who distance themselves from it cause suffering.
Religious people are in prison at higher rates than non-religious people.

>How can you be sure you aren’t in hell now?
This is a pretty tolerable hell. If this is as bad as it gets I'm fine.

>> No.21420561
File: 144 KB, 828x629, Dawkins.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21420561

>>21418120
Dawkins, alongside niel degrease tyson, is basically a symbol of everything wrong with postwar academia.
An individual with a good education in a specialised field who consistently reveals himself to be a gormless, close minded midwit every single time he opens his mouth to discuss anything outside else, yet who manages to take pride in his intellect, assuming that being well educated on a field of science is a sign of true intelligence and wisdom.
We need to bring back the fucking trivium.

>> No.21420589

>>21419951
What? No, I was referring to the 613 Mitzvah that define Halakha. That's why Yeshua had to be sacrificed, to fulfill the precise legal procedures set out in the Jewish holy texts. "Don't steal" and "don't fuck your neighbor's wife" have nothing to do with that (given that the legal procedures that Yeshua had to die because of actually allow for fucking your neighbor's wife and stealing under certain circumstances).

>> No.21420593

>>21420561
Your entire perception of this man is through a carefully selected slice of his tweets. Even then, you barely read what he's tweeting, as your zoomzoom """"""""""""brain""""""""""""" has been fried by tiktok.

>> No.21420604
File: 11 KB, 85x106, FA6DBD97-7D92-4CA8-9136-FB8BD3B8565D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21420604

>>21420593
lol

>> No.21420609

>>21420431
le shit nigger

>> No.21420743

>>21418091
They don’t.

>> No.21420921

>>21419949
>Being in the grace of God is all you need
God is personal. He exists entirely within the confines of your own skull.
If you are talking about an external entity, >>1420027 and >>21420249 are correct.

>> No.21420931

>>21420921
*>>21420027

>> No.21421360

>>21419706
I’d say it’s incoherent and useless. It doesn’t answer anything or even offer a complete view of matter let alone form. It’s basically useless. An entire generation of millenials turned from relgion because of space pictures and the spaghetti monster meme. Think about how dumb that is.

>>21419729
It’s interesting because you write this and at first I ‘get it’ because you’ve not read Aristotle and havnt grasped his logic and certainly not followed it through the scholastics.
But why couldn’t an all powerful being embrace the human experience and offer atonement for discord with his will?

Also. There are three theories about why Christ died. One is the ransom payment one and didn’t really survive out of early Christendom in official church teachings.

I won’t sum it up here in detail but there is a very valid logic to Christian theology and I mean that quite literally unlike when the atheist says ‘logic and reason’. Google valid and sound logic. Those are precise terms.

The gist without speaking in a logical way is god creates man. Man is his highest creation. Man’s purpose is happiness. Happiness requires a certain ethic and that ethic coincides with divine. Man cannot succeed at this ethic on his own. God becomes man and accomplished this feat as a human being and offers it to the rest of the humans. It is necessary that this would happen.

I’m thinking someone already said to read aquinas. He does do an impressive job at summarizing all of this. And it’s even funnier that his genius is recognized in nearly every age going on 1000 years. And funnier yet, the atheists attack logic itself to try to get around his arguments rather than acknowledge they are good.

It’s a long road. And sadly you need to start with at least Plato because you need to understand Aristotle and really you need to understand logic in it’s pure form. So you could read Russell’s intro to mathematical philosophy too.

But you can’t have this conversation at an intellectual level without logic in my opinion. Otherwise you are just doing poetry and having an emotional reaction to it.

>> No.21421373
File: 138 KB, 1126x658, bugmen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21421373

>>21418120
That one's a banger but I prefer the one where the bugman is filtered by a manbug.

>> No.21421381

>>21418549
>the value system of someone who would find that meme funny is itself based on atheistic "anything-goes" endorsement of free love and competition in the sexual marketplace as a measure of one's worth
Imagine coping this hard over a meme.

>> No.21421386

>>21420604
Based.

>> No.21421396
File: 52 KB, 828x628, Dawkins fixed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21421396

>>21421373

>> No.21421427
File: 1.01 MB, 512x512, nj.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21421427

>>21418091
An enemy that numbers time in millennia with cultural roots that go back to preliterate man and symbolism rooted in primordial homonids appears!
>(You)--CHOOSE YOUR FIGHTER!
a) Richard Dawkins: rat-faced evolutionary biologist who popularized the word meme (secret weapon: Scientism; weakness: Kafka)
b) Sam Harris: midwit who solved the problem of induction (secret weapon: meditiation; weakness: complex thought)
c) Christopher Hitchens: reformed commie/former fag with great talent for rhetoric (secret weapon: alcoholic snark (aka Hitchslap); weakness: Neoconservatism)
d) Daniel Dennett: bargin bin philosopher whose focus is rooted in topics prevalent to Saturday morning philosophy (secret weapon: broad and topical; weakness: phenomenology)
>(You): WEAPONIZED CONDESCENTION! FOUR HORSEMEN I CHOOSE (YOU)S!!
Fight!
>(You) choose: YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN SANTA CLAUS, DO YOU?!
Counter attack: nuance. Enemy isn't 4. Attack is ineffective.
>(You) choose: WHY DON'T YOU WORSHIP ZEUS?!
Counter attack: nuance. All myth is meaningful and some are more meaningful than others. Attack is ineffective.
>(You) choose: SCIENCE THOUGH!
Counter attack: nuance. Enemy knows history of science and its complex and relationship with religion. Attack is ineffective.
>(You) choose: FEDORA TIP!
Counter attack: enemy is laughing.
>(You) choose: NO YOU!
Counter attack: enemy is laughing.
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>...
(You) have fainted.