ITT: Disgusting words you hate in today's English

[Anonymous No.21411499]

>y'all
>finna/trynna
>doggo/kiddo
>convo
>ppl
>prolly
>latinx
>ion
>[anything] ass
>legit
>based off of

[Anonymous No.21411516]

>>21411499
>latinx
que te calles pendejx fex de mierdx

[Anonymous No.21411550]

Im from the south and people use ya'll as a natural slang word. its only been ruined in the modern sense because coastal liberals want to imitate negroes and it comes off as unnatural

[Anonymous No.21411562]

>though
This is the one word that absolutely sends me. I stop giving a shit about hiding the autism and just start seeing the person who utters it as a complete drooling droopy eyed bellend, and discard everything that they might say because of it. I can take all of the clichéd twittertard terms, even if they irritate me to various degrees, over a phrase that ends with "though". And you know what? 9 times out of 10 that person really does turn out to be a donkey (i can forgive some young ESLs that do this, depending on their attitude)

[Anonymous No.21411564]

>>21411499
>literally
That word morphing from emphasizing a strict sense to mere exaggeration hurts the soul. I fucking hate when people use that word now.

[Anonymous No.21411574]

>>21411562
Same. Using "though" (or even worse "tho") at the end of sentences makes me think less of the person saying it.

[Anonymous No.21411590]

>>21411574
You also have to point out how phonetically ugly it is. It has never sounded good, no matter what accent you associate to it. That's a sign.

[Anonymous No.21411594]

>>21411499
Legit and based [on/off of] are the only English words there, dumb frog poster. The rest are slanguage

[Anonymous No.21411607]

>>21411574
>>21411562
Are you zoomers? How do you react to ubiquitous sweatpants and broccoli hair? What about the "retro" style denim from the 90s aka "mom jeans"? What about sling-shot bikini wedgie fashion?

[Anonymous No.21411615]

>>21411594
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/y'all
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/doggo
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kiddo
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Latinx
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/convo
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ass

[Anonymous No.21411616]

>>21411607
None of those things affect me in any noticeable way. What made you ask?

[Anonymous No.21411618]

>>21411594
'Based on' is correct English. 'Based off of' is retarded Negro/zoomer English.

[Anonymous No.21411627]

>>21411499
hating on
>y'all
fucking kill yourself yankee

[Anonymous No.21411655]

>>21411618
And what are the reasons for this little rule?

>>21411615
Go ahead. Look at them. Slang-terms

[Anonymous No.21411665]

>>21411616
But words written on a screen do effect you in a meaningful enough way to become discomfortable? The logical deduction here is that you are made easily discomfortable.

[Anonymous No.21411667]

>>21411655
>Go ahead. Look at them. Slang-terms
It doesn't say they're slang.

[Anonymous No.21411672]

>>21411655
>And what are the reasons for this little rule?
What rule? Not sounding like a retard? Just common sense.

[Anonymous No.21411680]

>>21411667
Oh. Well try a physical book. They include word origins

>>21411672
Ah. You may go.

[Anonymous No.21411682]

Don't google Multicultural London English

[Anonymous No.21411688]

>>21411665
ok, how u know?

[Anonymous No.21411756]

>>21411688
The thing I've noticed about zoomers is how they cope with clown world; a world in which they were born into and which they bare no responsibility for making. The coping is in part noticing all of the odd aspects of CW, but also in mixing up the mundane aspects of human life that existed prior to clown world. It's as if they take all human existence to be something just made up in the last decade and thus ready for critique. So on one hand they will accurately "call-out" something like the continued debasement of language among their peers, but lump in mundane language as if that is also a new debasement. They have no understanding that much of what they consider to be cogent sparks of social-critique have already been discussed widely in the 90s.

It's hard to present a list of items of this odd behavior, but I notice it like spotting an ESL. You are simply from a different place (time-wise) and arrive with certain assumptions.
"Though" being a word widely used for God knows how long, simply isn't the linguistic hill you should be fighting upon.
Anyway I should make an essay on this regardless of how much I've had to drink tonight.
t. Millennial

[Anonymous No.21411769]

>>21411756
>"Though" being a word widely used for God knows how long, simply isn't the linguistic hill you should be fighting upon.
It's a specific use and tone, not the word itself. I'm not that guy but I agree that it's very annoying.

[Anonymous No.21411772]

>>21411756
I see your point, but I think you're more off base than you might believe yourself to be.

[Anonymous No.21411802]

>>21411772
I suppose what I'm getting at with this post >>2141160 is that linguistic fashion and clothing are both fashions. Trends if you like. Saying one trend is better than another is merely a cope. There is no true fashion in the same way there is no true linguistic fashion.
Zoomers have incredibly odd fashion sense, but to get bothered by it is the wrong path. I went to the mall today for xmas shopping and saw zoomers all wearing either sweatpants or "mom jeans". We called them mom jeans in the 90s because our fucking moms wore shit like that. And the broccoli hair style? What's with that? But I'm not taking a position other than befuddled amusement. It's neither right nor wrong, simply odd is what it is.

[Anonymous No.21411845]

Not a singular word, but
>my/your/their truth
gets on my fucking nerves like nothing else

[Anonymous No.21411846]

>>21411655
>Little rule
It simply makes semantic sense. Build off of something makes little to no sense. Build onto something makes more sense. Similarly, if you have a base, based on makes sense, as you are setting a concept upon another for a foundational sense of truth. Based off makes little sense, as you are not doing so.

[Anonymous No.21411847]

>>21411756
>>21411802
Nothing frightens me more than the question "Hasn't it always been like that?" from zoomers. Fuck. Gave me fucking CHILLS. Brainwashed little freaks.

[Anonymous No.21411854]

>>21411847
Example?

[Anonymous No.21411867]

>>21411846
True. How to spot a zoomer (2nd paragraph): >>21411862

[Anonymous No.21411871]

>simple as

[Anonymous No.21411878]

>>21411867
That's funny because I posted in that thread as well and thought the crosslink wasnt a crosslink lol
>How did Grimms turn into grammar?

[Anonymous No.21411883]

>>21411562
spastic

[Anonymous No.21411884]

>>21411499
Affect/Affecting
Increasing/Increase
Worse/Worst
Please
Cope
BIPOC
Inappropriate
Feminism/Feminist
Retard/Retarded
Mongoloid
Nostalgia
Amermutt

Im sure there is more but that's enough for now
>inb4 what the hell is wrong with you?
Its just autism. I have no issue typing those words out they just sound audibly unpleasant to me

[Anonymous No.21411888]

>>21411884
Can you elaborate on affect, worse, and increase? I particularly think affect is an exceptional word.

[Anonymous No.21411889]

>>21411499
imma finna smack the OP you hear

[Anonymous No.21411890]

>>21411854
Not that anon, but the entire fashion sense of zoomers implies "hasn't it always been like that/this"
Mom jeans universally were mocked not that long ago. The idea of a young woman putting on public display her FUPA would have been a nightmare scenario for X-ers and Millennials, they'd wake up in cold sweat if they dreamed anyone noticed that part of their body. (I happen to be a FUPA enjoyer but I'm also on 4chan rn)
Wearing sweatpants around in public was also shame inducing unless your were on your way to the gym or hockey practice.
What is considered normal changes with increasing speed it seems. Again, I just sit back and watch because I'm clown-pilled.

[Anonymous No.21411959]

>>21411590
>phonetically ugly
What the absolute fuck does that mean? Does "although" sound ugly to you?

Though yet of Hamlet our dear brother's death
The memory be green, and that it us befitted...
- King Claudius, "Hamlet", act 1, scene 2
Dumb Shakespeare using ugly words...

>>21411680
>Well try a physical book. They include word origins
The dictionary that was linked is just a digital version of the "Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary", a physical book.
And the entries linked all include etymology. You obviously didn't even look at them.
Not that etymology is the measure for a word being slang or not.

>>21411878
>>How did Grimms turn into grammar?
Is that a question or are you quoting someone? Niggers here can't even use greentext correctly but they will lecture you on proper English.
Anyway the Grimms were philologists, they studied language, especially what was written in that language.

>>21411846
>It simply makes semantic sense
Lol, you're talking about semantic sense in a language that can't tell apart singular and plural "you". The building *off* is metaphorical, not physical building, and it suggests building into any direction (as in "walking off", etc.), rather than only following what the base was originally intended to support. Being unable to intuitively recognise this distinction suggests an autistic, literalist mind, completely unfit for language or literature.

[Anonymous No.21411971]

>>21411959
fine speech

[Anonymous No.21411976]

>>21411959
So you support the “based off of” construction? Just answer yes or no. That will tell me all I need to know about you.

[Anonymous No.21411984]

>>21411959
I was quoting myself. You seem to be a man of poor reading comprehension. For that I am sorry. You admit, yourself, you cannot tell the difference between singular you and plural you. You seem to think you can build something off of an unrelated thing without a connection to the original. Be it metaphorically or literally, it's not a good idea to do so, as your concepts would be unlinked or your walls would be shaky. You seem to be a dull man who is not worth much note.

[Anonymous No.21412007]

>>21411682
Multicultural London English and general Jamaican Patois are at least phonetically pleasing, unlike retarded culturally imitational zoomer tiktok word vomit.

[Anonymous No.21412011]

>>21411499
I hate zoomer slang:
>G.O.A.T.
>slaps
>bussin
>sus
>glow up
>gaup
>big yikes/big mad
>boujee
>cap/no cap
>high key
>cheugy
>clapback
>catch these hands
>take several seats
etc

[Anonymous No.21412013]

>>21411976
Words don't need support, they're not buildings.

>>21411984
>I was quoting myself.
Where did you ask the question about the Grimms first?
>you cannot tell the difference between singular you and plural you
The English language can't. I can, don't worry, since I know other languages too.
>You seem to think you can build something off of an unrelated thing without a connection to the original.
But the new thing is not unrelated to the original. Of course they're connected, that's why the phrase is used, but the difference is that the connection isn't linear, predictable, as it would be when you build the base of a building and then the floors on top of the base.
When you try to imagine an apple, what do you see exactly?

[Anonymous No.21412014]

>>21412007
Weird taste.

[Anonymous No.21412016]

>>21411499
>bussin

[Anonymous No.21412022]

There is a seething zoomie ITT. Take care, lads.

[Anonymous No.21412027]

>>21412013
What does this image mean? I can perfectly imagine the shape and appearance of something down to the last detail but I don't "see" it. It's not as if I am directly looking at the object. Is seeing from the mind's eye supposed to be different from physical sight?

[Anonymous No.21412031]

>>21412013
> Words don't need support, they're not buildings
Who’s the literalist faggot now? Keep projecting.

[Anonymous No.21412038]

>>21412027
Dont humor that nigger. He’s trying to say you’re an NPC because he has a shit taste and no arguments. Probably some sudaca.

[Anonymous No.21412040]

>>21411846
Build off of reflects the rhizomatic tendencies of decentralized thought in modern leftism and how it has affected language. “Build off of” is a more spatially neutral/flexible term since it implies a general divergence, not limited by conceptual “gravity” or arborescence.

[Anonymous No.21412057]

>>21412011
where's the fr you daft twat, fuck your etc, you should feel bad for not adding that

[Anonymous No.21412068]

>>21411499
>ion
what's wrong with charged atoms?

[Anonymous No.21412074]

>>21412068
It's not that ion. It's the 'ion' used by negroes/zoomers meaning 'I don't', example: 'ion care' = 'I don't care'

[Anonymous No.21412085]

>>21412013
I can taste the apple. I can feel it's waxy pesticide covered skin on my own. I can rip it apart and feel the stem pressing into my palms and as it tears I can hear it rip and smell the juices as they fly into the air. I can count the seeds visible from the rip. I can drop it out of my hand and watch it fall to the ground. I can hear it hit the ground in front of me. The other half, still in my left hand, I can take a bite of and taste it's flesh. I can feel my gums bleed onto it and when I look I can see my own blood there, and take another bite so no one sees to avoided the feeling of embarrassment I would feel if someone noticed my gums were so unhealthy that eating an apple makes my gums bleed. I don't really like red delicious, never found them very delicious to be honest. The mealy texture on my tongue and the overly sweet flesh with the waxy thick skin has always been off putting. I can see the skin and pick at it with my fingernail and feel it underneath my skin. I can see the little white specs. The way my Christmas tree reflects off it's edge. If you think aphantasia is a way to identify hylics perhaps you are one yourself. I am, in a sense, hyperphantasic. I'm a schizophrenic murderer. I'll hunt you down and force you to eat my imaginary apples, faggot.
>Where did you ask the question first
In my head. I imagined it. I saw the captcha in my minds eye. It even got digits.
>The English language can't
No, it can, you just can't assess whole sentences as singular ideas.
>The new thing is not unrelated
Then it is based on, or based in.

[Anonymous No.21412089]

>>21411888
I think its a solely subconscious thing that really can't be elaborated on. Sorry

[Anonymous No.21412094]

>>21412040
Build off is more acceptable. "Based off" is still simply nonsense, wouldn't you agree?

[Anonymous No.21412113]

>>21412074
That's fucking retarded. I hate zoomers so much it's unreal.

[Anonymous No.21412125]

>>21412113
The influence of blacks on the last 80 some years on all walks of life, be it language, music, fashion is something that needs to be addressed, even if I can give them some concessions here and there.

[Anonymous No.21412129]

>>21412011
All that shit comes from black people, zero exceptions.

[Anonymous No.21412131]

>>21411562
go back to /int/

[Anonymous No.21412148]

>>21411550
I fucking hate when YouTubers and political pundits say folks or y’all. It’s cringe. Pure unadulterated cringe. Stop stealing our words. You don’t use it right. I hate it. I miss when it was a signifier of poverty and backwater. I miss when the only war was the class war.

[Anonymous No.21412909]

>>21411499
Wellspring is a bad word.

[Anonymous No.21412954]

>>21411562
why though?

[Anonymous No.21412972]

>>21411499
I'm sure it's a complete and total coincidence that half of the words you hate are stereotypically associated with black people. (And 'prolly' is how everyone says it in rapid/rushed speech.)

[Anonymous No.21412975]

>>21411562

[Anonymous No.21412979]

>>21411846
What about all the expressions that don't make any semantic sense?