[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 57 KB, 176x200, wojak-karl-marx-crying-angry-thumbnail.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21389187 No.21389187 [Reply] [Original]

>"labor creates value because... because it just does okay?!"

This is like the phrenology of economics.
Is there any Marxist literature that actually dropped this nonsense?

>> No.21389196

>another "Capitacuck seething over Karl Marx" thread

>> No.21389223

>>21389196
>commie faggot conflates disagreeing with megabitchboy with being an ideological enemy
go back to blacked.com

>> No.21389228

>>21389196
>"Uhh actually you just don't get it! Read some theory"
>go and read theory
>it's stupid
>"noooo you're just seething!"

Cough up some answers or get fucked.

>> No.21389455

>>21389187
Well, reducing all value to labour is problematic, yes, but I definitely think labour plays a role. Even when considering a bottle of water; it had to be collected, then bottled, then transported to wherever you buy it. Or a diamond; it had to be mined, which necessates the labour of lots of people to establish the mines, create the tools etc., and the same applies with regards to transport. It seems to me that labour is always "embedded" into the value of something, because it's (part of) what even allows it to be of any value to me or you (as it would never present itself as a commodity otherwise)

>> No.21389669

>>21389187
>>21389196
>>21389223
>>21389228
>>21389455
Holy shit, no one on /lit/ reads. Capital is literally 1000 pages explaining this. Just go fucking read the book.

It's... uh... not my job to educate you, sweetie.