/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.21333212]

Should you read Freud before Jung?

[Anonymous No.21333216]

>>21333212
Yes. And before Freud you should read Schopenhauer, Kant, Hume, Leibniz, Locke, Hobbes, Maquiavel, Descartes, Thomas Aquinas, Augustine, Aristotle, Plato and so on

[Anonymous No.21333225]

You should just read what you want when you want, and read other things as necessary to understand whatever. Following some strict regimen is one way to lose all genuine curiosity and excitement of learning. If you’re not in school why bend yourself to such a rigid way of doing things?

[Anonymous No.21333394]

>>21333212
No. You would get much more out of Jung if you read Schopenhauer, Wagner and Goethe before reading him.

[Anonymous No.21333408]

>>21333216
Start with the Akashic records.

[Anonymous No.21333486]

>>21333212
both shit, just read physics

[Anonymous No.21333497]

>>21333486
Yes, study physics until you are at the level of Wolfgang Pauli, then realize Jung was right all along, as Pauli did.

[Anonymous No.21333500]

>>21333212
Skip Jung.
Skip Freud too.
Read Harry Potter.

[Anonymous No.21333579]

>>21333212
Yes. And before Freud you should read Schopenhauer, Kant, Hume, Leibniz, Locke, Hobbes, Maquiavel, Descartes, Thomas Aquinas, Augustine, Aristotle, Plato and so on

[Anonymous No.21333668]

>>21333500
This

[Anonymous No.21333677]

>>21333500
Alright, who has the Harry Potter flow chart?

[Anonymous No.21333690]

Both at the same time

[Anonymous No.21333708]

yes.
also Peterson is a fag.

[Anonymous No.21333753]

>>21333216
>>21333394
>noo you can't enjoy yourself by digging into this author you may like you have to go through all the classics and their influences otherwise you will get filered aaaaa
This is how you get disgusted with philosophy. Let people fail and get frustrated organically instead of telling them to train for 15 years before tackling something

[Anonymous No.21333912]

>>21333408
/thread
dare I even say,
/board
actually even,
/4chan
now that I think about it,
/internet
let's just say the conclusion is:
/media
but let's go a bit further and end this with
/noosphere

[Anonymous No.21333993]

I think it is safe to assert after reading the last two posts above mine that /lit/ is worse than booktok. The ZOG has come for us here as well, it's truly over.

[Anonymous No.21334002]

>>21333993
>seething so much because his daddy peterson was insulted

[Anonymous No.21334011]

>>21333408
/thread
dare I even say,
/board
actually even,
/4chan
now that I think about it,
/internet
let's just say the conclusion is:
/media
but let's go a bit further and end this with
/noosphere

[Anonymous No.21334018]

>>21334002
Kill yourself, nigger

[Anonymous No.21334052]

>>21333212
Coming from a Freud guy, I don't think you really need to. If you want to, though, I would recommend "On Dreams," to give you an idea of their common starting point, and "Three Essays on Sexuality," to give you an idea of where they start to diverge.

[Anonymous No.21334073]

>>21333212
You skip Freud unless you're a NPC

[Anonymous No.21334079]

>>21334011
> The noosphere (alternate spelling noösphere) is a philosophical concept developed and popularized by the Russian-Ukrainian Soviet biogeochemist Vladimir Vernadsky, and the French philosopher and Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Vernadsky defined the noosphere as the new state of the biosphere[1] and described as the planetary "sphere of reason".[2][3] The noosphere represents the highest stage of biospheric development, its defining factor being the development of humankind's rational activities.[4]
> the planetary "sphere of reason"
Who comes up with this shit

[Anonymous No.21334096]

>>21334079
Some heavy s o y vibes in this frogpost ngl

[Anonymous No.21334603]

>>21333690
You should read freud first though, then young for trascendence.

[Anonymous No.21334626]

>>21333212
I like the MMISOAS chapter organically detailing why Freud was shit and thereby superceding the conclusions one would come to by reading him in full

[Anonymous No.21335711]

>>21333212
You should just read what you want when you want, and read other things as necessary to understand whatever. Following some strict regimen is one way to lose all genuine curiosity and excitement of learning. If you’re not in school why bend yourself to such a rigid way of doing things?

[Anonymous No.21335719]

>>21333212
You just shouldn't read Freud at all.

[Anonymous No.21335769]

>>21333216
>just spend half your life reading 20 different authors then and only then can you read him

[Anonymous No.21335829]

>>21335769
yes

[Anonymous No.21335863]

>>21333212
You should read neither.

[Anonymous No.21335879]

>>21333497
>until you are at the level of Wolfgang Pauli, then realize Jung was right all along
Absolute retardation produced by the combined influence of pop-soience and watching videos about spoopy paranormal stuff like ESPERs and fortune tellers.

[Anonymous No.21335925]

>>21333212
I prefer reading the psychos that lived the reality not write about it...

Then play dota 2

[Anonymous No.21336067]

>>21333677