/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.21240327]

Objectively, is there a reason a vast majority of literature if left-leaning and pretty much 99.99% of modern writers are left-leaning?

Why is that so and when it come to pas that it was decided?

[Anonymous No.21240335]

>>21240327
intellectualism is inherently leftist and leftism is inherently intellectual. make of that what you will.

[Anonymous No.21240339]

>>21240327
take a look at pol

[Anonymous No.21240349]

>>21240327
because its inherently a middle of the road eventuality. being smart enough to recognize there ARE problems, but being too stupid to actually consider things evenly and go for understanding instead of j'accuse.

its kinda how bell curves work. not trying to say rightism is inherently intellectual either.

[Anonymous No.21240365]

Fuck, female incels are even uglier than their male counter-part.

[Anonymous No.21240379]

>>21240335
Shitty bait or you legitimately are mentally retarded

[Anonymous No.21240381]

>>21240365
She's not even ugly, keep seething you bovine brown dyke.

[Anonymous No.21240383]

>>21240327
>there a reason a vast majority of literature if left-leaning
Its not. Idk how you could possibly believe this. Atm the prestige publishing industry in the US is run by liberals and commies so that's what they print but this is a fairly recent phenomenon, really only got under way in the 60s.

[Anonymous No.21240619]

>>21240381
Just look at her tired eyes, pig nose, fetal alcohol philtrum, manly cheeks, and weak chin.
The other one is wearing a mask she's so ugly. Lmao.

[Anonymous No.21240652]

>>21240327
Because all conditioning and social engineering is designed to foster globalism and internationalism. Even the current right-wing is this and is presented as a better alternative to the the modern left.

There is only one solution to this position. People are now becoming aware.

[Anonymous No.21240659]

>>21240327
Guess who owns the publishers. Yeah, that's why.

[Anonymous No.21240732]

>>21240619
That’s peak VVhite genetics in full display.

[Anonymous No.21240789]

>>21240327
Writing fiction takes a tremendous amount of empathy. You're continuously imagining how you would feel in another person's situation in order to write their character, and in doing so, assuming that others have inner lives as real and valid as your own. You're putting yourself directly in touch with the common struggles of human life. Try doing this every day and staying right-wing.

I think this fact also excludes the woke. Good writers can't be so far left they can't empathize with people on the right. If you can't steelman everyone from Marx to Ayn Rand, you're won't be doing as well as you could be.

[Anonymous No.21240791]

>>21240327
>a vast majority of literature if left-leaning
Is it? It doesn't seem like this is the case.

[Anonymous No.21240805]

>>21240732

[Anonymous No.21240811]

>>21240379
The righty never stops to think. He just gets mad.

[Anonymous No.21240878]

>>21240811
NTA tranny but you know there’s like hundreds of years of history and writing proving you wrong right?

Also I’m a right so I’m obligated to tell you to kys and you’ll never be a women

[Anonymous No.21240887]

>>21240327
be my boyfriend pleasz

[Anonymous No.21240892]

>>21240887
please*

[Anonymous No.21240904]

>>21240365
The worst part is she thinks this is 'art'

[Anonymous No.21240910]

>>21240365
I admit I'm ugly.

[Anonymous No.21241136]

>>21240327
Modern literature is globohomo. Current leftists are nothing like modernist leftists for example (which is pretty much how far back retards like >>21240335 go; "leftist" but patting themselves on the back for being promoted by corpocratic publishing houses, truly retarded).

[Anonymous No.21241150]

I'm different from everybody else, don't you see?

[Anonymous No.21241152]

>>21240805
>posts pukerainian to prove his point.
Sorry, not White.

[Anonymous No.21241161]

you don't make much money on the right

[Anonymous No.21241299]

>>21240339
Confirms the belief that righties are retarded

[Anonymous No.21241312]

>Why are educated people more left leaning

answers itself

[Anonymous No.21241449]

>>21241312
This. Apparently chuds have never heard of political indoctrination. It's what the left excel at.

[Anonymous No.21241774]

>>21241312
>Why are educated people more left leaning
Because education is controlled by billionaires and the bankers.

[Anonymous No.21241781]

>>21240878
That was just oppressors and colonialists trying to justify their right to bully others lol

[Anonymous No.21241782]

>>21240335
This.

>>21240379
Lmao. Hail Drump!

[Anonymous No.21241786]

>>21241152
Then what race?

[Anonymous No.21241789]

>>21240327
Right Wing ideas are often short term ideals, the gimme mine and fuck you. It doesn't take long to realise this, so most people lean to the left. Not the whole way, just beyond center.

To counter this, the Right Wing, again because they think only in the short term, cut funds to education. I'm sorry, but this war machine is not going to fund itelf, and the only way to do that is to give it half the education budget, which wouldn't even move the needle.

Now education is cut, this leads to stupider people. Stupid people are easier to control and scare with things like immigration.

The problem with having so many stupid people for so long is that eventually they stip being intellectuals. So eventually a less intellectual right, and more left wing authors.

[Anonymous No.21241791]

>>21240811
Being "far right" is actually normal. For almost all of human history every civilisation was far right. Leftism spreading so widely in the past few decades is merely a symptom of the acute stage of the decline of the West. You talk about thinking while your little negroid pea-brain can't even expand beyond extremely limited temporal horizons. You are mentally a child.

[Anonymous No.21241794]

great art has an element of the subversive which rightoids can't stand for. they need their order and structure, their tropes and cliches.

[Anonymous No.21241797]

>>21241791
The majorities of those civilizations were also comprised of uneducated peasants, so...

[Anonymous No.21241800]

>>21241797
peasants having a say in politics is entirely a modern phenomenon

[Anonymous No.21241804]

>>21241800
They also did things we consider inhumane like have slaves and fuck kids, but you probably think there's nothing wrong with either so you're a lost cause.

[Anonymous No.21241805]

>>21240619
She's average or slightly below. Hardly ugly. Feel free to post your greasy shit-coloured acne-ridden face, chimp, so i can laugh at you some more.

>>21240732
>primitive hominid finds humans unattractive
Whites invented everything and conquered the world multiple times over, you're just butthurt. Nobody knows or cares about your irrelevant BIPOC slave ancestors, don't let the anti-white WEF/UN agenda fool you, you dumb animal.

[Anonymous No.21241807]

>>21241786
Slav.

[Anonymous No.21241809]

>>21241781
>>21241782
>redditor actually getting mad at 4channel shitposts
Kek

[Anonymous No.21241811]

>>21241804
right on the slaves at least

[Anonymous No.21241815]

>>21241791
The bigest civilizations in s america pre columbus were working models of socialism. In fact pre agriculture humans were largely left wing in their leadership and distribution of reaponsibilities. Pirate crews without the yoke of arbitrary rules became democratic socialist crews.

Also you'd be right wing too if the people you ruled over had no education, couldn't read, and could revolt at a moment's notice.

It's just another con the ruling class of no-talent mobsters want you to believe. Jist like wanting lower taxes for billionaires. "Be right wing, because one day you might be in a position to use your powers."

It plays well with stupid people who think that one day they'll make it.

[Anonymous No.21241819]

>>21241797
I don't see your point. Peasants consistently push left throughout history, but they had no political sway in all normal civilisations. The aristocracy is far right, since they are wise and cultured, the leaders of society. But speaking of mixed-race halfwit peasants, do you honestly think your dumb BIPOC opinion on politics is correct? That is statistically extremely unlikely. Back to your 3rd world toilet, where u belong.

[Anonymous No.21241822]

>>21241815

[Anonymous No.21241825]

>>21241805
>She's average or slightly below.
Fucking lmao. Where do you live?

[Anonymous No.21241827]

>>21241804
Look at this nigger flexing its 3rd grade understanding of history on /lit/.

[Anonymous No.21241830]

>>21241819
Why should statistics determine my perception of my self-worth? Obviously as a human being that's not how my brain was programmed to function and perceive the world. And obviously I am not going to want to kill myself just because of some arbitrary observation about my environment from an outside source. For all your worship of rationality, you people always seem to miss that.

[Anonymous No.21241831]

>>21241815
How's 8th grade?

[Anonymous No.21241834]

>>21240327
This is not even true. All writers before the 1970s or so would be considered fascists and deplatformed if they lived today. Kant was an explicit white supremacist, just for example, Schopenhauer was a monarchist, St. Thomas Aquinas argued for patriarchy and anti-egalitarianism, hell even Marx was an anti-Semite and a racist. I mean, the whole reason the right claims to defend tradition and the left claims to “liberate us” from tradition is because, traditionally, the vast majority of people held what would be considered today right wing values. So yeah if you look at a tiny sample from the 1960s-1970s and ignore everything before that then it seems like most writers are left wing. But it’s not actually the case for the vast majority of history.

[Anonymous No.21241836]

>>21241830
>i'm correct because i want to feel good about myself
You are a nonwhite female i assume.

[Anonymous No.21241839]

>>21241825
Stop replying to me you annoying, ugly shitskin.

[Anonymous No.21241840]

>>21240327
your entire perception of literature is based on a modern phenomena, there's history beyond the 20th century

[Anonymous No.21241841]

>>21241827
It is an objective fact that right now is the humane and tolerant human civilisation has ever been. People did not even acknowledge the concept of mental illness until a little more than a century ago. But again, you're probably the kind of person who thinks depression isn't real and solutions to all mental illnesses are to work extra hard and to pray extra hard.

[Anonymous No.21241849]

>>21241841
how is it objective. you're stuck pretty far up your own ass if you think your opinions are objective reality

[Anonymous No.21241852]

>>21241836
>i'm correct because i want to feel good about myself
Absolutely. For the vast majority of people, this is 100% the most correct and productive way of self-perception. We seek comfort above all else, including mental comfort. Which is why "normal" people don't indulge in honest arguments, they know the price for that is potentially having their worldview shattered and no sane person would actually want that, they have obligations to fullfill, bills to pay, a family to feed etc.

We are not independent observers of the world, especially when talking about our own nature. We inherently seek conclusions that are evolutionary advantageous for us, there is simply no point in conclusions that lead to one's own destruction. The fact that these occur is nothing but a horrible bug in our admittedly extremely flawed and rigid brains.

There is only point in genuinely doubting your worldview if you're a scientist or a serious philosopher, which most people here are not. They simply have too much free time and choose to spend it torturing themselves in their own maze of sophistry without a clear purpose in mind.

[Anonymous No.21241874]

>>21241805
Congratulations on being the race with most contributions to the human race, right below the jews. However, most white people are really just average and this image of “beauty” they have does not match up in the real world.

[Anonymous No.21241877]

>>21241849
It is objectively true and logical that the more advanced a civilisation is, the more tolerance it has for vulnerability, the less need there is for indifference or cruelty. I don't know how you can argue against that.

[Anonymous No.21241878]

>>21241831
You'll get there one day, Anon.

[Anonymous No.21241883]

>>21241841
The only reason you value being as tolerant as possible and "humane" is because those values have been instilled in you probably since birth. You're like a fish in a bowl not knowing of anything but the small volume of water around you. Also i doubt it is objective, big Western cities resemble crime-filled 3rd shitholes more and more each year, Westerners are brutalized by nonwhites everyday, and the news ignores it but will show us george floyd and other criminal scum as victims. I guess you'll just keep tolerating it or remain blissfully ignorant.

[Anonymous No.21241889]

>>21241878
I design process control systems for chemical plants and have a 7-figure networth.

>>21241877
You are so pathetically naïve. Bless you.

[Anonymous No.21241891]

>>21241877
advanced how? culturally? modern civilisation is a global mud hut. the modern world is rife with indifference and cruelty, you closing your eyes to it doesn't make it go away

[Anonymous No.21241895]

>>21241831
>Imagine comparing your opponent to a child. >Imagine thinking this makes you superior to anyone
Good job, Anon, you beat an 8th grader. Well, you didn't beat them with reasoned informed arguments, so much as just call them names. But well done.

[Anonymous No.21241904]

>>21240327
Look who owns the publishing.

Guys, finding the jew isn't hard.

[Anonymous No.21241905]

>>21241874
Whites have contributed far more than jews. To start, look around you right now. All of it came from white people. What language are we writing in, dumdum?

The collective of whites throughout history completely mogs almost all others races, I like how you don't even deny this and just cope by pointing out the average white is an average white. Very astute, well done jamal.

[Anonymous No.21241907]

>>21241889
You're a plumber?

[Anonymous No.21241915]

>>21241895
>implying it was a debate
>implying my superiority comes from calling you an 8th grader
Learn how to greentext properly, underaged faggot. Lurk more, spend a few hours on pol before coming to other boards so you don't stick out like this.

[Anonymous No.21241921]

>>21241907
Ya

[Anonymous No.21241960]

>>21240327
OP makes a statement, basically noone asks him to define what he means with leftwing and literature.

[Anonymous No.21241965]

>>21241904
Just from this comment I decided to actually "look who owns the publishing." Typed in "biggest publisher", it's Penguin. Turns out it was founded in the early 1900s by a British man named Allen Lane and then later in 2013 merged with Random House, which admittedly was founded by two Jewish men.
However, by the time the merger happened Random House was headed by Markus Dohle, a German, and a representative of German corporation Bertelsmann, which is owned by the Mohn family. The Mohn family are described by Wikipedia as "strict Protestants" who had ties with the Nazi party and the SS during WW2.
Bertelsmann now owns the merged company Penguin Random House with Markus Dohle as the CEO. Interestingly, Bertelsmann was in high favour among the Nazi party:
>In Nazi Germany, the publishing house gained a prominent position with its affordable "Bertelsmann Volksausgaben" ("people's editions").[15] In particular, war adventure books such as Werner von Langsdorff's "Fliegerbuch" on aviation were a commercial success.[16] Heinrich Mohn belonged to the patrons' circle of the SS and sought to turn his company into a National Socialist model enterprise...
So, in short, the biggest publishing company in the world is owned not by Jews but by Germans who had strong ties with the SS and the Nazi party, and even had Jewish slave labourers working in their factories in Lithuania.
But of course, your comment wasn't interested in the truth, was it? You just said that because you've heard others say it, you've been taught that "the Jew" owns everything, controls everything, and you just guessed that they must "control the publishing industry" didn't you? You didn't anticipate someone would actually take you up on your offer and "look who owns the publishing", did you? Nothing but a brainwashed, ideological retard.

[Anonymous No.21241974]

>>21241874
>White

Broad racial category, that atleast contains people with a north and west European background, but usually also includes people from south and eastern Europe and even the Middle east.

> Jewish

Ethnic/religious category that is contained by the concept of White.

Mhmmm

[Anonymous No.21241976]

>>21241965
>bluepilled retard can't do research or think critically

[Anonymous No.21242004]

Right wing politics was made illegal in 1945 and 1947.

[Anonymous No.21242013]

>>21241889
>no rebuttal
>>21241891
Technologically. And thus, morally. Duh. Indifference and cruelty aren't as normalized as they were beforehand, at least in civilized society. 50 years ago 95% of people could unironically tell you that
>solutions to all mental illnesses are to work extra hard and to pray extra hard.
Nowadays you'll only hear this from the low-brow and the schizos.
>>21241883
The reason I value being tolerant and humane is because I'm not a hypocrite. I understand you might be genuinely sociopathic, so for you the concept of a world where every individual lives in a permanent state of cold war with other individuals seems normal and maybe even like a given. But not for me. In my mind, if you demand others to treat you with respect, you should treat them with respect as well. But again, sociopathic people tend to disagree with this and believe that their perceived high intelligence makes them worthy of exploiting others, since they (allegedly) can avoid consequences of this.
>the news ignores it
Then how do you even know it happens?

[Anonymous No.21242024]

>>21242013
>no rebuttal
>Then how do you even know it happens?
Primary sources and independent journos/media, because i know how to use the internet, unlike boomers and clueless brown dykes.

[Anonymous No.21242025]

>>21241915
>implying my superiority comes from calling you an 8th grader
No one implied this but you. Or else why say it? Are you incapable of controling your febrile autism?

Don't answer. We know.

[Anonymous No.21242038]

>>21242013
>Technologically. And thus, morally
oh, you're a nigger

[Anonymous No.21242046]

>>21242025
See>>21241895

[Anonymous No.21242051]

>>21241789
This lmao

[Anonymous No.21242053]

>>21242038
Shes a nonwhite female, possibly a nigga

[Anonymous No.21242059]

>>21242053
kind of makes responding pointless

[Anonymous No.21242074]

>>21242051
Oops meant to reply to >>21241791

[Anonymous No.21242076]

>>21241976
I literally did the research. You just asserted that "the Jews" own the publishing industry with no arguments whatsoever to back this up. Then I showed you that the largest publisher in the world is owned by some Germans, "strict Protestants" who had ties with the Nazi party and were part of "the patrons' circle of the SS". If I thought like you did, I would be screaming "NOO THE GERMANS OWN THE PUBLISHING INDUSTRY! THE PUBLISHING INDUSTRY IS NAZI!"

[Anonymous No.21242079]

>>21242059
Indeed

[Anonymous No.21242087]

>leftists pretending they believe in objectivity
TOP KEK

[Anonymous No.21242094]

>>21242024
Where do you get the primary sources? Can you be sure of their legitimacy any more than the legitimacy of mainstream news?

[Anonymous No.21242098]

>>21240327
Maybe I just read the wrong literature but I never really see politics in what I read. Can I have your source for 99.99% of modern writers are left leaning?

[Anonymous No.21242100]

>>21242038
Technological progress is always the basis for better life conditions, which leads to more lenient morals. You've yet to refute this in any meaningful way.
>>21242053
>>21242059
>>21242079
Either a sad circlejerk or a very sad samefag. Enjoy advocating for a society built on cruelty and indifference, I'm sure this will net you a ton of supporters.

[Anonymous No.21242103]

>be right wing, imperial west (until like 19th century)
>50% world pop, 90% of world gdp
vs
>leftist, progressive west
>not even 30% world pop or world gdp

i rest my case
right wing politics are superior, and being a leftist would be antisemitic :^)
we need to emulate israel :^)
israel, my favorite country :^), should be our model for development.. hyper closed borders, ethnic testing for citizenship, militaristic rogue nuclear ethnostate
right wing politics are clearly superior, otherwise jews wouldnt be doing them for themselves while all of their journalists and bankers promote leftism abroad

also wondering what would a self described leftist reply to this post, i am actually intellectually curious unlike the 'censor this, censor that!!' crowd

[Anonymous No.21242104]

>>21240327
Rightoids are retarded.

>>21241831
How's your argument? Haven't seen it.

[Anonymous No.21242107]

>>21242100
don't worry about it babe

[Anonymous No.21242109]

>>21241905
I don’t mind admitting the technological contribution a civilisation has made because God elected them to bestow the world with it, just as the Persians were the elected in the Islamicate world. I am not denying a race has their own speciality. English is a perfectly beautiful language but let’s not pretend people adopted it because of its special literary qualities. It is the current lingua franca because of British imperialism. To say that they are the best civilisation for the reasons you stated is silly what with the horrific philosophy they spread and their utter lack of virility therefore. The spreading of their philosophy is akin to corruption, exactly what they claim Jews to be doing. However, they are the same as jews with their arrogance and their impositions. So in the end, considering their jewishness is a point of pride, their little Nazi charade is hilariously moot.

[Anonymous No.21242114]

>>21242103
>i am actually intellectually curious
Nah you're not, you're just arrogant. You don't have to support Israel to be leftist.
Also why do you treat population as a criterion of greatness?

[Anonymous No.21242121]

>>21242107
touch sex have grass etc.

[Anonymous No.21242124]

I feel like the problem here is attempting to differentiate between the 'left' and 'right here, which contains an important error.
The issue (and I’m assuming that this is common knowledge already) is that it functions on an inherently reductionist position, geopolitically and philosophically.
Understanding the left/right distinction in of itself is to first understand that it is reliant upon a specific definition of a mode of cognitive metaphysics and a definite explanation of our perception of substantial qualia. While it could be possible to explain this process through a dialectical synthesis, this would negate an explanation of the substance by which this system is able to operate in of itself, which I will attempt to give a half-assed explanation for.
The dialectic exists within contemporary society within an increasingly omnipresent form of cybernetics, and within this dialectic, the construct of the ‘Absolute’ withers, and along with it, so does the heuristic influence that we can make in determine absolute positions in regards to political differentiation.
It is for this reason that the right essentially exists within a vacuum, in as much as contemporary political philosophy analyses it as. Yet, this vacuum is something that we can epistemically know to exist, for ideology does not exist within a vacuum without some metaphysical force being able to circumambulate into the corpus of ‘commodity’. This is where political metaphysics comes into play, which I feel like Thomas Hobbes says something pretty interesting about this vacuum.
He mentions in his theory of the social contract that humans are essentially irrational beings, and in order for an explanation of societal cohesively to be justified, the existence of sovereignty must act as a means by which rationality is allowed to exist. Even though this theory has problems (once again, I’m giving an extremely half-assed explanation here), we can use it for its utility in justifying how the ‘right-wing’ essentially exists as a means by which this Hobbesian rendition ‘irrationality’ is able to operate in of itself, especially through this metaphysical corpus.
So from this, it doesn’t make sense that we distinct the terms ‘left’ or ‘right’ solely based on their ideological association alone without much depth to these definitions. The ‘right’ can essentially be seen as a metaphysical dimension with the absence of sense, not in the derogatory manner, but in pushing the metaphysical limits of societal tautology. By this logic, the Communist can be ‘right-wing’, as well as the Nazi, in as much as the metaphysical limits of societal tautology and its interaction with their ideological tautology pushes the limits of metaphysics.

Basically, the notion that ‘the vast majority of literature is left-leaning’ is a correct notion, just not in the way that you think of it to be.

Recommended reading -> The Cybernetic Hypothesis - Tiqqun

[Anonymous No.21242125]

>>21242121
sure thing what's your @

[Anonymous No.21242126]

>>21242114
because it was always about genetics

you can have the most resource rich places in the world, such as arab deserts and places like congo, you get 3rd world countries
you can have the most barren death worlds like iceland and australia, 1st world
difference: genetics

[Anonymous No.21242128]

>>21241834
This. It was really eye opening to read Hume not just defend monarchy but act like it was the obvious choice. That was the first time I saw anything other than democracy, probably because I simply hadn't read works that were that old lol

[Anonymous No.21242142]

>>21241965
It's true - of the Big Five, a mere TWO are Jewish owned! Clearly they do not have much influence in the industry. Much ado over nothing.

[Anonymous No.21242260]

>imperial, right wing west
~90% of world gdp
vs
>oh so modern and progressive, leftist west
not even 30% of world gdp

i rest my case
which politics are better? ask israel, rogue nuclear militaristic ethnostate

[Anonymous No.21242261]

>>21241830
Betting on yourself to be right is as much a gamble as any other action in the world. Obviously this isn't addressing your main point, but statistically the odds of someone like you being right about these matters is negligible.

[Anonymous No.21242268]

>>21242261
To add, you probably won't be able to understand this point because of your solipsism. It's just as unlikely that you care about the capital t truth or are even aware of such a thing compared to whatever political solution raises your social status (bio-leninism).

[Anonymous No.21242291]

>>21241834
The post-civil democracy that came to flourish in America and elsewhere was radical on its own, but it is really difficult to convey to people just how radically divergent with all of history and philosophy and really basic common sense the neoliberal norm that came into fruition after the post-war consensus is. The Wall of Separation legal decision of 1947 just might be the most radical legal decision ever made and the Nuremburg trials used racism as a pre-text to prosecute all forms of autocracy, effectively making religious politics, ethnic politics, and autocratic politics all illegal simultaneously for the first time in known history.

[Anonymous No.21242292]

Because jews and other faggots approved by them run media in the US and that's true for books too. They have their own incestous circlejerk where quality is second hand and politics goes first. Tell them in a article that this new book about a tranny cutting themselves is the best thing they've ever read and the retards will parrot the same opinion, no thoughts just empty heads echoing a signal given to them by their masters.

[Anonymous No.21242297]

>>21241877
It's called decadence and it's followed by doom. Which is why you don't let women (the feminine in general) have a say in matters of politics.

[Anonymous No.21242304]

>>21242291
Post-civil war democracy*

Since it gradually transformed from a sort of pseudo-aristocratic republic where only particular citizens had political say to a democratic republic that included not only expanding enfranchisement but eliminating aristocratic norms altogether, a true democratic republic for a citizenry that was always expanding.

It's pretty jarring actually to read not only the figures mentioned as monarchists, but also American leaders after Washington, who appear as some of the most revolutionary, anti-aristocracy, and frankly, idealistic, delusional even, political thinkers in all of history. Jefferson's letters to Adams are actually quite insane, or naive.

[Anonymous No.21242311]

>>21242013
Explain how you just casually jumped from technology to morals.

[Anonymous No.21242321]

>>21241805
She looks like she has seven different allergies and weak bones. You're fat aren't you?

[Anonymous No.21242324]

>>21242260
>GDP
Oh, lawdy.

How much do you benefit from Anon? If it's not enough to see you through several lifetimes, you are just another useful idiot.

[Anonymous No.21242330]

>>21242324
If % of world GDP is a rough measure of industrial output, which it is, then it's a fair thing to point out. Countries that produce nothing and make no money cannot field tanks or artillery.

[Anonymous No.21242331]

>>21242074
I think you proved
>>21241789
right by agreeing with the wrong post.

[Anonymous No.21242349]

>>21240327
Because conservatism and right wing ideology in general is a mental illness.

[Anonymous No.21242384]

>milk is le creepy
im going to hunt you as a psychic werewolf and make you drink from my milk bag

[Anonymous No.21242391]

>>21242330
So you build these tanks to defend yourself against another civilization that has build tanks.

Sounds like failed foreign policy. Got news for you, that has been foreign policy since the 40s and nothing is getting better.

[Anonymous No.21242393]

>>21242391
you've just changed topics

[Anonymous No.21242394]

>>21241815
>The bigest civilizations in s america pre columbus were working models of socialism
Good lord..

[Anonymous No.21242410]

>>21242393
>>21242330
>Countries that produce nothing and make no money cannot field tanks or artillery.
I'm sorry you are unable to keep up with the conversation. Have you tried tumblr?

[Anonymous No.21242434]

>>21241805
And you exactly have done what of merit? Hahahahahahaha comming with the dick of others

[Anonymous No.21242521]

>>21241815
>It's just another con the ruling class of no-talent mobsters want you to believe. Jist like wanting lower taxes for billionaires. "Be right wing, because one day you might be in a position to use your powers."
When you start earning enough to actually pay income tax you'll understand why people want lower taxes. I'm not even remotely wealthy and I still forfeit about a third of my income.

[Anonymous No.21242550]

>>21240327
>is there a reason a vast majority of literature if left-leaning
is it?
Romance novels are the most common kind of novel and the premise for most of those is "My Vampire Rapist CEO can't be this Cute!"

[Anonymous No.21242560]

>>21240327
it's the path of least resistance, it's not rocket science
appealing to the lowest common denominator peoples, feelings, pathos, following the direction of entropy, etc.., will always pay off in terms of quantity

[Anonymous No.21242685]

>>21242142
There's nothing wrong with a Jewish person deciding to open a publishing house. If you think you can do better, open one yourself and outcompete him. If you can't, you're just a nigger crying for the state to give you affirmative action because you know you can't compete.

[Anonymous No.21242694]

>>21242685
Not him but if you say something like that to any group besides white people you will be denounced as racist

[Anonymous No.21242695]

>>21242685
So which is it? You first claimed that Jews don't have any real influence in the industry (because of your inadequate research), and now you're claiming that they're the real victims because someone pointed out two of the five largest publishers are owned by them? Are you OK?

[Anonymous No.21243186]

Reading and writing all day gives you an unwarranted sense of expertise since none of your ideas are ever tested by reality. Leftists love writing towers of bullshit on how to run society, which immediately crumble whenever someone tries to implement these theories. No insight is gained from these experiments since they can always return to their fantasy worlds and write up another tome justifying their failures. It's unsurprising that idle ego strokers imagine a society where their vain pursuits are highly prized.

[Anonymous No.21243383]

>>21242384
the only reason milk is portrayed as evil in films is because jews hate White people and Whites are mostly the only people capable of drinking milk.

[Anonymous No.21243403]

>>21240327
Leftists should get it, but they don't. It's the material conditions.

You have a situation where "quality" literature is propagated in ideologically captured universities and by ideologically conforming publishers and librarians.

There are very active social and institutional controls that prevent outsiders from participating in these systems.

Can you imagine rocking the boat from the right in a library science program?

Despite a steady demand for right wing books, they only get sold from print on demand and obscure publishers, and are largely blacklisted by mainstream booksellers. Just about every city has a handful of independent leftist bookstores with drag queen story hour and/or is just explicitly communist. A right wing brick and mortar store would get burned to the ground.

Then you act like it's totally an organic thing that it just so happens that most of the literature/academia that you're exposed to is left-leaning.

All of this institutional capture was fairly recent, and most of what is considered modern leftism would have been considered insane until very recently.

Anyway, right wing literature is thriving, it's just a subculture that takes effort to access.

[Anonymous No.21243431]

>>21242685
you're assuming that we are opperating in a free market. looking at the example of larry fink strong-arming the financial sector into submitting to his model of ESG investing by (alongside vanguard) monopolising hedge fund management. such a monopoly has excluded the possibility of right wing or anti jewish corporations from existing on a large scale. this is only one example of jewish control of the financial sector that would preclude any sort of publishing company that worked against the interests of the jews. The excuse given to jews disproportionately occupying positions of power (usually given after a failed attempt to deny such a phenomenon) is that the jews are simply more competent for whatever reason (more wrong than you could possibly comprehend).

[Anonymous No.21243454]

>>21240327
Book publishing is run by major corporations. These corporations benefit from mass-immigration and the supply of cheap labor as well as increased demand for housing etc. that comes with it.
Same with feminism, at the root of which lies the idea that it's better for employers to pay half a wage each to a man and woman instead of a man demanding an adequate pay to support a family in which the woman can spend the day taking care of the kids.
It also supports gay/tranny shit because those people are the most enthusiastic enforcers of corporate policies, since they often have a chip on their shoulder against non-perverted people.

There ARE some right-wing book publishers like Arktos and counter-currents.com, but because their books get banned from Amazon, their websites delisted by Google, their Paypal and bank accounts shut down to the point that they can only do business with cryptocurrency, they have very limited reach.

[Anonymous No.21243465]

>>21240327
The European race was defeated in WWII. We have lost control of our governments and institutions, but the resistance is organizing and will be unstoppable.

As for literature, the right would naturally dominate if it wasn't suppressed. Check out the publishers Antelope Hill, Imperium Press, and Counter-Currents for just a small sample of what would be best sellers if we took back the media and academia.

The popularity of leftism is entirely manufactured.

[Anonymous No.21243570]

>>21242410
You went from gdp as it relates to national defense to foreign policy. Foreign policy is not a factor here. Whether your foreign policy is amazing or pathetic, or anything in-between, it's just a fact that if you can't field an army, it makes no difference and you have no power. So foreign policy is irrelevant in that regard.

[Anonymous No.21243750]

“Intellectuals” as a class came to be in the bourgeois-democratic revolutions of the 16th-20th centuries. These people don’t want there to be any barriers in the way for their brains to act in the world. Brainpower alone = social prestige and respect is the equation this class wants. The association of intellectuals with left-liberalism/leftism is strong because these are the ideologies that support there social framework wherein only brainpower (not titles, adherence to doctrine, bloodlines etc.) leads to social advancement. This idea was probably inaugurated by John Locke’s seething statements about the English landed Aristocracy and how if he was in charge he could do everything better than them because of his brain. Today, these ideas are ascendant because the only discrimination that’s socially acceptable and legal is that between the educated and the uneducated + elites are filtered through the University system

[Anonymous No.21243799]

>>21242291
What is this wall of separation legal decision? Is it related to Nuremberg or American free speech shit I can’t find anything

[Anonymous No.21243812]

>>21240335
honestly this

Rightwingers really misunderstand most culture and even the meaning of tradition and try to defend this misunderstanding against the real thing.

[Anonymous No.21243853]

>>21242695
>You first claimed that Jews don't have any real influence in the industry
Stop lying. I never said "Jews don't have any real influence in the industry" I contradicted the anon's comment which said "Jews own the industry". I showed that, in fact, the biggest publisher is owned by a family of German Protestants with ties to the Nazi party, one of the funders of the SS. Literally.
> now you're claiming that they're the real victims
Never claimed that, not even close. You are a fucking retard.
>>21243431
Bro, the biggest publisher is owned by a German family with ties to the Nazi party. Stop making excuses. And this whole fucking debate is irrelevant anyway because there are hundreds of smaller publishing houses which publish within a certain niche. You have libertarian publishing houses, Catholic ones, communist ones, Islamic ones, Buddhist ones, etc. Your ability to get published is not hampered by the fact that the biggest publishers are "Jewish", which is not even true, as I've shown the Mohn family -- German Nazis -- are the owners of the biggest publishing house in history. Stop making excuses, nobody will give you affirmative action.

[Anonymous No.21243861]

>>21243853
A right wing publishing house would be blacklisted by banks

[Anonymous No.21244112]

>>21240335
...b but to arrive at new ideas you need to be very much conservative since everything builds on top of previous.

This is exactly what science is now and always was, with the most shallow outlook it is an embodiment of progressive liberal values, but the second you start to talk back, it is conservative beyond the rhyme and reason.

[Anonymous No.21244119]

>>21240335
Sorry, had to take a bait... Im hungry

[Anonymous No.21244347]

>>21240327
It's because trait openness is highly correlated with being left wing. Artists in general are left wing.

Now if you want to listen to /pol/ it's da joos.

[Anonymous No.21245012]

>>21241299
that was what i meant

[Anonymous No.21245048]

>>21243853
So 2% of the population owns 20% of major book publishers? You don't find that odd? And every rich German family was pro-nazi when the nazi party was in power. I doubt very much that they have nazi sympathies today, other than the garden variety nazi sympathies that every person with an ounce of self interest and rationality pretends not to have.

[Anonymous No.21245247]

>>21240327
Well we're talking about authors in (former) Christendom OP, Christianity naturally evolves into left-wing politics.

[Anonymous No.21245293]

They’re following the herd to get published. It’s so easy to break “creatives” this way.

[Anonymous No.21246560]

ALL OF YOU ARE SO FUCKING INUNDATED IN GAY COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE IT.
YOUR OPINION OF "RIGHT WING" IS MERELY ANY ONE WHO SITS IDEOLOGICALLY TO THE RIGHT OF FUCKING MARX.

LIKE FISH SWIMMING IN WATER,

BUT THE WATER IS GAY COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY.

AND THE FISH IS YOU.

[Anonymous No.21246564]

>>21240327
Here's some right wing thought for you.

[Anonymous No.21246581]

>>21243383
This right here. And this is the answer to OPs question.

[Anonymous No.21246597]

>>21240327
Conservatives revile the arts. They don't cultivate a love of art in their children. They outright discourage it, saying it's a waste of time. That's why children with artistic inclinations who grow up in conservative environment either give up any artistic aspirations or they don't stay conservative.

[Anonymous No.21246735]

>>21246560
that's cute. now of course
monarchy=right-wing
republic=left-wing

guess what the bourgeois freemasons endorsed

[Anonymous No.21246850]

>>21246597
you must be 18 to post here

[Anonymous No.21246856]

>>21246597
Yeah, Adorno was extremely Conservative; as well as the Frankfurt school and their dislike of art being ruined.

Yikes, my bro.

[Anonymous No.21246880]

>>21241834
Of course the overton window is going to shift from the age of centralist monarchies handed down by God to the modern day. The people you listed were still left wing by their day's standard

[Anonymous No.21246932]

>>21240327
vast amount of literature written before the 1990s would be considered right wing if not far right today. especially classical philosophers and historians. even englishwomen writing in the early 20th century mocked blurred gender roles and wrote of the problems of multiple ethnic groups inhabiting the same region.

[Anonymous No.21246945]

>>21240335
>natural selection stops at the neck because SCIENCE
>we are all the same it is not because magic it is SCIENCE
>I am an intellectual