[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 18 KB, 517x373, 1298987305711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.2107378 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/09/28/russian-church-seeks-one-hundred-years-solitude-lolita-ban-c
iting-pedophilia/

>Russian Church Seeks Ban on Modern Classics Such as 'Lolita,' Citing 'Pedophilia'

Blame it on the demonization of pedophiles in contemporary society. If pedophiles werent so fucking demonized we wouldnt have such kind of histeria.

>> No.2107386

>If pedophiles werent so fucking demonized

Yeah. Why do we demonize sexual predators? That's weird.

>> No.2107390 [DELETED] 
File: 31 KB, 561x370, the more you know.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Nabakov's Lolita wasn't pro-pedophilia.

>> No.2107392
File: 31 KB, 561x370, the more you know.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Nabokov's Lolita wasn't pro-pedophilia.

>> No.2107401

>>2107386
zizek has some good theories regarding this

>> No.2107410
File: 67 KB, 400x295, laughing chinese man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>2107401
>zizek... good theories

>> No.2107439

>>2107386
>>2107386

Pedophiles are not sexual predators. Having a different sexual orientation doesnt turn you into a "predator". People think that pedophiles are "predators" just like 50 years ago people thought that homosexuals were "predators". Having a sexual orientation that isnt heterosexuality doesnt turn you into a monster.

>> No.2107447

>>2107439
You're a faggot, please get your face raped.

There is an enormous difference between two consenting homosexual adults and some old bitch taking advantage of the young who don't know any better.

>> No.2107500

>>2107447
>>2107410
assholes

>> No.2107515

>>2107500
If I'm an asshole for not supporting child-rapists, that's fine with me.

>> No.2107519
File: 19 KB, 400x400, philosoraptor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Is it possible to demonize a demon?

>> No.2107659

>>2107447
>>2107447

You still ignore my point. Having a different sexual orientation doesnt turn you into a predator, or a child molester. A pedophile is not a "predator" or a "child molester" just for being attracted to kids.

I said: having a different sexual orientation (including pedophilia) does NOT turn you into a child molester/predator. One can be a pedophile and not be neither. Just like one can be gay and dont be one. Having a different sexual orientation doesnt turn you into a "monster". Its exactly the same stigma that was once against gays.

If you think that a person who is not heterosexual or homosexual (a pedophile, for example) is a "sexual predator" just for NOT BEING STRAIGHT OR HOMO, please get YOUR faced raped.

>> No.2107667

>>2107659
I'm damn sick of your stupid posts. Every time someone mentions Lolita, you spam the thread with this idiotic logic about how preying on children who aren't sexually mature enough to know what they're doing is not a bad thing.

Go away. Stop posting here. You take advantage of inexperienced children, and you are a sexual predator.

>> No.2107672
File: 27 KB, 1024x585, cap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>2107447

Here, I made you a drawing. Some people needs books with pictures to understand a very simple point.

>> No.2107677

>>2107667

>how preying on children who aren't sexually mature enough to know what they're doing is not a bad thing.

Where I said that? Where I said that preying on children was right? I said:

Pedophile do not imply child predator/molester, just like being homo does not imply being a predator.

I never said that rape was OK. I said that pedophiles are not rapists.

>> No.2107679

I was all ready to agree with OP about the stupidity of outlawing books containing subject matter one doesn't agree with, especially since Lolita was hardly sympathetic to the narrator, in fact it was written entirely from his perspective to highlight his self centered-ness in victimizing a young girl for his hedonistic pleasure. But then OP had to go and make a whiny point about why it's okay to fuck kids.

>> No.2107681

Girls are ready to fuck when they start bleeding from their axe wound, guys when we started getting boners from our hot teachers. Doesn't mean they should be fucking creepy, mentally challenged 40 year old who resort to loving children because they can't get no pussy,

>> No.2107680

>>2107677
You're talking about, what, a non-practicing paedophile?

Well, if you download and beat off to sexually explicit photos of children, you are aiding and abetting the exploitation of children.

>> No.2107684

>>2107679
>>2107679

Saying "pedophiles do not fuck kids" is the same that saying "it's okay to fuck kids"?? I think you should learn to read.

>> No.2107688

>>2107684
No, but of course you never said that. You tried to differentiate them from "sexual predators". But pedophilia is innately predatory, whatever superficial consent you get from a child. You'll never understand this of course. TLDR, just fuck and die.

>> No.2107693

>>2107680
>>2107680

>Well, if you download and beat off to sexually explicit photos of children, you are aiding and abetting the exploitation of children.

... And you still think that being attracted to kids implies that.

>> No.2107694
File: 8 KB, 104x144, me1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>outlawing different forms of love
so much for freedom right americans

>> No.2107696

>>2107681
>>2107684
>>2107680

Now I don't want to sound like I'm supporting the idea that being a pedophile is some kind of positive mental state but you people are fucking retarded.

>> No.2107698

>>2107693
Do I? I was under the impression we were talking about practising pedophiles, since that's what Lolita is about. Have you read the book? Do you even know what you're complaining about?

>> No.2107699

>>2107688
>But pedophilia is innately predatory

Just like how heterosexuality or homosexuality is innately predatorial? Like how we have a bunch of men raping other men and women all the time?

>> No.2107703

>>2107688
>>2107688

And you will never understand that pedophile does not imply predator.

>> No.2107707

>>2107698

Yes, I have read the book. I think it sucks, but thats just me. I never complained about the book. At worst, I complained about idiots who think that the book is an "accurate" portrayal of a "pedophile".

>> No.2107716

>>2107707
So, what are you talking about? A paedophile who doesn't act on any of his urges, and doesn't download child porn?

>> No.2107718

>>2107699
No obviously, since you're talking about consensual acts between adults who have the capacity to give meaningful consent.

>>2107707
Well the OP goes further than that:
>Russian Church Seeks Ban on Modern Classics Such as 'Lolita,' Citing 'Pedophilia'

>Blame it on the demonization of pedophiles in contemporary society.

>> No.2107722
File: 28 KB, 243x280, 23232321321312.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>Group whose belief system is built on a book filled with rape, incest, sodomy and lots of pedophilia wants to ban a book with pedophilia as a minor theme
I don't want to live on this planet anymore

>> No.2107812

Liberals believe every other degeneracy or mental illness or fetish needs to promoted glorified and worshipped, so all you are left with is pedophilia to condemn, and they put ALL their hatred on pedophiles and "racists".

>> No.2107815

>>2107718
No women at any age is capable of giving meaningful consent, so your point is invalid.

>> No.2107817

>>2107812
How's thinking in absolutes working out for you?