[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 4 KB, 198x254, billyshakes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21043869 No.21043869 [Reply] [Original]

I've decided to convert to the secular religion of Bardolatry. What do I need to know before joining the faith? Would it be useful to memorize all of a character's lines, such as Macbeth or Hamlet? How much do I need to know of the life of William Shakespeare (PBUH)?

>> No.21043880
File: 72 KB, 500x500, 1652825959356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21043880

>>21043869
Read Wagner's lecture The Destiny of Opera and then follow with his major essays Beethoven, Actors and Singers and Opera and Drama.

>Here our first business would be to discover the exact principle on which the mimetic naturalism of Shakespeare's dramas is to be distinguished from what we call by that name in the case of almost every other dramatic poet.
>I venture to deduce this principle from the one fact that Shakespeare's actors played upon a stage surrounded by spectators on all sides, whereas the modern stage has followed the lead of the French and Italians, displaying the actors only from one side, and that the front side, just like the painted 'wings.' Here we have the academic theatre of the art-Renaissance, modelled upon a misunderstanding of the antique stage, in which the scene is severed from the public by the orchestra. The special-privileged "friend of art," who erst preferred to sit on each side of this modern stage as well, our sense of seemliness has finally sent back into the parquet, to leave us an untroubled view of a theatrical picture which the skill of the decorator, machinist and costumier has almost raised to the rank of a generic work of art. Now, it is both surprising and instructive to see how a trend toward rhetorical Pathos, intensified by our great German poets to the didacto-poetic pitch, has always preponderated on this Neo-european stage, miscopied from the antique; whereas on Shakespeare's primitive folk-stage, which lacked all blinding scenic glitter, the interest was centred in the altogether realistic doings of the meanly clad play-actors. Whilst the later, academically ordered English Theatre made it the actor's imperative duty under no circumstances to turn his back on the audience, and left him to sidle off as best he could in case of any exit toward the rear, Shakespeare's performers moved before the spectator in all directions with the full reality of common life. We may judge what a power the naturalistic mode of acting had here to exert, since it was backed by no auxiliary illusion, but in every gesture had to set in closest neighbourhood to us the poet's marvellously true and yet so curiously uncommon figures, and make us believe in them to boot: here was need of the very highest dramatic pathos, if only to maintain our belief in the truthfulness of this playing, which would otherwise have proved quite laughable in situations of great tragic moment.

>> No.21043896

>>21043869
>What do I need to know before joining the faith?
1. He literally invented English
2. He invented the concept of complex personalities
3. Some people don’t think he existed he’s that good
4. This is a journey, not a destination, you will travel with Shakespeare your whole life
5. No film adaptation nor stage performance will ever match your imagination. Don’t sweat it
>Would it be useful to memorize all of a character's lines, such as Macbeth or Hamlet?
More useful to memorize the sonnets and specific monologues. You should only memorize all of a characters lines if you are actually going to play that character (which, based if you are).
>How much do I need to know of the life of William Shakespeare (PBUH)?
Surprisingly, you don’t need to know a thing about his life. His writing truly stands on its own. Doesn’t mean it’s a waste of time to learn, just that you don’t NEED to learn
Check out Anthony Burgess’s Shakespeare book

>> No.21044487

>>21043869
In britain long ago when we had bards and druids both were fundamentally important to the culture.

They could wander wherever they wanted without fear of attack and were forbidden to carry weaponry.

>> No.21044515

>>21043896
You can’t learn about Shakespeare’s life because biographical information is almost completely lost, especially his formative years before breaking out on stage.

>> No.21044530

>>21044515
stratfordian cope

>> No.21044537

>>21044530
Other than his dead son Hamnet influencing Hamlet, I don’t really know what biography you could read into Shakespeare; further; Foucault debunked biographical readings in “The Function of the Author.”

>> No.21044540

I am an idiot
Here I am thinking I should read the Bible for it's historical importance but what I really should be doing is reading Shakespeare instead

>> No.21044877

>dude reimagined a bunch of known plays/tales likely got ideas in collaboration with his actors and playwright friends (Middleton)
>he was a genius and otherwise normal dude who enjoyed a good pint at ye olde pub down the way

it's that simple

>> No.21044902

>>21044877
>somehow knew beowolf despite there only being a tiny handful of translated copies in england at that time in very refined hands.

>> No.21044917

>>21044902
Yes. If Shakespeare LARPed as an erudite intellectual instead of just a normal dude who liked to drink you would believe it.

Cope seethe and dilate that Shakespeare didn't live a pretentious life.

>> No.21044935

>>21043896
I read the sonnets a couple weeks ago, it's not even too hard to memorize them. You'll end up reading them half a dozen times or more trying to grasp them anyways. I loved the sonnets.. I don't care to extrapolate what shakespeare could have been or not though these, they resonate regardless. Read about half of those so far. Just started King Lear today, it's pretty good, there's a good dramatic audio of it on YouTube that makes it even more enjoyable.

>> No.21045497

>>21044902
>somehow knew beowolf
What?
>despite there only being a tiny handful of translated copies in england at that time in very refined hands.
There were zero copies

>> No.21045511

>>21045497
The Nowell Codex now in the british library.

>> No.21045572

>>21045511
What did he do, pop over to Cotton's house and take a look?

>> No.21045700

All these people seething because Shakespeare wasn't pretentious IRL.

>> No.21045727

>>21045497
He's a retard that thinks Hamlet was based on Beowulf.

>> No.21045747

>>21045727
There are stylistic similarities that suggest a degree of inspiration from Beowolf in the writing of Hamlet although not in any way conclusive.

>> No.21045761

>>21045572
Laurence Nowell who collected together what papers on Beowolf he could find was the tutor of one of the proposed Shakespeare candidates Edward de Vere.

>> No.21045770

>>21044487
>we

>> No.21045867

>>21045761
I was so confused about this topic, but I see you believe that kind of stuff so now I understand you're just stupid.

>> No.21045939

>>21045867
Probably but that doesn't answer whether shakespeare or someone else actually wrote the plays

>> No.21046505

>>21045939
Literally just: How could he write such good art and live a simple life? Why wasn't he posturing 24/7 and seeking attention?

Go read Nabokov or something.

>> No.21047198
File: 57 KB, 885x874, sad autism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21047198

>>21043896
>5. No film adaptation nor stage performance will ever match your imagination
but i can't understand his plays unless i watch a performance of it first

>> No.21047251

>>21044902
>>21045747
Hamlet aligns far better with the story of Amleth than it does with Beowulf. The only way to make it fit with Beowulf is by force. It's also far more likely to be inspired by Amleth since the story of Amleth was somewhat widely circulated from the 1570s onward and would've inspired Ur-Hamlet which in turn inspired Hamlet (arguments about if Shakespeare wrote Ur-Hamlet is a whole other mess).

>> No.21047549

>>21047198
Get a version with footnotes, and keep trying. It gets easier!
>>21044935
It's hard to talk about King Lear without sounding ridiculously hyperbolic—it's that good. It is one of the greatest artistic experiences humanity has to offer. Just thinking about it breaks my heart.
>>21043896
>>21043869
Good points. Bloom's "invention of the human" thing gets criticised a lot, but the depth of Shakespeare's characterisation really is unbelievable. I might be wrong, but no character in literature—at least Western literature—before him has the sort of depth that his characters have, the kind of developing, complicated inner worlds that they have. Chaucer is a possible exception. But even in the Greek tragedies, the characters, though interesting and amazing, don't seem to be real people like Shakespeare's do. I don't know how that works.
I'll have to check out that Anthony Burgess book.

>> No.21047650

>>21045761
Nowell didn't collect "together what papers on Beowolf he could find". He simply was in possession of one manuscript of it. This manuscript he inscribed with his name the same year as he started tutoring Edward de Vere. But the issue is that he only tutored de Vere for 8 months. I find it highly unlikely that he taught a 13 year old Edward to read Old English to the point where he could read all of Beowulf in at most 8 months (possibly even less since it's unknown when during 1563 he got the manuscript).

>> No.21047654
File: 574 KB, 900x1157, how now falstaff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21047654

Ignore authorship fags, they're a plague. Instead post your favorite character.

>> No.21047712

>>21047549
I’m gonna confess something now: I haven’t read that Anthony Burgess Shakespeare book I recommended. That being said, I know Anthony Burgess is a great author from reading other works by him, and I have seen it recommended by other anons on /lit/
I stand by every other word in my post still, and I am planning on reading Burgess’s Shakespeare book. I just haven’t read it yet.

>> No.21048352
File: 49 KB, 800x434, 753D8FBE-ADA3-4E47-8C00-53FD15A14043.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21048352

Favorite film adaptations?

>> No.21048570

>>21048352
I like the Polanski Macbeth.

>> No.21048617

>>21048352
Not the best adaptation but a masterpiece of film.

>>21048570
Pleb taste. Nothing but Hollywood shlock.

>> No.21048641

>>21043869
>secular religion
>Shakespeare was a Christian

>> No.21048644

>>21048617
>Hollywood
It was produced by a porn magazine

>> No.21048672

>>21048641
>Christian
>Jesus was a Jew

>> No.21048690

>>21048672
>Jewish religion
>Moses was a Levite

>> No.21048709

>>21048690
Thanks for strengthening my argument.

>> No.21048730

>>21048644
Remind me again when Shakespeare defined Christianity as no longer sufficient as Jesus did the Old Testament?

Shakespeare wasn't trying to make a secular worldview, while Jesus was trying to make a Christian worldview.

>> No.21048744

>>21048641
What evidence do you have for that?

>> No.21048749

Enjoy Hell idol-worshippers.

>> No.21048751

>>21048749
I’m glad I’m not alone in damning these heathens. Alhamdulillah, brother, we will be rewarded mightily in Heaven by our Lord, Allah, and his Prophet(PBUH).

>> No.21048799

what hidden codes and ciphers do you find the most amusing?

>> No.21048932

what's the best edition of his complete works?

>> No.21048948

>>21048744
Gee I dunno the playwright who lived in 16th and 17th century England with a Christian worldview evident in his plays must have been an atheist.

>> No.21048953

>>21048932
Riverside Shakespeare imo

>> No.21049019

>>21048948
I didn't say he was an atheist. But what makes you think his plays have a Christian worldview? Some of them are definitely set in a Christian society (Othello, Hamlet), but even they don't seem very Christian. It's even more difficult to argue that a "Christian worldview" is evident in plays like King Lear. I'm not saying he was or wasn't a Christian, but the issue is far more complex than you're making it out to be.

>> No.21049033

>>21048948
rosacrucian and old pre-1800s-scotish rite subversion freemason

>> No.21049247

>>21043869
Okay?

>> No.21049743
File: 654 KB, 2688x1512, 1664283226631695233360713506525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21049743

>>21048953
It's a big book, but at least the paper is good.

>> No.21050021

>>21048948
> Christian worldview evident in his plays
For example?

>> No.21050030

>>21050021
The positive portrayal of chastity in A Midsummer's Night Dream and All's Well that Ends Well.

>> No.21050079

>>21050030
>The moon methinks looks with a wat’ry eye;
>And when she weeps, weeps every little flower,
>Lamenting some enforced chastity.

You're so stupid. But that's to be figured by someone who worships a jew who died like a cuck on a piece of wood.

>> No.21050272
File: 138 KB, 900x842, midsummer-nights-dream-titania-and-bottom-henry-fox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21050272

>>21050079
Titania is literally drugged to fall in love with a man with a fucking Donkey head you retard. I bet you don't even know who the moon is, either, but somehow my "Jew cucked" brain does.

>> No.21050292

>>21044540
Or just read both you got time, negro

>> No.21050301

>>21048751
>>21048749
Accept Jesus Christ, then read some Shakespeare