Champion of freedom and individuality

[Anonymous No.20910213]

"All sick and diseased people strive instinctively after a herd-organisation, out of a desire to shake off their sense of oppressive discomfort and weakness; the ascetic priest divines this instinct and promotes it; wherever a herd exists it is the instinct of weakness which has wished for the herd, and the cleverness of the priests which has organised it, for, mark this: by an equally natural necessity the strong strive as much for isolation as the weak for union..."

[Anonymous No.20910255]

Buddha as a White man.

[Anonymous No.20910305]

>>20910255
>Buddha
Nietzsche recognized that it's the weak that are the biggest threat to the strong, not the other other strong men.

Buddha advocates weakness, he's a degenerate.

[Anonymous No.20910323]

>>20910305
There are many Buddhas.

[Anonymous No.20910327]

>>20910323
All dying men. Self-castrated, one wonders if they can even be called men. Are Buddhists the first transgenders? Their gender is somewhere between a boy toddler and a woman.

[Anonymous No.20910345]

>>20910327
No, Buddhas are not men. Anyway, you seem to be too eager to fight your own spooks publicly. That attitude communicates a strong desire to be on the winning team. And that is just another herd.

[Anonymous No.20910363]

>>20910345
If everyone is strong and an individual there can ever be tyranny. It's in all our interests.

[Anonymous No.20910447]

>>20910363
You've made a typo? If so, I agree. Sovereignty solves the necessity to gather up into panopticons. Sure, it was a half-joke, but there is some truth to it: Buddhist nature of the ground as guarantor of sovereignty. (In its personalist fashion.)

[Anonymous No.20910490]

>>20910447
>Buddhist nature of the ground as guarantor of sovereignty. (In its personalist fashion.)
Why would you say no to life when you can yes and be sovereign all the more?