/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.20750896]

Post a book hidden in plain sight which contains knowledge so useful and relevant to life it will make you OP.

[Anonymous No.20750918]

>>20750896
My Diary Desu
And My Diary Desu 2: My Manifesto Desu

[Anonymous No.20750935]

>>20750896
if you are already OP then every book will increase your power, because you will either assimilate the knowledge in an already active mind or you will see through it, to its innocences or faults. if you are a stupid person then nothing will help you, and the most precious words in the universe will be lost on you

[Anonymous No.20750942]

[Anonymous No.20750949]

>>20750935
Agreed, now give me the title of the book. You know which one I mean.

[Anonymous No.20750977]

>>20750896
The Bible.

[Anonymous No.20750988]

>>20750896
>it will make you OP
Why would I wanna be a faggot?

[Anonymous No.20751044]

>>20750896

[Anonymous No.20751189]

1009. Scientists still swear up and down that there's a fundamental difference between the classical behavior of the universe at macro scales, and the quantum behavior observed at the micro level, but that's only because the type of scientist who understands the micro levels has not the faintest clue of how the macro levels operate, and vice versa. Take for example the double-slit experiment. Its philosophical significance is that the particle's behavior is ultimately dominated by the observer's will; the particle will simply go wherever the scientist consciously wants it to go, depending on how he sets up the experiment, and the only conclusion the scientist will arrive at, no matter how many times he runs the experiment, is his own will. And this is where the quantum mechanists throw their hands up in the air and despair, pathetically exclaiming that "THAT'S NOT AT ALL HOW REALITY FUNCTIONS AT THE MACRO LEVEL, THIS IS A BRAND-NEW, RADICALLY DIFFERENT TYPE OF BEHAVIOR!" And yet isn't that precisely how pyschologists observe that people function under examination, in interviews for example? Doesn't the way the interviewer poses the question radically alter the type of answer he gets? Don't people always end up getting the types of answers they are looking for, at the end of the day? Isn't the infinite way in which statistics can be interpreted "a type of wish-fulfillment" as Baudrillard has strikingly noted? So there is no fundamental difference between the macro and quantum scales, it just takes a genius who understands both to connect the dots and reconcile the apparent contradictions.

http://orgyofthewill.net

[Anonymous No.20751247]

>>20750896
If you can find the book hidden in plain side on my power shelf that has a power level >3000 I will send it to you for free. (you will also have to take the multivitamins for full effect)

[Anonymous No.20751255]

>>20751247
>Revolt against the modern world

[Anonymous No.20751366]

>>20751255
No, would you like to receive some multivitamins anyways?

[Anonymous No.20751370]

>>20751366
No thanks I already have some.

[Anonymous No.20751387]

>>20750942
Good god, its honestly pathetic you do this 24/7.

[Anonymous No.20751526]

>>20751044
SHUT IT DOWN

[Anonymous No.20751541]

>>20751189
Don’t quantum scientists have to learn about classical normal macro physics before going to the micro scale? This is retarded

[Anonymous No.20751550]

>>20751189
Also isn’t this already known? Only seems different on micro scale because it is micro but it is the same laws

[Anonymous No.20751599]

>>20751189
But the particle doesn't "go wherever the observer wants it to go", it just goes through one slit or the other when it's observed. You don't will it through one in particular. Whoever wrote this has completely misunderstood the experiment

[Anonymous No.20751894]