[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 26 KB, 1092x1037, 1658861947271848.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20739620 No.20739620 [Reply] [Original]

What are some books about capitalism that aren't retarded? I want genuine critiques that aren't just tranny copes.

>> No.20739674

>>20739620
Wealth of nations

>> No.20739694

>>20739620
The game Monopoly.
>but that's a problem in all systems and you will always have to address it with some kind of exceptions to the general rule
Yes.

>> No.20739711

>>20739694
>The game Monopoly.
lol.

>> No.20739720

Progress and Poverty

>> No.20739732

Capital

>> No.20739735

OP IS A TROLL. DO NOT ENGAGE.

>>20739620
WE’VE ALREADY ANSWERED THIS DOZENS OF TIMES
GO TO WAROSU.

>> No.20739743

>>20739620
all critiques against capitalism boil down to general observations about managing, allocating, and distributing resources. So any book about logistics will give you insights into capitalism and what can go wrong with it.

>> No.20739774
File: 247 KB, 1533x2560, 71UOJPMXTtL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20739774

>>20739620
Read Ellul.

>> No.20739776
File: 203 KB, 531x823, Cambridge controversy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20739776

>>20739620
https://bnarchives.yorku.ca/259/2/20090522_nb_casp_full_indexed.pdf
Capital as Power (2009)

>> No.20739815

>>20739674
Thanks.

>> No.20739913
File: 23 KB, 267x401, why-liberalism-failed-patrick-j-deneen-9780300240023-447612918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20739913

>>20739620
Pic related covers how capitalism produces an upper class who by necessity mutates into this rootless cosmopolitan identity in order to succeed in an increasingly globalized, anti-communal world. It also covers how the logic of capitalism and social liberalism go hand in hand to destroy entire ecosystems and local cultures/communities for the benefit of capital.

>> No.20739916

>>20739711
It all seems to boil down to that. Most critics will add a lot of flowery language but basically just talk about Monopoly, mostly because they're confused themselves about what they're talking about.
If you add the tiniest bit of welfare and reactive regulations by a government to the game it plays forever. If you account for reality a little bit more in the game as a model and start including less material factors like family ties and ideas then you're starting to account for the things that actually move people and motivate honest interactions.