[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 38 KB, 400x405, 1620272765972.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20609387 No.20609387 [Reply] [Original]

Okay so what am I supposed to take away from "Beiträge zur Philosophie" compared to Sein und Zeit. I don't want anyone here to explain or even act like they've actually read it, I'd just like a starter on what he's actually "on about", what the project is, why he never published it. There's essentially nothing or nothing substantial on the internet, and I personally know no one who's at all studied Heidegger to any significant degree.
I've heard nonetheless that he tries to construct a new "philosophy" and that it is in some way opposed to what he constructs in SuZ (I won't try to summarize here in one word or sentence what he does there either).

>> No.20609448

>>20609387
>The concept of Dasein is too anthropocentric, I'm going to bring back some of the late Husserl's discussions and focus more on Being than Dasein
This is Dreyfus' suggestion on Late heidegger. I don't buy all of it, but he is really clear on his theory

>> No.20609521

>>20609387
Oh and he abandoned time, someone suggest he did this because he read bergson and convinced by that

>> No.20609626

>>20609448
Fpbp

>> No.20609823

>>20609521
>Oh and he abandoned time, someone suggest he did this because he read bergson and convinced by that
What