[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 74 KB, 1200x675, 1A6F7161-EE14-4337-B5E9-D087624422B8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20577365 No.20577365 [Reply] [Original]

Any books that refute Stirner and egoism? I literally can’t refute egoism. I think this is the end of the road.

>> No.20577435

>>20577365
The book you read of Stirner's is not Stirner's it is yours, thus you win. Why refute yourself?

>> No.20577464

>>20577435
Someone should make a meme about Stirner and the Rorschach test.

>> No.20577815

I don't think it's the sort of thing that's objectively true or false.

>> No.20577825

As an egoist, I don't see why there's any point in having a conversation or even posting here. At best I'm just entertaining you people or subjecting my mind to hostile foreign views

>> No.20577832

>>20577365
Is there a single person who buttmangled Marx more than this mad lad? The careful dissection of collectivism is, to this day, unable to be argued against successfully

>> No.20577849

>>20577365
Did Stirner even exist

>> No.20577938
File: 211 KB, 867x635, 1CDB7352-BE4D-48C7-944A-7ACEE83CF7B2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20577938

>>20577832
>Is there a single person who buttmangled Marx more than this mad lad?
No.

>> No.20577946

>>20577365
Just read any book in defense of moral realism.

>> No.20577948

>>20577365
iirc james rachels wrote a refutation of egoism. as did derek parfit

>> No.20577967

>>20577849
Yes, but communists can only cope by literally denying his existence.

>> No.20578115

>>20577946
I’m not religious.

>> No.20578266

>>20577938
Incredible

>> No.20578371
File: 602 KB, 1024x566, Benatar.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20578371

>>20577365

>> No.20578379

>>20578115
ok

>> No.20578540
File: 85 KB, 626x800, CB180AD8-0D51-4650-9FFA-EB7B016373A6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20578540

>>20578371
Did he plagiarize The Trouble with Being Born?

>> No.20578686

>>20577825
>Subjecting your mind to hostile foreign views
Isn't that kind of the point of philosophy

>> No.20579087

>>20578686
No, the point of philosophy is to subject the author to your thoughts.

>> No.20579320

>>20578540
It could be said no, Benatar is very autistic at times. Whereas Cioran really makes you think.

>> No.20579324

>>20577365
Try evola or sex

>> No.20579455
File: 828 KB, 4351x882, 502D6AABCA8C4AA98DADCDB768D15485.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20579455

>>20577365
>Any books that refute Stirner and egoism? I literally can’t refute egoism. I think this is the end of the road.

>> No.20580322

>>20577365
i guess by reading about the thing he shits on the most in his book the biggest spook of them all god

>> No.20580334

>>20577365
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch03.htm
This is Marx's famous chapter about Stirner, probably a good place to begin

>> No.20580335

>>20578371
>>20578540
How do they refute him? Tell me?

>> No.20580340

>>20577938
Lasalle and prodhoun both buttmangeled him worse. Marx never called stirner a 'nigger' lol

>> No.20580481

>>20580335
No.

>> No.20582177

Maybe I am a brainlet but did Stirner say much more than that in the end everything is your individual opinion? What is there to refute?

>> No.20583516

>>20577938
God this cope exceeds levels we haven't seen before