/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.20565678]

My normie friend saw me reading Revolt and asked me about it. She ended up freaking out after she Googled Evola and saw "antiegalitarian" on the wikipedia page.
What do /lit/? She said I shouldn't read him and doesn't blame me for "wanting to be strong". What the fuck does that even mean? She recommended some Malcolm Gladwell book instead. Fuck my life.

[Anonymous No.20565696]

>>20565678
Admit you’re a chud or explain some chuds pressured you into reading this dustbin author.

Don’t listen to any of these “wizards”. They don’t want you to get your dick wet.

[Anonymous No.20565697]

>>20565678
She wants to fuck

[Anonymous No.20565704]

>>20565678
Explain you’re “researching extremism after Jan 6 almost ended our democracy. What could bring them to do such a barbaric act?”

[Anonymous No.20565708]

>>20565678
tell her not to judge an author based on the Wikipedia page. try to make her read some Evola herself to make up her own mind. Maybe the book on the Grail is a good start.

[Anonymous No.20565715]

ghost her lol

[Anonymous No.20565717]

>>20565678
Anon - just say you think it's interesting reading and that you don't give a fuck whether it offends her or not. Don't be a pussy for once in your life.

[Anonymous No.20565726]

>>20565678
>She said I shouldn't read him and doesn't blame me for "wanting to be strong". What the fuck does that even mean? She recommended some Malcolm Gladwell book
"It is important to read different perspectives and authors. I hope that you don't read just stuff you already know and already agree with? How are you supposed to broaden yourself?"

[Anonymous No.20565730]

>>20565678
Stand in it, chudoid. You people need to be tarred and feathered like the old times.

[Anonymous No.20565736]

>>20565730
>>20565696
You will never be a woman

[Anonymous No.20565748]

>>20565730
Last time I check it was the trannies who were tarred and feathered

[Anonymous No.20565752]

This is the one she told me "changed her life". I honestly didn't even really know about the guy except for some podcast episode I had to write a paper about at uni (revisionist history?). I couldn't stand it, not sure I'd be able to even humor her by reading a page of this garbage.

[Anonymous No.20565768]

>>20565748
nah, they usually check out of life before that happens lol

[Anonymous No.20565771]

>>20565736
Incel, giving good advice to a guy who’s got a girl interested in him doesn’t make me a tranny. Go fuck off

[Anonymous No.20565774]

Read Outliers by Gladwell and thank her for recommending it. Mention how you wonder if Gladwell was influenced Evola, since they both have a worldview where a tiny minority of geniuses are the only worthwhile humans in a sea of mediocrity. If this makes his dislike Gladwell, remind her that he's black and we should support Black voices even when we disagree

[Anonymous No.20565775]

>>20565768
Good point

[Anonymous No.20565776]

>>20565678
>being friends with women

[Anonymous No.20565780]

I fucking love science, thus I fucking hate Evola.

[Anonymous No.20565782]

>>20565771
You seem upset.

[Anonymous No.20565785]

>>20565752
>I couldn't stand it,
And yet, you’re reading evola. Oh the ironing

[Anonymous No.20565786]

Normies are so far gone. I honestly don’t think you should care what they have to say at all. You should maybe not even interact with them beyond what’s necessary.

[Anonymous No.20565790]

>>20565780
Do you worship Science too? That's what the vakseen shills do. Are you one of them?

[Anonymous No.20565795]

>>20565782
I’m tired of hearing Incels levy this inane insult ALL THE TIME. You think it’s funny? You’re the one who sounds upset

[Anonymous No.20565799]

>>20565786
Why are you online at all?
It’s crawling with NORMIEEEEES

[Anonymous No.20565807]

>>20565771
"giving good advice" all you did was call someone chud for reading
rethink your life you inauthentic looser

[Anonymous No.20565808]

>>20565678
>>20565752
Gladwell is a frail, nerdish personality that I find intolerable. Also, he constantly attempts to incorporate underdog mentality into everything, even when talking about talented, successful athletes and entrepreneurs who were not underdogs whatsoever. From what I can make of it, he's attempted to turn his own academic failures (despite coming from a highly educated background) into a career that condemns individualism and sees personal traits as nothing more than a product of environment, which is ironic considering he was not as successful as he should have been considering his upbringing. Weak people identify with the underdog.

[Anonymous No.20565816]

>>20565795
I'm a 40 year old man whose been in several relationships and I think the incels have a point. Barking up the wrong tree fella

[Anonymous No.20565821]

>>20565697
Can confirm

[Anonymous No.20565841]

>>20565808
>condemnation of individualism
I see nothing wrong with this
>underdog mentality
Why is this even bad? Who wants to see Chad win all the time?

[Anonymous No.20565860]

>>20565678
>What do /lit/
Tell her you read for the reason you do. Reading a book doesn't even mean you accept its message, even though lot of people seem to think so.

[Anonymous No.20565861]

>>20565821
Unfathomably based

[Anonymous No.20565891]

>>20565807
I don’t know the guy. You read it and you want to base your life on this numbskull, you’re a chud.
Learn to read.

>>20565816
>I’m forty years old and I tell people they’ll never be a woman online for thrills
You dumbass.

[Anonymous No.20565940]

>>20565678
don't read trash. if you really want to be a fascist that bad at least read someone respectable like schmitt

[Anonymous No.20565958]

>>20565678
You either have to leave town or kill her, those are the only two options.

[Anonymous No.20565963]

>>20565774
kek
this

[Anonymous No.20565984]

>>20565678
man, if you're gonna start bending the knee to women over this sort of shit you will end up the average soiboy, they got to that point by simping for women and molding themselves as what they think women want them to be, stand your ground in a respectful manner and even if outwardly she pretends to dislike you for it she will respect you more for it in the longrun, women are always testing men like this to see who's a weak faggot that bends the knee at the first sign of resistance and who's the man who isnt afraid to stand against adversity

i said this in the most "proper" and normie manner i could so i hope you understand im being serious, a female tested me recently and i bent the knee like a faggot and i can tell she thinks less of me for it
>>20565696
also
>implying simps get laid

[Anonymous No.20565996]

also astounded at the amount of retards that think that if you read mein kampf you'll magically transform into hitler, people nowadays are so stupid, i guess im a communist for having read marx then, idiots

[Anonymous No.20565999]

>>20565891
>You read it and you want to base your life on
Reading a book is basing you life on it? So basically I could write anything right here, and you would base your life on it since you read it? Great, kill yourself. There, those are the words you have to base your life around now.

[Anonymous No.20566008]

>>20565795
>someone who uses the word incel complaining about lack of originality and derivative spam

[Anonymous No.20566014]

>>20565996
>>20565999
this, women are retards
and yes women in plural because its too often some cunt comes screeching at me with this retarded mentality

[Anonymous No.20566020]

>>20565841
>I see nothing wrong with this
You should probably see what Marxism did in the last century with this belief

[Anonymous No.20566025]

>>20566020
>NOOOO FOCUS EXCLUSIVELY ON NAZIS AND THE ATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE NOOO

[Anonymous No.20566028]

>>20565799
This website is not and that’s probably the biggest reason I’m addicted to browsing the dump.

[Anonymous No.20566038]

>>20566028
>this website is not
nigger this site is literally redd1t 2 at this point

[Anonymous No.20566042]

>>20566028
>This website is not
It is, but the ratio of them to true-blue anons make this site slightly more tolerable than other places. I must emphasise my use of the word "slightly".

[Anonymous No.20566044]

>>20565678
Tell her you just like reading different books. Out of a sense of curiosity and such like.

[Anonymous No.20566049]

>>20565678
Something similar happened to me once. Just call them a nigger as loudly as is reasonable and go on with your day.

[Anonymous No.20566056]

>>20565999
>Reading a book is basing you life on it?
Most people unironically do this. They refuse to read things they either disagree with or don't understand because they cannot download a personality from it to look intelligent.
Nice digits, by the way.

[Anonymous No.20566060]

>>20565704
dont you get it? they're afraid that everything they put their faith in and preach is all bullshit and that a mere few books would refute it and it'd all come crumbling down thats why theres so much fucking censorship fucking nigger, deep down they know all this neo liberal globalist crap is bullshit wich is why they dont like people reading "problematic" books

[Anonymous No.20566062]

>>20566038
>>20566042
It’s not. Let’s be real here. I know it’s en Vogue to call it Reddit but it’s a fringe community of regular posters.

[Anonymous No.20566070]

>>20566062
It's not quite Reddit, but it slowly progresses more and more and gets that tiny bit more intolerable. I do not see myself using this site 5+ years down the line, simply due to it slowly getting worse. I've noticed the decline myself.

[Anonymous No.20566094]

>>20565678
no one can see what I read because its all pdfs. I just say im doing uni reading stuff if they ask

[dago No.20566095]

>>20565821
kek
alpha post

[Anonymous No.20566100]

>>20566060
It is pretty interesting how people are so terrified of authors considered to be “fringe, discredited, insane” etc. You would think that this stuff would be treated with laughs and sneers but instead it gets hatred and calls for censorship. Guess it’s just normalfag herd mentality though

[Anonymous No.20566105]

>>20565678
I got my first girlfriend when I sperged out about Evola but she's a redscare type edgy girl so it didnt matter

[Anonymous No.20566110]

>>20566070
I just take breaks. I leave for a few months then come back, rinse, repeat. My only issue is spending too much time her per day when I am here.

[Anonymous No.20566115]

>>20566070
Nah, unless this place starts to accommodate redditors. Bigger problem is people who follow social media like Twitter.

[dago No.20566125]

>Malcolm Gladwell
don't (You) me unless you've put in 10,000 hours on 4chan

[Anonymous No.20566133]

>>20566115
>Bigger problem is people who follow social media like Twitter.
You very may well be right. I've never used any social media besides here and I know very little about the others so Redditors and other social-media users blend together for me.

>>20566110
I do this too, and I usually get sick of it after a month.

[Anonymous No.20566179]

>>20566125
Kek

[Anonymous No.20566205]

>>20565678
>caring what a woman thinks
Are you really that much of a spineless normalfaggot? Is this what /lit/ has become?

[Anonymous No.20566207]

>>20566100
they ridicule it too, they mock fringe things because they want to undermine and supress it while also hating it and censoring it
i hate normalfags so much

[Anonymous No.20566213]

>>20566205
not OP but i worry sometimes i care too much what some dumb cunt thinks because my instincts are frustrated from lack of sex, i wanna fuck a prostitute just so i can get over what they think cause dwelling on the stupid shit they say will erode you as both a man

[Anonymous No.20566223]

>>20566205
I don't care what she thinks. I'm just baffled at the collective idiocy of the normie hivemind.

[Anonymous No.20566253]

You could do the classic boomer conservative move where you back down immediately and apologize and say that your views were wrong and they do not reflect the principles of real conservatism.

[Anonymous No.20566275]

>>20565715
/thread

[Anonymous No.20566279]

>>20566213
i went on auto pilot and forgot to edit this shit, i was gonna say both as a man and a person, but it didnt sound right so i got rid of the person bit cause the stupid shit women say wont fuck with a woman's head as much as a man's, of course i was alluding to something greater but whatever
>>20566223
>fuck my life
just admit you care but realize you need to have some self control and not assign too much value to what a cunt says otherwise you become her little beta bitch boy puppet
>>20566253
last thing you should do, its a fucking game anon shes fucking TESTING YOU, women fuck with men all the time precisely because of this, and if shes testing you that means she cares about you, god all this could be summed up with just saying do the opposite of what you think a femoid wants because their no is yes and their yes is no
the tranny that pretends to understand women will say this is what you should do, clearly they're fucking stupid and dont know shit about how women think, all they know is sissy skittles and crossdressing makes my pp hard

[Anonymous No.20566310]

>>20565795
You will never be a real woman. You have no womb, you have no ovaries, you have no eggs. You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and surgery into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.

All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your ghoulish appearance behind closed doors.

Men are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed men to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even trannies who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a man. Your bone structure is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk guy home with you, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your diseased, infected axe wound.

You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.

Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you with a headstone marked with your birth name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a man is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a skeleton that is unmistakably male.

This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.

[Anonymous No.20566314]

>>20565715

[Anonymous No.20566321]

>>20565696
>>20565730
It’s really hard for me to believe these faggots still use words like “chud”. This has to be bait.

[Anonymous No.20566326]

>>20565678
Your fault for having a normie friend, a woman no less

[Anonymous No.20566370]

>>20565678
Who cares? You read what you read. Don't make fucking excuses for it. Maybe you do need that fucking Gladwell book if your first instinct is to run to the internet and ask for advice.

[Anonymous No.20566380]

>>20566321
It’s your word for it, kid. It’s really hard to believe you still post frogs and ugly white guys. Shits a decade old.
Yeah. Get used to it I guess. “Chud” is new, just replaced alt right

[Anonymous No.20566500]

>>20565821
mega based

[Anonymous No.20566535]

>>20565678
>see a couple of Evola books in some new agey schizo book shop
>get excited because they're in sale
>hand them to cashier
>they give me a death glare as the run them through the till.
I paid with my card, am I on a list now?

[Anonymous No.20566541]

>>20566535
It's over. Burn all of your belongings and move into an unmarked shack, preferably before sunset.

[Anonymous No.20566548]

>>20565696
Sounds like incel advice.

[Anonymous No.20566565]

>>20566535
>always giving the fart face.

>>20566548
It’s not “incel advice” to angle on how to get your dick wet and ignore the incels reminding you of walls and used roast beef and shit.

[Anonymous No.20566625]

>>20566535
DFW in interviews always came across like a neurotic trying very hard to stay calm.

[Anonymous No.20566632]

>>20565678
>She thinks you're trying to be one of those internet masculine types
>Recommends fucking Gladwell
She's definitely a midwit even by uni woman standards. Don't know what much there can be done about it really. I guess you could try recommending The Outsider by Colin Wilson to her and see if it changes the way she views literary figures outside the norm. If she doesn't change after that, you're completely fucked

[Anonymous No.20566641]

>>20566535
>see pascal's pensees on sale in used bookstore
>bring it to cashier
>ask her if she's heard of pascal
>she says no
>tell her he's a RAPIST
>"...oh..."
>yeah these are his fragmentary unpublished writings (pensees means thoughts in french), he was really fixated on RAPE in them
>she says that's interesting but is weirded out
>buy book
>say thank you in a weird way like we made more of a connection than we did
>leave
>wonder if she'll look up pascal and find out there's nothing about rape in them

[Anonymous No.20566685]

>>20566641
I kek'd

[Anonymous No.20566722]

>>20565678
>friend
>she
OP, she views you as her pet retard. That's why she defaults to talking down to you like a mother to a child.

[Anonymous No.20566735]

>>20565678
>anon tries to get laid by playing the intellectual card
>girl realizes the virgin power level underneath and freaks out instead

[Anonymous No.20566802]

>>20566380
this post gave me cancer
its like an amalgamation of zoomer newspeak, tranny posting and conservative boomer drivel with nihilist apathetic defeatism garnished all over all delivered with a condescending snobbish attitude
>inb4 nice buzzwords kid
unlike you faggots i actually know the nuance and meaning of each word i use and dont just call any random faggot an incel or chad like a lot of retards do
>>20566565
have you actually gotten laid by sucking up to women?

[Anonymous No.20566842]

>>20566380
>It’s your word for it, kid. It’s really hard to believe you still post frogs and ugly white guys. Shits a decade old. Yeah. Get used to it I guess. “Chud” is new, just replaced alt right

Please fucking god nigger go back. Your kind is not welcome and it never will be.

[Anonymous No.20567203]

>>20565678
either ghost her, or just stop being fucking onions and tell her you read what you want

[Anonymous No.20567215]

>>20566802
>anonymous invents a word
>gets cancer from it
I hope you die of it soon

[Anonymous No.20567247]

>>20565696
You sound like the actual incel, obsessed with sex and what women think about him. I know you're falseflaggin btw but I'm rolling with it.

[Anonymous No.20567257]

>>20565752
>meme self help book
stop talking to her lol

[Anonymous No.20567259]

>>20565678
>doesn't blame me for "wanting to be strong"
it is over she sees you as a weakling which you probably are

>>20565821
You can see that he is 170 at best

[Anonymous No.20567266]

>>20565752
Just rape her

[Anonymous No.20567350]

>>20565821
The superior Aryo-Roman chad.

[Anonymous No.20567358]

>>20566380
Brown hands typed this.

[Anonymous No.20567363]

>>20567259
This post was typed by a black beta.

[Anonymous No.20567366]

>>20565678

Tell her about Eros and the Mysteries of Love, and that there's some sex magic ritual that you've tried for years to use, but haven't yet managed to find the right woman for. And that maybe she has the correct magical potential for this ritual, and it would really be doing you a favor if she'd join in.

[Anonymous No.20567373]

>>20566100
They are really afraid of whites regaining any ethnic identity that they had pre-ww2, that would end their judeo-masonic system. Even parents going to school meetings simply to protest anti-white propaganda being taught to their children in school makes the jews cry white supremacy terrorism.

[Anonymous No.20567375]

>>20566802
Sucking up on their pussy gets you laid, yea boi.

[Anonymous No.20567428]

>>20567366
>and that there's some sex magic ritual that you've tried for years to use, but haven't yet managed to find the right woman for. And that maybe she has the correct magical potential for this ritual, and it would really be doing you a favor if she'd join in.
No, instead say the women you’ve done it with have never had better sex. Don’t say you’re inexperienced.

[Anonymous No.20567568]

>>20565678
Show her the meme of his Wikipedia page being changed post-2016 and gauge her reaction to figure out if you should even care. (I don't have the meme but someone will post it).

[Anonymous No.20567575]

>>20567568

[Anonymous No.20567605]

>>20567575
Holy shit!

[Anonymous No.20567761]

>>20565696
ok groomer

[Anonymous No.20567769]

>>20567575
i like they even went with the "more evil" looking picture lol

[Anonymous No.20567785]

>>20567769
Wikitards are awfully unskilled in their blatant trickery.

[Anonymous No.20567859]

>>20565678
Simply ignore her and continue reading whatever you want. She won't be attracted to you if you let her tell you what to do - unless she isn't attracted to you to begin with, in which case it doesn't matter anyway

[Anonymous No.20568064]

>>20567575
should be changed, it's gotten much worse.

[Anonymous No.20568373]

>>20568064
It has. Look at them trying to smear and undoing what one user (now banned apparently) was doing while ignoring him.

[Anonymous No.20568385]

>>20568373
Fighting a losing battle there lol.

[Anonymous No.20568405]

>>20568385

[Anonymous No.20568407]

“Julius Evola” is an awesome name.

[Anonymous No.20568412]

Prince Charles is sympathetic to Trad ideas, he's also the heir to the throne after the Queen right? Seems like he could push a satanic parody of Traditionalism to the world later.

[Anonymous No.20568425]

>>20568385
The ones changing the articles to make him seem more like a boogeyman continuously threaten the people raising issues with their characterization with bans and undo/change without discussion. The revision page is a lesson as to why no one should build an opinion of anything political/controversial based on Wikipedia articles.

[Anonymous No.20568434]

>>20568412
Whatever it is he wants it’s divinely right of course.
The great reset for all save them.
And cuckservatives support it.
>Well you don’t want the neoliberal nazis world order do ya?

[dago No.20568444]

>>20568412
>Prince Charles
obsessed

[Anonymous No.20568449]

>>20568412
He has been designing and building an experimental community somewhere in England while waiting for the queen to die. I think it's called Poundbury.

(pic related deserved a highlight from the above).

[Anonymous No.20568454]

>>20565821
Holy based!

[Anonymous No.20568458]

>>20568425
I know m8, I have my own favorite Wikipedia talk page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jonathan_P._Jackson#Kidnapper_vs._Activist

In which a kid who kidnapped judges in a courthouse to free his brother was described as "an American revolutionary" based on some commie source. After someone pointed out how ludicrous this was(and was ignored at first) they changed the label to "activist" and then "kidnapper", but the latter was deemed insufficiently sensitive to his "political" aims(freeing his murderous convict brother from prison lmfao), so now he is referred to as, I shit you not, a "youth". It is almost too funny

[dago No.20568464]

>>20568412
>>20568444
royals being inbred fucks could be considered a satanic parody of man

[Anonymous No.20568465]

>>20568458
Cool, I'll have a look. Posting one more from the Evola article.

FYI: For any retards you read these from the bottom up.

[Anonymous No.20568495]

>>20568449
Interesting. I wonder how filled with turd worlders it is.

[Anonymous No.20568568]

>>20568465
Just one more because this one is kind of funny.

[Anonymous No.20568609]

>"Evola's doctrine can be considered as one of the most radical, consistent, rigorous expressions of anti-equalitarian, anti-liberal, anti-democratic and anti-popular thought in the twentieth century"
They're really hyping this man up. Do people think this makes his work look unattractive? They even describe it as rigorous.

[Anonymous No.20568760]

bump

[Anonymous No.20568770]

>>20565821
BASED

[Anonymous No.20568792]

>>20566535
>things that never happened

[Anonymous No.20568797]

>>20568792
Same shit happened to me when I found a couple of his books in a used bookstore and bought them.

[Anonymous No.20568848]

>>20565678
Just say that Evola is a popular philosopher and you are interested in learning about diverse point of views. Don't be a pussy.

[Anonymous No.20569030]

>>20565678
You're a bitch if this scares you. Jesus. How the heck do you even have friends when you're this much of a coward?

[Anonymous No.20569034]

>>20565696
>Midwit pleb can only think in terms of sex

Checks

[Anonymous No.20569036]

>>20565752
Imagine being scared of a girls opinion and letting her control you through shame.
You're a pathetic little boy.

[Anonymous No.20569044]

>>20566380
I cant tell whether this is bait or not

[Anonymous No.20569063]

>>20565678
If you don't read authors you disagree with, how do you know you disagree with them?

[Anonymous No.20569123]

>>20565678
>What do /lit/? She said I shouldn't read him
Simple:
>I read whatever I please.
And that's it. There's no point in further discussing it. You read what you want, she reads what she wants. If she has a problem with it, she can hysterically jump off of a building if need be.

[Anonymous No.20569131]

>>20565696
imagine putting women so much on a pedestal that you end up being proud to fuck a woman, without being paid for it like some pussy janny

[Anonymous No.20569165]

>>20565678
>cares what a woman says or thinks of him
NGMI. Maybe you really should pick up Gladwell instead.

[Anonymous No.20569183]

>>20566213
This is severe mental illness. Putting your dick in a pussy won't fix it.

[Anonymous No.20569188]

>>20566722
Best post in this thread. Very true. She disrespected OP big time. OP is her bitch.

[Anonymous No.20569723]

>>20568792
>nothing ever happens

[Anonymous No.20569750]

>>20568797
>>20569723
Nobody gives you 'deathstares' over the kind of books that you buy. Especially not Evola, who at this point is nothing but a meme considering that that he is often thought of as a 'fascist thinker'.

[Anonymous No.20569763]

>>20565678
>Caring about what women's opinions
>Caring about what pasu's opinions
>Being afraid of being judged
Stop reading Evola.

[Anonymous No.20570254]

>>20569763
Evola would argue in favour of everything you greentexted so you telling him to stop reading Evola doesn't make any sense unless it is assumed that you just don't like people reading Evola because you disagree with him, probably because he's pro-white.

[Anonymous No.20570275]

>>20570254
I have never read Evola but he just comes across to me as a new age hippy like alan watts but with an autistic fixation on the class which he hailed from and was ultimately destroyed.
>because he's pro-white
That is not saying much. He was opposed to all nationalism.

[Anonymous No.20570343]

>>20570275
>I have never read Evola
Then you should read him instead of spreading ignorance.

[Anonymous No.20570394]

>>20570254
>Caring about the author's opinion
Stop reading.

[Anonymous No.20570501]

>>20570343
>Then you should read him instead of spreading ignorance
But how am I spreading ignorance? Evola most definitely is new age. He most definitely has a hyper-fixation with the European aristocracy and he was most definitely opposed to nationalism.

[Anonymous No.20570512]

>>20570254
Evola was a big Islamophile.

[Anonymous No.20570577]

>>20570275
>I have never read Evola
Opinion discarded

[Anonymous No.20570620]

>>20565678

Tell her to fuck off. If she is asking you not to read something because the author was x then she needs to be told how much of a weak brainlet she is.
If she is telling you not to read it end the friendship.

Be better.

[Anonymous No.20570633]

>>20570577
Please tell me how any of the the things I said are wrong. I don't have to read what someone wrote to know what they are all about when I am judging them by their actions.

[Anonymous No.20570658]

>>20569750
You're not making any sense. People would give you glares for buying the book of a writer who is generally thought of as a fascist thinker. You get judged for what you read. People raise eyebrows when you say you're reading Lolita. Secret is not to care.

[Anonymous No.20570685]

>>20570658
>People would give you glares for buying the book of a writer who is generally thought of as a fascist thinker.
99% of people have no idea who Evola is.
>People raise eyebrows when you say you're reading Lolita.
Lolita is a famous novel and Nabokov a famous author. Evola is obscure and people who work at book stores don't know who he is or what he supports.

The kind of people in antique stores who would raise an eyebrow at you buying an Evola book do not exist as they would not be selling such a book if they thought reading evola was worth raising an eyebrow over.

[Anonymous No.20570687]

>>20566535
You'll be hearing from us shortly.

[Anonymous No.20570688]

>>20570633
>I don't have to read what someone wrote to know what they are all about
False

[Anonymous No.20570710]

>>20570688
I have a very good intuition that has yet to fail me. Tell me, in what way was my characterization of Evola objectionable?

[Anonymous No.20570734]

>>20570685
Someone who worked in a new agey book store would well know who he is.
>would not be selling such a book
The person at the cashier isn't necessarily the one buying the stock.

[Anonymous No.20570743]

>>20570734
>Someone who worked in a new agey book store would well know who he is.
(x) doubt
>ugh, evola.
no cashier ever.

[Anonymous No.20570782]

>>20570743
Why not? Have you ever been in that kind of bookshop? They tend to quite knowledable about that stuff. Evola isn't nearly as obscure as you think, especially within that field.

[Anonymous No.20570840]

>>20570782
Antique literature is not a specialist field. It is a general categorization of out of print literature. I simply do not believe that there were 2 (two) anons in the same thread who had an experience where a cashier not only knew evola's name but also outwardly judgemental enough to give a 'death glare' for purchasing said book. From a probability standpoint it is rather unlikely. If the two anons were telling the truth, how am I supposed to take their word for what they recieved was a 'death glare'. People on this board tend to be autstic and not good at telling apart moods and expressions. What they characterize to be a 'death glare' can very much probably be their misreading of a person's facial movements.

Do you understand my skepticism?

[Anonymous No.20570879]

>>20570710
>I have a very good intuition that has yet to fail me.

[Anonymous No.20570888]

>>20565678
Laugh at her and ignore any remarks she makes. If it is clear she has no idea what she is talking about and doesn't want to broaden her viewpoint it is not worth talking to her about it.

[Anonymous No.20570907]

>>20570879
Why are you posting a picture of a basedjack thinking he is a big brain Wojak? How am I asserting that I am that?
Intuition is feeling sans heavy brainwork i.e: logic.
In other words I am using my sentiment towards evola to justify not using my brain to read his work. So again, I ask how do I think I am 'big brain'?

And you have not even responded as to how my sentiment towards Evola is misconstrued, so you are not a brain user either.

[Anonymous No.20570931]

>>20570907
>Intuition is feeling sans heavy brainwork i.e: logic.
Nigger, logic is specifically following a specific reasoning while intuition is knowing something without any reasoning. Those things are anything but the same.

[dago No.20570958]

Been thinking about this post >>20565821 today no homo
He is the alpha trad at moment

Gonna surpass your ass by labor day and claim the throne for myself tho
Screencap this

[dago No.20570963]

>>20570958
But what is ultimately important is to create a whole race of /lit/ alpha trads

[Anonymous No.20570983]

>>20570931
>Nigger, logic is specifically following a specific reasoning while intuition is knowing something without any reasoning.
>Those things are anything but the same.
So how can I possibly think I am 'big brain' when my justification for something is my sentiment rather than logic?

You still have not corrected my attitude towards Evola btw.

[Anonymous No.20571079]

>>20565821
there's literally no counterargument to this.

[Anonymous No.20571088]

>>20566253
A better move would be literal, unironic suicide at the quickest and most convenient juncture.

[Anonymous No.20571111]

The answer is to get trannies to read Evola, so they can reconnect to their ancient Aryan roots:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enaree

[Anonymous No.20571136]

>>20570963
I’m already there just waiting for my copy of the book to arrive, I encourage everyone that is into traditionalism to workout, it is good for your spirit

[Anonymous No.20571139]

>>20571079
>there's literally no counterargument to this.
Not everyone wants to have muscles.

[dago No.20571275]

>>20571139
Biggest cope of all time
Hit the gym fattie

[Anonymous No.20571291]

>>20571275
>Biggest cope of all time
How? I want to look dainty and pretty. Muscles do not help me here.

[Anonymous No.20571299]

>>20570958
Join me, brother

[Anonymous No.20571342]

>>20567575
Have you ever wonder that Wikipedia just proved that the system of "everyone can help" doesn't work anymore since now you can only help if what you did has been accepted by editors? You are not even free to edit any famous/infamous person anymore.

[Anonymous No.20571397]

>>20565821
n-no homo

[Anonymous No.20571408]

>>20570958
>Screencap this
Got it

>>20571079
This

>>20571139
>Not everyone wants to have muscles.
Kek'd

[Anonymous No.20571425]

>>20571408
>Kek'd
What is there to kek about? You think everyone, much less every man wants muscles? That is a very narrow world view.

[Anonymous No.20571426]

>>20571342
Collectivized truth is dependent on the nature of the collective that is in power. Democracy is and has always been mob rule, no matter if it's elected officials, a simple majority, or anything in between.

[dago No.20571430]

>>20571291
Just say you want to be a femboy twink next time

[Anonymous No.20571439]

>>20571430
Those buzzwords give me a different image to what I have specifically in mind. Thus I did not use them.

[Anonymous No.20571452]

>>20571111
Enaree comes from anarya, which means the opposite of aryan, which is definitely true

[Anonymous No.20571462]

>>20571425
No, you're right. Not all men want muscles. Namely, weak men turn to intellect as a form of defense in place of physical strength, and they become nerdish demagogues and purveyors of a rationalist materialism that kills the spirit and, eventually, the mind. To truly extend one's powers, he must develop in mind and body. Nietzsche talked about a man with a disproportionately large ear: "The people told me, however, that the big ear was not only a man, but a great man, a genius. But I never believed in the people when they spake of great men—and I hold to my belief that it was a reversed cripple, who had too little of everything, and too much of one thing."

[Anonymous No.20571469]

>>20570512
Only in the sense that it represented a Tradition while he was alive, if he saw what it had devolved into he would not be a fan.

[Anonymous No.20571474]

>>20570840
I also had the same experience

[Anonymous No.20571481]

>>20571452
It was a real Scythian practice.

[Anonymous No.20571492]

>>20571474
You're pulling my leg

[Anonymous No.20571510]

>>20571469
I'm not sure. He seemed to have positive views on Jihad.

[Anonymous No.20571523]

>>20570501
>But how am I spreading ignorance? Evola most definitely is new age
No he isn't, he is totally different from new age and predates it, and his principles are often the complete opposite of new age. So this is a massive oversimplification, just because he is spiritual does not at all mean he is new age.
>He most definitely has a hyper-fixation with the European aristocracy
He was obsessed with all aristocracy, not in a sentimental or vain way, but in the higher principles which they stood for (very related to Nietszche's "master morality" among other things). And how is he supposed to be new age if he is radically anti-egalitarian and pro-aristocracy? makes no sense.
>he was most definitely opposed to nationalism
Only insofar as it was profane or devoid of higher principles from which it could take root. He didn't think nationalism would be able to stand a chance without these, which is correct.

[Anonymous No.20571525]

>female
>friend

[Anonymous No.20571539]

>>20571510
Not at all in the sense you are thinking of. You have a most superficial understanding of what Jihad is. I cannot understand why someone would know so little about someone and yet spread his ignorant opinions like this unless he is trolling or just an idiot, or perhaps they are craving attention.

[dago No.20571550]

>>20571299
Soon brother

[Anonymous No.20571564]

>>20571539
Then care to explain instead of acting like a fat aggrieved Jew*sh bastard in every thread tangentially related to Evola? Do you realize how many long analyses I've written on various writers and philosophers on here whereas all you ever do is just say the same bullshit over and over again without providing any additional information?
Also, I feel like you're on 4chan 24/7.

[Anonymous No.20571571]

>>20571564
>Do you realize how many long analyses I've written on various writers and philosophers on here whereas all you ever do is just say the same bullshit over and over again without providing any additional information?

[Anonymous No.20571578]

>>20571571
I'm not the one posting in Evola threads crying about why people won't read him rather than actually talking about concrete facts.

[Anonymous No.20571629]

>>20566253
I don't understand what the backlash was against him. It's known. Go and look at any agent's page, they all state they are looking specifically for blacks, trannies, gays etc. it's a fact the industry is run by women, and largely for women. there are plenty of articles over the years in lefty magazines and papers all about this. it's just more doublespeak from lefties, just like how they say there is no white genocide while at the same time from the opposite corner of their mouth telling everyone how glad they are white people are about to become minorities in their own countries and be bred out of existence.

[Anonymous No.20571646]

>>20571564
Sorry that I am really not too eager to explain an entry-level Evolian concept in a thread about Evola.

To start, the concept of Holy War ("jihad") is proper to a multitude of Traditional civilizations, Islam just took it from older civilizations. The Vikings, Celts, Medieval Christians, Aryan Indians, Persians, and many many others all had it (basically becoming immortal through overcoming the human condition through battle).

Then there is also the fact that the modern conception of jihad is nothing but a mockery of sacred warfare from Traditional civilizations. Ruthlessly killing unarmed Christians and Muslims who disagree with you is not jihad. If you did the minimum amount of required reading on this subject it would clear things up for you.

[Anonymous No.20571655]

>>20571629
You're not allowed to speak the truth

[Anonymous No.20571658]

>>20571523
>No he isn't, he is totally different from new age and predates it, and his principles are often the complete opposite of new age. So this is a massive oversimplification, just because he is spiritual does not at all mean he is new age.
He is new age in regards to Tradition, he places the Kshatriya above Brahmin, unless you would like to correct me if I am wrong.
>He was obsessed with all aristocracy, not in a sentimental or vain way, but in the higher principles which they stood for
I mean the european aristocracy as a class, not a spiritual entity. The aristocracy as a class in Europe were decadent and not any more noble than the class which replaced them.
>very related to Nietszche's "master morality" among other things
Bringing up Nietzsche does not help your case, consider §257 'what is noble' in beyond good and evil.
>And how is he supposed to be new age if he is radically anti-egalitarian and pro-aristocracy
Because again he places the warrior class over the priestly class.
>Only insofar as it was profane or devoid of higher principles from which it could take root
No, he opposed all populist movements. He was not even a defender of his native fascism, which was one of the most noble political movements yet he could not help attack it.

[Anonymous No.20571664]

>>20571646
>Ruthlessly killing unarmed Christians and Muslims who disagree with you is not jihad.
The Persians, Celts, and so on did that all the time.
>If you did the minimum amount of required reading on this subject it would clear things up for you.
I've studied overlapping fields.
>Sorry that I am really not too eager to explain an entry-level Evolian concept in a thread about Evola.
It should be easy if you're not a salty fat ass.

[Anonymous No.20571710]

>>20571658
>He is new age in regards to Tradition, he places the Kshatriya above Brahmin, unless you would like to correct me if I am wrong.
Now you're just using new age for anything that goes against orthodoxy, which is also an oversimplification. He also only granted pre-eminence to the warrior insofar as pontifex was concerned.
>I mean the european aristocracy as a class, not a spiritual entity. The aristocracy as a class in Europe were decadent and not any more noble than the class which replaced them.
Well then you're dead wrong again, because he also believed the European aristocracy had become extremely decadent to the point that more aristocratic traits could be found outside of their circles.
>Bringing up Nietzsche does not help your case, consider §257 'what is noble' in beyond good and evil.
I was simply making a comparison, since you are quite ignorant when it comes to Evolian thought.
>No, he opposed all populist movements. He was not even a defender of his native fascism, which was one of the most noble political movements yet he could not help attack it.
You oversimplify everything, probably because you don't know what you're talking about and are just interested in arguing for your side and not getting to the truth. He saw good and bad elements in fascism, he worked with them and praised Mussolini, but he never joined the party because he didn't believe in party politics.

>>20571664
>The Persians, Celts, and so on did that all the time.
No they didn't, they would take slaves or maybe kill priests.
>I've studied overlapping fields.
Jack of all trades, master of none.
>It should be easy if you're not a salty fat ass.
This is so juvenile, your response are very low quality and not worth my time. You are very petty.

[Anonymous No.20571720]

>>20571710
>No they didn't, they would take slaves or maybe kill priests.
Create a post
News Feed posts
People You May Know
Profile Photo of Phuc Hau Ly
Phuc Hau Ly
Profile Photo of William Nguyen
William Nguyen
Profile Photo of Thúy Hạnh
Thúy Hạnh
Profile Photo of Mina Amirkhani
Mina Amirkhani
Profile Photo of Fariba Miragha Amirkhani
Fariba Miragha Amirkhani
Profile Photo of Ly Van
Ly Van
Profile Photo of Hung Ly
Hung Ly
Profile Photo of Andy P Nguyen
Andy P Nguyen
Profile Photo of Leng Thi Bich Phuong
Leng Thi Bich Phuong
Profile Photo of Phong Trần
Phong Trần
Profile Photo of Gary White
Gary White
Profile Photo of Trang Ly
Trang Ly
Profile Photo of Nguyễn Thành Đạt
Nguyễn Thành Đạt
Profile Photo of Asil My
Asil My
Profile Photo of Quỳnh Hương
Quỳnh Hương
Profile Photo of Lay Bach
Lay Bach
Profile Photo of Tien Pham
Tien Pham
Profile Photo of Hồ Phúc Lộc
Hồ Phúc Lộc
Profile Photo of Ngôn Lê
Ngôn Lê
Profile Photo of Setup Grow
Setup Grow
Contacts

Group conversations

For example, going against the "geiss" of a Druid would have you ostracized or killed, and Zoroastrians of Sassanian empire were very oppressive, slaughtering non-Mazdan traditions, under the decree of Kartir Hangirpe.
>Jack of all trades, master of none.
What I study follows a common theme, you insufferable snobbish jackass.
>You are very petty.
And you have absolutely no qualia, connection to the sacred dimension, or a single redeeming quality. I highly recommend suicide.

[Anonymous No.20571728]

>>20571710
For example, going against the "geiss" of a Druid would have you ostracized or killed, and Zoroastrians of Sassanian empire were very oppressive, slaughtering non-Mazdan traditions, under the decree of Kartir Hangirpe.
>Jack of all trades, master of none.
What I study follows a common theme, you insufferable snobbish jackass.
>You are very petty.
And you have absolutely no qualia, connection to the sacred dimension, or a single redeeming quality. I highly recommend suicide.

[Anonymous No.20571739]

>>20571728
>slaughtering non-Mazdan traditions, under the decree of Kartir Hangirpe
Cool, you must know a lot! but that isn't the initiatic doctrine of the Holy War.

[Anonymous No.20571762]

>>20571739
You argued either most or all Traditional civilizations did not ruthlessly kill unarmed people who disagree with them. However, anyone with any basic historical understanding would know this to be false bullshit. It was no uncommon for outgroups to be slaughtered (e.g., Anti-Buddhist Persecution in China and Inquisition of Europe). Granted, the Jews deserve it.

[Anonymous No.20571785]

>>20571762
>You argued either most or all Traditional civilizations did not ruthlessly kill unarmed people who disagree with them.
No I didn't, I was talking about the initiatic doctrine of the "Holy War" and using Islamic terrorists slaughtering innocents under the pretext of jihad as being a mockery of the Holy War.

[Anonymous No.20571796]

>>20571785
This is what you said here: >>20571646
>Then there is also the fact that the modern conception of jihad is nothing but a mockery of sacred warfare from Traditional civilizations. Ruthlessly killing unarmed Christians and Muslims who disagree with you is not jihad.

Traditional societies also ruthlessly killed innocents too, you retard. Also, on a deeper level, there are no "innocents" except animals.

You're probably a Jew. There is no greater glory than killing a Jew, which are incarnations of the pure and unadulterated metaphysical principle of evil.

[Anonymous No.20571855]

>>20571796
You are still confused so I will clarify once again. I am talking about the Traditional conception of Holy War vs. the modern conception of jihad which is a mockery of the former. Whether or not Traditional civilizations killed innocents is a separate issue, the doctrine of the Holy War is in the context of sacred battles through which the fighters can obtain immortality by overcoming the human condition, like we see in the Bhagavad Gita.

[Anonymous No.20571882]

>>20571855
>the doctrine of the Holy War is in the context of sacred battles through which the fighters can obtain immortality by overcoming the human condition, like we see in the Bhagavad Gita.
Arjuna is told in the Bhagavad Gita that he should kill his own relatives "on the other side" because it is a part of his karma/duty.

How is the modern conception of jihad a mockery in relationship to this?

I'm not defending jihad. I'm just saying your argument sucks ass.

[Anonymous No.20571902]

>>20571882
>Arjuna is told in the Bhagavad Gita that he should kill his own relatives "on the other side" because it is a part of his karma/duty.
No, he is told to fight for the sake of fighting. It isn't about killing.
>How is the modern conception of jihad a mockery in relationship to this?
Because it isn't fighting if you're just going around with guns killing in militias killing innocent people. Adopting the term jihad to describe it is a mockery.

[Anonymous No.20571946]

>>20565940
>Evola
>fascist
What a retard.

[Anonymous No.20571956]

>>20571710
>Now you're just using new age for anything that goes against orthodoxy
It is my characterisation of a zeitgeist present in the 20th century.
>He also only granted pre-eminence to the warrior insofar as pontifex was concerned.
Now you are saying something coherent. I do not know of Evola's revision to comment on it so here is a relevant article if you would like to eludicate on it.
https://www.gornahoor.net/?p=3788
>Well then you're dead wrong again, because he also believed the European aristocracy had become extremely decadent to the point that more aristocratic traits could be found outside of their circles.
To my knowledge he only thought so after world war 2.
>I was simply making a comparison, since you are quite ignorant when it comes to Evolian thought.
You are right, I am not familiar with his thought. In fact I am sure it is quite good in many parts. However I am familiar with his actions which I am no fan of and he ended up in a wheel chair and died of old age [supposedly a warrior]. I do not want to end up in a wheel chair and die of old age and so I stray away from the mentalities of people who end up the way he did.
>You oversimplify everything, probably because you don't know what you're talking about and are just interested in arguing for your side and not getting to the truth.
I am not arguing for a side, only that the way in which I conduct my life makes his thought uninteresting to me save for the times he engaged with my main theoretical interest: subjective idealism.
Evola saw mostly bad elements in fascism, said some really mean things, and in general did nothing to participate in the political life of the state [damning evidence he was no warrior]. He to me suffered from hubris and remained paralyzed and suffering as a result of it. Only then after 'his' nation was defeated did he begin to propose a sort of 'neo-fascism' revision of his attitude towards nationalism.

He did not know what he had, until he lost it. This, in my view is why I refuse to read his main body of work but I have taken peaks at his critque of Gentile's thought and will really begin reading them after I have sublimated crux of gentile's thought.

[Anonymous No.20572046]

>>20571902
If you want to be Hindu, then just become Hindu instead of wasting your time with figures like Evola. Your time would be better spent on Nisargadatta Maharaj's I Am That.
>It isn't about killing.
It still ultimately involves killing. I read it when I was young, and the translation may have not been the best.
>Because it isn't fighting if you're just going around with guns killing in militias killing innocent people.
The only ones doing that are the Wahhabists/Salafists who were financed & armed by Jews and ZOG.

My point is your argument sucks. These Wahhabists/Salafists use similar rhetoric as you. It's better to approach this from a non-LARPy soteriological angle such as negative karma, sin, or whatever, which yields a negative rebirth or hell.

[Anonymous No.20572051]

>>20571902
>>20572046
>Because it isn't fighting if you're just going around with guns killing in militias killing innocent people.
Also, historically speaking, that's how most wars occurred. I don't think there's anything unprecedented in the fanaticism of contemporary Muslim radicals. Your entire narrative is trash and ultimately undermines itself. It is unironically more materialistic than most I've encountered.

[Anonymous No.20572228]

>>20565678
Tell her you like old books and are smart
Not hard to flex on the hoes ubless you're ugly...
UH oh I think I have bad news OP

[Anonymous No.20572237]

>>20565678
Who gives a shit, you ‘tard, what some roastie thinks?

[Anonymous No.20572570]

idk why you pseuds read Evola in places where people can notice you reading him or even worst around women and then ask wtf do i do bros roastie doesnt approve of me reading Evola

Stfu seriously.

[Anonymous No.20572591]

>>20565891
It is what it is. Let people have their fetishes, I know you would agree.

[Anonymous No.20572599]

>>20572570
idk why someone who reads Evola would give a shit about the opinion of a woman

[Anonymous No.20572710]

>>20569750
It happened. I also got glared at by a random black woman when Trump was still in office because I was reading the second part of Kershaw's bio of Hitler in a park. (For the record, the bitch sat across from me and stared for over a minute; note that I was also wearing an expensive suit because I had just left work and didn't exactly look like a skinhead). The political climate encourages retards to project and emote the most simplistic ideas onto complete strangers--if that retard looked at the title and/or knew what "nemesis" means maybe she would have simply asked me what I was reading (considering she was so interested).

[Anonymous No.20572739]

>>20565678
tell her you practice sex magic

[Anonymous No.20572764]

>>20572710
A black girl once complimented my pants in the corner store. She was pretty hot but when i attempted to say thank you and smile I just made a kind of weird sad grimace and said thank...you in this bizarre descending tone. She looked extremely offended and then left the store

[Anonymous No.20572770]

>>20572764
Did you wait 8 years for a moment that was even remotely close to relevant so that you could unload this baggage?

[Anonymous No.20572776]

>>20572770
I had completely forgotten this encounter until your talk of hostile strange black women reminded me of it. You are welcome

[Anonymous No.20572780]

>>20572770
Yes.

[Anonymous No.20572785]

>>20572764
/thread

[Anonymous No.20572788]

>>20565984
this is true also if you are a good shag she will slowly change her mind, I've had a broad that was 100% globohomo kool-aid that I slowly molded into AT LEAST understanding many far right talking points of my own so over the course of a couple of months she went from far left to center - women are born appeasers they will yield to you if you do not yield to them, just don't sperg out all at once, go slow, be socratic and most importantly, be a good shag. I could have gotten her to go full 14/88 if I had the time (I moved on because she had brown eyes and I want blue eyed babies)

[Anonymous No.20572836]

Evola was a pseud.

[Anonymous No.20572849]

>>20565678
Is she hot? The answer to this question will determine the appropriate course of action.

[Anonymous No.20572968]

>>20572849
No

[Anonymous No.20572978]

>>20565678
Don't make friends with women. They're fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.20573010]

>>20572968
Fuck her, then ghost her.

[Anonymous No.20573040]

>>20572599
just tell them he's spiritual and le esoteric and a baron

i told some chick at chapters i read guenon and she looked him up and said cool, then i said he basically refuted everyone and everything else was superfluous, then she said we should talk over coffee and i said i was busy trading and that my gf wouldn't like it but really it was because she was black and only a 7.5. swag.

[Anonymous No.20573048]

>>20573040
Pic of her?

[Anonymous No.20573518]

>>20565678
"While Evola himself may have had problematic views, he was an incredibly important author, and much like Hegel, we have to be able to read him while understanding that he is imperfect."
If she doesn't know who Hegel is, drop her.

[Anonymous No.20573597]

>>20573518
>Incredibly important author

For some reason I don't really believe this. I could believe this for Guenon, Spengler, Schmitt, but Evola just seems far lesser than them as a thinker.

[Anonymous No.20573678]

>>20572776
That wasn't me (I just ignore nonsequiturs).

[Anonymous No.20573691]

>>20573678
I will nonsequiturally rape you faggot

[Anonymous No.20573944]

>>20573691
You couldn't even talk to a nigress who told you that you had nice pants.

[Anonymous No.20574196]

>>20572968
kek

[Anonymous No.20574391]

>>20565678

A female co-worker started thinking that I was racist after I started reading Men Among the Ruins at work and tried to explain it to her. I actually am racist.

[Anonymous No.20574401]

>>20566100
These books are literally available on amazon bro

[Anonymous No.20574404]

>>20566056
Marxists are not "most people", retard.

[Anonymous No.20574417]

>>20574391
It's usually best to argue that racist is essentially a meaningless buzzword, and that you're merely open to acknowledging the differences between people and groups of people. That's how I play down the racism buzzword without openly inviting ridicule (it frames it, instead of as a prejudice, as a scientific openness to the possibility and likelihood of racial differences). After all, egalitarianism, as a kind of monism and dogma, is just as much of a prejudice as hating someone for the simple reason that his skin is a few shades darker than normal.

[Anonymous No.20574433]

>>20571291
You can look very aesthetic with muscles lol it doesn’t get in the way of anything, besides low body fat is required to look pretty by most standards so you can get there either by starving yourself or working out and getting healthier your choice, no running away from it lardass

[Anonymous No.20575322]

>>20574404
Good job I wasn't talking exclusively about Marxists, then, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.20575327]

>>20565696
Why do you give a shit what othe people think about what you read?
Fuck her and fuck you read what you want

[Anonymous No.20575329]

>>20565821
Based. I will post this as a reply to Evola deniers.

[Anonymous No.20575330]

>>20575327
>>20565678
Sorry that was ment for OP

[Anonymous No.20575334]

>>20565821
Skinniness Evola bro

[Anonymous No.20575452]

>>20565678
Tell her that you "want to read it to make up your mind rather than rely on someones interpretation of his works, and then go on to her suggestion(dont really have to in actuality)". But do not give in. She is teating you. The female hero journey is to turn a beast into a prince. Reading evola is beastly so dont give in and just tell her what I wrote above. Same goes for anybother author. You show confidence and assertiveness. Thats kryptonite for women. She cares for you as in sex as in no woman that cares would try to talk you into other books. Get dick wet. Dont rush. Confidence is big boobs.

[Anonymous No.20575532]

>>20565821
HOLY.

[dago No.20575545]

>>20575532
lmao

[dago from Brit/pol/ No.20576246]

>>20575532
>>>/lgbt/26436507

(I am not gay btw)

[Anonymous No.20576271]

>>20576246
Kek

[dago from Brit/pol/ No.20576274]

>>20576271
drop evola quote pics in there kek

[Anonymous No.20576668]

>>20574401
Until the ADL deems them a problem.

[Anonymous No.20576673]

>>20575532
The Evola pepe is just too good.

[Anonymous No.20576677]

>>20575532

[Anonymous No.20576679]

>>20565752
she recommended you a book every zoomer wordcel read in AP English. which means she hasn't read since high school. which means she must be raped.

[Anonymous No.20576683]

>>20576673

[Anonymous No.20576719]

>>20565678
>woman
>friend
>what do
Just like stop lying on the internet.

[Anonymous No.20576787]

>>20566310
Was there ever a “you will never be a man” equivalent? Shocked I’ve never seen one.

[Anonymous No.20576864]

>>20571291
>I want to look dainty and pretty

I know this feeling to well. I'm cursed as a male so living my life as a normal looking adult male is out of the question; I could transition better than most (and potentially be happy) but the thought of living an unorthodox, inauthentic life fills me with massive fear; and finally going the macho route and lifting/being too masculine fills me with immense discomfort that I can't explain and just can't get past.

I feel like every option facing me leads to the same place of despair and I don't know what to do.

[Anonymous No.20576876]

>>20576787
No one gives a shit about ftm even though they're three times as numerous. The truth is even women hating incels treat men worse than women.

[Anonymous No.20576888]

>>20576864
>better breeding hips than a woman
Thank you RNG God, very cool!

[Anonymous No.20576918]

>>20576888
Why is that lucky?

God also gave me a conscious and morals. Even if to some degree I wished I were a woman, if woke up the next day and we're suddenly transgender I would be horrified. I don't think a good life can be a life of imitation.

[Anonymous No.20576931]

>>20565678
bait of the highest quality

>>20565696
quality bait

[Anonymous No.20577041]

>>20576864
>I don't know what to do
Kill yourself. Isn't it obvious?

[Anonymous No.20577045]

>>20577041
for what reason though?

[Anonymous No.20577093]

>>20576864
stop caring, improve yourself in other ways and overcome your perceived shortcomings.

[Anonymous No.20577116]

>>20571291
>>20576864
Please take this elsewhere.
>>>/lgbt/

[Anonymous No.20577143]

>>20576864
the 2 gender ideals you have in your mind are very warped, and it's clear you have no idea of what a masculine mindset is, you don't have to a fucking beefcake to be masculine, just fit and disciplined, it comes at a level of humility and passionate love for all that you consider good.
Just do your best man, hit the gym, have principles, and put yourself out there.

[Anonymous No.20577285]

>>20576918
Just be a faggot and let men drill your ass until you FEEL like a girl.

I volunteer to test the hypothesis.

[Anonymous No.20577305]

>>20577285
I'm not sure about that but I'm willing to provide friendship which I lack in life.

my discord is Daniel126#2361

[Anonymous No.20577384]

>>20577045
For being defective.

[dago from Kraut/pol/ No.20577560]

>>20576864
hit the fucking gym chud

[dago from Kraut/pol/ No.20577568]

>>20576864
>>20577560
I would put you in a headlock at snap you in the name of ALLAH

[Anonymous No.20577776]

>>20577568
nice

[Anonymous No.20579408]

>>20577305
Sorry anon, I don't have discord, plus I'm too much of a neurotic loser to actually engage with someone on a semi-regular basis; I just like telling people to get fucked, especially when they're cute.

Be aware of your own worth! You look young and it's always a prize to do nothing more than speak with sexy young men. You really should find better places to seek companionship than 4chan, though.

[Anonymous No.20579417]

All you dummy’s are incel simps. I got my girl to say hard R nigger, not take the jew jabs and question the holocaust. Anything less means you’re a spiritually castrated cuck. Never compromise for some pussy (esp when she’ll most likely never give it to you to begin with lmao).

[Anonymous No.20579992]

>>20576864
>I feel like every option facing me leads to the same place of despair and I don't know what to do.
People say this all the time but they really haven't exhausted every option like they think they have.
You have a fucked up endocrine system, due to living in a shitty modern environment. This can be fixed (and no, roiding can make it worse)