[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 38 KB, 500x683, virginia-portada-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20503828 No.20503828 [Reply] [Original]

>"The poet was forced to be passionate or bitter, unless indeed he chose to 'hate women', which meant more often than not that he was unattractive to them."

Was she right?

>> No.20503833
File: 111 KB, 520x588, Arguing_with_holes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20503833

>>20503828
It always cones down to the hole argument.

>> No.20503845

>>20503828
Holy fucking based. No wonder this board seethes over here.

>> No.20503856

>>20503828
>was she right?
She's a woman. I don't care what she 'thinks', because she shouldn't be thinking at all.

>> No.20503933

>>20503828
that's not a coherent sentence

>> No.20503944

>>20503933
It is. You've just been filtered by a woman is all.

>> No.20503972 [DELETED] 

>>20503828
This is the case for some mysgonists, the difference with misandrists however is that all of them are undesirable to men.

>> No.20503976

>>20503944
no it's not. it implies the poet being passionate or bitter is mutually exclusive with choosing to hate women. that's not a coherent statement

>> No.20503977

>>20503828
This is the case for some misogynists, the difference with misandrists however is that all of them are undesirable to men.

>> No.20503980

I'm gonna read The Voyage Out soon, is it good.

>> No.20503982

>>20503828
100%

>> No.20503988

>>20503828
Her family tried to marry her off and everyone with a brain said no way fag.

>> No.20503991

>
>>20503828
>"The poet was forced to be passionate or bitter, unless indeed she chose to 'hate men', which meant more often than not that she was unattractive to them."

Am I write or am I write?

>> No.20504011

>>20503991
But she liked both men and women

>> No.20504024

>>20503980
Yeah. Not her best but it’s way more accessible than her more difficult and superior works. It’s a good starting place.

>> No.20504043

>>20504011
She liked women because men didn't want that ugly schizo hoe.

>> No.20504054

>>20503856
>she

>> No.20504557

Its cringe she can't think of a better put down than that. That's got to be the lowest hanging fruit. Especially if we're talking about poets, since so many poets who have been attractive to women were misogynists, perhaps for that very reason (expecting too much of romance etc).

Everything I see from her confirms my view that she's a trash writer, and that her parents actually contributed more to ltierature.

>> No.20504587

>>20503828
Pretty much.

>> No.20504738

>>20503828
Yes, you have to be an idiot to not realize it.

>> No.20506070

>>20503833
The male equivalent is that every smart girl is coping for her ugliness.

>> No.20506564

>>20503828
>>20503828
pfftaahhahaha oh man no wonder /lit/ hates her

>> No.20506574

>>20506564
>>20503845
Does /lit/ hate Woolf? Aren't three of her books in the top 100 list?

>> No.20508181

>>20503828
Holy fucking based. No wonder this board seethes over here.

>> No.20508234
File: 20 KB, 736x616, 1423889520920.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20508234

>>20503845
>>20506564
>>20508181
Switch it up a little, guys.

>> No.20508318

>>20503976
She is referring to classic poetic genres/tropes. Generally love poems (which is what the first two adjectives are meant to describe) were kept entirely separate from satires about women (described by the stance of hating women).

>> No.20508353

>>20503828
I've read the same kind of roast from many other writers prior to her