Classical music

[Anonymous No.20435059]

Alright /lit/, you all know and read the classics. But do you do the same with other art forms? Let's talk classical music, any style or period, and your favorite composers, pieces, performers, recordings etc.

[Anonymous No.20435083]

>>20435059
wagner tranny, mahler cuck, radiohead, imbecile.

[Anonymous No.20435088]

>>20435059
Music classic is for nerds.

[Anonymous No.20435098]

>>20435059
Schubert. I like Schubert.

[Anonymous No.20435124]

scriabin, bach, and reich never fail me. mostly a fan of modernist/minimalist composers, which somewhat mirrors my taste in lit

[Anonymous No.20435155]

My tastes only extend from early Italian baroque of Monteverdi thru Pergolesi, Boccherini, Vivaldi, Bach, Purcell to Handel, and beyond that only including Mozart and Haydn. Everything before or after that I simply don't consider music. Cope and sneed in the comments below.

[Anonymous No.20435174]

>>20435059
Here are some examples.
Missa papae marcelli by palestrina is gold(especially kyrie).
Mass in Si minor by Bach is gold(especially gloria).
Messiah by Haendel is gold (especially for unto us a child is born).

[Anonymous No.20435183]

Bach and before, Ives and after.

[Anonymous No.20435261]

>>20435059
Is the Wagner stigma finally going away?

[Anonymous No.20435281]

>>20435261
Where was there a sustained Wagner stigma outside of Israel?

[Anonymous No.20435304]

>>20435059
Anyone have a chart of an entire western canon of all art forms?

[Anonymous No.20435309]

>>20435304
Anyone stupid enough to need one is unworthy of what it contains.

[Anonymous No.20435320]

>>20435261
It was really nice of Hitler to play good music in his concentration camps.

[Anonymous No.20435328]

>>20435309
Sorry professor

[Anonymous No.20435403]

>>20435304
>music
Pretty easy to do, there's already a collection of charts on /classical/, add in a few genres of modern music with introductory /mu/ albums and its done. It's basically already done, but scattered around /mu/.
>architecture
Books, pics and locations, would be basically a guidebook.
>sculpture
Pictures and locations to go, a few books.
>dance and theatre
A collection of books and videos, some places to visit and watch.
>photography
Books about history and technique and lots and lots and lots of pics to see.
>painting and drawing
Literally the same as photograpy.

Overall, a 7/10 task, would take a few weeks for 4chan autists to make and a few years for academics. Not a single person would finish it.

[Anonymous No.20435419]

Post some music you're listening to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2pwTP7g7xE

[Anonymous No.20435428]

>>20435183
I see you’ve also googled “Midwit”, and read the 1949 Highbrow / Midbrow / Lowbrow Life Magazine chart. Is copying a line from a magazine itself midbrow?

[Anonymous No.20435443]

>>20435059
I would really like to get into classical music, but the problem is that I have received basically zero music education (I have no idea what "in C Minor" means, for example) and I would really like to learn how to read sheet music but so far no one has been able to help me. It seems like everyone has learned this when they were in music school and there are no beginner-friendly resources for those who wish to learn how to enjoy classical music.

[Anonymous No.20435444]

>>20435059
Mostly a Renaissance and 19th century classical fan. Baroque is too upbeat and musique concrete is legit

[Anonymous No.20435459]

>>20435443
What do you mean by "get into"? You don't need to know any of that stuff to listen to classical music.

[Anonymous No.20435472]

>>20435059
bach, schubert, monteverdi, louis armstrong (jazz is classical)

[Anonymous No.20435496]

>>20435059
To be honest, I’ve always been varied on my opinions of which composer is the “best”. I go through phases more than anything, currently I’m going through a Telemann phase mixed with a fair amount of Borodin. I guess if I have a hot take it’s that while I understand Bach’s reputation, for Germanic baroque composers I would say Telemann is better.

[Anonymous No.20435511]

>>20435472
pretty tame choice for jazz when legends like coltrane and dolphy exist. not disrespect to armstrong though, just not as notable to me as other for jazz.

[Anonymous No.20435534]

>>20435059
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rP4pSomJnDE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoUluGGJvhk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8cicQYzYaA


not exactly "classical", but still great
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1KERgeRAHo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo9G9C6KvCE

[Anonymous No.20435564]

>>20435059
I'm just entry level. I like Bach, Beethoven, Monteverdi, Schubert, Wagner, Ives, ceteros. My favourite works are the eroica, grosse fuge, matthauspassion.

[Anonymous No.20435621]

>>20435059
For me, it's Vivaldi, Handel and Bach.
Baroque kings tbqhwy.

[Anonymous No.20435682]

Vivaldi, Monti & Chopin'.

Also Hank Williams III.

[Anonymous No.20436101]

>>20435059
>If Wagner does not dominate time like Beethoven, neither does he fulfil it like Schubert. He revokes it. The eternity of Wagnerian music, like that of the poem of the Ring, is one which proclaims that nothing has happened; it is a state of immutability that refutes all history by confronting it with the silence of nature ... the amorphous primal condition.

[Anonymous No.20436118]

>>20435059
>>>/mu/

[Anonymous No.20436172]

>>20435419
based octatonic/birdsong enjoyer

[Anonymous No.20436266]

>>20435511
Are you that anon that posted the out to lunch album cover to compare with the cover of a book a few weeks back?

[Anonymous No.20436295]

>>20435098
Unironically patrician taste
I fell in love with the genre because of Debussy
I grew when I learned to love Ravel

[Anonymous No.20436305]

I've been reading this

[Anonymous No.20436309]

>>20436305
oops

[Anonymous No.20436313]

>>20436172
we going birdmode??
>https://youtu.be/Bm9OUK7fgP8

[Anonymous No.20436341]

>>20436309
Gardiner is an insecure midwit.