[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.44 MB, 1498x1132, sunrise.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20435031 No.20435031 [Reply] [Original]

This book is the only thing you need to read. It stands alone in the philosophical canon.

>> No.20435032

>>20435031
The prologue is maybe the best thing ever written by a human, certainly the best thing written in the 19th century.

>> No.20435036

>>20435031
I agree that it is one of the best books of all time, but there are others as well

>> No.20435038

>>20435031
Second only to Plato

>> No.20435043

>>20435036
which others can stand the mountain air that comes from this book?

>> No.20435048

>>20435043
Emerson. Nietzsche is very indebted to him

>> No.20435050

>>20435031
It's cringe. Bible is all you'll ever need, the rest is optional entertainment.

>> No.20435051

Can I just jump into it or should I read his other work first?

>> No.20435058

>>20435051
Any understanding of Plato, Kant, Schopenhauer and start with BT

>> No.20435065

>>20435050
>it's cringe
>Bible is all you'll ever need
pick one

>> No.20435066

>>20435031
Is gay. Nietzsche was gay.

>> No.20435068

>>20435051
just some basic understanding of Nietzsche's work and other philosophical ideas, but you can jump in pretty easily if you're willing to put in the work

>> No.20435085

>>20435051
Nietzsche contradicts himself on many things, so you can just into it.

>> No.20435095

>>20435058
No. If you read TSZ, an don’t understand it at all, he’s not for you. You don’t need any prerequisites to get the gist and Nietzsche’s other work explains the finer details

>> No.20435099

>>20435085
Like what?

>> No.20435109
File: 95 KB, 867x685, 50626ADD-A9DD-4442-9863-22724B99EB53.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20435109

>>20435031
I love Nietzsche threads.

>> No.20435118

>>20435038
Plato didn’t even understand the value the arts and needed Aristotle to correct him on that in Poetics.
>>20435050
Kys tradlarper. Stay mad Nietzsche BTFO’d your Jewish slave morality.

>> No.20435135

>>20435095

The bible is a prereq to TSZ

>> No.20435146

>>20435135
No. Nietzsche explains his issues with the Bible, such as the chapter “on the priests” and others

>> No.20435160

>>20435118
Old testament has plenty of ubermensch, something that hardly exist now

>> No.20435194

>>20435146

Lol

>> No.20435201

What’s so good about it?

>> No.20435351

>>20435031
> Bro just become the Ubermensch bro

>> No.20435469

>>20435031
I wish I hadn't gotten rid of my copy. I read it when I was quite young and it was way over my head.

>> No.20435473

Did you understand it? I had to have my dad explain it to me

>> No.20435487

>>20435160
>in the old testament (before Jesus’) there were Übermensch
>now (after Jesus) there are no Übermemsch
Maybe worshipping a weak figure that prescribes humility, non-violence, and self renunciation is the problem.

>> No.20435493

>>20435031
It’s easily Nietzsche’s worst book. I’m not sure why he kept praising it so much and saying that it was his most important work. I have to assume that it was just an elaborate joke.
Genealogy of Morality and Gay Science, on the other hand, are magnificently brilliant.

>> No.20435508

>>20435493
Birth of Tragedy is his worst. TSZ is a beautiful book.

>> No.20435524

>>20435493
Contrarianism

>> No.20435560

>>20435473
How old are you?

>> No.20435561

>>20435031
>I now go alone, my disciples! Ye also now go away, and alone! So will I have it.
>Verily, I advise you: depart from me, and guard yourselves against Zarathustra! And better still: be ashamed of him! Perhaps he hath deceived you.
>The man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies, but also to hate his friends.
>One requiteth a teacher badly if one remain merely a scholar. And why will ye not pluck at my wreath?
>Ye venerate me; but what if your veneration should some day collapse? Take heed lest a statue crush you!
>Ye say, ye believe in Zarathustra? But of what account is Zarathustra! Ye are my believers: but of what account are all believers!
>Ye had not yet sought yourselves: then did ye find me. So do all believers; therefore all belief is of so little account.
>Now do I bid you lose me and find yourselves; and only when ye have all denied me, will I return unto you.
>Verily, with other eyes, my brethren, shall I then seek my lost ones; with another love shall I then love you.

I would hope that anyone who appreciates Nietzsche take good care in reading these lines. He was such a powerful thinker and writer that your first reaction when reading him is to latch on to his ideas as supreme truth, but his whole conceit was for individuals to not blindly follow and worship him or anyone, rather, to develop your own ideas and pursue your own self-education. I see a lot of Nietzsche worship on this board, a lot of parroting of his words as if he was never wrong, but anyone familiar with his work will see that he remains elusive throughout all of his writings and celebrated that Heraclitean sense of contradiction.

>> No.20435571

The Twilight Of Idols is clearly his best book.

>> No.20435603
File: 771 KB, 480x270, 1451767345_giphy (4).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20435603

>>20435508
BoT was one of my first, I really loved it. Maybe the Wagner stuff specifically is bad, but I think he's right about music. "...world symbolism of music cannot be exhaustively interpreted through language, because it symbolically refers to the primal contradiction and the primal suffering within the primal Oneness." I think the book does a good job of setting the stage for the rest of his work. And it has my favorite section out if all his books where he points out that in Christianity the serpent is used to place all of humanities greatest traits on women as sin. "What distinguishes the ayran version is the sublime idea of active sin as the truly Promethean virtue... The contradiction at the heart of the world was... a confusion of different worlds, a divine and a human world... both individually right, but each merely one individual beside another, suffering from its individuation." What didn't you like about the book?

Oh also since you like TSZ; What's the fire dog meant to convey? I've been having trouble conceptualizing that one.

>> No.20435613

>>20435560
I am in my twenties

>> No.20435630

>>20435085
He never contradicts himself. If what you read seems contradicting you don't understand the deeper layer underneath it

>> No.20435637

>>20435493
>t. filtered

>> No.20435644

>>20435561
Maybe this is one of the best things Nietzsche wrote. Don't become a blind follower, remain individual

>> No.20435652

>>20435031
To be fair, it gets funnier if you do read previous canon. And in German.
>>20435048
Nietzsche isn't guilty about it at all.

>> No.20435700

>>20435603
BoT is still a good book, but among his books it has the least to offer and is the weakest in terms of his writing (naturally, since it was his first full book). But if the subject matter really appeals to you, I can see why you wouldn't think it's his worst. All of his books are something special.

>Oh also since you like TSZ; What's the fire dog meant to convey? I've been having trouble conceptualizing that one.
It refers to revolutionaries of any kind. People who want immediate change and believe they can create it through major upsets of a system. That's the fire dog being criticized by Zarathustra. Nietzsche is strongly opposed to that notion, believing instead that all great things and radical changes develop slowly and through the incremental efforts of more patient types of people, summarized elegantly when Zarathustra says: "It is the stillest words that bring on the storm. Thoughts that come on doves’ feet guide the world." In the Nietzschean worldview, it is invisible hands, not big mouths, around which new values revolve and take shape from.

>> No.20435727
File: 156 KB, 770x470, 1646204897242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20435727

>>20435031
Many of the most innovative features of the language and themes of Zarathustra were taken from Der Ring des Nibelungen.

>'Wotan’s relationship with Siegfried is something wonderful, like no other poetry in the world: love and enforced enmity and the desire for destruction. This is highly symbolic for the understanding of Wagner’s character: love for that which redeems, judges, and destroys; but splendidly perceived!'

>The confrontation between Zarathustra (as ‘Untergehender’) and his progeny, the ‘Übermensch’, appears as a free paraphrase of the confrontation between Wotan and his progeny, ‘the man of the future’, in Siegfried, Act III, where Wotan (in Wagner’s own words) rises to the tragic height of willing his own fall. Nietzsche’s attempt to improve on the scene he described as comparable to no other poetry in the world will be evident to the student in the long excursus of ‘Zarathustra’s Vorrede’, beginning

>'What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal. What can be loved in man is that he is a going-across and a going-down.'

>By availing himself of material culled from the dramatic climax of the trilogy, he prepares to deliver his own answer to the question propounded in both works.

>> No.20435730

>>20435727
Nietzsche while writing Zarathustra:
>With this book I have stepped into a new Ring
>Finally, if I am not completely mistaken about my future, it is through me that the best part of the Wagnerian enterprise will live on—and that’s what is almost droll about the affair.
>I am better now and I even believe that Wagner's death was the most substantial relief that could have been given me just now. It was hard for six years to have to be the opponent of the man one had most reverenced on earth, and my constitution is not sufficiently coarse for such a position. After all it was Wagner grown senile whom I was forced to resist; as to the genuine Wagner, I shall yet attempt to become in a great measure his heir (as I have often assured Fräulein Malvida, though she would not believe it).
>It's already beginning, what I prophesied for a long time, that in many pieces I will be R.W.'s heir.—

Ecce Homo:
>Suppose I had christened my Zarathustra with a name not my own,—let us say with Richard Wagner's name,—the acumen of two thousand years would not have sufficed to guess that the author of Human, all-too-Human was the visionary of Zarathustra.

>> No.20435731

>>20435700
Fair enough. thank you for helping me grasp the concept, but what is Nietzche if not a big mouth from which the actions of invisible hands are inspired?

>> No.20435735
File: 164 KB, 862x654, 1650685341009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20435735

>>20435730
Wagner on act 3 of Siegfried:

>Da treffen wir, wie die Hellenen in der dampfenden Erdspalte zu Delphi, auf den Mittelpunkt der grossen Welttragödie… Hier ist Alles erhabenes Grauen, nur in Räthseln ansprechbar. Seit jener Zeit, wo ich von der wundervollen Hohenschwangau-Woche nach München zurückkehrte, und bange Fragen über Unser Schicksal aufzuwerfen hatte, entstand mir, und verfolgt mich nun das Thema, das Uns sogleich beim Beginne dieses Aktes zu begrüssen hat, und Uns die Entscheidung, die letzte Frage, den letzten Willen des Weltengottes ankündigen soll.

>There we meet, like the Hellenes in the steaming chasm at Delphi, at the center of the great world tragedy... Here everything is sublime horror, only addressable in riddles. Since the time when I returned to Munich from the wonderful Hohenschwangau week and had to raise anxious questions about our fate, the theme has arisen and is now haunting me, which greets us immediately at the beginning of this act, and our decision, the last question, the last will of the world god is supposed to announce.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOc6iZtukrs

>> No.20435773

>>20435051
Even academics don’t understand the work anon, you’ll be fine.

>> No.20435789

>>20435652
>Nietzsche is guilty about it at all
Are you saying he isn’t indebted or he doesn’t pretend he isn’t indebted?

>> No.20435801

>>20435731
>what is Nietzche if not a big mouth from which the actions of invisible hands are inspired?
Sorry, I guess I was kind of vague there. By big mouths I meant people like all the Marxist revolutionaries of the 20th century who thought making a loud clamor and shaking everyone violently all at once was going to lead to dramatic change in the zeitgeist / dominant value system. By invisible hands I meant people who work quietly and diligently, take the time to learn and respect the current value system and how it works, and focus on honing themselves above all else.

>> No.20435872

>>20435801
Ah that's true. His mouth was big but his words were for the few and for the future. Sharp edges don't need as much force to cut through. Thank you for reminding me so gently.

>> No.20436049
File: 7 KB, 156x180, 6D69FDBD-EBA0-4552-B5FB-A63815F90BE3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20436049

>>20435050
>So basically, hear me out Reddit, this book, put together by a Roman council of Jew LARPers, is literally the divine truth and all you ever need. Abandon all your goyish practices, come to rabbi yeshua.

>> No.20436056

>>20435135
Fuck the Bible, fuck christniggers, fuck Jews, fuck Muslims, fuck your Jewish god, hang all christniggers, Abraham was a dumb nigger, I hate christniggers

>> No.20436083

I know an Ubermench in real life, wins everything tall good looking women adore him. Makes me feel genetically inferior

>> No.20436085

>>20435146
>>20436056
Literal retards. Please never read Nietzsche again.

>> No.20436109

>>20435031
I thought you need to read his other work to read it

>> No.20436133

unabridged Will to Power and this are his essential masterpieces

>> No.20436154

>>20435038
based

>> No.20436504

>>20435789
Whom are you quoting?

>> No.20436872

>>20436049

he never said that (?)

>> No.20436964
File: 686 KB, 2048x3316, elisabeth_nietzsche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20436964

>>20436133
Elisabeth was right.

>> No.20437931

>>20435031
The copy i have is full of archaic words
Can you tell a good translation.

>> No.20437940

>>20435031
I've read multiple translations of Zarathustra's Gathas, but I have no interest in Nietzsche.

>> No.20438000

>>20435109
Nobody here has actually read him

>> No.20438009

Why are there so many anti-semitic admirers of NIetzsche? He'd loathe all of you

>> No.20438040

I didn't like it... I thought the writing was forced in a way that genuine religious texts (which I believe he was emulating) aren't. I thought the some of the metaphors were bad, borderline nonsensical. I really wanted to like it - maybe I should give it another chance? I only read a few dozen pages

>> No.20439203

>>20437931
Hollingdale

>> No.20440125

>>20438009
He just doesn’t like ressentiment or whatever. That applies to a lot of anti-semites but not all. You can be aware of Jewish power and corruption without being a little bitch about it. Just admit they excel in terms of in-group loyalty which has given them a level of power that allows them to exert their will upon the world. The cringe anti-semites are the ones saying “noooo Jews bad rejecting Jesus, Talmud says can kill non-Jews, bible says be good and submissive little boy” instead of just playing the power game also.

>> No.20440244

>>20435160
Example?

>> No.20440268

>>20438009
Did you read Genealogy of Morale?

>> No.20441484

>>20435031

it's just ok. relax.

>> No.20442208

Syphilis.

>> No.20442264

>>20439203
After reading Hollingdale, Common should be read.

>> No.20442739

>>20435099
>>20435630
His account of the formation of objects does not really have a definitive answer, as he gave contradictory accounts, one being in favor of constructivism, the other elimitivism.

These are the finer details, so to speak, of his philosophy, but I would agree that he does not contradict himself on his core ideas.