Stirner and The ego and its own

[Anonymous No.20421024]

So I want to know your opinions about this philosopher and his book thank you in advance

[Anonymous No.20421035]

>>20421024
That’s Beckett

[Anonymous No.20421047]

His entire worldview is contained in the title of his book.

[Anonymous No.20421076]

>>20421024
Was Stirner inbred?

[Anonymous No.20421205]

>>20421035
Not anymore

[Anonymous No.20421325]

>>20421024
His work is fine and starts a man off into the pathway of the Anarch as the representation of Nietzschean Christianity.

[Anonymous No.20421328]

>>20421024
>opinion
It's simply true.

[Anonymous No.20421338]

>>20421035
fpbp

[Anonymous No.20421348]

Is this really a photograph of Stirner?

[Anonymous No.20422828]

>>20421024
Nigga died to a bee sting lmao.

[Anonymous No.20422843]

[Anonymous No.20423067]

>>20421348
No. This was a different Johann Schmidt. Quite plainly from a generation later too by the dress

[Anonymous No.20423151]

>>20421024
I guess interesting as a moral theory but not much else.

[Anonymous No.20423202]

>>20421348
Stirner was already impoverished and dead prior to the widespread of photography.

[Anonymous No.20423291]

>>20421024
The most important thing you need to know about Stirner, is like Nietzsche, he was essentially a skeptic pf the political movements of his day (socialism/liberalism/republicanism), and believed they would replace the waning Catholic Church with something just as sinister and corrupt.

[Anonymous No.20423410]

Unironically a good book with many insights that can be applied to current politics and ethics. Also an interesting reflection on the history of morals itself.
Why do I feel like almost nobody here read it and is talking out of his ass. I also feel like you just want an excuse to "not have to" read it.

[Yyo No.20423422]

>>20423410
I just downloaded it some time ago. Will get around to reading it

[Anonymous No.20424102]

>>20423410
Nah I've read it I just wanted this sites opinion because of curiosity