Best books about the philosophy of technology?

[Anonymous No.20396628]

Pic may be related

[Anonymous No.20396646]

[Anonymous No.20397319]

The Failure of Technology

[Anonymous No.20397329]

>>20397319
Why the Schmidt?
Is he at the heart of the fake “ecofash” meme?

[Anonymous No.20397527]

>>20397319
thanks this is juicy

[Anonymous No.20397580]

It's a little densely written, I think because of the translation, especially the introduction parts, but well worth getting through.

[Anonymous No.20397655]

https://www.hedweb.com/

[Anonymous No.20397662]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx3rdVQZ3mo

[Anonymous No.20397671]

>>20396646
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7AhsE57fwk

[Anonymous No.20399107]

[Anonymous No.20399114]

[Anonymous No.20399748]

>>20396628
Forgotten Nature

[Anonymous No.20399843]

Man and Technics - Oswald Spengler

[Anonymous No.20399987]

It is such a shame that there are no contemporary getman philosophers of technology.
All contemporary shit is not rigorous, mild and unimpressive where one questions the author’s general intelligence.
Nothing high brow.

[Anonymous No.20400074]

in addition to what others have posted

[Anonymous No.20400324]

>>20397329
Ai is blasphemy against organic life. Engineers are organic and more importantly humans tied to a collective known as the State, the only effective option is a political stance aimed at curbing the overenthusiasm of the souless minions of technology. Evolve or die, build EMPs now.

[Anonymous No.20400344]

>>20399987
Just you wait

[Anonymous No.20400424]

>>20400344
are you even German?

[Anonymous No.20400442]

>>20400424
A mere technicality, Faust will not be so contained, I shall release Inifnity

[Anonymous No.20401633]

Even Ratzinger talks of technology in a philosophical framework

[Anonymous No.20402698]

>>20397329
Who?

[Anonymous No.20403437]

>>20402698
Pardon. Spellcheck mishap. *Schmitt

>>20400324
EMPs?
I am against the state. It builds soulless minions better than any religion ever dreamed

[Anonymous No.20403507]

>>20401633
where?

[Anonymous No.20403992]

[Anonymous No.20404138]

>>20403992
Why leave the best book out?

[Anonymous No.20404195]

>>20404138
What book? I didn't make that chart.

[Anonymous No.20404197]

>>20403992
>Thoreau
>Abbey
>Kaczynski
>Heidegger
garbage

[Anonymous No.20404202]

>>20396646
Ahhh Nick Bostrom....one of the biggest psueds in the game

[Anonymous No.20404212]

>>20404197
okay

[Anonymous No.20405827]

>>20404197
What's wrong with Heidegger?

[Anonymous No.20406061]

>>20404197
Heidegger's critical appraisal of technological thought was excellent and rather prophetic.
Also, he wasn't even anti-tech. He wanted us to develop a 'free relation to technology' instead of being consumed by it.

[Anonymous No.20406240]

>>20404197
low iq

[Anonymous No.20406251]

>>20403992
Add Skrbina's Metaphysics of Technology

[Anonymous No.20406425]

>>20406251
Stop shilling your book.

[Anonymous No.20406448]

>>20406251
that book is really shit. I regret having read it.
would not recommend

[Anonymous No.20406496]

any books on how all sciences are one and the same

[Anonymous No.20406560]

Here's a question to you anti-technology people: if we were to proceed and have a tech-revolution, returning us into a state of nature that satisfies our power process (or whatever you wish to call it), how do we prevent technology from being developed again?

As I see it, even if we were to destroy all facets of industrial society, it would not be too long before we once again began to develop certain cost cutting technologies, ESPECIALLY if we retained agricultural practices like cereal cultivation. What is the solution to this problem? It is not as if we would have governments with enshrined anti-technology laws being enforced.

[Anonymous No.20406586]

>>20406560
anti-technology people are literal retards

[Anonymous No.20406658]

>>20406586
Maybe, I think there's definitely something in there. Technology is instrumental in the way we understand the world and ourselves, and I don't think it's all for the better. I am just interested in how far these people have planned this stuff out. No use wiping the table if you haven't got something clean to put on it after.

[Anonymous No.20406682]

>>20406560
I'm not anti-tech, just skeptical of the over reliance on tech and cautious of it dangers.

[Anonymous No.20406716]

>>20406560
>how do we prevent technology from being developed again?

I'm not anti-tech, but the only way this can happen -- and Ted says this -- is that there would have to be a mutual global agreement to suppress the technological system. However, it's highly unlikely such an accord could ever remain since even a hint of superiority would get one nation running wild, and then another, and then another.

[Anonymous No.20406764]

Now companies want to move all the factories from China to another country and destroy the land in that country with pollution.

[Anonymous No.20406774]

>>20406682
>>20406716
I am sympathetic to concern regarding technology, but (like the other objection) I wonder about how we could feasibly disentangle the situation. Can and should the industrial system be reformed? What is the solution to the problem, if we acknowledge there is one, with technology? Or are we just fucked, doomed to lie in this terrible bed we've made.

[Anonymous No.20406787]

It ticking time bomb. It only a matter of time before we doom ourselves.