[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 336 KB, 1535x900, bookshelf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20367140 No.20367140 [Reply] [Original]

What book have you reread the most and why?

>> No.20367337

Despite being a meme read GR five times. Always something new to discover.

>> No.20367351

Gotta be Jurassic Park, even though last time I read it was like at least 20 years ago.

>> No.20367377
File: 748 KB, 1126x1500, 1321563455686.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20367377

>>20367140
Nietzsche stuff.

I don't know what he's talking about most of the time only for me to make sense of it months or years later.

Truly his wisdom is ripe but I am not yet ripe for his widom

>> No.20367378

>>20367140
The Hobbit is the only book I've ever read twice. There are too many books I haven't read to waste time rereading.

>> No.20367386

>>20367140
Invisible Cities
>because it’s a therapeutic manual disguised as a novella

>> No.20367490

Ender's saga
My favorite books, have probably read them 7 times since I'm 10. I find a new meaning in it every time, they're just beautiful

>> No.20367508
File: 125 KB, 634x659, 157.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20367508

>>20367377
>you will endure necessity and you WILL love it

>> No.20367520

>>20367140
I guess at this point it would be both The Extraordinary Adventures and The Confessions of Arsene Lupin, because I would check some facts and because it's a really fun read.

>> No.20367533

Lord of the Rings
I've read it 6 times so far
Next would be The Hobbit about 3-4 times
Then A Hero of Our Time, Notes from the Underground, Dubliners, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, Temple of the Golden Pavilion, The Trial, Pride and Prejudice and the Sun also rises 3 times
There's probably a lot that I've re-read twice but the biggest one is the ASOIAF books and Harry Potter
t. late millennial

>> No.20367541

Ronia, the robbers daughter

>> No.20367596

>>20367140
Probably Richard Brautigan - So The Wind Won't Blow it All Away. We can not escape our pasts and it has a real knack for putting things into perspective, and it only takes a few hours to read.

>> No.20367656

>>20367351
Damn you're old lol

>> No.20367662

Probably In Our Time.
Though I usually skip My Old Man

>> No.20367665

>>20367656
I was 8 the first time I read it.
There was a bunch of shit I didn't understand, like all those "iterations" pages and a whole lot of genetics. Action scenes were pretty cool and scary though.

>> No.20367744

Finished Blood Meridian and I am now starting it over and making notes to translate Spanish text.

>> No.20368387

>>20367140
I reread The Sun Also Rises every year during the transition from spring to summer.
I just really love that novel, when I first read it it was like the book I'd been searching for my whole life.

>> No.20368454
File: 1.77 MB, 500x375, tumblr_ntynotd09b1rkmkdxo1_500.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20368454

>>20367140


I seldom rewatch, much less reread, anything; I only do so with more complex, and/or especially relevatory, things, and/or if I want to better remember something that I had watched/read a long time ago.

Everything has its original season, including one's personal experience; with revolution, you merely further interiorize —resurface, and reestablish— what you have already envolved/traversed, generally not needing to redo so —the seed is sown; the deed is done.

>> No.20369133

>>20367490
I've read the first book around four times. The sequel annoyed me off so much I ripped it up and tossed it in case I was tempted to read it again.

>> No.20369198

>>20367140
None, since I don’t read to begin with.

>> No.20369215

>>20367140
I don't reread, let alone, read books.

>> No.20369228

>>20367140
Flowers for Algernon. I just find it easy to read and it makes me tear up every time.

>> No.20369365
File: 818 KB, 736x983, 1638647242444.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20369365

>>20367140
Probably Clive Barkers "Imajica"
I read the german translation twice or trice many years ago and very recently another time but this time the original english version.

Same goes for "Lords Of Chaos: The Bloody Rise of the Satanic Metal Underground". First I read the german version and some years later the english original.

And very recently I reread some book that I read in my childhood years way back in east germany. "Die Akademie des Meisters Klex" (english title "Academy of Mr. Kleks") by the polish Autor Jan Brzechwa.

But I can't quite remember reading other books more than once.

>> No.20369405

I regularly re-read books, but one time I only had a copy of the complete works of Edgar Allan Poe to read for at least six months, so that might tip the scales a bit. I don't even like Poe that much.

>> No.20369575

I just tear pages from books as I read them. This way, the experience of reading it remains pristine and pure, and it helps train my memory.

>> No.20369691

>>20369575
lying is bad anon!!!!!

>> No.20369901

>>20367533
Based. I also have reread the lotr about 6 or 7 times. I used to read it every year in February as one of my cringe traditions

>> No.20369906

>>20367140
Probably a toss up between Siddhartha and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas

>> No.20369975

did you know that you can troll the jannies by reporting post that don't break any rules, if they decide to get a power trip and unlawfully ban you, you can bring balance to the force

>> No.20369979

>>20367378
>waste time rereading
you know that reading a book once is the experiential equivalent of watching a jpeg load on a dialup computer right? rereading is the only way to have real appreciation of the book's aesthetic

>> No.20370041
File: 323 KB, 817x993, 851907675.1.x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20370041

>>20367140
>What book have you reread the most
asterix in switzerland
>and why?
because i thought it was great when i read it as a kid and i still think it's great now

>> No.20370049

>>20369405
Dude what happened to the rest of your books? Were you in prison or something lol

>> No.20370063

The Sound and The Fury. 3 or 4 times, it really rewards you on every re-read.
That's as an adult, as a kid I must've read the first 4 Harry Potter books at least 10 times each, then I grew out of it and never finished the series.

>> No.20370090

>>20367140
I’ve reread Portrait of the Artist 6 times. Most of those were for courses at university where the book kept cropping up. Heart of Darkness for the same reason. 4 times or so.
Otherwise The Recognitions and Moby-Dick at 3 times each.

>> No.20370117

I have read only one book in my life: In Search of Lost Time. Once I finish Time Regained I start again with Swann's Way. Again and again.

>> No.20370131
File: 72 KB, 295x460, knee-deep-in-the-dead.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20370131

This one because idk I just really like it.

>> No.20370158

>>20369979
How long should I wait to reread a book?

>> No.20370170
File: 350 KB, 1400x2098, 20-000-leagues-under-the-sea-9781625585974_hr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20370170

20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is the only book I've ever reread. It captivated my imagination the 5th grade and I'll come back to it every 6 or so years.

>> No.20370220

>>20370131
>Dafydd ab Hugh
>Brad Linaweaver
Come on, these people cannot exist.

>> No.20370226

Starship Troopers, like 4 times i guess

>> No.20370227

>>20370220
>Dafydd ab Hugh is an author whose novelette, "The Coon Rolled Down and Ruptured His Larinks, A Squeezed Novel by Mr. Skunk" in Asimov's Science Fiction, was nominated for a Nebula Award in 1990.

>> No.20370250
File: 111 KB, 709x709, 1601842213346.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20370250

>>20370227

>> No.20370344

>>20370158
"Curiously enough, one cannot read a book: one
can only reread it. A good reader, a major reader, an active and creative reader is a rereader. And
I shall tell you why. When we read a book for the first time the very process of laboriously
moving our eyes from left to right, line after line, page after page, this complicated physical work
upon the book, the very process of learning in terms of space and time what the book is about,
this stands between us and artistic appreciation. When we look at a painting we do not have to
move our eyes in a special way even if, as in a book, the picture contains elements of depth and
development. The element of time does not really enter in a first contact with a painting. In
reading a book, we must have time to acquaint ourselves with it. We have no physical organ (as
we have the eye in regard to a painting) that takes in the whole picture and then can enjoy its
details. But at a second, or third, or fourth reading we do, in a sense, behave towards a book as we
do towards a painting. However, let us not confuse the physical eye, that monstrous masterpiece of evolution, with the mind, an even more monstrous achievement. A book, no matter what it is — a work of fiction or a work of science (the boundary line between the two is not as clear as is generally believed) — a book of fiction appeals first of all to the mind. The mind, the brain, the top of the tingling spine, is, or should be, the only instrument used upon a book."
- Nabokov, Good Readers and Good Writers

It's not a question of when you should reread, it's a question of if. Do you like it enough to engage with it on a deeper level?

>> No.20370371

>>20367140
I've read The Scottish Play probably more than anything. Then Hamlet.

>> No.20370401

I've read the whole Wheel of Time series 5 times.
Go ahead and laugh.

>> No.20370482

>>20370371
Why do people use metonyms? Do you think you're in some sort of secret club? Do you think it make it makes you look more knowledgeable? Do you think it makes you better than other people? I don't get it.

>> No.20370526

>>20370482
He might be an actor. They're famously superstitious.

>> No.20370581

>>20367140
Scripture, mostly a combination of Genesis, Matthew, Romans and Revelation

>> No.20370710

>>20370401
Not going to laugh, but I am impressed that you could tolerate some of those middle books enough to read them five times. I don't know if I'll ever get around to reading the whole series again. Maybe one day. I was satisfied enough to complete it after taking ten years off.

>> No.20370719

>>20367378
>It is is better to know one book intimately than a hundred superficially.
Donna Tart

>> No.20370867
File: 90 KB, 1996x1572, kjh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20370867

>>20367140

White Noise by Don Delillo has incredible sentences. I don't care about how long it takes to read a book, I like to stop and contemplate when I'm given interesting observations, things to weigh or examples of good writing. White Noise is Delillo trying to have a full on conversation with you about American life if your willing to engage with it.

>> No.20371010

>>20369215
Kek

>> No.20371022

War & Peace

I enjoy it immensely and like to finish off every year by rereading it.

>> No.20371142

>>20367140
I've re-read the unbearable lightness of being twice I don't particularly know why, I guess because it's beautiful

>> No.20371326

Plato's Republic also Sophist and Gorgias

>> No.20371737

A Place of Dead Roads by Burroughs. Comfy surrealist Western

>> No.20371791

>>20367140
Unironically Paradise lost at four times.

Perhaps it's actually some childhood book I've forgotten.

>> No.20371794

>>20369901
Don't berate yourself like that, it's not something to be embarrassed about at all.

>> No.20371798

>>20370170
I wish I'd read Verne as a child. If I ever have a boy—my God prevent that inception of another's suffering—I'd love to read him Verne as a bedtime story at age 5 or so.

>> No.20372135

>>20370482
Triggered? It's just a nickname.

>>20370526
Yes, I actually did act in it back in high school, I played Banquo (if I could do it again though, I think I'd rather play one of the murderers or even the Porter - Banquo's only fun to play after he's dead).

>> No.20372185

>>20371326
You should add Philebus to that list, Republic is my first and most read philosophy book though. Not sure how many times I've gone through it or just read certain books again.

>> No.20372191

The sorrows of young werther because I need to be constantly reminded that my proclivity to fall for anyone and to think of love as some transcendental thing will only kill me eventually.

>> No.20372362

>>20367533
Same, reading Lotr for the 4th time now

>> No.20372399
File: 223 KB, 640x360, JPEG-Promo-33.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20372399

House of Leaves. I love the experience of engaging with the gimmicks. I just read it for the fourth times ove a weekend last year. So much fun to forget about aspects of the book only to have them punch you on a re-reading.

>> No.20373085

Sprawl trilogy by Gibson. The books have a certain aesthetic where the writing focuses less on the characters and plot and more on the creation of the environment. It's almost as if the universe is the plot and everyone is along for the ride. I enjoy early Gibson because of this signature immersive prose

>> No.20373385

>>20368387
I see you're a man of culture as well, anon. I like to read it on cool windy days, there's a cafe near my house that has good Spanish brandy and coffee and it makes me feel like I'm at the festival with them.

>> No.20373649

>>20367140

The bible