[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 271 KB, 699x1080, image_2022-04-27_151301493.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20285922 No.20285922 [Reply] [Original]

> with reproducibility being generally stronger in studies and journals representing cognitive psychology than social psychology topics,[214] and the subfields of differential psychology (including general intelligence and Big Five personality traits research),[215][216] behavioral genetics (except for candidate gene and candidate gene-by-environment interaction research on behavior and mental illness),[217][218] and the related field of behavioral economics being largely unaffected by the replication crisis.[219]

Any good books on behavioral economics? I'd prefer long, technical, and accurate as opposed pop-sci and vague, though also even if not an entire beginner an almost absolute beginner.

picrel

>> No.20286050

>>20285922
reddjt thread

>> No.20286465

bump

>> No.20286706

>>20285922
that book could be summarized in a single page

>> No.20286718

>>20286706
do it in a single post, if you dare.

>> No.20286895

>>20286718
System 1, system 2, elephant rider.

>> No.20287528

bump

>> No.20287574

i went to econ school for 4 years and took an Behavioral Economics class - and still that's the only book I recall being asked to read. the whole thing of behavioral economics felt just a simple thing being streeched into oblivion. this is partly mainstream economics fault for being just too dumb all the time and whole subjects being created to correct its faults.

but for study material itself I don't recall much books, I guess you'll be better reading the main papers from those economist that got the Nobel of Economics for their contribution to the subject (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_economics#Nobel_laureates))

if i'm not mistaken, there is a whole thing of then giving a lecture when each got their Nobel. I remember having to read some of those.

>> No.20287612

>>20287574
oof. Thank you, anon!

>> No.20287832
File: 110 KB, 907x1360, gerd gigerenzer rationality for mortals.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20287832

>>20285922
Never read it, I just listened to a podcast about it that also talked about Thinking, Fast and Slow.

>> No.20287907
File: 27 KB, 258x392, The_Elephant_in_the_Brain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20287907

>>20285922

>> No.20288173

>>20287612
>oof
reddjt thread

>> No.20288511

>>20288173
go suck a cum-buried stinky, greasy wizard cock you insignificant tribal piece of shit nigger

>> No.20288521

>>20288511
No, how about you do it instead

>> No.20288533

>>20288521
I'm not the one whose entire contribution to the thread is whining "reddjt thread" over and over like some insolent child, if you don't like this thread sage it, otherwise your greasy little chicken wearing off these letters on your keyboard will do little more than make you look like an idiot and bump up my thread. If that is your wish, be my guest. :)

>> No.20288538

>>20288533
I can't possibly look like any more of an idiot than you, reddjtor.

>> No.20288555

>>20288538
"googoogaagaababy talk"
This is the level of your prose:
>>20286050
>>20288173
Observe it diligently and stick to a level of language you can handle. Each new time you try to talk like an adult and get laughed at for the dimwit you are, heed my words and return to regurgitating slogans like some twitter troon.