[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 125 KB, 634x659, 157.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20258289 No.20258289 [Reply] [Original]

Any good books that explain wa-bing bing yahoo mindblowing topics such as the many worlds theory, anthrophic principle, fermi paradox and such?

>> No.20258293

Basically I've read too much theology and need a scientific perspective on the mysteries of the universe.

>> No.20258301

books? I don't know any books

>> No.20258303

>>20258289
Google it retardo

>> No.20258339

>>20258293
>I've read too much theology and need a scientific perspective on the mysteries of the universe
http://rantswithintheundeadgod.blogspot.com/2012/10/darwinism-and-natures-undeadness.html

"Indeed, this philosophical implication of Darwinism, that the ordinary notions of life and nonlife no longer make sense and that they need to be replaced by something like the idea of a baffling state of living death, amounts to an ironic, postmodern kind of pantheism. Darwinism not only zombifies but deifies all of nature, since the evolutionary process encompasses the cosmic preconditions of the emergence of life so that the whole universe is required to create life in a mindless, natural fashion. There is no personal God, but the universe as a whole in all of its interconnectedness does yield organisms as byproducts, as though the universe were a creator god. Nature as a whole isn’t personal, but social creatures like us will inevitably anthropomorphize evolutionary patterns. The divinity of nature is no majestic thing, since the cosmos is best understood as an undead monstrosity. Whereas prior to Darwin, educated people could attribute intentional properties to the universe, with no hint of irony since they could assume that a personal God created the universe as a machine, bestowing it with artificial functions, in our postmodern time we can only look on in disgust as the universe abuses our social reflex, compelling us to be overly friendly with what we know scientifically to be inanimate matter. We know that we ourselves are spiritless entities; to be sure, we have a brain that has marvelous effects, but metaphysically we’re one with the natural cosmos, meaning that we’re thoroughly material and physical. But physically interacting material things aren’t inert or dead; they’re peerlessly creative and thus as divine as anything we can know. That divinity, however, is repulsive, blasphemous, and just as abominable as a zombie monster’s mockery of life."

>> No.20258346

>>20258289
My diary desu

>> No.20258433

>>20258289
buy a random "hard" sf novel from like 1995-2005 and open it on a random page. you will find a monologue explaining one of those ideas. it will be bullshit but it's not like you actually want the real thing - that's all math.

>> No.20258932
File: 631 KB, 1936x2081, b76000db4da232cc30641021c48c903b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20258932

>>20258289
All you need is here

>> No.20259264
File: 247 KB, 1000x1000, 1645585478572.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20259264

>>20258289
No just read the heckin bible