If You Give A Gay Their Way

[Anonymous No.20229653]

I wrote a book explaining how LGBT dissidents are ruining America. I shared this here a couple weeks ago and multiple people told me to take it back to the drawing board. I ended up paying an anon to help me edit it, and I think it's pretty good now. I've archived it so you can read for free.

>Archive
https://archive.org/details/iygagtw-ebook-review-copy/

>Alternate link in case archive goes down
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Euaxyb2ITKYN1Z6wuNuw9J1XPukAJv3H?usp=sharing

[Anonymous No.20229658]

Here's the preface so you can see if you're interested

[Anonymous No.20229681]

>>20229658
>this future bestseller
lol
let us know how that works out for you

[Anonymous No.20229749]

>>20229653
The cover should be parody of if you give a mouse a cookie

[Anonymous No.20229754]

>>20229658
>The LGBT hordes have become a problem; a problem that, unlike their victims, has gone unmolested.

[Anonymous No.20229760]

decent bait

[Anonymous No.20229763]

>>20229754
That guy gangweed is a hell of a writer. That was a joke he put in when editing it

[Anonymous No.20229770]

>>20229653
based. send me the amazon link I'll take a copy.

[Anonymous No.20229772]

>>20229658
>future bestseller
"They" won't let that happen buddy.

[Anonymous No.20229776]

>>20229770
>>20229772
(((They))) probably won't, but I'm more interested in spreading the word around than making money. As long as the archives are up, I'm happy

[Anonymous No.20229780]

>>20229653

[Anonymous No.20229801]

>>20229763
;)

[Anonymous No.20229808]

>>20229776
How are you already being hate bombed? Did you advertise this on twitter or some pro-gay and pro-trans site/forum?

[Anonymous No.20229817]

>>20229653
Damn

[Anonymous No.20229824]

>>20229763
>Had it ended there, it would be a touching story showing homosexuals make lovely parents
>Unfortunately it becomes a touching story when they're arrested for victimizing the boy
Honest chuckle which is more than most books give me. Keep writing.

[Anonymous No.20229826]

>>20229808
I sent out review copies to a few people and shared it on /lit/ and /pol/, but that's it. Not sure where this brigade came from

[Anonymous No.20229828]

>>20229817
Don't you think it's more likely that the right leaning-pages got spammed for their transphobia? People come out of the woodwork when you post something "incorrect".

[Anonymous No.20229834]

>>20229801

[Anonymous No.20229839]

>>20229826
>/pol/
That's how. SJWs and discord trannies monitor /pol/.

[Anonymous No.20229842]

>>20229828
chuds can't stop seething

[Anonymous No.20229849]

>>20229842
The majority of peope who retweet and tweet at the Governor of Florida are not Floridians nor are they Republicans. Why is this different?

[Anonymous No.20229861]

>>20229839
Unfortunate, but some sacrifices have to be made to get the message out

[Anonymous No.20229868]

>>20229849
>I'm. Not. Mad.

[Anonymous No.20229883]

>>20229763
>>20229658
ngl this is peak comedy, richard gervais would be jealous

[Anonymous No.20229961]

>>20229763
two dad's what?

[Anonymous No.20230319]

>>20229776
>troons seething
Im going to buy it. I love making Evil seethe

[Anonymous No.20230338]

>>20229817
The graph is showing interactions on tranny posts, not total number of posts. What you're implying is "the right constantly thinking about trannies for no reason" is explicitly the opposite: it's the number of people who RESPOND when trannies are shoved in their face. Content that drives outrage is the most engaging material on social media in all contexts so this is entirely trivial.

[Anonymous No.20230386]

Just bought it hope it’s a good read

[Anonymous No.20230389]

no no no this can't be happening hetero bros...

[Anonymous No.20230392]

>>20229763
/pol/yps have been milking this one story for over a decade... you'd think if gay parents were all evil pedos there would be more material

[Anonymous No.20230430]

>>20230392
There are plenty of stories that showcase the indoctrination of faggotry, if only you were to listen to them.

[Anonymous No.20230452]

>>20230430
Yep, another single clickbait article that the armchair culture warriors have been obsessed with for over a decade. 99.99% of gays have no idea that article exists, meanwhile it has been living rent free in /pol/'s heads for years (as intended, since it is clickbait grift). Anyway, that dumb fag is wrong. The best way to get boys to think faggotry is cool would be to revive classical education and expose them to real "queer" heroes like Hadrian, Pelopidas and Alexander instead of banal liberal sacred cows like Harvey Milk.

[Anonymous No.20230454]

>>20230389
the jews of sexuality

[Anonymous No.20230509]

>>20229658
kek

[Anonymous No.20230521]

>>20230430
I mean it’s not like straigh couples haven’t been whoring out their little girls in beauty pageants for years for the hopes of striking it rich
The only thing people can conclude is that most people probably are unfit to actually raise kids

[Anonymous No.20230535]

>>20230521

Yes. Straight whoring is the natural precursor to gay whoring.

[Anonymous No.20230621]

>>20229658
Writing is a bit too zoomerish and low brow for me, any sample arguments rather than masturbatory prolusion?

[Anonymous No.20230631]

>>20229961
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_J._Newton_and_Peter_Truong
It's unironically true.
Just search the names of the faggots.

[Anonymous No.20230836]

>>20229658
This is funny as fuck.

[Anonymous No.20231042]

>>20229653
> No Epub

Unreadable.

[Anonymous No.20231054]

If you have to make a purchase to leave a review on Amazon, you OP are a truly magnificent bastard for taking money off these flaggots.

I salute you.

[Anonymous No.20231196]

>>20231054
>unabashedly based
nice review anon

[Anonymous No.20231490]

this is what heterosexual "men" actually have sex with

[Anonymous No.20231585]

>>20229817
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/media-matters-for-america/

[Anonymous No.20231620]

Can someone explain the Reddit = Eglin Air Force Base thing he mentioned? I've never heard that before.

[Anonymous No.20231912]

>>20231585
Seethe harder chud

[Anonymous No.20231988]

>>20229658
>the phallic figures projected on the walls of Plato's cave
...is this the power of pseuds?

[Anonymous No.20232015]

Honestly, this book is pretty based.

[Anonymous No.20232219]

>>20231054
I think on Amazon your review still stays up if you cancel the order. I haven't tried it, but I imagine they "bought it", reviewed it, and then immediately cancelled the order.

[Anonymous No.20232354]

>>20229658
based AF

[Anonymous No.20232436]

>>20229658
Nobody thinks this hard about homos and is not a homo themselves. This should be read and marketed as OP's journey of self discovery. It would raise its appeal to onionsboys and psychology departments.

[Anonymous No.20232457]

>>20231054
>If you have to make a purchase to leave a review on Amazon
You don't, but reviews from people who bought the product show a "Verified Purchase" on their comment.

[Anonymous No.20232565]

>>20229658
>Some people think that . . . .
You literally started your book in passive voice. Fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.20232623]

>>20232565
>>Some people think that . . . .
>passive voice
???

[Anonymous No.20232624]

I don't think the problem is really gays. We don't want to admit it but it's men. Men commit 99% of the rape in our society. Men start most wars. Gays are just bound to be the worst because they are mentally ill men.

[Anonymous No.20233013]

I don't know about ending the book with "And thats why I'm homophobic". It seems like that gives detractors an easy route to write the book off.

[Anonymous No.20233026]

>>20229653
>>20229658
Lmao are you the same retard that always replies to all the faggots here with pure seethe?
>The LGBT hordes have become a problem; a problem that, unlike their victims, has gone unmolested.
Kek

[Anonymous No.20233030]

>>20232623
Passive as in it's weak and could be a lot stronger if it said "Certain men say"

[Anonymous No.20233034]

>>20230454
Those are women though

[Anonymous No.20233043]

>>20229658
>comma splice in the second sentence of the book
I’m good.

[Anonymous No.20233051]

>>20233034
>the woman sexuality

[Anonymous No.20233060]

>>20233030
That's not what "passive VOICE" means. It's a specific type of grammatical construction.

[Anonymous No.20233065]

>>20233051
O shit I meant to say those are lesbians

[Anonymous No.20233078]

>>20233030
Retard

[Anonymous No.20233081]

>>20232436
kek

[Anonymous No.20233086]

>>20232436

[Anonymous No.20233109]

>>20233043
so, you think "for me" is an independent clause? interesting.

[Anonymous No.20233214]

been done better

[Anonymous No.20233219]

>>20232624
they arent men

[Anonymous No.20233244]

This is quite mediocre if I do say so myself. Nothing much of substance here beyond a book length version of 4chan posts from a high schooler

[Anonymous No.20233252]

>>20229653
>If You Give a Gay Their Way
>plural pronoun referring to a singular antecedent
>in the title of a book, no less, intended as an attack on a demographic that has increasingly adopted the plural pronoun as a means of self identification

bruh

[Anonymous No.20233414]

>>20229658
>a problem that has gone unmolested
Wow

[Anonymous No.20233453]

>>20229653
Thinking about converting to Catholicism and praying to the rosary to cure myself of this homosexual illness

https://youtu.be/vuziQsUrbeM

[Anonymous No.20233462]

>>20229653
This would seem to vindicate the claim that homophobia and transphobia are rooted in ignorance. What is the thesis of this book even supposed to be? It just starts off with the laundry list of objectionable things gay people have done and then concludes, “the Weimar republic also had an LGBT movement. Are we in the same position?” I don’t know, are we? It’s your job to make that case, you dunderhead. There’s no historical analysis or research in the text to support that claim. Instead, after this screed that reads like a Google search results page, it just drops that point and goes into more autobiographical bitching and moaning that’s also completely thoughtless. Like alright dude, you had these experiences with gay dudes in the Army. But nothing is said about them other than that you found them annoying enough to write a hundred page schizo rant about it. You mention gay men inhabiting this masculine space, having a particular vocal affect, one referring to himself as a “faggot”, taking complaints up the chain of command, and so on. In a book purportedly about homosexuality, it might make sense to consider WHY you had these experiences. Maybe that guy called himself a “faggot” as a defense mechanism or as a form of social role playing trying to find his place in this social environment where he didn’t fit in, and maybe that has some connection to how queer people navigate and relate to society writ large. Instead though, because this book has no thesis, nothing taking place in it is ever connected back and it’s all just processed with this troglodytic rage.

Why are you so angry? The closest thing this book has to an overarching purpose is that it all seems like you’re trying to rationalize or intellectualize this rage you feel. It’s this weird circular logic where rage is both the book’s premise and conclusion. And sure, many people feel instinctive aversion to homosexuality, and brighter traditionalist thinkers would use that to make some kind of natural law argument. But this book goes beyond that, and it comes across as completely pathological. You come across as a repressed and self-hating queer.

I’m not going to assume this is the case, but it seems like you’re unhappy. You should read Herman Hesse’s Steppenwolf. Our time is similar to the Weimar Republic’s in that rapid technological change, economic disappointment, and social dislocation have produced a new cohort of angry young men. Steppenwolf was Hesse’s response to them: you’d be happy to scourge yourself for thousands of years, but you’ve got to learn to live. You’ve got to learn to laugh.

[Anonymous No.20233527]

It's very simple: G good, LBT+ bad. Read the Greeks, and you'll find this to be true.

[Anonymous No.20234235]

>>20230389
Gaychads... I kneel...
(Lesbians are exempt, they suck just as much as regular women)

[Anonymous No.20234291]

>Your job as a parent is to decide what’s best for them, as Zeus bellows commands from Mount Olympus, but that’s not something you'll hear
from these deranged coomers.

[Anonymous No.20234307]

>>20233527
If it was bad it wouldn't be +

[Anonymous No.20234313]

>In fact, many of us have found comfort and


joy in pretending to be a slave at some point in our lives. Just ask the African American
community.

[Anonymous No.20234320]

>>20229658
>The LGBT hordes have become a problem; A problem that, unlike their victims, has gone unmolested.
lol
>I hate my political opponents. I hate their warped minds and diseased bodies, and I will never apologize for expressing that righteous hatred. I do not care about your feelings. I do not care about social justice. I do not care what names people might call me for saying what I have to say. I care about the truth, and the following chapters are what I know to be true.
Based and redpilled
>>20229776
If you're making troons seethe this hard then you're doing something right. I must buy a copy!
Amazon link plz

[Anonymous No.20234332]

>>20229653
>LGBT
>Dissidents

it is literally one of the most state-mandated social movements in modern history, none of them are dissidents. they're foot soldiers for the empire

[Anonymous No.20234345]

>>20230631
no >>20229961 was a comment about one of the grammatical errors in the text in >>20229763
it seems anon is still skimping on the proofreading

[Anonymous No.20234384]

>>20230389
I think we can agree on the distinct difference between modern homosexuals and classical homosexuals without having to get into a full fledged conversation on the topic.

[Anonymous No.20234402]

>>20233252
Native English speakers understand that "a Gay" is in reference to a group, thus "their" is not inappropriately used.

[Anonymous No.20234409]

>>20229658
you should ask for your money back because there are some basic grammar errors in here lol

[Anonymous No.20234431]

>>20234402
>indefinite article means it’s a reference to a group

Brainlet cope. Christians are also a group, but if I say “a Christian” you would understand I’m talking about one person.

t. actual native English speaker

[Anonymous No.20234445]

>>20233252
>>If You Give a Gay Their Way
>>plural pronoun referring to a singular antecedent
dude this has been done for centuries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

[Anonymous No.20234463]

>>20234409
you shut your whore mouth

[Anonymous No.20234510]

>>20229658
You're definitely gay. The only people who think this much about homosexuality are fags. That's why us straight guys get annoyed when they constantly push it.

But we don't write books about it. Because we're not homos.

[Anonymous No.20234544]

>>20234445
>people trying to defend OP’s gramatically incorrect usage of the singular “they” in the title of his deranged homophobic screed
>queer people trying to advance popular, academic, and professional acceptance of “they/them” pronouns
>muh heckin linguistic prescriptivism

People informally using the singular they doesn’t mean it’s gramatically correct. Cope harder.

[Anonymous No.20234590]

ignore the shills, this shits based
about halfway though rn
good job OP, may they nail you on a cross

[Anonymous No.20234668]

>>20233252
they're just respecting pronouns like a reasonable adult

[Anonymous No.20234687]

>The point is that transgender people don’t want to “pass,” except into the next life.

[Anonymous No.20234700]

>They know that their ideology is self-hanging

[Anonymous No.20234784]

>>20230389
Wow capitalist society rewards faggots with more money! Who would have thought

[Anonymous No.20234797]

This is why I hope they never give the gays in my country union. That will just open the floodgates of their other ridiculous "rights".

[Anonymous No.20234802]

>>20230389
I think most of this could be because lower income homosexuals are less likely to marry homosexually and are more likely to repress or hide their homosexuality (I'm assuming this is true). So the homosexuals that do enter same-sex marriages tend to be of higher income, which leads to more "successful" "children".

[Anonymous No.20234823]

>>20229653
Why was a book on this topic neccessary? Like I think fags are weird and gross but I would never read a book about it. Tbh I feel like mostly fags would buy such a book since they all seem to hate themselves fetishistic way.

[Anonymous No.20234845]

>>20229653
I suggest to make the cover look a bit more Q'uran-ish.

[Anonymous No.20234865]

>>20229653
The google drive link is more likely to go down than the archive.org link.

[Anonymous No.20234890]

mmmm exquisite

[Anonymous No.20235095]

>And that’s why ’'m homophobic

[Anonymous No.20235109]

>>20229653
Joel I told you to leave out the flat Earth and Creationism shit already over at pol God damnn it.

[Anonymous No.20235122]

>>20229658
>I hate my political opponents.
This prose is unironically briliant.

[Anonymous No.20236235]

gay marriage was legalized 7 years ago
now we have 7 year olds on hormone pills and people fighting for their right to be mutilated
slippery slope is not a fallacy

[Anonymous No.20236415]

>>20231042
this

[Anonymous No.20236543]

>keep telling everyone that grade inflation is going to lead to formulaic but fundamentally incorrect common use akin to baboo English in Bengal
>twenty years later a Nepalese hat weaving slideshow proves me right

[Anonymous No.20236830]

>>20229780
Thanks that's the first thing that came to my mind too.

[Anonymous No.20236853]

I think you have to put in the stuff about correlation between anime and trannies

[Anonymous No.20237069]

>>20229776
That second one is a solid sales pitch for me.

[Anonymous No.20237102]

>>20231988
What's the matter, don't like metaphors?

[Anonymous No.20237127]

>>20229653
>>20229658
Holy based I thought of doing this for ages, I haven't skimmed through the book what position do you argue from science, religion, etc.?

[Anonymous No.20237132]

>>20229653
Also congrats.

[Anonymous No.20237139]

>>20229653
There's also another good book which is similar that I read called
"Fag Agenda" may be hard to find? But it's very dense.

[Anonymous No.20237141]

God bless

[Anonymous No.20237214]

>>20229653
This is fucking hilarous. Thanks for sharing kek

[Anonymous No.20237229]

>Like women, children do not know what is best for themselves

A lot of this shit is pretty shocking, but the women bit? Come on man, lmao.

[Anonymous No.20237946]

>>20233252
She/They bigot

[Anonymous No.20238053]

>>20229653
Honestly I like the title.

I'll give it a read, anon.

[Anonymous No.20238095]

>>20234784
This.

[Anonymous No.20238142]

>>20230452
>>20232436
>>20234823

Is that the only rebuttal you people have?
>Lol RENT Free
or...
>You MUST be gay if you even think about gays!

Jesus christ...

[Anonymous No.20238217]

>>20230430
>the very future of X depends on recruiting children
You can literally make this statement about any organization or ideology

[Anonymous No.20238339]

>>20229658
The Cave is such a pseud metaphor. People use it all the time, I used to think that it had a deeper meaning because I didn't think it was possible people would keep repeating this same old bullshit and not have it mean more than muh world of illusions, muh Satan, etc but it really is just that. Such a simple idea, well explored throughout history is constrained to this one metaphor because midwits just cannot wait to reference Plato no matter how simple and easily communicable the idea itself actually is. Beyond that this reads like a 4chan post, and posting it on 4chan is just masturbatory.

[Anonymous No.20238343]

>>20238217
>>20238217
So faggotry is now an organization or ideology?

[Anonymous No.20238353]

>>20238343
You said it, not me pal

[Anonymous No.20238365]

>>20234845
Yea because christians love gays right?

[Anonymous No.20238372]

>>20234510
>y-you're gay!
This argument is the non woman version of calling someone an incel.

[Anonymous No.20238377]

>>20234463
lmao put that anon as a cowriter you didn't write any of that shit

[Anonymous No.20238656]

>>20238339
There are levels of hierarchy within symbolism

[Anonymous No.20238694]

>>20234510

[Anonymous No.20238701]

>>20238694
Thanks, I was looking for this.

[Anonymous No.20239161]

>>20233030
you're so fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.20239282]

>>20229653
That's a beautiful cover anon I'll give it a read, as soon as I have time. is it being sold anywhere?

[Anonymous No.20239871]

This better be good OP

[Anonymous No.20239974]

>>20238365

[Anonymous No.20240020]

>>20234784
Negro tier cope

[Anonymous No.20240034]

>>20238142
>>20238694

[Anonymous No.20240077]

>>20240034
>study of 35 guys
>more homophobic men than non homophobic (thus increasing the chance of closet fags in homophobic selection)
great study there faggot.

[Anonymous No.20240090]

>>20240034
nice sample size faggot
now kill yourself

[Anonymous No.20240111]

>>20230389
>Adopted children are more successful
Who would have thunk that the children that are actually wanted, even financially planned for, would do better..
This really shouldn't be underestimated.

[Anonymous No.20240160]

>>20239974
>lookup gayface in the dictionary
>it's this guy's face

[Anonymous No.20240173]

>>20229658
Not Based.

[Indeed french people are crazy(...) No.20240270]

>>20232565

??

Explain your passive position shit.

[Indeed french people are crazy(...) No.20240304]

>>20233527

I think you dont read your The Use Of Pleasures rather well.

[Indeed french people are crazy(...) No.20240326]

>>20234510

People who wrote about theology must be God themselves.

[Indeed french people are crazy(...) No.20240371]

>>20234823

True. Also: why are a book like mme bobary necesary? It's, esentially, about nothing... the form eats the content in such way there left nothing.

Other unnecesary books:

Moby Dick: just say it: don't mess with nature, wi ll kill ya.

Tales of two Cities: french people are crazy, we know that.

[Anonymous No.20240652]

>>20229658
Fucking based anon, counting in your underground success.

[Anonymous No.20240663]

>>20230389
Harold Bloom was gay too... wtf??

[Anonymous No.20240684]

>>20233252
Did you imply that they is not a suitable pronoun for an individual?

[Anonymous No.20240707]

>>20229658
> Lights pipe
> puff
> puff
Mhm, quite based

[Anonymous No.20240735]

>>20229653
>>Title rhymes
I already know it's garbage
>inb4 dilate
Not a tranny.
But I'd rather be a tranny than a hack author.

[Anonymous No.20241869]

>>20229653
>It’s 2018, Jack Chapman, a gay, dies after injecting silicone into his testicles. An article details that Chapman signed a contract that made him a sub to maladjusted Dylan Hafertepen. The bondage contract stated that Chapman was a “pup” and Hafertepen was a “master.” The author writes, “The contract also said the pup's body and mind were the exclusive property of the master and that the pup had no identity outside that given to him by the master. As part of this contract Jack was required to take Dylan's surname, sign over his salary, wear a chain around his neck and cut off all contact with anyone who existed outside the circle.”40 100% normal. In fact, many of us have found comfort and joy in pretending to be a slave at some point in our lives. Just ask the African American community.

You're doing the Lord's work Joel. It's both hilarious and well written. Keep up the good work.

[Anonymous No.20242250]

>>20229653
>their
Anon...
Observe, the proper form:
>If you give a gay his way

[Anonymous No.20243197]

>>20232565
You don't know what the passive voice is

[Anonymous No.20243244]

>>20242250
>>20233252
ESLs detected. A group is obviously implied, hence their.

[Anonymous No.20243306]

>>20229653
Flipped to a random page. This comes off as deranged rambling, but its funny. Good job OP

[Anonymous No.20243346]

>>20240735
Tranny.

[Anonymous No.20243375]

>>20230389
>Erasmus
Not gay
>Shakespeare
Not gay
>Proust
Not gay
>Hemingway
Not gay
>Wittgenstein
Not gay
>Frederick the Great
Not gay
>Byron
Not gay
This is some serious "we-wuzzing". Also the Greeks wouldn't call themselves gay, they all had wives, they just also liked the company of other men.

[Anonymous No.20243507]

>>20243375
You are blatantly wrong

[Anonymous No.20243723]

>>20243375
>he doesn't realize half of all authors in history can't even be confirmed to exist one way or another
midwit detected

[Anonymous No.20244136]

>>20229658
Many grammatical issues, specifically regarding the arbitrary and inconsistent use of periods, commas, and semicolons. See pic related for a refined version.
Also, you rely too much on cliched turns of phrase. Tighten it up and try to be a little more original.
Also, your opening sentence uses "homophobia" and "transphobia" as if they have clearly-defined definitions when they don't. You therefore shouldn't lean on them so heavily.

[Anonymous No.20244146]

>>20244136
Congratulations, you butchered the grammar of the second sentence. Don't quit your day job.

[Anonymous No.20244159]

>>20244146
That was a typo. Take out the word "which" and it's fixed.

[Anonymous No.20244389]

tavistock mods deleted my own thread but left up the book I edited lmao, shameless

[Anonymous No.20245058]

>>20243375
>Shakespeare
Wrote 120 odd love poems addressed to a youth. Friend and collaborator with open pederasts Christopher Marlowe and Richard Barnfield.
>Proust
Arrested in a male brothel. Described as exclusively homosexual by numerous contemporaries. Has a poem called pederasty.
>Hemingway
He’s not in the image.
>Wittgenstein
Describes cruising for sex with working class men in his diaries. Described as bisexual by colleagues.
>Frederick the Great
Never married or had sex with a woman. Populated his mansion with and statues of Ganymede. Described as homosexual by Voltaire. Wrote a poem where he describes Jesus and the beloved disciple as gay. Even depicted as gay in Nazi propaganda movies.

[Anonymous No.20245104]

>>20229653
literature is for FAGGOTS only. if you read you are a FAGGOT not a breeding cunt.

[Anonymous No.20245129]

Thank you Joel, this has been a good laugh. If somehow you DO get this published I wish you the best

[Anonymous No.20245131]

>>20229658
You are obviously a closet faggot.

[Anonymous No.20245523]

>>20232565
>its actually a clear example of active voice
spend some time on some ap english websites and do not return for like a year.

[Anonymous No.20245528]

>>20229658
Actually funny and enjoyable to read. OP is filtering grammar-clutchers who don't know how to weigh style for correctness.
>The LGBT hordes have become a problem; a problem that, unlike their victims, has gone unmolested.
Kekking

[Anonymous No.20245539]

It's a general issue with /lit/ books that they all lean on a specific type of humor. This is pretty much the latest version of berrycone or the peach book but now with a message.

[Anonymous No.20245876]

We need a compendium of 4chan authors, like those NSG reading lists, but less cringe.

[Anonymous No.20246026]

>>20234402
This is a shit post.
Good thing you have no grasp of grammar so you believe that what I am saying is that the posts in this thread in general are shit.

[Anonymous No.20246078]

>>20245058
Was anyone in theatre straight? There were a bunch of cross-dressing boys who acted and sounded feminine, and no women. It is no wonder that theatre was thought of as sinful.

[Anonymous No.20246187]

>>20230454
if balling you a jew, if you struggling you a nigga.
this is america.

[Anonymous No.20246189]

>>20234784
>capitalism is when you give gay people money for no reason

[Anonymous No.20246207]

>>20229658
holy shit lmfao

I'd say, going entirely off of preface, ease off of some of the harder lines (unlike their victims, forbidden knowledge) early on and try and hook readers later on. If you're really trying to convince people and not preach to a choir, it's going to need a lot of work. If you really hope for it to be a "future bestseller", this whole "abandon all hope" message isn't going to attract anyone.

[Anonymous No.20246229]

>>20229763
>unfortunately, it becomes a touching story
>>20229658
>a problem that, unlike its victims, has gone unmolested
Holy shit this is wonderful.

[Anonymous No.20246275]

WRITE A SOCRATIC DIALOGUE COMEDIC SCREENPLAY!
DO IT NOW!!!

[Anonymous No.20246409]

>>20243306
>Good luck getting women if you're five feet tall and your dick doesn't work.
holy based

[Anonymous No.20246579]

>>20246275
you mean like https://www.scribd.com/document/551280851/Unfiltered ?

t. The editor

[Anonymous No.20246632]

>>20229658
Your metaphor is off the charts.
Just like HIV in the gay community.

[Anonymous No.20246650]

>>20229658
Some of the funnier stuff I've read recently. Use less big words, drop your bias (rewrite it) and it might become readable

[Anonymous No.20246661]

>>20246275
Socrates is a good example of a gay who was not allowed to have his way

[Anonymous No.20246727]

>>20246661
>a gay
source?

[Anonymous No.20246791]

>>20246727
>SOCRATES: I saw inside his cloak and caught fire, and could possess myself no longer; and I thought none was so wise in love-matters as Cydias, who in speaking of a beautiful boy recommends someone to "beware of coming as a fawn before the lion, and being seized as his portion of flesh"; for I too felt I had fallen a prey to some such creature.
—Charmides 155d

>COMPANION: Where do you come from, Socrates? And yet I need hardly ask the question, for I know that you have been in chase of the fair Alcibiades. I saw him the day before yesterday; and he had got a beard like a man,–and he is a man, as I may tell you in your ear. But I thought that he was still very charming.
>SOCRATES: What of his beard? Are you not of Homer’s opinion, who says ’Youth is most charming when the beard first appears’? And that is now the charm of Alcibiades.
—Protagoras 309a

[Anonymous No.20246830]

>>20246791
Socrates didn't have sex with Alcibiades. source: Alcibiades .

[Anonymous No.20246893]

>>20246791
where's the gay?

[Anonymous No.20246963]

unironically kill yourself

[Anonymous No.20247445]

>>20243306
>laughinstocks
only among bigots
>trans men typically want to date women
hilariously wrong if you've ever spent any time with any trans men
>they would have had much better luck just being lesbians
they aren't lesbians and they don't want to date lesbians
>good luck getting women if you're five feet tall and your dick doesn't work
trans men generally have chill attitudes and know how to make women cum. good luck getting women if you're a hateful basement dwelling pseud and your dick still doesnt work after years of death grip fapping to hentai though
>sherlock-fucking-holmes
not how hyphens work
>the whole non-binary thing
congrats on smoking your first marijuana cigarette
>who really cares?
clearly the virgin who despite never interacting with a trans person has written, formatted and uploaded a comically worthless manifesto of over 100 pages. you've made a negative contribution to human culture and should kill yourself at your earliest convenience

[Anonymous No.20249358]

>>20229754
Kek, pretty kino line ngl, might have to check it out

[Anonymous No.20249990]

>>20229658
>phallic figures projected on the wall of Plato's cave
>The LGBT hordes have become a problem; a problem that, unlike their victims, has gone unmolested.
>I make frequent use of ad hominems throughout this book and I offer absolutely no apology for this.
Sold it to me in the first paragraph alone. Cheers, anon.

[Anonymous No.20250185]

>>20247445
>typed all this out
thanks for the effort tranny, youre still a fag

[Anonymous No.20250189]

I'm glad everyone else is enjoying this as much as I did

[Anonymous No.20250212]

>>20247445
i'm trans by the way

[Anonymous No.20250221]

>>20229658
I hate these people to and will continue to read. Ignore the usual /lit/ tranny "lesbians"

[Anonymous No.20250225]

>>20230621
This. It's too raw and polemical, but on to a good start negatively juxtaposing tolerance with understanding and should have explored this thought further. But he shifts to polemics and loses the narrative.

[Anonymous No.20250271]

to OP - I remember the ABC article "two dads are better than one" - this journalist is typical of the new breed of slime who write for our national broadcaster.

This stuff never gets discussed - I would not let homosexual or transgender monster anywhere near my children willingly. Good work.

[Anonymous No.20250337]

why is every literary effort that comes out of this website so cringe

[Anonymous No.20250342]

>>20250271
>I would not let homosexual or transgender monster anywhere near my children willingly
Yea they might end up with better life prospects >>20230389

[Anonymous No.20250373]

>>20250342
its just balding man

[Anonymous No.20250434]

>>20229653
>making multiple threads to promote your schizo manifesto
>using google drive as a backup
Lol, lmao perhaps

[Anonymous No.20250446]

>>20229754
I burst out laughing when I read this.

[Anonymous No.20250510]

>>20229658
May the Lord have mercy on us all

[Anonymous No.20250730]

>>20239871
>OP is now a professional writer and 1000 /lit/posting hopefuls still haven't published a single page

[Anonymous No.20250764]

>>20229754
This should have been the opening line.

[Anonymous No.20250825]

>>20247445
I don't disagree with you on your other points but you're legitimately delusional if you believe narrow shouldered, wide hipped, pube bearded, 4'9" trans men with chest scars have it better at dating than the average "cis" man. Perhaps you're one yourself and this is your way of coping with it; in which case, carry on.