[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 56 KB, 332x500, .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20186525 No.20186525 [Reply] [Original]

>Mucho Maas
>Dr Hilarius
seriously...?

what is the appeal of this book?

>> No.20186542

>>20186525
>NOOOOOOOOO YOU CANNOT HAVE CHARACTERS WITH WEIRD/SILLY NAMES, YOU MUST NAME EVERYONE BORING SHIT LIKE JOHN SMITH OR JAMES SCOTT. SILLINESS IS LE BAD

>> No.20186550
File: 15 KB, 251x242, 6dBt2Oj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20186550

>Oedpia settled back to await The Crying of Lot 49.

>> No.20186605

>>20186525
I can’t understand how someone can read the description of Mucho as a used car salesman and not get hooked on Pynchon. Maybe the scene hit me so hard bc I detailed cars at a poorer part of town than l lived in.

>> No.20186611

>>20186525
Mucho is a nickname though, isn't it?

>> No.20186770

>>20186525
Not from CoTL, but no name in literature tops the beautiful simplicity of Ploy.

>> No.20186832

>>20186605
That scene really hit me too. The way Pynchon writes that scene is beautiful. It's pretty much just a huge run on sentence but it was a perspective I was never aware about.
>"...a parade seven days a week, bringing the most godawful of trade-ins: motorized, metal extensions of themselves, of their families and what their whole lives must be like, out there so naked for anybody..."

>> No.20186854

>>20186550
stopped reading after this

>> No.20186856
File: 117 KB, 750x1000, fposter,small,wall_texture,product,750x1000.u2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20186856

>>20186525
BUILD MASS WITH SASS!

Real answer: stamp collector autism.

>> No.20186861

>>20186854
I LITERALLY put the book down

>> No.20187007

>>20186525
Part of the appeal is the silly names

>> No.20187027

>>20186525
What is the appeal of you?

>> No.20187432

>OP hasn't even gotten to the musical numbers yet

lmao

>> No.20187620

>>20186525
The appeal is that it is both charming, clever and funny, and those three in unison are very, very rare.

>> No.20187636

how does a lot cry

>> No.20187642

>>20187027
6'7".
Inherited 1.2 million dollars.
full head of hair.

>> No.20187653

>TOMMY PINECONE PLEBFILTERS YET ANOTHER ONE

>> No.20187729

I thought the book was pretty good

>> No.20187750

the problem for me was that it was insufficiently silly. and the main thing is so hard to care about. if it was a prank by her ex husbandu, how and why did he expect her to care about all this?

>>20186832
>we live in a 50/60s society

>> No.20187775
File: 103 KB, 900x900, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20187775

>>20187636
It's like a metaphor

>> No.20187782

>>20187750
Being a '60s spinster housewife sounds fun

>> No.20187805

>>20187636
Read the bible

>> No.20187835
File: 95 KB, 1090x1090, 1635626392232.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20187835

>Mike Fallopian
>Manny DiPresso
>Genghis Cohen

>> No.20187889

Lot 49 finds our boy Tommy making a big jump up in skill from V and really coming into his own style. But it's definitely thematically lighter than his work in GR and onward (duh, it's way shorter).

Bleeding Edge and Inherent Vice are fine, but obviously minor.

You guys know we likely don't have long before he croaks, right? Think he's got another book in him still?

>> No.20188018
File: 41 KB, 474x632, OIP (41).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20188018

>Joaquin Stick

>> No.20188144

>>20187889
V. is better than 49 though

>> No.20188499

>>20188144
It has more going on but he's to me still in search of his voice and the signature elements of his style are either absent or still in raw stages.

A decent chunk of the Benny Profane material in V is either just boring or is reminiscent of Kerouac/Beat bullshit in an unflattering and off-putting way.

There's obviously good stuff in there too, like the Mondaugen's section and V crushed by the beam. But Tommy's power level is still low at this point.

>> No.20189385

>>20186525
>Mucho Maas
Is it supossed to be translated as "Much more"? That's the joke?

>> No.20189411

>>20187889
>You guys know we likely don't have long before he croaks, right? Think he's got another book in him still?
He has one big book he wrote in the 80s/90s that he instructed not to release until he dies and that will be the last book released.

>> No.20189414

>>20189411
I heard it will be called Gravity's Rainbow 2: Slothrop Moons

>> No.20189459

>>20186525
Is it true he wanted to get out of a contract by writing 49, a book so horribly bad it would end his career in less than 300 pages?

>> No.20189467

>>20189459
>writes a masterpiece even when he's trying to be shit
How do we compete with that?

>> No.20189474

>>20186525
Still my favourite Pynchy

>> No.20189493

>>20189414
Slothrop will be a minor character

>> No.20189873

>>20189474
That's cause you're a pseud who lacks the willpower and aptitude to read long difficult books.

The one thing that 49 does best is build up nested layers of the larger Trystero conspiracy through various in-world mediums and texts (stamps, differing publications of The Courier's Tragedy, etc).

But thematically it's pretty shallow other than "hurr durr mid-60s paranoia"

Mason & Dixon is secretly his best book.

>> No.20189978

>>20189873
>But thematically it's pretty shallow other than "hurr durr mid-60s paranoia"
>this nigga has no idea that the thematic of paranoia is intrinsically aligned to the thematic of teleology
>this nigga overlooked the thematic relation because of weed jokes
>this nigga thinks that the most masterful and funny literary investigation of one of the primary philosophical concepts of 2300 years of western civilization is shallow
If only you could see what I see.

>> No.20190136

>>20189978
Bruh I just re-read 49 a couple months ago and it's really good and fun to read but it's just not as deep as his Big Books. Have you even read all of them?

>> No.20190212

>>20189411
That bad huh

>> No.20190441

>>20190212
If that's when he wrote it it's probably way better than IH & BE

>> No.20190474

>>20186542
Honestly, since first reading Pynchon like 20 years ago I'm very critical of boring names in literature. I can't read anything about Winston Smith or any other turd with a boring name without wondering why any writer would do that.

>> No.20190922

>>20186525
Charles Dickens gave some of his characters ridiculous names. Your complaint is a mirror into the banality of your soul

>> No.20190928

>>20190922
Pynchon's prose is very Dickensian in places as well. Definite influence there.

>> No.20190963

>>20189385
yes, i find it charming

>> No.20190969

Bumping the best pynch thread we’ve had in a bit. I’ve read all of his books except for ATD, BE and IV. Which should I read next?

>> No.20191034

>>20190969
Against the Day for sure. Inherent Vice is comparatively amateur.

>> No.20191085

>>20190969
>the best pynch thread we’ve had in a bit
Holy shit, this is sad man

>> No.20191138

tfw guy im in love with wants to get the stupid tattoo from the book

>> No.20191655

>>20191138
ywnbaw

>> No.20191678

>>20190969
>>20191034
Seconding AtD. BE and IV are among his worst, with BE being the very worst.

>> No.20191681

>>20187636
You're misreading the title, it means that Oedipa cries a lot.

>> No.20191709

>>20187636
The title refers to a "lot" being auctioned off or "cried."

>> No.20191719
File: 10 KB, 277x200, 1444591056898.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20191719

>>20191709
>hasn't read the book
oh no no no