[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View postΒ  Β 

File: 37 KB, 400x300, Kom El Shuqafa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20097197 No.20097197 [Reply] [Original]

π“…“π“Œƒπ“‚§π“…±π“‚‹π“Ίπ“ˆ– π“†Žπ“…“π“π“Š– edition

Feel free to share your experiences, resources, and sufferings from studying literary and old languages (except Latin) that nobody but autists bother with.
Latin studiers, Latin general is that-a-way -----> >>20090148

Previous: >>20077087

Greek/Latin Mega - https://mega dot nz/folder/9o4QEIIK#P3piz8Bfw-z7jgb7Q8NWDg

>> No.20097206

>>20097197
FUCK every language other than English.

>> No.20097220

If by fuck you mean ""hit" the books" for hours on end, that's the idea.

>> No.20097498

>>20097197
>π“…“π“Œƒπ“‚§π“…±π“‚‹π“Ίπ“ˆ– π“†Žπ“…“π“π“Š–
>π“‚‹π“Ίπ“ˆ– π“†Žπ“…“π“π“Š–
>r n kmt
>language of Egypt
What’s the whole translation?

>> No.20097556

How the hell do you learn where to put accents on verbs in greek? On nouns its easy but i cant figure out the verbs

>> No.20097596

>>20097498
mdw r n km.t
to speak/speaking the language of Egypt
it's missing the determinative of a man with his hand to his mouth, though

>> No.20097603

>>20097596
There’s no need of this determinative in β€œr”. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/r_n_kmt

>> No.20097610

>>20097603
i'm talking about the infinitive of mdwj

>> No.20097612

>>20097610
Oh, sorry. Am dumb.

>> No.20097621
File: 73 KB, 308x400, Papyrus_Ebers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20097621

What's your favourite non-literary text genre to read? I love reading Egyptian medical texts because they contain such interesting terminology.

>> No.20097637

>>20097596
Wrong, it's just the noun form

>> No.20097640

Here's how Egyptian determinatives work

You use them to clear up a word that sounds like another word

Meat (flesh)
Meet (together)

It is rather convuluted but that's just hieroglyphics

>> No.20097644

>>20097637
what text? it could be both the noun form and the infinitive without context

>> No.20097646

>>20097644
Its called a gerund

>> No.20097653

No one can actually read hieroglyphs

>> No.20097656

>>20097646
the gerund is technically the infinitive
so the translation would be 'a speaking' instead of 'speech' which is the noun mdw
>>20097640
mdw is also the word for 'staff', says Allen

>> No.20097657

>>20097653
Why do you say that?

>> No.20097661

>>20097197
How do I best learn greek grammar - Does any technique exist that helps one retain all that information?

>> No.20097666

>>20097661
Get the oxford greek grammar

>> No.20097672
File: 10 KB, 273x246, thoth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20097672

>his concise dictionary isn't beautifully handwritten
>his concise dictionary doesn't contain weirdly specific terms that only appear a few times in one text
>his concise dictionary isn't just cobbled together notes from an eminent scholar
oh no no no

>> No.20097675

>>20097661
>>20097666
Terrible advice. Oxford/Cambridge education material is seriously out of touch with the education concerns of ordinary people. We just have to wait for the LLPSI of Greek, though it has to use a different format, since LLPSI works differently since Latin and English are so similar, while Greek less than 5% so.

>> No.20097680

>>20097675
The oxford greek grammar is fine if you cant learn from it you cant learn greek
>llspi
Thats just terrible please go back to your containment thread

>> No.20097689

>>20097666
>>20097675
>>20097680
I have a danish grammar that I've been told has a better system than the dated oxford one - It disagrees with oxford on intricacies in categorization about temporality - so I don't need a grammar: I need to know a better way to learn and retain grammar.

>> No.20097694

>>20097689
Ah right you're one of those people
Peppa pig is in danish im sure so try that

>> No.20097696

>>20097689
>I need to know a better way to learn and retain grammar.
Keep reading primary texts. Bliv ved med at læse kildetekster. Keep reading primary texts.

>> No.20097710

>>20097675
>We just have to wait for the LLPSI of Greek
Check out LGPSI, but even still the Italian Athenaze is the best reader we have.

>> No.20097716

>>20097710
>LLPSI works differently since Latin and English are so similar, while Greek less than 5% so.
Did you not read my post. LGPSI is such a step backwards it hurts.

>> No.20097719

What are the most useful languages if I want to dive deep into christian mysticism? I guess the order should be Greek > Coptic > Latin.

>> No.20097726

>>20097716
It's the best you have if you are so afraid of grammar. This mythical textbook that will magically make you fluent in Greek doesn't and will not exist.

>> No.20097733

>>20097719
>christian mysticism
Pseudo-Dionysios is written in greek, and much of the desert fathers as well, plus the bible itself.

>> No.20097753

>>20097197
>>20097498
>>20097596
>>20097603
How do i learn ancient egyptian? My understanding is there was the seperate "heiroglyphic" script and a more normal script that wasnt used for writing in pyramids, and obviously these would have changed over the thousands of years.

>> No.20097758

>>20097726
I can understand the concerns of learning a new language. I've had them myself, but this urge I see on here to avoid grammar is pathetic and perplexing. People on /lit/ are supposed to be readers, and some are writers. It's true that learning a new language, at least in the traditional, non-LLPSI way, helps one's understanding of their own language. You'd think that /lit/izens would be interested in grammar. The turnover for Ranieri posters and input devotees must be incredible.

>> No.20097760

#Question

- What book on heiroglyphics show published inscriptions from and catalogues their source locations, preferably from the main locations?

- How do we know how close reconstructed Egyptian pronunciation probably was?

>> No.20097769

>>20097758
>Ranieri
Please kill yourself. Literally nobody fucking brings him up besides you.

>> No.20097785

>>20097556
look up recessive accent

>> No.20097791

>>20097661
Textbook + Smyth's Grammar
Smyth's is a reference book and an excellent one
For textbook I recommend Mastronarde Introduction to Attic

>> No.20097793

>>20097689
read as much as you can. best way is through practice. If authentic texts with translations are too difficult scour every textbook you can find for sample sentences and passages. The Mega has a ton

>> No.20097830

>>20097758
Input is the only way to actually get to a stage in which you're able to produce your target language correctly.
Doesn't matter how many pages of grammar you read. You need to consume the language in context.

>> No.20097841

>>20097830
stay in the containment thread tranny

>> No.20097847

>>20097830
go back to your thread holy fuck

>> No.20097868

>>20097753
Google "ancient egyptian textbooks" lmao

>> No.20097876

>>20097868
lmfao this its so bizarre hearing questions like that

>> No.20098074

I'm learning Lithuanian language.
You just know

>> No.20098187

>>20097661
People here are too beliigerent. You just need to practice a lot. Reference grammars like Smyth and Cambridge are useful but not for learning stuff about grammar initially, and they won't teach you vocabulary, which is at least equally important. I would just go for a textbook. Athenaze, JACT, Zuntz, these are all pretty good. Learn To Read Greek is OK I guess. I wouldn't use Mastronarde or H&Q alone because neither has that much Greek text in it.

>> No.20098198

>>20097868
different anon, but any particular one you (or anyone else) would recommend?

>> No.20098208

>>20098198
Allen even though it's kind of autistic

>> No.20098301 [DELETED]Β 

>>20097753
If you want material to study, look on /t/.

>> No.20098431
File: 89 KB, 1920x1080, 1558201141162.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20098431

Thinking of taking a Latin 101 class over the summer
What am I in for? Never studied a foreign language before

>> No.20098616

Can we talk about language education methods? I don't want Ranieri wars, but comprehensible input, vocabulary drilling, and hard grammar study, all seem highly prescribable methods to be used in combination, at least as our level of technology will allow. Vocabulary drilling is obviously still the most mind numbing of them.

>> No.20098695

>>20097753
I recommend Gardiner’s grammar, despite the fact that it is a little bit dated, but Allen’s is also good, though not very didactic. Wiktionary is also unironically helpful. There are some dictionaries you can easily find on-line, but here its is a link for one of them: https://archive.org/details/DictionaryOfMiddleEgyptian.. Strangely, learning Egyptian is like learning Japanese. If you want an Anki deck I’ve made on the ~32 uniliteral hieroglyphs, just tell me.

>> No.20098706

>>20097675
The Oxford classical grammar book is perfectly fine for referencing grammar principles. In fact, the self-learner/student should consult it frequently for support and review. I have found it an absolutely fantastic resource that summarizes the sometimes confusing lay-outs of intro text books.

>> No.20098727

>>20098706
Maybe, but they seriously need a more clear memorable and discerning format. Almost everything from Oxbridge I've used has seems to use intentionally clunky methods and refuses to fill helpful explanatory gaps on purpose.

>> No.20098791

>>20097410
Was that how they learned it? By copying it out? I've heard they'd also do what we'd recognize today as cloze-deletion tests.

>> No.20098831

>>20097470
How do I become a professor of classics in China

>> No.20098834

>>20097197
>π“…“π“Œƒπ“‚§π“…±π“‚‹π“Ίπ“ˆ– π“†Žπ“…“π“π“Š–
That says mdw r n kmt/β²™β²Ÿβ²©β²§β²£β²Ÿβ²›Μ€β²•β²β²™β²“ right? (Coptic reflex might be wrong, I don't really speak Coptic.)

>> No.20098845

>>20097653
Lol.

>> No.20098883

>>20097680
There are plenty of intelligent people who don't know the sort of highly specialized terms in a book like that. Most Ancient Greeks spoke it fluently despite knowing nothing of them.

>> No.20098887

>>20097675
>since Latin and English are so similar, while Greek less than 5% so
Er... aren't they all three from different branches of IE? Or do you just mean English has more loans from Latin?

>> No.20098903

>>20097753
I have other languages I'm focusing on currently but I plan to do it like Perepelkin did- first learn Coptic, then learn to read Egyptian in Coptic reflexes.
>>20097841
>>20097847
They're not wrong, though. The evidence supports them.

>> No.20098909

>>20098431
At university they're likely to use backwards methods, I know mine does.

>> No.20098918

>>20098909
Could you elaborate?

>> No.20098924

>>20098918
They're likely to focus on grammar-translation and rote memorization of forms rather than comprehensible input despite all the evidence (which I can link if you like.)

>> No.20098951

>>20098924
Yeah that's be nice

>> No.20098981

>>20098951
https://books.google.com/books?id=HrhkAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=Approaches%20and%20Methods%20in%20Language%20Teaching&hl=es&pg=PA6#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://eidolon.pub/teaching-latin-to-humans-4e6b489b4e17
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_EQDtpYSNM
https://www.sk.com.br/sk-krash.html
http://blogicarian.blogspot.com/2019/03/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWOjBulEyrs
https://magisterp.com/2018/07/02/studies-showing-the-ineffectiveness-grammar-instruction/
https://books.google.com/books?id=_udVA--sg4kC&lpg=PA251&dq=grammar-translation%20latin&pg=PA250#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2058631020000513

>> No.20099042

>>20098431
Please go to LLL, linked in the OP.

>> No.20099088

>>20098909
>>20098924
shoo shoo Esperanto tranny
You shit up the Latin thread and now shit up this one as well.
For the record this troon knows neither Latin nor Greek yet will tell you all about how to learn them and how what you are doing is wrong.

>> No.20099120

Some Classical Chinese discussion at >>>/his/13034109

>> No.20099336

>>20099088
Calling me names does not suspend the scientific facts about human brains.

>> No.20099352

>>20099088
Where'd he talk about Esperanto? I don't follow these threads.

Also hi, what languages are you studying?

>> No.20099353

what's some nice easy medieval latin

>> No.20099360

>>20099352
It's true- I do speak Esperanto. But that has nothing to do with whether I'm right or wrong.

>> No.20099789

#Questions

- What language education method overview books give the best information?

- What book on hieroglyphics show published inscriptions from and references their source locations, preferably from the major Egyptian monuments and locations?

- How do we know how close reconstructed Egyptian pronunciation probably was?

>> No.20099801

>>20099336
>>20099360
why not learn latin and greek if you are so adamant on frequenting these threads? do you just get off on everyone hating you?

>> No.20099843

>>20099801
Eas linguas disco, sed mihi adhuc tamen sunt multa discenda.

>> No.20099859

Akkadichads, is Akkadian worth learning for some who knows Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic? I love the Epic of Gilgamesh, and I know that I will never be able to learn Akkadian in a classroom. I'm trying to be an independent scholar, but from what I understand, Assyriology is very oversaturated, and there are already tons of people like me in the field. Is there any benefit in me learning it for scholarly purposes, not just enjoyment? How linguistically helpful will it be for me? I'm looking at Ge'ez, Syriac, Old English, and Coptic in the near future, based on what's available to me and what I'm interested in, but I hope to learn Akkadian in 20 years.

>> No.20099890
File: 3.08 MB, 1596x1417, 1597038116115.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20099890

Ok language nerds.
This is supposedly the body and letters recovered from Apollo 20s mission near the big stone ship.
Just humour me and pretend it's real.

What language does the letters in pic related look like?

>> No.20099898
File: 22 KB, 453x312, 8e54a41665b8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20099898

>>20099890
Apologies the quality is terrible

>> No.20099915
File: 117 KB, 600x683, 1647896309444.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20099915

>>20099890
It's impossible to discern because it's so blurry, but it looks like cuneiform or Syriac to me, but then again, it looks more scribbly than those scribble languages. It's obviously written with ink, but it has similar qualities to the script you see on clay tablets.

>> No.20099935

>>20099859
Try asking in the cuneiform thread on /his/ but it's almost reached the bump limit.

>> No.20100146

getting a bit confused/overwhelmed by indirect speech/optative, etc..., usually I try to self correct my own exercised but can any Hellasbro give a green light on this?(Athenaze chapter 25 exercise f)
I'm interest mostly on whether I'm using optative/infinitives correctly with the (past/historic) verbs, not so much precise translation
>Ὁ ΞšΟΞΏαΏ–ΟƒΞΏΟ‚ ᾀΡτο αὐτὸς Ξ΅αΌΆΞ½Ξ±ΞΉ α½€Ξ»Ξ²ΞΉΟŽΟ„Ξ΅ΟΞΏΟ‚ αΌ€Ξ½ΞΈΟΟŽΟ€Ο‰Ξ½, ἀλλ' ὁ Ξ£ΟŒΞ»Ο‰Ξ½ ΡἢπΡ ὅτι ἄλλους ὀλβιωτέρους ἴδοι. ἬρΡτο ΞΏα½–Ξ½ Ο„α½ΈΞ½ Ξ£ΟŒΞ»Ο‰Ξ½Ξ± διὰ τί κρίνοι ἄλλους ὀλβιωτέρους. Ὁ Ξ΄α½² Ξ£ΟŒΞ»Ο‰Ξ½ ἀπΡκρίνατο οὐδένα νομί΢Ριν ὄλβιον πρὢν μάθοι ΞΊΞ±Ξ»αΏΆΟ‚ τΡλΡυτῆσαι Ο„α½ΈΞ½ Ξ²Ξ―ΞΏΞ½. Ὠργίσθη Ξ΄α½² ὁ ΞšΟΞΏαΏ–ΟƒΞΏΟ‚ Ξ£ΟŒΞ»Ο‰Ξ½ΞΉ ΞΊΞ±α½Ά αΌ€Ο€Ξ­Ο€Ξ΅ΞΌΟˆΞ΅Ξ½ Ξ±α½Ο„ΟŒΞ½, Ξ½ΞΏΞΌΞ―ΟƒαΎ±Ο‚ αὐτὸν αΌ€ΞΌΞ±ΞΈαΏ†. ΞœΞ΅Ο„α½° Ξ΄α½² ταῦτα Ο€ΟŒΞ»Ξ»Ξ± ἔπαθΡ ΞΊΞ±ΞΊα½° ὁ ΞšΟΞΏαΏ–ΟƒΞΏΟ‚ ΞΊΞ±α½Ά αΌ”ΞΌΞ±ΞΈΞ΅ ὅτι ὁ Ξ£ΟŒΞ»Ο‰Ξ½ Ξ΅α½– κρίνοι.
Original(translated from Italian):
>Croesus considered himself the happiest of men, but Solon said that he saw happier ones. He asked then Solon why did he judge others were happier. Solon then answered that he didn't judge anyone happy/blessed until he learned they experienced a good death. Croesus got angry at Solon and sent him away, considering him a fool. After these (events) Croesus suffered many bad things and realized Solon had spoken/judged correctly.

>> No.20100167

>>20097206
Inconceivably based. Only language that will go to the stars. Pretty wild to think about planets at this moment beyond our humble ken that will be speaking a version of English in 12,000 years. But that just goes to show the flow of the Anglo.

>> No.20100179

>>20100167
OK chud.

>> No.20100432

>>20099898
theres no way of telling what that is

>> No.20100451

>be indo-euros
>gang bang our way across europe to india
>have bastard children languages all along the way
based

>> No.20100517

>>20100451
>our

>> No.20100520

>>20100167
But modern English is not organic. It was intentionally influenced to take stuff from Latin and Greek.

>> No.20100545
File: 94 KB, 498x468, chudjak-poljak.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20100545

>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T HECKIN POINT OUT ENGLISH IS A MUTT LANGUAGE OR THAT CHUDS VICARIOUSLY LIVE THROUGH ANCESTORS WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN DISGUSTED WITH THEM

>> No.20100569

>it's another episode of an irrelevant ESL shitting up the thread

>> No.20100983

>>20100517
Yea, "our" makes sense because green text is used for quotations. Anon started it out with "be indo-euros"

>> No.20101104
File: 28 KB, 661x323, 86525738d45d3f6106317237b8ccbff2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20101104

>>20100451
Which child was the prettiest? which one the smartest?

>> No.20101108

>>20097841
>>20097847
Hello midiwts. How many languages can you speak?
Pretty sure I'm more qualified to speak about language learning as I've learned both dead languages and modern, living languages to varying degrees.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing a Grammar textbook alongside comprehensible input. I'm not a proponent for completely avoiding Grammar, but you shouldn't be spending majority of your time drilling conjugations and declinations, complete waste of time. And that's coming from someone who's spent probably 500 hours or more with my face glued to a Grammar textbook.

>> No.20101123

>>20101108
Damn looks like I'll never learn Akkadian. It lacks CI :(

>> No.20101143

>>20101123
No, you won't.

>> No.20101168

>>20101143
I should ask my Akkadian professor how he learned it

>> No.20101894
File: 602 KB, 1280x1731, 2553 - a9d59823ccc4ea87ec07ad78cabf9d95.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20101894

> TUTEMET carnem canis edito
> TUTEMET consuetudinem basiandi aquilam accipito
> TUTEMET pueros tuos cinaedam in disciplinam pediconum ascribito
> TUTEMET sedem et domicilium in insula habitato
> TUTEMET ad nostrorum deorum cultum eruditor
> TUTEMET maribus in balneas solis ito
> TUTEMET nobis vectigalia tributaque pendito
> TUTEMET maiestatem imperatorculi subito (non quidem est rex quia . . . modo non est, bene!?)
> TUTEMET auxilia capessito
> TUTEMET togam sumito
> nihil diripto
> laetus estoque

>> No.20101907

>>20099935
I can't find it in the archive. Can you link it?

>> No.20102164

>>20101104
>Oscan-Umbrian
What could've been :(

>> No.20102296

These threads are struggling to stay afloat. If lit was 10x less active, we'd be able to garrison to keep it from page 10 during our sleep cycle. If we exhaust clg without Latin, it's fine. We had a good series of threads.

>> No.20102301

>>20102296
The split was honestly a bad idea. The solution was not to ban Latin, but rather to just not engage with B*ld M*n bait.

>> No.20102310

>>20102301
Let's give it a few years, and maybe the Latin learners will branch to Greek/Sanskrit/Classical Chinese, since those have the biggest catalogs to read in, and we'll have enough enthusiasts to make clg sans Latin threads work.

Guys, it will have been all right. We put in an effort, but artificially supporting these threads will exhaust good intentions.

>> No.20102343

>>20101907
hi anon, I'm the op of that bread. It has since died
>>>/his/13006431
It's not very linguistically helpful, since Akkadian is the only known eastern semitic language (its closest relative was Eblaite). You'd have to get a basic understanding of Sumerian at least, and learn all the various graphies of cuneiform in order to have access to all cuneiform texts.

>> No.20102366

>>20102310
Please no, at least not until my questions have been answered.

I was able to complete the last wave of questions, including the one in /lll/, now I have these four


#Questions

- What language education method overview books give the best information?

- What Greek textbook using Latin as its base language is recommended?

- What book on hieroglyphics show published inscriptions from and references their source locations, preferably from the major Egyptian monuments and locations?

- How do we know how close reconstructed Egyptian pronunciation probably was?

>> No.20102392

>>20102366
Someone already answered #2 last thread for you. #1 is heavily debated. Look into the books and choose one, maybe two. #3 not sure. #4 It is impossible to know. Reconstructions of Egyptian are made using best guesses informed by Coptic, Semitic languages, and, in some cases, there are descriptions of the sounds made when pronouncing a letter(s). I don't know if the latter exists for Egyptian, but such guides appear in ancient sources for some languages.

>> No.20102454

>>20102392
1, I really just want a chapter or a few going over the major methods and their pros and cons. The least viable that I know are the G-T method which is mind numbing, and the Direct/Natural method, which only works if one is rich enough to have an expert teaching. Most of us can't work with either method.

2, I looked at a bunch, including the ones mentioned, but they're in poorly scanned and very old unreadable copies. Some people mentioned a standard medieval Greek textbook in Latin, but I haven't been able to find any.

3 is very niche. I can't find any, and it may be a while before somebody mentions a French diehard historian's work on it

I just got 4 answered. We will never know some missing vowels despite other gaps being filled, so I'm just going with MEP.

>> No.20102497

>>20102454
>1, I really just want a chapter or a few going over the major methods and their pros and cons. The least viable that I know are the G-T method which is mind numbing, and the Direct/Natural method, which only works if one is rich enough to have an expert teaching. Most of us can't work with either method.
Hilariously enough, modern textbooks rarely even cover Comprehensible Input, even though that's been around for a while. It's like language education is trying to subvert language learning.

>> No.20102525

>>20102343
I just read through it all. Very cool project. I hope to see you often in /clg/. I asked about Akkadian from a linguistic perspective because it is referenced with some frequency in Hebrew and Aramaic textbooks and dictionaries. Does shaphel sound like a familiar term to you, a causative verb type that begins with "sh"? I'm just looking for ways to justify me learning Akkadian down the road. Maybe, being an expert is unreasonable, but maybe, it can inform my other studies.

>> No.20102546

>>20102525
I personally have no knowledge of Hebrew or Aramaic, but there is a causative aspect in Akkadian, and it also uses sh/ő. If in "shaphel" the sh marks the causative, I presume the root would be something like '-p-l. apālum is "to answer" in akkadian, and the causative infinitive őūpulum would be "to cause to/make answer".
How close?

>> No.20102607

>>20102546
Yeah, that's it. Hebrew and Aramaic verb types are named based on what is added to them (prefix and vowels). For instance, haphel, the non-Akkadian Aramaic causative, is distinguished by its Χ” (h) prefix, "a" first vowel, and "e" second vowel. The only difference between the haphel and the shaphel is Χ© (sh) vs Χ”. There is no difference in meaning.
How many verb types are there in Akkadian, i.e. simple, intensive, causative? Akkadian must be really hard. If you had any interest in Hebrew, you could learn it easily, and from there, learning Aramaic would take you a day or two before you could read Daniel. Semitic languages are so much fun yet learning them is so discouraged by plebs.

>> No.20102628

>>20102454
>1, I really just want a chapter or a few going over the major methods and their pros and cons. The least viable that I know are the G-T method which is mind numbing, and the Direct/Natural method, which only works if one is rich enough to have an expert teaching. Most of us can't work with either method.
Don't know nothin bout no chapters splainin thangs. It seems to me that your big issue with self-study is that it doesn't work for you, like most people. Unfortunately, you're just stuck. You've just got to keep bashing your head against the wall if you want to learn the language. Simply put, just learn to code. Sorry.

>> No.20102639

>>20102607
There are 4 main themae in akkadian, numbered I-IV or marked G/D/Ε /N after their German names and characteristic features.
I or G is the basic verb meaning, infinitive "parāsum"
II or D(oppelstamm) has a reduplicated second radical, infinitive "purrusum". Its meanings vary, but it's used as a causative aspect for state verbs.
III or Ε  is the causative, and IV/N is the passive, with the infinitive "naprusum".
Added to these are the iterative and reciprocal aspects marked by -tan- and -ta- infixes respectively, and an R thema in northern dialects I haven't been able to work out yet. So "Ε‘utaprusum" would mean "to divide each other/among themselves".
Towards the end of my second year I kinda realised akkadian is a very difficult language. I've never felt it personally, because it's fascinated me from the start and I threw myself at it with a vigour I hadn't even reserved for Tolkien's elvish. I might take a look at Aramaic soon, actually, since it would be very useful, and I've started to appreciate semitic languages more

>> No.20102667

That reminds me, I think clg will be more sustainable if we allow limited modern language and conlang discussion.

>> No.20102690

>>20102639
I am the dumb
"to cause* to divide among themselves/each other"

>> No.20102766

>>20102667
>limited modern language and conlang discussion
No, one Esperanto tranny is already too much

>> No.20102780

>>20102766
If anything we need more Esperantists. A lot of inaccessible works in dozens of minor languages have been unified under Esperanto translation.

Modern languages have works that still are literary and classical. French has lesser covered works that use dated French language, but honestly are a good fit for this thread.

>> No.20103008

Interslavic chads where we at

>> No.20103161
File: 720 KB, 1944x2592, Augusto_di_pirma_porta,_inv._2290,_02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20103161

>>20101894
begone, nigger slave meme-poster.

>> No.20103728

>>20103008
Also interested in Interslavic. How good is it as a lingua franca vs Russian?

>> No.20104091
File: 283 KB, 1920x450, Contendings_of_Horus_and_Seth_(CBL_Pap_1.2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20104091

For me it's the mythological tale where Horus' cum answers from inside the stomach of Seth.

>> No.20104108

>>20102780
esperanto is literally nothing but latin roots
what utter garbage i'd rather speak mexican

>> No.20104237
File: 181 KB, 1187x768, EzNTOXhVUAkofdZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20104237

Good evening.
I've just came about a lot of spare time recently and it should last for at least two years. I've always wanted to learn Greek and Latin and I suppose I'd rather start with Greek.

My questions are: For me to read and enjoy the epics, the lyric poets, Herodotus, Thucydides, Xenophon, the tragedians, the philosophers and anything else I want until the end of the Hellenistic age, how many different "Greek languages" would I have to learn?
Also: is two years of reasonable diligence - a few hours everyday - enough for me to get to a point where I can read a normal text with a good rhythm?

>> No.20104262
File: 2.78 MB, 406x720, 1647968140367.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20104262

I know this thread isn’t about Latin, but, since I’m not a Ranierifag, I feel free to post here. I will start to handwrite every fucking word of LLPSI in a notebook. What do you think, chad/clg/bros? In fact I already know the three first declensions and some conjugations, but I feel like I am lost right now.

>> No.20104298

>>20104237
>two years of reasonable diligence - a few hours everyday - enough
Yes, most likely
>how many different "Greek languages" would I have to learn?
One. There are a few dialects but they aren't difficult once you understand the basics of the language and each dialect's quirks. Most learners begin with Attic then branch out into others. My first reading was Herodotus which is Ionic and it took all of a week or two to get the dialect down.

>> No.20104329

>>20103728
I've been using it to post on the ex-yugo general on /int/. It works great to get your point across, but understanding the other language still requires some legwork. Basically they knew everything I was saying, while I had to use google translate to understand them.
Tried it on a russian once and his only reply was "what", but I didn't explain beforehand and the post was rather short so he might've thought I was butchering ruskie

>> No.20104339

Any good attic greek pronunciation guides for the alphabet on youtube? I'm a complete beginner and I don't know what to trust.

>> No.20104344
File: 24 KB, 440x534, 1617644783545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20104344

>>20104262
>that webm

>> No.20104350

>>20104262
Post in the Latin general you retard

>> No.20104362

>>20104237
In 2 years, you can read Xenophon and Herodotus. It will take more time to read Thucydides. He and Aristotle are incredibly hard to read, iirc. It's perfectly fine to start with Greek first. Learning one will help with the other, and dare I say, learning Greek first is better than learning Latin first, at least when it comes to understanding grammar.
Here's what you need to know about reading YWNBATRWUAD (you will never be able to read without using a dictionary). That's just how it is. There are tons of words that are hard to remember, have unique usages and forms, and only show up once. Eventually, you'll be reading at a decent pace, and unique language things will fascinate you as if you were walking through museum. At least that's where I'm at now with Homer. Here is an excerpt that was highlighted in my homework. I just liked the simplicity of, he brought her there with her stuff and then sent her away without her stuff.
>τὴν ἐπΡὢ ἂρ δΡῦρ᾽ αΌ€Ξ³Ξ±Ξ³αΎ½ αΌ…ΞΌαΎ½ ἄλλοισι κτΡάτΡσσιν,
>αΌ‚Οˆ α½… Ξ³Ξ΅ τὴν ἀπέλυσΡ λαβὼν ἀπΡρΡίσι᾽ ἄποινα

>> No.20104438

>>20104362
>>20104298
thank you for your help

>> No.20104456

>>20104339
Try to mimic this guy. He's a native Greek and his reconstructed classical pronunciation is excellent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Am71Njxz0eI

>> No.20104468

>>20100520
Hence why there is no need to learn backwards languages unless you are purposefully doing it to translate documents that haven't been translated to English yet.

>> No.20104517

>>20104350
Read the first sentence again.

>> No.20104617

How should I endeavor to learn Sanskrit?

>> No.20104636

>>20104617
>low effort faggotry
ngmi

>> No.20104671

>>20104636
:(

>> No.20104714

Be nice. Also yes where does one start with Sanskrit? Don't make me add it to my list of Questions.

>> No.20105206
File: 19 KB, 524x439, 18342811_1430051137054171_6460587892953475452_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20105206

Sorry for the reddit

>> No.20105215

>>20104714
Thank you for defending me

>> No.20105773

#Questions

- What language education method overview books give the best information for each kind, including Comprehensible Input?

- Where can I find a list of the major Greek hapax legomenons?

- What Greek textbook using Latin as its base language is recommended?

- What book on hieroglyphics show published inscriptions from and references their source locations, preferably from the major Egyptian monuments and locations?

>> No.20106447

I've narrowed things down.

>>20105773
#Question

- What Greek textbook using Latin as its base language is recommended?

>> No.20106520

>>20097556
You just have to learn it, say it out loud with the pitch. Eventually you just remember it with enough practice

>> No.20106688

>>20106520
Right. Comes naturally with their sentence flow. Just like how if you only know noun accents in English you eventually get almost everything else right.

>> No.20106945

>>20101104
Lmfao this list doesn't even have Celtic wtf

>> No.20106968

>>20106447

#Question

- Greek textbooks with Latin as base language: Which was the benchmark classic standard for the postclassical world? What are some other useful ones?

>> No.20106990
File: 96 KB, 568x548, 1628924521976.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20106990

>>20104671
Anon I think that you should pursue Sanskrit and Pali too! I have no advice though, because I know nothing about it. I wish you luck homie.

>> No.20107134
File: 95 KB, 1101x972, gilgamess.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20107134

Anons, in order to make firm my grasp of Akkadian, I am writing a fantasy memoir in cuneiform, heavily inspired by works like Anabasis, On the Gallic War, Gilgamesh and Enkidu in the Cedar Forest, and the Neo-Assyrian royal expeditions. Are there any other works I can read that have this structure? I'd like to find inspiration in indian or chinese literature too, but I don't know where to start there. Any advice in general is appreciated

>> No.20107138

>>20107134
should be *travel memoir, just to be clear

>> No.20107541

>>20097556
verbs are the easy ones. Except for some forms (infinitives, some participles, some imperatives) the accent goes as far back as possible according to the rules of vowel length and contraction. It's the nouns and adjectives you have to learn it for

>> No.20107579

>>20101104
Pictish

>> No.20107592

>>20105206
priorities

>> No.20107605

>>20105206
Pictish for goose is gèadh and so is it in all Celtic

>> No.20107958

>>20097672
faulkner's dictionary is so goddamn aesthetic

>> No.20108739

#Questions

I have no questions, I've cleared them all, anons.

>> No.20108859

>>20101123
Try to find some way to bootstrap it?

>> No.20108881

>>20102454
Instead of using Egyptological pronunciation, you could learn Coptic first and read in Coptic reflexes. That's what Perepelkin did and he apparently read Egyptian fairly fluently.

>> No.20108889

>>20102780
Bazite.
>>20104108
A good part of the vocabulary is Germanic and Slavic. But more to the point, a language is not just a bag of words; its grammar is pretty un-IE, being agglutinative.

>> No.20108902

>>20104262
Seems like a lot of toil for unclear benefit.

>> No.20108909

>>20105206
I mean, it would work on me.

>> No.20108929

In the old thread, the number sequence for bootstrapping Chinese characters made sense. But how would it bridge to other ideograms? CCPSI using this bootstrapping method would be one of the best things ever btw

>> No.20108941

>>20108929
How would you learn pronunciation?

>> No.20109112

>>20098887
Yeah, English has more loans from latin. Also using the Latin script, so you're just learning 1 thing instead of 2.

>> No.20109171

>>20108941
Very good question. How do the Chinese learn pronunciation from books? There are obviously easy illustrations and instructions for this, but for the needlessly difficult (but conceptually sufficient, as it may become required to relearn Chinese after an apocalypse, reducing technology to a medieval level) bootstrapping concept, one would have to teach mouth anatomy by Hanzi alone, and the anatomical procedures to produce sounds. After such bootstrapping in itself can be proved possible, I can be satisfied a potential loss future setting can rediscover Chinese, and I will settle for using illustrations the way LLPSI does.

It's possible to teach sound rules to and from the various Chinese scripts used to transcribe this already, including the Mongolian script from the 13th C. commissioned by Kublai Khan. These can be included with the bootstrapping concept for convenience, and because they will be necessary for translating certain artifacts.

>> No.20109368

Are there any Chinese Hellenists? I would be interested to hear how the pronounce the pitch accents.

>> No.20109546

>>20108941
its has no pronunciation

>> No.20109568

>>20109368
>e pronounce the pitch accents.
no point

>> No.20109674

>>20109368
I've seen some around. If we bump still, they might see. I imagine Chinese Hellenists experience extreme phonetic degradation, at least those without trilingual Western educations. Most of them literally can't hear the differences between new sounds. Not that they're incapable, but extra steps need to be taken to make it clear and conscious.

>> No.20109932

>>20108929
>>20109171
>>20109674
This has been done before. Gimme a while and I'll post the book

>> No.20110213

>>20109171
Goddamn, are you German or something? Fucking system autist.

>> No.20110587

Where are the Greek posters?

What's a good Bible for linguistic notes for Hebrew, Greek, etc, used?

>> No.20110599

>>20110587
Or a book of linguistic notes about the Bible

>> No.20110904

>>20110587
What do you mean by linguistic notes? What kind of information are you aiming to learn?

>> No.20111000

>>20109171
>How do the Chinese learn pronunciation from books?
They learn the spoken language first and then their teachers show them the characters and tell them their pronunciations orally. Nowadays that process goes by way of pinyin.

>> No.20111005

>>20109368
I was watching a Great Courses video series about Ancient Greek and the instructor mentioned that he once had a student who was a native Chinese speaker and he could pronounce the pitch accents fine.
>>20109546
What are you talking about? Of course Chinese characters have pronunciation.
>>20109568
Couldn't you say the same for any phonemic distinction you find tricky, by that logic?

>> No.20111022

>>20111005
What about Chinese directly into Greek

>> No.20111027

>>20111022
What do you mean?

>> No.20111053

>>20111027
How do they unclutter themselves from Chinese phonology and learn Greek? Especially book only. Is Chinese precise enough to convey the sound differences?

Honest questions, not to sound condescending. It's obviously much easier to unclutter oneself from English monoglotdom into Greek, as the writing system and phonology are much more similar.

>> No.20111063 [DELETED]Β 
File: 32 KB, 480x601, Hide-the-Pain-Harold.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20111063

𓉐𓅱
𓉐𓅓

>> No.20111080

>>20111053
I don't know, you could probably mostly explain the sounds the letters make.

>> No.20111203

I'm back with my specific questions mostly no one can answer. But this one should be easier.

#Question

- For Hellenic anons, which commentaries/guides on Sophocles and Aeschylus do you recommend?

>> No.20111696

>>20110587
Greek posters are too busy trooning out probably.

>> No.20112724

>>20111696
Midwit cope. The real reason we rarely post is because we are actually trying to learn the language.

>> No.20113301
File: 98 KB, 599x899, FAGGOT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20113301

uh yeah ok then

>> No.20113400

>>20112724
This

>> No.20113941

any sanskrit chads here?

>> No.20113993

>>20113941
theres barely any greek cucks. there were 2 sanskrit students in an old thread, but havent heard from them in a while, and they might have just given up on it. native sanskrit learners in india wouldnt want to visit this hellhole

>> No.20114343

How many gaps exist in knowledge of Ancient Chinese pronunciation, and how accurate the current research seem when compared with what we can't know yet? What are the chances there are more research-pushing pronunciation guides hiding in a cache somewhere?

>> No.20114458
File: 58 KB, 976x850, _91408619_55df76d5-2245-41c1-8031-07a4da3f313f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20114458

I cannot differentiate between a long consonant and glottal stop followed by a consonant.

>> No.20114462

>>20114458
>between
Just remove it ffs.
>and
from a

>> No.20114498

>>20113941
I am still here, but it is fucking hard.
Sanskrit is demanding.

>> No.20114560

>>20113993
We are called GREEK CHADS, and we still exist.

>> No.20114610
File: 200 KB, 245x463, dom.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20114610

>>20114560
AYO GIBS ME DAT GREEK TWINK

>> No.20114637

>>20114560
Now that I think of it, we should do a language survey of this thread. I created a Straw Poll. I think we should add another one in the OP of the next thread.
https://www.strawpoll.me/46004428

>> No.20114639

>>20114610
why don't you go back to your Esperanto Duolingo

>> No.20115075

>>20114610
Black Ranieri please no...

>> No.20115092

>>20114458
You do this naturally in English

What (i)n
Yes you are welcome

>> No.20115096

>>20114343
>many gaps exist in knowledge of Ancient Chinese pronunciation
90%
Its all guesswork with less evidence than proto-indo-european

>> No.20115133

>>20104517
So? There's a Latin thread. Post in it you fucking retard. I don't care if you aren't a ranieri circle jerker. God damn you're stupid.

>> No.20115183

>>20115133
Be nice. Why so abusive?

>> No.20115194

>>20115133
What was even the point of separating Latin in to a different general? Especially seeing how it sucked all the life out of /clg/. Imagine not being able to talk about Ferrari in /f1/ or virginity in /KPOP/

>> No.20115253

>>20115194
clgs recently been 99% llpsi meta shitposting ic u havent noticed retard

>> No.20115694

>>20114343
Reconstructions for Old Chinese are pretty uncertain and varied. Middle Chinese is much less so, though- a friend who's familiar with it said the different reconstructions are on par with different accents of one language.

>> No.20115704

>>20114639
Hey, it's me, the Esperanto girl, I've tried Duolingo and it sucks. Don't associate me with that crap.

>> No.20115724

I'd rather spend my time learning Hittite than esperanto, specially since i know the kind of persons (((use)))) esperanto

>> No.20115744

>>20115724
Shouldn't the triple parentheses be around "persons"? But I really haven't noticed all that many Jewish people in Esperantujo, in my experience, though there are a few.

>> No.20115764

>>20115704
>girl
kek

>> No.20115766

>>20115704
How often do you dilate? Do you always make sure to do it? Many trannies seem to resent dilation, which is funny because it's just fucking your wound with a dildo, yet they are obsessed coomers. I'm curious on your perspective, as a brave transwoman.

>> No.20115771

>>20115764
Yes, I am a trans woman, which is a type of woman.
>>20115766
Not planning on bottom surgery.

>> No.20115798

>>20115766
A better question is why he spends so much time on a website known for "transphobia" and seems to enjoy making his condition known and arguing about things he knows he has little experience in or support for. It's like he relishes in being attacked and belittled on whatever grounds he can find, whether it's his gender confusion or his strong opinions about ancient language instruction.

>> No.20115811

>>20115798
Hey, I didn't bring it up, they did- though they had knowing at the time. (Also please stop misgendering me. It's not hard to have basic civility.)

>> No.20115815

>>20115811
Please stop policing my language. You should instead endeavor to accept that gender is socially constructed.

>> No.20115824

>>20115815
Race is socially constructed too, doesn't mean people won't be offended if you go around calling them racial slurs.

>> No.20115829

>>20115824
First, "he" isn't a slur, and if a transracial white man who thinks he's asian gets offended because I call him a white man that's his problem.

>> No.20115850

>>20115829
Misgendering is offensive just like using slurs is.

>> No.20115868

>>20115850
The compulsion to recognize trans identities as social fact is offensive.

>> No.20115873

>>20115868
It is not offensive to say that you shouldn't call women men or men women.

>> No.20115875

Do you see?
Esperantists are like him, that's why you should avoid that language.
>>20115744
Yes, i'm retard

>> No.20115877

>>20115875
Nah, only a tiny minority of Esperantists are trans, just like anywhere.

>> No.20115882

>>20115873
I agree. That's why it is offensive to compel people to call you a woman.

>> No.20115887

>>20115882
But I AM a woman. That's just a fact.

>> No.20115905

>>20115887
That statement is offensive to my deeply held cultural beliefs.

>> No.20115908

>>20115905
Well too bad because it's true.

>> No.20115912

>>20115908
Alternatively: you're a man, and if that offends you it's too bad because it's true.

>> No.20115914

>>20115877
Not only trans, but also freaks, hippies alike, dellusional middle aged...

>> No.20115919

>>20115912
If that were true, then sure. But it's not, because I'm a woman.

>> No.20115942

Just when I thought it couldn't get worse than /llllllllllllllllllllllll/...

>> No.20115953

>>20115919
Whatever you want to believe. I'm going to continue believing you're a man and referring to you as he/him in these threads.

>> No.20115961

>>20115953
Okay, but you're lying and insulting me.

>> No.20115979

>>20115961
>you're lying
Not according to my beliefs.
>insulting me
You insult me by demanding that I call you a woman. How about we just mutually deal with it.

>> No.20115986

>>20115979
How about you don't fucking misgender people. Transphobia kills.

>> No.20115998

there's nothing mentally ill people love more than having people take them seriously
ignore these americanized zombies and stop shitting up the thread

>> No.20116006

>>20115986
How about you don't fucking kill yourself and don't pretend like if you do it's the fault of people who didn't entertain your delusions.

>> No.20116013

>>20115986
>How about you don't fucking misgender people. Transphobia kills.
Okay, now I know, it's a man
Not going to support conlangs for now. One tranny is already annoying enough

>> No.20116023

imagine taking the bait

>> No.20116024

>>20116006
I won't, but some people do, and I'm not going to pretend discrimination and hatred have nothing to do with it.

>> No.20116031

>>20116023
You're right. He clearly loves abuse and this is just going to make him come back for more.

>> No.20116062

Why'd janny delete this clg/lang thread? It's completely on topic
>>20066519

>> No.20116408

>>20115194
LLPSI vs. Wheelock hyperwars, February-March 2022, nevar 4get

>> No.20116743

Are there any textbooks being developed better than Athenaze?

>> No.20116804

>>20116408
They were at least from December onward. It's amazing the split didn't happen sooner.

>> No.20116813

>>20116743
I hate Athenaze so much, it's unreal. As far as I know, there are no better textbooks. I'm just happy I won't have to learn Greek ever again.

>> No.20117843

.

>> No.20117858

Dido amore incensa Aeneam Carthagine mansurum speravit

Why isnt it "mansurum esse"?

>> No.20118035

>>20117858
mansurus is a verbal adjective in the first place
it also happens that you can form an infinitive as mansurus esse, but you don't need to, in your case, it's an adjective modifying Aeneam

>> No.20118110

>>20116813
Why do you hate it?

>> No.20118147

>>20118110
Because Greek is hard but honestly anyone who learns Greek from Athenaze and has the audacity to complain is a bitch.

>> No.20118363

>>20118110
>>20118147
That's not the reason why. I like Wheelock a lot. It is my ideal textbook. Athenaze's stories suck. I'd much rather read single sentences about girls giving roses to sailors. The sentences in Athenaze help less than the ones in Wheelock. Athenaze's lessons are not done as well as Wheelock's. The format of the Athenaze is poor too. Basically, everything about Athenaze sucks compared to Wheelock. I've learned two other dead languages, and I've had no problems with the textbooks I used to learn them.

>> No.20118375

>>20118147
>worse
Is it that much harder than Latin? Morphology seems to be more complex (augments, sound changes, weird verb conjugation) but I've also read that it's easier to read than Latin (article, order more standardized)

>> No.20118439

myself I love Athenaze, maybe it's because it's the often praised Italian version and I already have a good command of Latin, but the learning experience has been rather smooth and enjoyable, taking my time with it

>> No.20118465

Italian Athenaze is super conveniently formatted. It's like learning to type with a keyboard than a typewriter. I pity Angloids who can't take the Latin-Italian-Greek route

What are the Oxbridge Greek courses like? How come no one ever recommends them?

>> No.20118565

Are English and Italian basically the same text and readings, but Italian has more supplemtnary material? Or are they very different texts?

>> No.20120170
File: 23 KB, 132x168, 6ec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20120170

>>20118375
I don't know Latin, but Greek grammar is tough but fair. By that I mean, there is a huge hump of rote memorization necessary to get over before reading with a dictionary is possible. Once the main verb forms and noun declensions are mastered it takes a huge mental load off everything. Many of the irregular forms are also trivially explained if you know some phonology and are aware of sound changes or what consonants tend to drop out where.

The hardest part about Greek is the vocabulary. They have multiple weird one off words for everything, or wordsmith compounds that have weird meanings. Poetry is especially bad for this, it's pretty much a whole new language you need to learn with all the poetic words that gets dug up

>> No.20120185

>>20118565
Two main differences btw UK and Italian version
1) The Italian's reading section is far more expanded than the UK one (10 pages of Greek text vs 2 pages)
2) The Italian uses pictures and Greek synonyms/explanations for new vocab whereas the UK one just uses English glosses

Other than using a different language for grammar explanations and cultural stuff, they have the same structure, i.e. each chapter lines up w/ whatever grammar is being taught, so you can use the UK one for grammar explanations and the Italian one for more INPOOT

>> No.20120241

>>20104362
>YWNBATRWUAD
>>20120170
>before reading with a dictionary is possible.

Okay, fans of learning dead languages, please explain this to me. Every normal person knows that the knowledge of a language consists of 4 main elements: listening (comprehension), speaking, writing and reading.
Now, you claim that you willingly do not want to learn anything for the first 3 out of 4 skills and only learn to read. So then you spend years "learning" the language and end up reading. WITH A DICTIONARY. And potentially with a grammar book.
What exactly have you learned then???

>> No.20120264

>>20120241
>what exactly have you learned

As much as I can.

>> No.20120281

>>20120241
How to read with a dictionary you dipshit. If you think somebody with no education can read with a dictionary, just try it, sir.

>> No.20120543

>>20120241
Yeah I get what you're saying. It is a bit disheartening desu that I'll never be conversant in ancient Greek but I always have hope my Modern Greek will get there :)

I way underestimated how hard learning ancient Greek was when I started, but when I started to be able to read long passages of Plato and understand at a surface level what was being talked about it made it all worth it. Its also very useful if you want to go down the PIE hole and do comparitive linguistic autism for grammar and phonology

At the end of the day I don't think you'll understand Plato or the NT any better by reading them in Greek unless you're really good vs a translation by someone who lives and breathes every day.

The next language I'm going to learn is Russian and I am going to do it in a classroom and with a native speaker tutor if that tells you anything.

>> No.20120736

@everyone
You will never be Egyptian/Greek/whatever

>> No.20120759
File: 241 KB, 326x376, Screenshot 2022-03-26 at 01-55-40 luke ranieri – Google-haku.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20120759

tired of this esl fella using #'s and @'s and trying to provoke discussion on his dying thread. banning ranieriposting was a mistake

>> No.20120811

>>20120241
I mean, personally I'd like to be conversant in those languages, partly because I think it enables better reading comprehension to actually have a grasp of the spoken language. But I can understand why someone would want to focus mainly on writing since there aren't any native speakers around to communicate with anymore.

>> No.20120897

>>20120241
That's why I use the input method by Ranieri

>> No.20121076

Just bought the Wheelock Latin.
Did I gimp myself too early or will this get me started well?

>> No.20121174

>>20118363
Which other books and languages?
>>20118465
Do you have to be really advanced in Italian to read it?

>> No.20121345

>>20120759
That's not what I was doing retard. The #s were me trying to funnel as much value possible without contributing. I don't give a shit about the thread, faggot. The other @s aren't me.

>> No.20121405

>>20121345
yeah i can recognize all your posts from
>retard
>faggot
>dipshit

>I don't give a shit about the thread, faggot
then leave

>> No.20121455

>>20121405
ITT the only one of those I posted most of is "faggot". I never posted "dipshit".
>like dude stylometry is an accurate science!

>then leave
lmao

>> No.20121656

>>20120759
You didn't read the thread, look for the greentext from below. I consider the split a good experiment, but if there's not enough of a population, it doesn't have to exist.
>Guys, it will have been all right. We put in an effort, but artificially supporting these threads will exhaust good intentions.
After I posted that, I think well meaning anons bumped the thread from page 10 at least 3 times regardless. Some conversation was had since my above greentext, but it's basic stuff which has been covered in previous /clg/s. We will see how things turn out for /clg/.

>> No.20121906

>>20121174
>Do you have to be really advanced in Italian to read it?
Greek authors are quoted using Italian in some parts, so I'd say have at least a middle school level of Italian with a dictionary to make things convenient.

>> No.20122179

>>20120759
>>20121345
>>20121405
I'm #Questions anon. The anon who replied to you isn't me. What is an @? I haven't visited /lll/ so if someone is using @Question or something, it isn't me. I'm not OP, and saving the thread from dying wasn't my intent, but I have bumped it for /clg/ anons because it's one of the only good generals on this board.

>> No.20122305

>>20122179
>it's one of the only good generals on this board.
Hear, hear. If only we could get some discussion on literature instead of just language learning stuff. Regular users of this thread should be redirecting classics posters of /lit/ to post here. We should also try to attract anons who know other classical languages to come and comment. Furthermore, I think discussion related to degrees and jobs would be helpful.

>> No.20122354

I think it's funny non-Ranieri-tard Latin posters bumped the thread as goodwill.

>> No.20122377

>>20121076
I found that it was helpful to do like 1/3 of Wheelock before jumping into LLPSI and I ran through the Orberg chapters a lot easier.

>> No.20123407

>>20121906
So like C1?

>> No.20123717

>>20123407
Yes. So basically 2 years of Latin, then 2 years of Italian, then you can do Athenaze and Greek for 2 years.

>> No.20123727

So Erotemata is almost entirely in Greek. What Greek textbook like it has actual Latin instructions?

>> No.20123728

>>20123717
Imagine being an anglo

>> No.20123838

>>20123717
Don't forget: 20 years of learning the medieval, early modern, and modern Italian dialects before getting to modern standard Italian.

>> No.20124700
File: 18 KB, 344x342, 1646184687351.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20124700

>mfw Greek perfect
just when I though I was out of the steep initial learning curve....they pull me back in

>> No.20124735

>>20124700
you'll get it down in no time, don't worry

>> No.20124806

What's the most cool latin word you know? Something like BAMBOOZLE in English, which SOUNDS.

>> No.20124892
File: 42 KB, 713x528, 918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20124892

>>20123728
Imagine being a wog.

>> No.20124947

How should i name my classical literature and history blog?

>> No.20125061

>>20124947
Kalelegmena

>> No.20125176

>>20124700
Just wait til you get to participles

>> No.20125185

>>20125176
Pariticples have a total of 11 rules

>> No.20125231

>>20125061
Too much characters. What about 'scriptura'? But it's probably too banal.

>> No.20125250

>>20125185
yeah but the syntax is retarded

>> No.20126331

>>20123838
wut that's a thing?