[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 68 KB, 1200x630, Max_Stirner-1200x630-cropped.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20013914 No.20013914 [Reply] [Original]

What philosophers should I read after I'm done with Stirner? Anything similar?

>> No.20013986

>>20013914
Nobody, you have successfully finished philosophy.
Unless you're interested in the history of the field, in that case start with the greeks.

>> No.20014076

>>20013914
commit sepukku

>> No.20014106

Not a philosophy book but I read Sapiens shortly after and it was clearly inspired by Stirner's ideas, and serves as a very good example of how they can be applied to specific fields (in this case, human geography).

>> No.20014108

/thread

>> No.20014186
File: 35 KB, 391x565, MurrayBW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20014186

>>20013914
Rothbard

>> No.20014405

>>20013914
Nietzsche

>> No.20014449

>>20013914
> Spooner - natural right anarchist
> Benjamin Tucker - Spooner’s protege who eventually became a Stirnerite
> Rothbard like >>20014186 suggested returns to Spooner natural right tradition, he took issue with political strategy of ethical egoism
> L A Rollins critiques Rothbard’s natural right but doesn’t take him up on Rothbard’s critique of ethical egoism as a political strategy (because Rothbard was right)

>> No.20014522

>>20013914

Adi Shankara (pbuh)

>> No.20014584

anyone know an anarchist publisher that isnt infiltrated by lefty woke shit?

>> No.20014590

>>20013914
>stirner
>philosophy
Ya.... no, just saying I do what I want cause I can is not philosophy and no amount of coping makes it any deeper than that

>> No.20014611

>>20014584
I am curious too

>> No.20014622

>>20014590
you didn't get it.

>> No.20014765

>>20014590
It is clear you haven't read the book. I doubt you read much at all.

>> No.20014791

>>20013914
UG Krishnamurti.

>> No.20014810

>>20013914
Just familiarise yourself with the Münchhausen trilemma and you’re done with philosophy and its pretensions. Then you can read prose and poetry for the sake of it.

>> No.20014820

>>20014622
>>20014765
>y-y-y-you just don't get it
I do, I'm just not 14 anymore. Either of you are welcome to prove me wrong but we both know neither of you will, because you can't.

>> No.20014837

>>20014820
prove you wrong about what? your only claim is based on a misconception of stirner's thesis

>> No.20014842

>>20014837
>but we both know neither of you will
As predicted.

>> No.20014852
File: 8 KB, 215x235, smugsoy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20014852

>As predicted.

>> No.20014858

>>20014820
>I didn't get the point and the onus of proof is on YOU to correct my ignorance
sorry bub, that ain't how it goes

>> No.20014907

>>20014820
No, I clearly said "you didn't read the book", which is true.