[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 493 KB, 680x453, 1637005804665.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19982899 No.19982899 [Reply] [Original]

before going deeper into jung should i read some freud? his interpretation of dreams for example? from what ive seen in jung and other sources, freud is a fucking schizo

>> No.19982931

Skip fraud altogether.
The fact some fraudian thought moving Jung to magic was a downgrade from psychology tells you everything you need to know

>> No.19982933

>>19982931
Ohhoho

>> No.19982969

>>19982931
please type coherently your post is confusing me more than jung.

>> No.19982997
File: 1.16 MB, 1361x1815, 1631938340457.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19982997

>>19982899
Jung had many disagreements with Freud but he certainly didn't see him as a schizo. Freud was a trailblazer and a skilled essayist; you should read his important works based off that alone. As far as Jungian psychology is concerned, if you're looking for prerequisites you should read the Bible, Nietzsche, a bit of Kant, and Schopenhauer at the very least.

>> No.19983006

>>19982969
Fraud is bad just don't counterfeit currency and in a fraudian fashion. I think that's the just of what he meant

>> No.19983144

>>19982997
ok, ive already read a satisfactory deal of plato but just how well does my knowledge of ancient philosophy have to be to grasp those philosophers? do i simply go balls deep or just stop at plato and aristotle?