/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.19966484]

is /lit/ an INTJ board?

[Anonymous No.19966498]

>>19966484
INFP.

I want to top a femboy INFP.
t. INTJ

[Anonymous No.19966522]

>>19966484
INTP here, I bet most people here are INTP.
also the personality test is crap

[INTJ No.19966534]

>>19966522
>INTP
Train hugging ass.

[Anonymous No.19966573]

>>19966484
infj

[Anonymous No.19966575]

Gemini with ascending cancer here. My moon is also in Taurus.

[Anonymous No.19966581]

literally me as the ISTP

[Anonymous No.19966584]

>>19966484
The creator of this meme here really hates TJ's. Absolutely low test.

[Anonymous No.19966592]

>>19966498
I'm an INFP twink, is that good enough? I'd make a pretty cute femboy.

[Anonymous No.19966600]

>>19966592
neck yourself

[Anonymous No.19966603]

>>19966484
I'm INFJ, used to be INTP

[Anonymous No.19966604]

>>19966484
Im ENFJ. Both my parents are INFJ

[Anonymous No.19966609]

>>19966484
I always get INFJ and I still have no fucking clue what it's supposed to mean. Seems like a complete meme test.

[Anonymous No.19966717]

>>19966484
ESFJ and INFJ archetypal parents
I suppose ISTP
Parents fucking hate it.

[Anonymous No.19966738]

ESTP apparently, but this test was made by two retarded women and people who obsess over this shit are fucking nerds

[Anonymous No.19966753]

>>19966717
>ESFJ and INFJ archetypal parents
But what does that MEAN

[Anonymous No.19966761]

>>19966738
>Fine I'll do the test, but not because I'm interested in it or anything since it's gay as fuck...
>Whoa, would you look at that, after answering 80 questions in a row it turns out I'm a ESTP. But it's not like I care or anything or anything like that...

[Anonymous No.19966770]

I get intp or intj based in my mood, who else intx masterrace?

[Anonymous No.19966810]

>>19966484
INTJ. But it’s complicated.

When I first took the test, I was depressed yet clearly an INTJ. I started wavering between INTP and INTJ when I got into philosophy. INFJ and INTJ when I found my faith in God. I suppose I go on a lot more walks than I used to, and now I feel an urge to make the most of myself. So maybe I’ll cultivate some ISTJ and ENTJ traits soon? Who knows.

If this pattern continues, I would have walked through every MBTI category. Which I suppose is a good thing for becoming a well-balanced person. I think the problem with these tests is that people get locked into whatever archetype they get instead of using it as a way to own their strengths and work on their weaknesses.

[Anonymous No.19966878]

>>19966484

>is /lit/ an INTJ board?

No. ISTPs are the most common around here I bet. INTPs are the rare effortposters and I don't know jack about the behavior of INTJs.

>>19966498
>>19966592

Extremely homosexual.

>>19966522
>>19966609

The online tests are, indeed. Study the original theory by Jung if you'd like, but there's still not much to it. Or maybe there is and you jump into Russian Myers-Briggs and other rabbit holes. Suddenly, months later, you start to combine the concepts of Lacan, Freud, and Spinoza with personality typology for God knows what kind of special reason you have in mind and share it with other niche forum autists heavily dedicated to the study.

>>19966717

>ESFJ and INFJ archetypal parents
>As an ISTP
Jesus Christ. Your parents must be proud.

>>19966738

Why are you on 4chan and /lit/ of all places as an ESTP?

• https://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Psychological_Types

• https://mbti-notes.tumblr.com

Take the Socionics, Enneagram, four temperaments personality-maxxing pill for the ultimate knowledge of the sophistic/astrological/pseudo-scientific categorization method of individuals.

too lazy to effortpost there's no point defending something like this but i'm certain another will step in

[Anonymous No.19966883]

>>19966878
>mbti-notes
I asked this guy to type me a long time ago and he told me I was INFJ even though I thought I was INTJ. Now I realize he was right

[Anonymous No.19966886]

>>19966484
I Always Get INTP, INFJ or INTJ

[Anonymous No.19966894]

>tfw INTJ with Aspergers

[Anonymous No.19966901]

>>19966883
Nice going. I never had the courage to ask for a typing.

[Anonymous No.19966907]

>>19966484
>pic full of wojak memes and shitty mspaint tier scaled text and images
Not wasting 5 seconds looking at this crap

[Anonymous No.19966935]

>>19966484
It's called the Barnum/Forer effect. People are more likely to believe vague descriptions of themselves than openly accept criticisms. It's the same reason why astrology, tarot, fortune telling works - it's all vague abstract language

However, if you want a good laugh, then visit each of the individual MBTI personality subreddits. These people are absolute nuts compared to us. They waste hours and hours of their free time boasting about their personality type (one that doesn't actually exist anyway)
Just take a second, sit back, and reflect on that. People actually waste valuable hours of their life talking about their MBTI. Fucking crazy

[Anonymous No.19966963]

>>19966810
Very true, looks like you understand. You can't be one type forever - it's very dynamic.

>>19966935
It's pretty fucked, yeah. Especially as most of those people don't delve into any of the source texts and rely on those minimal descriptions from the test sites that cater to all and offer no negative evaluation. None of that. It's best to not let the average person get hooked on this.

[Anonymous No.19967031]

>>19966484
Is it even accurate to say you are 100% INTJ/ENFP/PUBG whatever? I've completed one very complicated test on MBTI a few times and I got something like 50/50 of an INTJ and an INFP. And I can say it really feels ambivalent and depends on my current mood and life situation.

Btw, I think any types of classification are very limited anyway.

[Anonymous No.19967084]

>>19966484
Realistically speaking why is INTP the objectively best type to be? Sure, you start off with some handicaps but you clearly have the most potential and end potential across the board.

[Anonymous No.19967099]

>>19966575
Gemini sun, Aquarius moon, Cancer rising, INTJ. So yes, it is

[Anonymous No.19967110]

>>19966935
That is debateable, just like other theories such as Dunning-Kruger which is normie-tier pseudopsychology based on educated guesses at best.

[Anonymous No.19967126]

INTJ reporting in.

[Anonymous No.19967133]

I am INTJ and my autism wants to submit a request to put in that graphic that I like Schopenhauer and he says some very good things about electricity, and books, and animals. It is not fair to make him seem like a bully to me when he has never thrown me down a staircase. Thank you.

[Anonymous No.19967145]

ENTJ can confirm

[Anonymous No.19967153]

This is my very favorite MBTI image. I really need to print it out next time anyone asks me my modern horoscope sign.

[INTJ No.19967157]

>>19967145
You wanna go bully some INTP's?

[Anonymous No.19967178]

>>19966484
There are some. But the INFJ master race rules the board.

[Anonymous No.19967180]

>>19967157
You have 5 minutes to go fuck yourself, before I start to bully you, bully.

[Anonymous No.19967181]

>>19967084
Extraverted is undeniably superior to introverted. At no time in history could a man truly be an island. We all rely on other people, and other people rely on us in turn. Losing energy from the necessary business of attending to other people is an outright genetic defect.

t. 96th percentile introvert

[Anonymous No.19967185]

>>19967157
I'm an INTP please no meanie to me :(

[Anonymous No.19967190]

>>19967157
Roger, loading antimatter wojacks
>>19967180
>You have 5 minutes to go fuck yourself, before I start to bully you, bully.

[Anonymous No.19967203]

>>19967190
Stop projecting on me!

[Anonymous No.19967215]

>>19967181
Speak for yourself. Just because it's rare to find a man that's properly capable these days doesn't mean they didn't exist. If you wanted to be a frontiersman or even a hermit you had to do everything yourself because that's all you had.
As for the genetic defect it's easier to say it's a genetic defect being unable to exist under your own power. Sure, it's nice being defective when your defect has some mild benefits but that does require you to exist around others and be reliant on others which heavily impacts your staying power whereas being properly introverted is a boon. You can exist around others and now you can also enjoy being alone. Your time is actually your own now and you're free to chase whatever path you want. You don't need others because a flaw in your brain isn't demanding you to get your daily social suck off.

[Anonymous No.19967218]

>>19966907
that shitty mspaint tier scaled text and images is older than you've been posting on this site, faggot queer

[Anonymous No.19967273]

>>19967157
Woe be it to the man,
Of intellectual stature,
To think it a trifling matter,
To mess with an INTP.

[Anonymous No.19967289]

>>19967215
>If you wanted to be a frontiersman or even a hermit you had to do everything yourself because that's all you had.
You clearly didn't read my post carefully. It has NEVER been possible for anyone, frontiersman or hermit or whatever, to exist in total isolation. The frontiersman who tries quickly gets injured and dies, unable to recover. The hermit who tries either starves to death, or eventually gets picked off by some wild animal. And even if you could make it work today, it's a terribly inefficient life to have to make everything yourself, 100% of the time, and you're only one bad pneumonia away from dying from lack of antibiotics anyway after all that effort. Homo sapiens is a tribal animal, just accept it.

[Anonymous No.19967294]

>>19966761
How would I know it’s bullshit if I didn’t engage with it at least once?

[Anonymous No.19967296]

>>19966761
very estp desu

[Anonymous No.19967298]

>>19966484
INTP here though i feel personality types are kinda bullshit humans are just too complex

[Anonymous No.19967302]

>>19967289
Sorry, champ. Historical fact>your sad attempt to rewrite it to suit your statement.

[Anonymous No.19967305]

>>19966484
ISTP/INTJ
I only come here to based-post and make commies and leftists seethe.
You may know me from such works as
>let me make this simple for you, we dont like niggers
and other such truth-pilled posts.

[Anonymous No.19967318]

>>19967305
*ISTP/INTP
>inb4 do you have X disorder
I have aspergers and several sub disorders.

[Anonymous No.19967319]

>>19966935
omg this says about our society we truly live in clown world!

[Anonymous No.19967325]

>>19967318
we can tell

[Anonymous No.19967346]

>>19967325
At least its the good kind ;)

[Anonymous No.19967410]

>>19967302
Feel free to tell me of hermits that didn't accept donated food or live off their inheritance, or frontiersmen that lived to ripe old ages out in the wilderness. I wish they were real.

[Anonymous No.19967415]

Here to say this guy >>19967289 is right and this guy >>19967302 is retarded

[Anonymous No.19967524]

>>19967110
>>19967319
Not necessarily. All of the personality trait attributions from MBTI are conceptual by nature, none of these 'traits' are concrete or definite. It's almost hard to argue whether any of these actually exist, speaking purely from a linguistic perspective. I am also familiar with the pop-psychology bastardizations you spoke about. Worry not my friend

From a psychological perspective, Barnum statements seem like vague suggestions. They are generalized, meaningless statements applicable to anyone. They're almost like idioms, or platitudes so to speak - they become completely meaningless if you detach them from the situation in which they were originally expressed.

Take for example, if I said to you right now:

>You are an independent thinker who likes to think outside of the box

Versus

>You are a very bad listener, and you do not take other people seriously

Which statement are you more likely to believe? Which one would you ignore?
Take a look at the picture I've attached. Do any of these statements describe you?

We're always seeking out information from other people, in order to learn more about ourselves. We normally discard the negative statements to protect our ego. On the flip side humans are very gullible to every psuedo positive statement. I would wager an individual's entire self-concept can become inflated to unrealistic proportions thru this bias. It also has implications spanning beyond religion, and in the real world economy

Apologies for the autism. I don't intend to knock your belief system. Maybe just knocking human belief systems overall. Anyway, it's only because *I* personally believe these biases show us more about ourselves

[Anonymous No.19967536]

>>19966894

I want this freak to die

>mommies feeding kids bleach to "cure" their "autism"

Runts die off. I want this freak to hurt and bleed. Die freak. FREAKEY DEEKEY FREAKEY DEEKEY FREAKEY DEEKEY FREAKEY DEEKEY

[Anonymous No.19967552]

>>19967524
forgot to add: **
>and
this is also used in the language of some conmen, cult leaders, and persuasive rhetoric folk alike. so it is not a matter of "we live in a society" or whatever you thought I was implying. it has a huge impact on communication in general, but it's stupid most people aren't familiar with it

[Anonymous No.19967568]

>>19967318
>I have aspergers and several sub disorders.