Dugin

[Anonymous No.19891551]

Are any of his books worth reading or is it all just schizo ramblings and/or psy ops?

[Anonymous No.19891688]

bumping my own thread

[Anonymous No.19891791]

>>19891551
Aren't most of his works not translated to english?

[Anonymous No.19891907]

He seems like a Heidegger fanboy, so I would read him instead of Dugin

Dugin is just an ultra conservative reactionary

[Anonymous No.19891937]

>>19891907
>Dugin is just an ultra conservative reactionary
what a shallow perspective

[Anonymous No.19892054]

>>19891551
He's a Russian neocon and a schizo. Eurasianism would be much better without him. The lingua franca of EVRASIA will be Mandarin not Russian and it will be based on Chinese technocracy not weird philosophical gibberish.

[Anonymous No.19892109]

>>19891551
He has profound knowledge of the Russian literary scene, reason enough to read him.

[Anonymous No.19892223]

>>19891551
The ones banned on Amazon

[Anonymous No.19892228]

dogshit, russia is just China's AIDS infested bitch

[Anonymous No.19892242]

>>19892054
Ok so you're a Chinese neocon then?

[Anonymous No.19892349]

>>19891551
>being profoundly anti nato is a psyop
>the seethe itt from glowies and illiterates
he's a well developed/non-vulgar left alternative (fourth) positionist concerned with a particular political geopolitical/political project. Outside of Eastern Europe & the west, in Asia as a whole, he'd probably be lumped in as a communist with fairly stock-standard social-nationalist views. Although his rooting in idealism & rejection of materialism puts him closer to the DPRK and maoist china.

[Anonymous No.19892471]

>>19891551
Yes.

[Anonymous No.19892480]

>>19891907
>>19891937
>Dugin is such a <meaningless word> <meaningless word>

[Anonymous No.19892486]

>>19891551
I didn't find them particularly insightful desu. Maybe translation lost something. The right hasn't had any good philosophers for like two centuries.