What is "wrong" with this book?

[Anonymous No.19828615]

I've seen people here that it's a fantasy of (trans)humanism. What does this mean? Are there any books that criticize the book in picrel?

[Anonymous No.19828670]

leftists hate it for being Whig history and tech people hate it for being pessimistic about their coming cybernetic transgender utopia. he can't win

[Anonymous No.19828763]

>>19828670
What do conservatives say about him?

[Anonymous No.19828792]

>>19828763
They don't read, so they have nothing to say. Except the jew-haters, they don't like it because... you know.

[Anonymous No.19828794]

>>19828763
no idea desu

[Anonymous No.19828804]

>>19828615
Nothing. It correctly identifies that the Agricultural revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

[Anonymous No.19828814]

>>19828804
>The Sneeding and Feeding Have Been a Disaster For The Human Race.

[Anonymous No.19828897]

>>19828804
Theen why the seethe from contrarians as normies gobble it up? I found that those two things always imply some underlying subversive character.

[Anonymous No.19828931]

>>19828897
I've genuinely been wondering this too. My guess is that it's because people don't like the implications of Harari's mechanistic (almost Hegelian) view of history. I think Harari is something of a Fukuyamist, which seems to piss everyone off beyond all measure

someone should link a few serious critiques of the book for us to read tho

[Anonymous No.19828966]

I simply refuse to read any books
>written by jews
>written by journalists
>advertising being on the new york times bestseller list

Bonus sus points for "brief history" riffing on the brief history of time (another book I refuse to read).

If you'll excuse me I'm halfway through reading pic related.

[Anonymous No.19828970]

>>19828931
>someone should link a few serious critiques of the book for us to read tho

here >>19828966

[Anonymous No.19829042]

>>19828615
>What is "wrong" with this book?
Atheist dishonesty.

As most atheists, Harari is an intellectual coward. He's very close to accepting the truth that we're just a cosmic flatulence on an indifferent universe, and that a cold bloody murder is as morally indifferent as a supernova exploding a billion parsecs away. But when he's about to jump to honesty, he appeals to his idiotic vegan hindu bs to justify his ridiculous worldview which can be summarized as:

>Nothing matters except being vegan and accepting homos.

[Anonymous No.19829051]

>author spends half the book talking about farming and the only thing some people can read in the book is about homosexuality
Guess who's the faggot. The faggot is the one quoting this post

[Anonymous No.19829073]

>>19829042
>Nothing matters except being vegan and accepting homos
Is this the "c'mon we are all humans lol" implication that the rightoids love to ree about?

[Anonymous No.19829115]

The jew york times giving the number one to a book written by an Israeli who supports techno globohomo?
How is this possible?

[Anonymous No.19829118]

I've only read the sequel and thought it was trash. The first 2/3 of the book are literally unnecessary and him stroking his own dick for how smart he thinks he is, and the last 1/3rd is literally 0 original/new contribution to what awaits us in the future.

[Anonymous No.19829139]

>>19829115
>supports techno globohomo?
>How is this possible?

Where does he support it

[Anonymous No.19829251]

>>19828966
Just finished, yet another cute and funny installment from an author who really knows his MMOs. The ending date between Maple and Sally with handholding was very moe. Eagerly awaiting volume 5 and season 2.

[Anonymous No.19829266]

>>19829051
>>author spends half the book talking about farming and the only thing some people can read in the book is about homosexuality

[Anonymous No.19829330]

the fact the book produces so much COPE and SEETHE from all sides is making me suspect it's actually good

[Anonymous No.19829336]

>>19828615
It doesn't really have any scientific backing, it's just his musings. You're not going to find many 'sources' for the stuff he says, and he gives a lot of half-truths and generalizations summarizing the science behind a thing.

[Anonymous No.19829340]

>>19829073
No idea. If you say so, it must be.

[Anonymous No.19829715]

>>19828615
2nd half took a nose dive
I had an interest in human origins and evolution so the first half was fun although you start to notice his bias toward certain theories

[Anonymous No.19829752]

>>19829336
>It doesn't really have any scientific backing, it's just his musings. You're not going to find many 'sources'

based, more writers should be like this

[Anonymous No.19829864]

>>19828763
I read the book (am conservative) it’s a very interesting book until he starts vomiting his own opinions about modernity in the last half of the book. It goes from informative and well written to straight up propaganda to push his political sentiments. It was hard getting through the last half.

[Anonymous No.19829881]

>>19829864
Excuse you, don't you know conservatives don't read books?

[Anonymous No.19829910]

>>19828615
Globohomo faggotism

[Anonymous No.19829916]

>>19828670
>their coming cybernetic transgender utopia
Hahahha. There isn’t enough fossil fuels to make to something like that

[Anonymous No.19829958]

>>19829916
There is if you depopulate and convince the masses to return to a feudal agricultural economy "to save the world".

[Anonymous No.19829974]

>>19829958
>if you depopulate
That’s not possible