right-wing lit

[Anonymous No.19804819]

Buying some books from Imperium Press. Should I add any of these to the cart?
Popular Government by Henry Sumner Maine
Steelstorm by Thomas777
Patriarcha: The Complete Works of Robert Filmer
Joseph De Maistre Major Works, Vol. I

[Anonymous No.19804840]

>>19804819
>Should I add any of these to the cart?
No.

[Anonymous No.19804854]

>>19804819
>>
>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.19804862]

>>19804819
Go to /pol/ or /his/. /lit/ is inherently a leftist board, since it's focused in fiction and art.

[Anonymous No.19804904]

>>19804862
>since /lit/ is inherently a leftist board
what

[Anonymous No.19804910]

>>19804862
Fuck you, faggot, and don't forget to dilate.

[Anonymous No.19804918]

>>19804819
Conservative literature is poor by nature.

[Anonymous No.19804919]

>>19804862
nigger

[Anonymous No.19804923]

>>19804862
>leftist board

[Anonymous No.19804927]

>>19804819
All examples of a profoundly insecure LARP. Go outside and make friends instead.

[Anonymous No.19804934]

If you're going to get de Maistre, get his friend de Bonald and their later disciple Donoso Cortes too.

https://www.amazon.com/Donoso-Cortes-Readings-Political-Theory/dp/1932589481

https://www.amazon.com/True-Only-Wealth-Nations-Economy/dp/1932589317

Don't forget to read about Charles Maurras and the Cercle Proudhon in Zeev Sternhell and Eugen Weber if you're interested in French counter-revolutionary thought.

[Anonymous No.19804935]

>>19804819
Based. Disregard these troons that will never be women, anon.

[Anonymous No.19804963]

>>19804923
Most of lit is left of center. We’re sick of the loud and persistent rightwingers, okay? Read a fucking book that challenges your prepackaged idealism. Grow some.

[Anonymous No.19804980]

Just finished Mine Were of Trouble today. Great read, but the print was a little low quality, some text is misaligned slightly and there was a typo on the back cover.

[Anonymous No.19804983]

>>19804862
based

[Anonymous No.19804988]

>>19804862
>>19804963
gb2discord

[Anonymous No.19804995]

>>19804980
what was of trouble exactly

[Anonymous No.19805001]

>>19804988
>everything left of Kissinger is tranny!!!!1
Kys.

[Anonymous No.19805054]

>>19804995
Englishman Peter Kemp's account of his time volunteering for the Nationalists during the Spanish civil war. Harrowing stuff.

[Anonymous No.19805063]

>>19805054
but what was of trouble. what does the title refer to

[Anonymous No.19805083]

>>19805063
Oh, I have absolutely no clue.

[Anonymous No.19805097]

>>19804862
>/lit/ is inherently a leftist board
No, it isn't you faggot

[Anonymous No.19805101]

>>19804819
An incoherent muddle of thinkers. The "right" is truly lost

[Anonymous No.19805175]

The left be like “let us fuck kids” an shit. Ion play that ya feel me? Frfr

[Anonymous No.19805182]

>>19805097
It is though. There's a reason the term is "liberal arts" instead of "conservative arts". Fiction is art and art is inherently leftist.

[Anonymous No.19805192]

>>19805175
Frfr

[Anonymous No.19805196]

>>19805175
This

[Anonymous No.19805307]

>>19804995
>>19805063
It's a quote from an ABBA song.

[Anonymous No.19805469]

>>19804862
>left wing
>since it's focused in fiction and art
TS Eliot would like a word with you.

[Anonymous No.19805507]

>>19804862
Based. Triggered rightoids are screaming already. It's so easy to trigger them

Also op go to /pol/ retard

[Anonymous No.19805531]

>>19804819
Filmer and Maistre are essential reading for monarchist/counter-revolutionary political philosophy. Great writers too.

I'm not familiar with Maine's work.

Thomas777 is a fascinating guy, absolutely insane, brilliant, and a great storyteller. I used to talk with him online back in the day. But I have no idea if he could write a good novel or not. Kind of curious to check it out.

[Anonymous No.19805532]

>>19805182
>liberal arts
fucking retard. it is called liberal arts because the romans viewed it as a highbrow education in literature and philosophy appropriate for a liber (free man) and not for a servus (slave). it has nothing to do with 21st ce burger politics.

[Anonymous No.19805546]

>>19804862
good one

[Anonymous No.19805571]

>>19804862
That’s not true. The most well known book series from here literally consists of a dozen redpilled schizo horror books

[Anonymous No.19805573]

>>19804862
I went to jail for far right political violence

[Anonymous No.19805576]

>>19805571
Kek. Good point

[Anonymous No.19805583]

>>19805571
Based

[Anonymous No.19805595]

>>19804862
BASED. NAZI PUNKS, FUCK OFF! MODS!!! DELETE /POL/ ALREADY HOLY FUCK

[Anonymous No.19805700]

>>19805571
Based

[Anonymous No.19805837]

>>19804819
All that, plus everything published by Arktos.

[Anonymous No.19805988]

>>19805595
Hitler was the first Rockstar, faggot.

[Anonymous No.19805998]

I got Firstness Issue 3. It was retarded

[Anonymous No.19806127]

>>19804862
the classic never fails, congrats in derailing the thread. even if it was doomed to begin with.

[Anonymous No.19806221]

>>19804862
>/lit/ is inherently a leftist board, since it's focused in fiction
I see what you did there.

[Anonymous No.19806237]

>>19806221
Do you really understand it though?

[Anonymous No.19806260]

>>19806237
Leftism, like fiction, is a departure from reality.

[Anonymous No.19806295]

>>19805182
Leftist are and corporate art are one and the same now.
The leftist is instructed to only make art that benefits everyone, you must celebrate gays, immigrants, blacks, and woe betide you if you do otherwise.
Leftists are soulless, hateful, they cannot create, they can only destroy what was once deemed beautiful.

[Anonymous No.19806306]

>>19806260
Thought not.

[Anonymous No.19806361]

T777 is funnier and more based then BAP.

[Anonymous No.19806683]

>>19806306
>Cunty response with no argument
Women, or just low test?

[Anonymous No.19808056]

>>19804819
Looks good. Just be aware you're on a list now.
>now for some keywords:
Trump Bomb terrorism January 6 Hitler Goebbels kidnap governor assassination

[Anonymous No.19809259]

>>19805083
>>19805063
“I to my perils
Of cheat and charmer
Came clad in armour
By stars benign.
Hope lies to mortals
And most believe her,
But man's deceiver
Was never mine.

The thoughts of others
Were light and fleeting,
Of lovers' meeting
Or luck or fame.
Mine were of trouble,
And mine were steady;
So I was ready
When trouble came.”
― A.E. Housman, A Shropshire Lad

[Anonymous No.19809349]

>>19805595
The guy shilling his books is a mod.

[Anonymous No.19809362]

>>19804819
there's better deals for actual toilet paper on amazon

[Anonymous No.19809522]

>>19804819
yeah OP

>>19804854
>NOOOOOOO YOU CANT DISCUSS THIS HERE NOOOOOOOO
stfu anon

>>19804918
wrong

>>19804963
doubt, and in any case why dont you broaden your horizons and see what the other side says? the point of books is to learn from them, not keep feeding yourself the same confirmation bias bullshit you fucking imbecile
YWNBAW

[Anonymous No.19809589]

>>19804819
Nah, dont read stuff just because it claims to be right wing
There are better authors out there, also some more essential ones like Schmitt

[Anonymous No.19809643]

>>19806295
Images like that remind me of a scene from an old Christmas film, where a group of radical anti-Christmas adolescents vandalize a nativity scene and destroy decorations for what amounts to no real reason. I'm so glad I get to live in current year, when real agitation can save the world.

[Anonymous No.19809646]

>>19809349
I see. Most likely true. Fuck /pol/tards

[Anonymous No.19809748]

>>19809589
A lot of it is contemporary social commentary or secondary sources on older reactionaries. Joel Davis actually sells Schmitt books on his site.
Granted, I got one of his journals because I liked his podcasts and commentaries on telegram. The journal was dumb and a waste of 15 bucks and now I'm probably on a list for purchasing radical literature

[Anonymous No.19809752]

>>19804819

It is an automatic fail when you choose your history and critique source by the same criteria as your entertainment -- what you are predisposed to like. Whereas choosing a genre is valid for entertainment, choosing your non-fiction by their bias reduces critique to entertainment. .. Makes you look stupid at parties too.

However, I will say that what the right accuses of being the liberal presses tend to be more carefully researched and verifiable. This is expected since the right wing is completely defined by not being liberal, so anything that disagrees with them is automatically labeled “liberal,” however, since what the right wing does believe is so abhorrent — the rich deserve more, the king is always right, violence is an acceptable social control, some people are just better and deserve to be in control — it is really unfair to call anything that is not specifically a right wing or conservative press a liberal press, Better to just say it is the press that prints what is verifiable. without calling it anything but a press, while the right wing press simply gets the label of worthless propaganda and entertainment for the mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.19809805]

>>19809752
>This is expected since the right wing is completely defined by not being liberal,
I was reading an interesting book, "Right Wing Critics of American Conservatism," and it made an interesting claim to the point I greentexted. "Left wing" is described as purporting equality as the highest value wheras right wingers don't. Not to say no right wingers value equality, but no right winger ever says its the highest value. So I guess you're right in saying right wingers are defined by not being liberal, but your estimation is merely tautological

[Anonymous No.19809970]

>>19809589
Personally I'm kinda annoyed how some books are getting slapped with the label of "right-wing". All that does is skew people's perspective of them and potentially leads to misinterpretations of the text.

[Anonymous No.19810042]

>>19805063
haven't read it but perhaps the days? A bad day in war, I assume, is as horrible as it can get and a good day would probably still have the shadows of past and future bad days cast upon it. Therefore one could argue that the author's days would indeed have been of trouble.

[Anonymous No.19810529]

>>19809805
>>19809752
I am on the right and would define the right as actively anti egalitarian. That does NOT mean the left has a stance and all the right is simply is a negation of that stance.

As a rightie, I would even argue that it is the other way around. The right existed for time immemorial and actively knew and understood and pursued hierarchy. The left is a novel response and a rebellion against this.

It is the left that is defined entirely by not being Hierarchical.

[Anonymous No.19810576]

>>19804819
The Holy Bible

[Anonymous No.19810635]

>>19806295
this.
traditionalism is the essence of non-boomer rightwing ideology. therefore all of the classics, especially antiquity period, are ours. leftism has, what, the french decadents? modern sjw/feminist whinging?

[Anonymous No.19810641]

>>19810635
The left has everything from Descartes onward.

[Anonymous No.19810671]

>>19804963
>lit
>center
>left

Lol, no.
COPE

[Anonymous No.19810673]

>>19810635

[Anonymous No.19810677]

2/?

[Anonymous No.19810684]

3/?

[Anonymous No.19810694]

4/?

[Anonymous No.19810710]

5/?

[Anonymous No.19810712]

6/?

[Anonymous No.19810713]

7/?

[Anonymous No.19810720]

>>19810671
>>19810677
>>19810684
>>19810694
>>19810710
>>19810712
>>19810713
>>19810713
How many of these books have you actually read

[Anonymous No.19810731]

>>19810720
All of them

[Anonymous No.19810745]

>>19810720
Basically all the christian ones.

[Anonymous No.19810752]

9/ end i think

[Anonymous No.19810767]

>>19804995
mine

[Anonymous No.19810840]

Between Imperium Press, Firstness, Counter-Currents, and the NJP I think we are really getting the ball moving. We at least have a beginning.

[Anonymous No.19811220]

>>19804995
>>19810767
This

[Anonymous No.19811576]

>>19810767
No it was mine

[Anonymous No.19812382]

>>19804819
'Folk-Tales in the Indo-European Tradition' is worthwhile if you're interested in that kind of thing.

[Anonymous No.19812547]

>>19810745
Based. I've been looking for a Convservative Christian chart and I finally found it. Thanks, King.

[Anonymous No.19813294]

>>19804819
Right wing literature is masturbatory whereas left wing literature is intellectually engaging.
Right wingers have a gigantic inferiority complex. Every reply to this post is proof of that.

[Anonymous No.19813300]

>>19813294
i can't refute you without proving your point how did you do this??? NOO CHOMSKY

[Anonymous No.19813345]

>>19813294
>Right wingers have a gigantic inferiority complex
But most leftist men think they’re women? I think what you typed is what is best known as projection

[Anonymous No.19813359]

>>19805182
Beauty = right-wing
All art was originally religious

[Anonymous No.19813377]

>>19813345
this is a right-wing anti work chud

[Anonymous No.19813412]

>>19804963
>Read a fucking book that challenges your prepackaged idealism.
PPI says everyone is the same and racial differences are purely aesthetic.

[Anonymous No.19813567]

>>19813377
This is a tranny who is now being bullied by other leftists on the Anti-Work forum

[Anonymous No.19813631]

>>19804918
Contemporary Leftism is an aberration and an abomination and almost every intellectual figure ever (which includes autgors) is right wing by the current standard.

[Anonymous No.19813688]

>>19813631
The man made horrors are made by right wing, fascist elites.

[Anonymous No.19813697]

>>19804819
I doubt /lit/ cares much about the dissident right, but it’s good to support imperium press and other companies like them. If you find any books offered on their site interesting, go ahead and buy them. If only to support other people of our movement

[Anonymous No.19813698]

>>19813688
>The man made horrors are made by right wing, fascist elites.
Why do those elites in power agree with every progressive ideal spouted by liberals and communists alike?

[Anonymous No.19813705]

>>19813698
They dont you dumbfuck. The delusions you people live under. Insane.
Communists were also elites by the way.

[Anonymous No.19813706]

>>19813688
please point at the right wing, fascist elites. are they in the room with us right now?

[Anonymous No.19813735]

>>19813705
But they do though. Hilarious how leftists think they see the truth whilst also being brainwashed by the rainbow cult with the full backing of those same elites that are “right-wing fascists”

[Anonymous No.19813753]

>>19813706
They rule you idiot. Who do you think capitalists are? Their politicians are everywhere and their financial markets work day and night, for them.

[Anonymous No.19813761]

>>19804819

[Anonymous No.19813767]

>>19810684
>including the Gita on this list
Dangerously based

[Anonymous No.19813789]

>>19813753
>Who do you think capitalists are?
Neoliberals, progressives, leftists. There is no right wing fascists in power contrary to what your favourite CIA backed leftist YouTuber tells you. If there was these fascists in power Europe wouldn’t be being swarmed with hostile immigrants, fag acceptance and new laws set in place so children can take hormone changing drugs and mutilate their genitals so they can act on the brainwashing liberal schools give them and change their sex

[Anonymous No.19813805]

>>19813753
point them out. im being serious. point them out.

now dont mistake what im saying here. im not asking you to point out people you dont like. im asking you to point out the specifically "fascist" elites. find some demonstrable evidence of facism on their part. not capitalism, fascism. i understand that there is overlap, but i want the proofs. the goods. you are so certain that they exist, that they are in fact fascist, that i imagine it should be pretty easy for you to find numerous, overwhelming examples.

[Anonymous No.19813807]

>>19813688
>invasion of nigger and muslim hordes
made by right wing

[Anonymous No.19813812]

>>19813807
>>19813805
>>19813789
>it's only right wing when I like how things are being run

[Anonymous No.19813821]

>>19813812
i didnt say there werent right wing elites. i wanna know who the fascist elites are. no conflating the two. wheres the examples i asked for?

[Anonymous No.19813837]

>>19813688
Chud here. You WILL use sex for procreation

[Anonymous No.19813871]

>>19813807
>nooo not a Black man!! Not a heckin Muslimerino!!!

Any European "conservative" who thinks this way is a leftist in disguise. You retards spent all day whining about these things while liberals handed over your sovereignty to a rootless elite in the form of the EU, eroded your languages by forcing them to convert to Anglo-centric gender neutrality, and denigrated your cultures.

Let me spell it out for you. If you are a European conservative, breaking up the EU is all that matters. Everything else is a distraction. Once that is done, you can turn to linguistic and cultural repair. But first comes dismantling the EU and freeing your nations.

[Anonymous No.19813936]

>>19813871
The goons in the governments of EU countries are there to impede any attempt to break out of this neolib-commie construct. It happend once by accident with the UK, they won't let it happen again. They will rather build reeducation camps and mass incarcerate people. It's already beginning in France and Germany with these anti vaxers protests.That's why the import all the 3rd world scum that will vote left/socialist because they get money for procreating.

[Anonymous No.19813954]

>>19804819
Teach yourself Greek and Latin and read the works of the Romans and Greeks.

[Anonymous No.19813961]

>>19813871
>Nooo the HECKIN chicken came before the egg.
That’s how retarded you sound. It’s one and the same problem

[Anonymous No.19814137]

>>19813761
Faye is peak midwit and an unabashed Liberal.

[Anonymous No.19814259]

>>19814137
proof or else shut up

[Anonymous No.19814886]

>>19814259
I made it up

[Anonymous No.19814941]

>>19814137
https://counter-currents.com/2021/11/remembering-guillaume-faye-4/

Faye, like New Rightists and White Nationalists in European societies around the globe, was motivated by a sense of danger: the reigning system — liberal, democratic, capitalist, egalitarian, globalist — has set the white race in all of its homelands on the path to extinction through declining birthrates and race replacement through immigration and miscegenation. If we are to survive, we must understand this system, critique it, and frame an alternative that will secure the survival and flourishing of our race. Then we need to figure out how we can actually implement these ideas.

I like Faye’s approach for a number of reasons.

First, Faye thinks big. He wants to take all of Europe back for Europeans. I completely agree with this aim. Furthermore, to secure the existence of Europe against the other races and power blocs, Faye envisions the creation of a vast “Eurosiberian” Imperium, stretching from Iceland to the Pacific, with a federated system of government and an autarkic economy. He believes that only such an imperium will be equal to the challenges posed by the other races in a world of burgeoning populations and shrinking resources. As I argue in my essay “Grandiose Nationalism,” I think that such ideas are neither necessary nor practical and they entail dangers of their own. But nobody can fault them for visionary boldness.

Second, Faye thinks racially. His answer to the question “Who are we?” is ultimately racial, not cultural, religious, or subracial: white people are a vast, extended family descending from the original inhabitants of Europe after the last Ice Age. There are, of course, cultural and subracial identities that are also worth preserving within a federated imperium, but not at the expense of the greater racial whole.

You can buy North American New Right vol. 2 here

Third, Faye is not a Luddite, primitivist, or Hobbit. He values our heritage, but he is attracted less to external social and cultural forms than to the vital drives that created them and express themselves in them. He also wishes to do justice to European man’s Faustian drive toward exploration, adventure, science, and technology. His “archeofuturism” seeks to fuse vital, archaic, biologically-based values with modern science and technology.

... We know a priori that an unsustainable system cannot be sustained forever and that some sort of collapse is inevitable. But Faye provides a detailed and systematic and crushingly convincing analysis of how the present system may well expire from a convergence of catastrophes. Of course, we need to be ready when the collapse comes. We need a clear metapolitical framework and an organized, racially conscious community to step into the breach, or when the present system collapses, it will simply be replaced with a rebranded form of the same ethnocidal regime.

[Anonymous No.19814993]

>>19814941
Thank you

[Anonymous No.19815016]

There is no fantasy or sci-fi that is 'right-wing'. It is all consumer porn and you are laughed at for reading it and thinking it has depth or worth.

[Anonymous No.19815190]

Thomas777 is very funny so i imagine the book is good. I hope there is capitalization throughout.

[Anonymous No.19815380]

>>19809970
It's like it's being done on purpose, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.19815553]

>>19814941
I don't want Americans in my Europe, thank you very much.

[Anonymous No.19815768]

>>19815016
marxist tier thinking

[Anonymous No.19815894]

>>19805182
Hilarious bait. Almost fell for it.

[Anonymous No.19816386]

>>19815768
No reddit-man, read national epics and native historical/classical ones. Tolkien is great for a young boy, but you must progress beyond it.

[Anonymous No.19816494]

>>19815190
It's funny in a My Immortal kind of way. I like the guy, but the book was painful. I didn't know he had schizophrenia though, so I'll give the sequel a chance.

[Anonymous No.19816528]

Anybody here ever written for a right-wing publication? I really enjoy reading essays on sites like Occidental Observer.